All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: NFS <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH - alt-2] NFSv4:  Don't try to recover NFSv4 locks when they are lost.
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 17:04:49 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130904170449.7d2662cd@notabene.brown> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 11127 bytes --]



When an NFSv4 client loses contact with the server it can lose any
locks that it holds.

Currently when it reconnects to the server it simply tries to reclaim
those locks.  This might succeed even though some other client has
held and released a lock in the mean time.  So the first client might
think the file is unchanged, but it isn't.  This isn't good.

If, when recovery happens, the locks cannot be claimed because some
other client still holds the lock, then we get a message in the kernel
logs, but the client can still write.  So two clients can both think
they have a lock and can both write at the same time.  This is equally
not good.

There was a patch a while ago
  http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.nfs/41917

which tried to address some of this, but it didn't seem to go
anywhere.  That patch would also send a signal to the process.  That
might be useful but for now this patch just causes writes to fail.

For NFSv4 (unlike v2/v3) there is a strong link between the lock and
the write request so we can fairly easily fail any IO of the lock is
gone.  While some applications might not expect this, it is still
safer than allowing the write to succeed.

Because this is a fairly big change in behaviour a module parameter,
"recover_locks", is introduced which defaults to true (the current
behaviour) but can be set to "false" to tell the client not to try to
recover things that were lost.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

--
This alternative uses a module parameter which defaults to the current,
incorrect, behaviour.
I suspect we don't want that one..

NeilBrown


diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs3proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs3proc.c
index f5c84c3..de0229b 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs3proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs3proc.c
@@ -826,9 +826,10 @@ static void nfs3_proc_read_setup(struct nfs_read_data *data, struct rpc_message
 	msg->rpc_proc = &nfs3_procedures[NFS3PROC_READ];
 }
 
-static void nfs3_proc_read_rpc_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, struct nfs_read_data *data)
+static int nfs3_proc_read_rpc_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, struct nfs_read_data *data)
 {
 	rpc_call_start(task);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int nfs3_write_done(struct rpc_task *task, struct nfs_write_data *data)
@@ -847,9 +848,10 @@ static void nfs3_proc_write_setup(struct nfs_write_data *data, struct rpc_messag
 	msg->rpc_proc = &nfs3_procedures[NFS3PROC_WRITE];
 }
 
-static void nfs3_proc_write_rpc_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, struct nfs_write_data *data)
+static int nfs3_proc_write_rpc_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, struct nfs_write_data *data)
 {
 	rpc_call_start(task);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static void nfs3_proc_commit_rpc_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, struct nfs_commit_data *data)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4_fs.h b/fs/nfs/nfs4_fs.h
index ee81e35..a468b345 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4_fs.h
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4_fs.h
@@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ struct nfs4_lock_state {
 	struct list_head	ls_locks;	/* Other lock stateids */
 	struct nfs4_state *	ls_state;	/* Pointer to open state */
 #define NFS_LOCK_INITIALIZED 0
+#define NFS_LOCK_LOST        1
 	unsigned long		ls_flags;
 	struct nfs_seqid_counter	ls_seqid;
 	nfs4_stateid		ls_stateid;
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index 108a774..6ef4016 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -3905,15 +3905,19 @@ static void nfs4_proc_read_setup(struct nfs_read_data *data, struct rpc_message
 	nfs41_init_sequence(&data->args.seq_args, &data->res.seq_res, 0);
 }
 
-static void nfs4_proc_read_rpc_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, struct nfs_read_data *data)
+static int nfs4_proc_read_rpc_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, struct nfs_read_data *data)
 {
 	if (nfs4_setup_sequence(NFS_SERVER(data->header->inode),
 			&data->args.seq_args,
 			&data->res.seq_res,
 			task))
-		return;
-	nfs4_set_rw_stateid(&data->args.stateid, data->args.context,
-			data->args.lock_context, FMODE_READ);
+		return 0;
+	if (nfs4_set_rw_stateid(&data->args.stateid, data->args.context,
+				data->args.lock_context, FMODE_READ) == -EIO)
+		return -EIO;
+	if (unlikely(test_bit(NFS_CONTEXT_BAD, &data->args.context->flags)))
+		return -EIO;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int nfs4_write_done_cb(struct rpc_task *task, struct nfs_write_data *data)
@@ -3988,15 +3992,19 @@ static void nfs4_proc_write_setup(struct nfs_write_data *data, struct rpc_messag
 	nfs41_init_sequence(&data->args.seq_args, &data->res.seq_res, 1);
 }
 
