From: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> To: Andrew Lutomirski <luto@mit.edu> Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6.33 regression] btrfs mount causes memory corruption Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:38:35 -0500 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20100225203834.GD10960@localhost.localdomain> (raw) In-Reply-To: <cb0375e11002251229q2a6989c5n64d739dec4f8de44@mail.gmail.com> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 03:29:34PM -0500, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> wrote= : > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 03:01:08PM -0500, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > >> Mounting btrfs corrupts memory and causes nasty crashes within a f= ew > >> seconds. =A0This seems to happen even if the mount fails (note the > >> unrecognized mount option). =A0This is a regression from 2.6.32, a= nd > >> I've attached an example. > >> > > > > And it only happens when you mount a btrfs fs? =A0Can you show me a= trace of when > > you mount a btrfs fs with valid mount options? =A0I'd like to see i= f we're not > > cleaning up something properly or what. =A0Thanks, >=20 > Seems OK. Or maybe I just got lucky, but it's crashed every time I > tried to mount with 'acl' before. >=20 > I even went through a couple iterations of trying to mount with > 'xattr' and 'user_xattr', both of which failed. >=20 Ok it looks like we have a problem kfree'ing the wrong stuff. we kstrd= up the options string, but then strsep screws with the pointer, so when we kfr= ee() it, we're not giving it the right pointer. Please try this patch, and moun= t with -o acl and other such garbage to make sure it actually worked (acl isn't a= valid mount option btw). Let me know if it works. Thanks, Josef diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c index 8a1ea6e..f8b4521 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/super.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ int btrfs_parse_options(struct btrfs_root *root, ch= ar *options) { struct btrfs_fs_info *info =3D root->fs_info; substring_t args[MAX_OPT_ARGS]; - char *p, *num; + char *p, *num, *orig; int intarg; int ret =3D 0; =20 @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ int btrfs_parse_options(struct btrfs_root *root, ch= ar *options) if (!options) return -ENOMEM; =20 + orig =3D options; =20 while ((p =3D strsep(&options, ",")) !=3D NULL) { int token; @@ -280,7 +281,7 @@ int btrfs_parse_options(struct btrfs_root *root, ch= ar *options) } } out: - kfree(options); + kfree(orig); return ret; } =20
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> To: Andrew Lutomirski <luto@mit.edu> Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6.33 regression] btrfs mount causes memory corruption Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:38:35 -0500 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20100225203834.GD10960@localhost.localdomain> (raw) In-Reply-To: <cb0375e11002251229q2a6989c5n64d739dec4f8de44@mail.gmail.com> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 03:29:34PM -0500, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 03:01:08PM -0500, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > >> Mounting btrfs corrupts memory and causes nasty crashes within a few > >> seconds. This seems to happen even if the mount fails (note the > >> unrecognized mount option). This is a regression from 2.6.32, and > >> I've attached an example. > >> > > > > And it only happens when you mount a btrfs fs? Can you show me a trace of when > > you mount a btrfs fs with valid mount options? I'd like to see if we're not > > cleaning up something properly or what. Thanks, > > Seems OK. Or maybe I just got lucky, but it's crashed every time I > tried to mount with 'acl' before. > > I even went through a couple iterations of trying to mount with > 'xattr' and 'user_xattr', both of which failed. > Ok it looks like we have a problem kfree'ing the wrong stuff. we kstrdup the options string, but then strsep screws with the pointer, so when we kfree() it, we're not giving it the right pointer. Please try this patch, and mount with -o acl and other such garbage to make sure it actually worked (acl isn't a valid mount option btw). Let me know if it works. Thanks, Josef diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c index 8a1ea6e..f8b4521 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/super.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ int btrfs_parse_options(struct btrfs_root *root, char *options) { struct btrfs_fs_info *info = root->fs_info; substring_t args[MAX_OPT_ARGS]; - char *p, *num; + char *p, *num, *orig; int intarg; int ret = 0; @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ int btrfs_parse_options(struct btrfs_root *root, char *options) if (!options) return -ENOMEM; + orig = options; while ((p = strsep(&options, ",")) != NULL) { int token; @@ -280,7 +281,7 @@ int btrfs_parse_options(struct btrfs_root *root, char *options) } } out: - kfree(options); + kfree(orig); return ret; }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-25 20:38 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2010-02-25 20:01 [2.6.33 regression] btrfs mount causes memory corruption Andrew Lutomirski 2010-02-25 20:23 ` Josef Bacik 2010-02-25 20:29 ` Andrew Lutomirski 2010-02-25 20:29 ` Andrew Lutomirski 2010-02-25 20:38 ` Josef Bacik [this message] 2010-02-25 20:38 ` Josef Bacik 2010-02-25 20:48 ` Andrew Lutomirski 2010-02-25 20:48 ` Andrew Lutomirski 2010-02-25 21:38 ` Daniel J Blueman 2010-02-25 21:38 ` Daniel J Blueman
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20100225203834.GD10960@localhost.localdomain \ --to=josef@redhat.com \ --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=luto@mit.edu \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.