All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>,
	Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: Fix bogus struct clk comparison for timer clock
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 07:44:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150507144437.GA15563@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <554AB1E3.2000304@codeaurora.org>

* Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> [150506 17:30]:
> On 05/06/15 07:55, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >> I don't think the coccinelle script was ever merged...
>
> > Oh OK, but the wrong comparisons in the kernel code got
> > fixed, right? 
> 
> Yes the ones that mattered were fixed.

OK thanks for confirming that.
 
> > Thanks here's an updated version with that.
> 
> Are you taking this through arm-soc?

Yes that's the plan.
 
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c
> > @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ static int __init omap_dm_timer_init_one(struct omap_dm_timer *timer,
> >  	if (IS_ERR(src))
> >  		return PTR_ERR(src);
> >  
> > -	if (clk_get_parent(timer->fclk) != src) {
> > +	if (!clk_is_match(clk_get_parent(timer->fclk), src)) {
> >  		r = clk_set_parent(timer->fclk, src);
> 
> I also wonder why we can't just call clk_set_parent() and skip the "is
> the parent already src" check?
> 
> If there's a good reason for not just calling clk_set_parent() then it
> makes sense to do the clk_is_match() thing, and you can have my ack
> 
> Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>

Good point. We've been unconditionally calling it anyways and
nobody has complained of any issues. So let's just remove the
check.

Regards,

Tony

8< ----------------------
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 09:03:34 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: Remove bogus struct clk comparison for timer
 clock

With recent changes to use determine_rate, the comparison of two
clocks won't work without clk_is_match that does __clk_get_hw
on the clocks first.

As we've been unconditionally already calling clk_set_parent
already because of the bogus comparison, let's just remove the
check as suggested by Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>.

Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Cc: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>

--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c
@@ -298,14 +298,11 @@ static int __init omap_dm_timer_init_one(struct omap_dm_timer *timer,
 	if (IS_ERR(src))
 		return PTR_ERR(src);
 
-	if (clk_get_parent(timer->fclk) != src) {
-		r = clk_set_parent(timer->fclk, src);
-		if (r < 0) {
-			pr_warn("%s: %s cannot set source\n", __func__,
-				oh->name);
-			clk_put(src);
-			return r;
-		}
+	r = clk_set_parent(timer->fclk, src);
+	if (r < 0) {
+		pr_warn("%s: %s cannot set source\n", __func__, oh->name);
+		clk_put(src);
+		return r;
 	}
 
 	clk_put(src);

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: Fix bogus struct clk comparison for timer clock
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 07:44:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150507144437.GA15563@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <554AB1E3.2000304@codeaurora.org>

* Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> [150506 17:30]:
> On 05/06/15 07:55, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >> I don't think the coccinelle script was ever merged...
>
> > Oh OK, but the wrong comparisons in the kernel code got
> > fixed, right? 
> 
> Yes the ones that mattered were fixed.

OK thanks for confirming that.
 
> > Thanks here's an updated version with that.
> 
> Are you taking this through arm-soc?

Yes that's the plan.
 
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c
> > @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ static int __init omap_dm_timer_init_one(struct omap_dm_timer *timer,
> >  	if (IS_ERR(src))
> >  		return PTR_ERR(src);
> >  
> > -	if (clk_get_parent(timer->fclk) != src) {
> > +	if (!clk_is_match(clk_get_parent(timer->fclk), src)) {
> >  		r = clk_set_parent(timer->fclk, src);
> 
> I also wonder why we can't just call clk_set_parent() and skip the "is
> the parent already src" check?
> 
> If there's a good reason for not just calling clk_set_parent() then it
> makes sense to do the clk_is_match() thing, and you can have my ack
> 
> Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>

Good point. We've been unconditionally calling it anyways and
nobody has complained of any issues. So let's just remove the
check.

Regards,

Tony

8< ----------------------
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 09:03:34 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: Remove bogus struct clk comparison for timer
 clock

With recent changes to use determine_rate, the comparison of two
clocks won't work without clk_is_match that does __clk_get_hw
on the clocks first.

As we've been unconditionally already calling clk_set_parent
already because of the bogus comparison, let's just remove the
check as suggested by Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>.

Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Cc: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>

--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c
@@ -298,14 +298,11 @@ static int __init omap_dm_timer_init_one(struct omap_dm_timer *timer,
 	if (IS_ERR(src))
 		return PTR_ERR(src);
 
-	if (clk_get_parent(timer->fclk) != src) {
-		r = clk_set_parent(timer->fclk, src);
-		if (r < 0) {
-			pr_warn("%s: %s cannot set source\n", __func__,
-				oh->name);
-			clk_put(src);
-			return r;
-		}
+	r = clk_set_parent(timer->fclk, src);
+	if (r < 0) {
+		pr_warn("%s: %s cannot set source\n", __func__, oh->name);
+		clk_put(src);
+		return r;
 	}
 
 	clk_put(src);

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-07 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-05 18:02 [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: Fix bogus struct clk comparison for timer clock Tony Lindgren
2015-05-05 18:02 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-05-06  5:35 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-06  5:35   ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-06 14:55   ` Tony Lindgren
2015-05-06 14:55     ` Tony Lindgren
2015-05-07  0:29     ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-07  0:29       ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-07 14:44       ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2015-05-07 14:44         ` Tony Lindgren
2015-05-07 19:01         ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-07 19:01           ` Stephen Boyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150507144437.GA15563@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
    --cc=tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.