-static void nfs4_proc_write_rpc_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, struct nfs_write_data *data)
+static int nfs4_proc_write_rpc_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, struct nfs_write_data *data)
 {
 	if (nfs4_setup_sequence(NFS_SERVER(data->header->inode),
 			&data->args.seq_args,
 			&data->res.seq_res,
 			task))
-		return;
-	nfs4_set_rw_stateid(&data->args.stateid, data->args.context,
-			data->args.lock_context, FMODE_WRITE);
+		return 0;
+	if (nfs4_set_rw_stateid(&data->args.stateid, data->args.context,
+				data->args.lock_context, FMODE_WRITE) == -EIO)
+		return -EIO;
+	if (unlikely(test_bit(NFS_CONTEXT_BAD, &data->args.context->flags)))
+		return -EIO;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static void nfs4_proc_commit_rpc_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, struct nfs_commit_data *data)
@@ -5378,6 +5386,11 @@ static int nfs4_lock_reclaim(struct nfs4_state *state, struct file_lock *request
 	return err;
 }
 
+bool recover_locks = true;
+module_param(recover_locks, bool, 0644);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(recovery_locks,
+		 "If the server reports that a lock might be lost, "
+		 "try to recovery it risking corruption.");
 static int nfs4_lock_expired(struct nfs4_state *state, struct file_lock *request)
 {
 	struct nfs_server *server = NFS_SERVER(state->inode);
@@ -5389,6 +5402,10 @@ static int nfs4_lock_expired(struct nfs4_state *state, struct file_lock *request
 	err = nfs4_set_lock_state(state, request);
 	if (err != 0)
 		return err;
+	if (!recover_locks) {
+		set_bit(NFS_LOCK_LOST, &request->fl_u.nfs4_fl.owner->ls_flags);
+		return 0;
+	}
 	do {
 		if (test_bit(NFS_DELEGATED_STATE, &state->flags) != 0)
 			return 0;
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
index e22862f..1e26e8c 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
@@ -998,7 +998,9 @@ static int nfs4_copy_lock_stateid(nfs4_stateid *dst,
 	fl_pid = lockowner->l_pid;
 	spin_lock(&state->state_lock);
 	lsp = __nfs4_find_lock_state(state, fl_owner, fl_pid, NFS4_ANY_LOCK_TYPE);
-	if (lsp != NULL && test_bit(NFS_LOCK_INITIALIZED, &lsp->ls_flags) != 0) {
+	if (lsp && test_bit(NFS_LOCK_LOST, &lsp->ls_flags))
+		ret = -EIO;
+	else if (lsp != NULL && test_bit(NFS_LOCK_INITIALIZED, &lsp->ls_flags) != 0) {
 		nfs4_stateid_copy(dst, &lsp->ls_stateid);
 		ret = 0;
 		smp_rmb();
@@ -1038,11 +1040,17 @@ static int nfs4_copy_open_stateid(nfs4_stateid *dst, struct nfs4_state *state)
 int nfs4_select_rw_stateid(nfs4_stateid *dst, struct nfs4_state *state,
 		fmode_t fmode, const struct nfs_lockowner *lockowner)
 {
-	int ret = 0;
+	int ret = nfs4_copy_lock_stateid(dst, state, lockowner);
+	if (ret == -EIO)
+		/* A lost lock - don't even consider delegations */
+		goto out;
 	if (nfs4_copy_delegation_stateid(dst, state->inode, fmode))
 		goto out;
-	ret = nfs4_copy_lock_stateid(dst, state, lockowner);
 	if (ret != -ENOENT)
+		/* nfs4_copy_delegation_stateid() didn't over-write
+		 * dst, so it still has the lock stateid which we now
+		 * choose to use.
+		 */
 		goto out;
 	ret = nfs4_copy_open_stateid(dst, state);
 out:
diff --git a/fs/nfs/proc.c b/fs/nfs/proc.c
index c041c41..a8f57c7 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/proc.c
@@ -623,9 +623,10 @@ static void nfs_proc_read_setup(struct nfs_read_data *data, struct rpc_message *
 	msg->rpc_proc = &nfs_procedures[NFSPROC_READ];
 }
 
