All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 15:47:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151014134721.GD3816@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151014123624.GV14956@sirena.org.uk>

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 01:36:24PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> Sure, but I don't really expect to have to trawl the implementation of
> an API to find out about this sort of thing (I hadn't even been aware

I more like view header files as 'documentation' and c files as
implementation :-)

> that the subclasses were required to be small positive integers, never
> mind needing to check what the limit was).  I think the main place I'd
> have expected to see it was in lockdep-design.txt or somewhere near
> that.

Oh, you're one of them people that actually looks in Documentation/.

> The other big one that came up recently was that lockdep apparently
> works out what a class is by looking at the point of allocation which
> causes a lot of problems for regmap since it makes all regmap locks look
> like a single class.  That's fixed now by explicitly allocating a class
> per regmap with some macro magic but it was a bit of a surprise.  The
> documentation doesn't make this obvious.

Yes, Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt needs help -- I'd even
forgotten we had it.

Does the below work for you?

---
 Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt b/Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt
index 5001280e9d82..e8e9ad4e6f5e 100644
--- a/Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt
+++ b/Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt
@@ -24,6 +24,10 @@ a lock-class is used for the first time after bootup it gets registered,
 and all subsequent uses of that lock-class will be attached to this
 lock-class.
 
+A class is typically associated with a lock's initialisation site; although
+its possible to explicitly initialize a lock with a different class key --
+such class keys much come from static storage.
+
 State
 -----
 
@@ -165,6 +169,10 @@ partition.
 The validator treats a lock that is taken in such a nested fashion as a
 separate (sub)class for the purposes of validation.
 
+Since lock classes are associated with static addresses, the size of struct
+lock_class_key determines the amount of sub classes that are possible --
+currently set to 8.
+
 Note: When changing code to use the _nested() primitives, be careful and
 check really thoroughly that the hierarchy is correctly mapped; otherwise
 you can get false positives or false negatives.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: peterz@infradead.org (Peter Zijlstra)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 15:47:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151014134721.GD3816@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151014123624.GV14956@sirena.org.uk>

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 01:36:24PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> Sure, but I don't really expect to have to trawl the implementation of
> an API to find out about this sort of thing (I hadn't even been aware

I more like view header files as 'documentation' and c files as
implementation :-)

> that the subclasses were required to be small positive integers, never
> mind needing to check what the limit was).  I think the main place I'd
> have expected to see it was in lockdep-design.txt or somewhere near
> that.

Oh, you're one of them people that actually looks in Documentation/.

> The other big one that came up recently was that lockdep apparently
> works out what a class is by looking at the point of allocation which
> causes a lot of problems for regmap since it makes all regmap locks look
> like a single class.  That's fixed now by explicitly allocating a class
> per regmap with some macro magic but it was a bit of a surprise.  The
> documentation doesn't make this obvious.

Yes, Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt needs help -- I'd even
forgotten we had it.

Does the below work for you?

---
 Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt b/Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt
index 5001280e9d82..e8e9ad4e6f5e 100644
--- a/Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt
+++ b/Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt
@@ -24,6 +24,10 @@ a lock-class is used for the first time after bootup it gets registered,
 and all subsequent uses of that lock-class will be attached to this
 lock-class.
 
+A class is typically associated with a lock's initialisation site; although
+its possible to explicitly initialize a lock with a different class key --
+such class keys much come from static storage.
+
 State
 -----
 
@@ -165,6 +169,10 @@ partition.
 The validator treats a lock that is taken in such a nested fashion as a
 separate (sub)class for the purposes of validation.
 
+Since lock classes are associated with static addresses, the size of struct
+lock_class_key determines the amount of sub classes that are possible --
+currently set to 8.
+
 Note: When changing code to use the _nested() primitives, be careful and
 check really thoroughly that the hierarchy is correctly mapped; otherwise
 you can get false positives or false negatives.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-14 13:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-13 20:30 [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-13 20:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-13 20:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-13 20:38   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-13 21:46   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-13 21:46     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-14  8:20     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-14  8:20       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-14  8:37       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-14  8:37         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-14  9:00         ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-14  9:00           ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-14  9:08           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-14  9:08             ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-14  9:59             ` Mark Brown
2015-10-14  9:59               ` Mark Brown
2015-10-14 10:27       ` Mark Brown
2015-10-14 10:27         ` Mark Brown
2015-10-14 11:07         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-14 11:07           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-14 12:36           ` Mark Brown
2015-10-14 12:36             ` Mark Brown
2015-10-14 13:47             ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-10-14 13:47               ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-14 13:50               ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-14 13:50                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-14 13:58                 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-10-14 13:58                   ` Ingo Molnar
2015-10-14 14:11               ` Mark Brown
2015-10-14 14:11                 ` Mark Brown
2015-10-22 15:02     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-22 15:02       ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-22 15:09       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-22 15:09         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-22 17:44         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-22 17:44           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-27 18:13           ` Ingo Molnar
2015-10-27 18:13             ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151014134721.GD3816@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.