All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
To: pbonzini@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	chuansheng.liu@intel.com, baolex.ni@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 0034/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
Date: Tue,  2 Aug 2016 18:36:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160802103601.16039-1-baolex.ni@intel.com> (raw)

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index def97b3..ce4f512 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ enum {
 
 #ifdef MMU_DEBUG
 static bool dbg = 0;
-module_param(dbg, bool, 0644);
+module_param(dbg, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 
 #define pgprintk(x...) do { if (dbg) printk(x); } while (0)
 #define rmap_printk(x...) do { if (dbg) printk(x); } while (0)
-- 
2.9.2

             reply	other threads:[~2016-08-02 11:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-02 10:36 Baole Ni [this message]
2016-08-02 13:25 ` [PATCH 0034/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Radim Krčmář
2016-08-02 13:59   ` Jiri Kosina

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160802103601.16039-1-baolex.ni@intel.com \
    --to=baolex.ni@intel.com \
    --cc=chuansheng.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.