-static void nfs_proc_read_rpc_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, struct nfs_read_data *data)
+static int nfs_proc_read_rpc_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, struct nfs_read_data *data)
 {
 	rpc_call_start(task);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int nfs_write_done(struct rpc_task *task, struct nfs_write_data *data)
@@ -644,9 +645,10 @@ static void nfs_proc_write_setup(struct nfs_write_data *data, struct rpc_message
 	msg->rpc_proc = &nfs_procedures[NFSPROC_WRITE];
 }
 
-static void nfs_proc_write_rpc_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, struct nfs_write_data *data)
+static int nfs_proc_write_rpc_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, struct nfs_write_data *data)
 {
 	rpc_call_start(task);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static void nfs_proc_commit_rpc_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, struct nfs_commit_data *data)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/read.c b/fs/nfs/read.c
index 70a26c6..31db5c3 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/read.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/read.c
@@ -513,9 +513,10 @@ static void nfs_readpage_release_common(void *calldata)
 void nfs_read_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
 {
 	struct nfs_read_data *data = calldata;
-	NFS_PROTO(data->header->inode)->read_rpc_prepare(task, data);
-	if (unlikely(test_bit(NFS_CONTEXT_BAD, &data->args.context->flags)))
-		rpc_exit(task, -EIO);
+	int err;
+	err = NFS_PROTO(data->header->inode)->read_rpc_prepare(task, data);
+	if (err)
+		rpc_exit(task, err);
 }
 
 static const struct rpc_call_ops nfs_read_common_ops = {
diff --git a/fs/nfs/write.c b/fs/nfs/write.c
index f1bdb72..7816801 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/write.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/write.c
@@ -1265,9 +1265,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nfs_pageio_reset_write_mds);
 void nfs_write_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
 {
 	struct nfs_write_data *data = calldata;
-	NFS_PROTO(data->header->inode)->write_rpc_prepare(task, data);
-	if (unlikely(test_bit(NFS_CONTEXT_BAD, &data->args.context->flags)))
-		rpc_exit(task, -EIO);
+	int err;
+	err = NFS_PROTO(data->header->inode)->write_rpc_prepare(task, data);
+	if (err)
+		rpc_exit(task, err);
 }
 
 void nfs_commit_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
diff --git a/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h b/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h
index 8651574..c71e12b 100644
--- a/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h
+++ b/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h
@@ -1419,12 +1419,12 @@ struct nfs_rpc_ops {
 	void	(*read_setup)   (struct nfs_read_data *, struct rpc_message *);
 	void	(*read_pageio_init)(struct nfs_pageio_descriptor *, struct inode *,
 				    const struct nfs_pgio_completion_ops *);
-	void	(*read_rpc_prepare)(struct rpc_task *, struct nfs_read_data *);
+	int	(*read_rpc_prepare)(struct rpc_task *, struct nfs_read_data *);
 	int	(*read_done)  (struct rpc_task *, struct nfs_read_data *);
 	void	(*write_setup)  (struct nfs_write_data *, struct rpc_message *);
 	void	(*write_pageio_init)(struct nfs_pageio_descriptor *, struct inode *, int,
 				     const struct nfs_pgio_completion_ops *);
-	void	(*write_rpc_prepare)(struct rpc_task *, struct nfs_write_data *);
+	int	(*write_rpc_prepare)(struct rpc_task *, struct nfs_write_data *);
 	int	(*write_done)  (struct rpc_task *, struct nfs_write_data *);
 	void	(*commit_setup) (struct nfs_commit_data *, struct rpc_message *);
 	void	(*commit_rpc_prepare)(struct rpc_task *, struct nfs_commit_data *);

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2013-09-04  7:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-04  7:04 NeilBrown [this message]
2013-09-04 14:31 ` [PATCH - alt-2] NFSv4: Don't try to recover NFSv4 locks when they are lost Myklebust, Trond
2013-09-04 23:48   ` NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130904170449.7d2662cd@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.