All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: axboe@fb.com
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Robert Hu <robert.hu@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
Subject: [PATCH] block: fix del_gendisk() vs blkdev_ioctl crash
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 14:26:56 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151217222656.1249.96719.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.jf.intel.com> (raw)

When tearing down a block device early in its lifetime, userspace may
still be performing discovery actions like blkdev_ioctl() to re-read
partitions.

The nvdimm_revalidate_disk() implementation depends on
disk->driverfs_dev to be valid at entry.  However, it is set to NULL in
del_gendisk() and fatally this is happening *before* the disk device is
deleted from userspace view.

There's no reason for del_gendisk() to clear ->driverfs_dev.  That
device is the parent of the disk.  It is guaranteed to not be freed
until the disk, as a child, drops its ->parent reference.

We could also fix this issue locally in nvdimm_revalidate_disk() by
using disk_to_dev(disk)->parent, but lets fix it globally since
->driverfs_dev follows the lifetime of the parent.  Longer term we
should probably just add a @parent parameter to add_disk(), and stop
carrying this pointer in the gendisk.

 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at           (null)
 IP: [<ffffffffa00340a8>] nvdimm_revalidate_disk+0x18/0x90 [libnvdimm]
 CPU: 2 PID: 538 Comm: systemd-udevd Tainted: G           O    4.4.0-rc5 #2257
 [..]
 Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff8143e5c7>] rescan_partitions+0x87/0x2c0
  [<ffffffff810f37f9>] ? __lock_is_held+0x49/0x70
  [<ffffffff81438c62>] __blkdev_reread_part+0x72/0xb0
  [<ffffffff81438cc5>] blkdev_reread_part+0x25/0x40
  [<ffffffff8143982d>] blkdev_ioctl+0x4fd/0x9c0
  [<ffffffff811246c9>] ? current_kernel_time64+0x69/0xd0
  [<ffffffff812916dd>] block_ioctl+0x3d/0x50
  [<ffffffff81264c38>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x308/0x560
  [<ffffffff8115dbd1>] ? __audit_syscall_entry+0xb1/0x100
  [<ffffffff810031d6>] ? do_audit_syscall_entry+0x66/0x70
  [<ffffffff81264f09>] SyS_ioctl+0x79/0x90
  [<ffffffff81902672>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x76

Reported-by: Robert Hu <robert.hu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
---
 block/genhd.c |    1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
index e5cafa51567c..1a971bebbbfe 100644
--- a/block/genhd.c
+++ b/block/genhd.c
@@ -664,7 +664,6 @@ void del_gendisk(struct gendisk *disk)
 
 	kobject_put(disk->part0.holder_dir);
 	kobject_put(disk->slave_dir);
-	disk->driverfs_dev = NULL;
 	if (!sysfs_deprecated)
 		sysfs_remove_link(block_depr, dev_name(disk_to_dev(disk)));
 	pm_runtime_set_memalloc_noio(disk_to_dev(disk), false);


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: axboe@fb.com
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Robert Hu <robert.hu@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org
Subject: [PATCH] block: fix del_gendisk() vs blkdev_ioctl crash
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 14:26:56 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151217222656.1249.96719.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.jf.intel.com> (raw)

When tearing down a block device early in its lifetime, userspace may
still be performing discovery actions like blkdev_ioctl() to re-read
partitions.

The nvdimm_revalidate_disk() implementation depends on
disk->driverfs_dev to be valid at entry.  However, it is set to NULL in
del_gendisk() and fatally this is happening *before* the disk device is
deleted from userspace view.

There's no reason for del_gendisk() to clear ->driverfs_dev.  That
device is the parent of the disk.  It is guaranteed to not be freed
until the disk, as a child, drops its ->parent reference.

We could also fix this issue locally in nvdimm_revalidate_disk() by
using disk_to_dev(disk)->parent, but lets fix it globally since
->driverfs_dev follows the lifetime of the parent.  Longer term we
should probably just add a @parent parameter to add_disk(), and stop
carrying this pointer in the gendisk.

 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at           (null)
 IP: [<ffffffffa00340a8>] nvdimm_revalidate_disk+0x18/0x90 [libnvdimm]
 CPU: 2 PID: 538 Comm: systemd-udevd Tainted: G           O    4.4.0-rc5 #2257
 [..]
 Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff8143e5c7>] rescan_partitions+0x87/0x2c0
  [<ffffffff810f37f9>] ? __lock_is_held+0x49/0x70
  [<ffffffff81438c62>] __blkdev_reread_part+0x72/0xb0
  [<ffffffff81438cc5>] blkdev_reread_part+0x25/0x40
  [<ffffffff8143982d>] blkdev_ioctl+0x4fd/0x9c0
  [<ffffffff811246c9>] ? current_kernel_time64+0x69/0xd0
  [<ffffffff812916dd>] block_ioctl+0x3d/0x50
  [<ffffffff81264c38>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x308/0x560
  [<ffffffff8115dbd1>] ? __audit_syscall_entry+0xb1/0x100
  [<ffffffff810031d6>] ? do_audit_syscall_entry+0x66/0x70
  [<ffffffff81264f09>] SyS_ioctl+0x79/0x90
  [<ffffffff81902672>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x76

Reported-by: Robert Hu <robert.hu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
---
 block/genhd.c |    1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
index e5cafa51567c..1a971bebbbfe 100644
--- a/block/genhd.c
+++ b/block/genhd.c
@@ -664,7 +664,6 @@ void del_gendisk(struct gendisk *disk)
 
 	kobject_put(disk->part0.holder_dir);
 	kobject_put(disk->slave_dir);
-	disk->driverfs_dev = NULL;
 	if (!sysfs_deprecated)
 		sysfs_remove_link(block_depr, dev_name(disk_to_dev(disk)));
 	pm_runtime_set_memalloc_noio(disk_to_dev(disk), false);


             reply	other threads:[~2015-12-17 22:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-17 22:26 Dan Williams [this message]
2015-12-17 22:26 ` [PATCH] block: fix del_gendisk() vs blkdev_ioctl crash Dan Williams
2015-12-17 22:38 ` Dan Williams
2015-12-17 22:38   ` Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151217222656.1249.96719.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.jf.intel.com \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=robert.hu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.