Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.6 04/10] s390x/cpu: Tolerate max_cpus

[Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>]

On Wed, 9 Mar 2016 22:55:30 +0100
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:

> While you're at it, it might be better to use g_new0 here instead
> (see e.g. https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/517377/ for a description
> why this is better).

Using g_new0 sounds sensible; but rather than respinning again, I'll
just put the following on top:

From 0a11840959f61861672858ce961fc34b71efa3be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 10:19:46 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] s390x/cpu: use g_new0

Let's use g_new0 to allocate cpu_states.

Suggested-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
---
 hw/s390x/s390-virtio.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio.c
index 4ea9040..7c6e281 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio.c
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ void s390_init_cpus(MachineState *machine)
         machine->cpu_model = "host";
     }
 
-    cpu_states = g_malloc0(sizeof(S390CPU *) * max_cpus);
+    cpu_states = g_new0(S390CPU *, max_cpus);
 
     for (i = 0; i < max_cpus; i++) {
         name = g_strdup_printf("cpu[%i]", i);
-- 
2.7.2