All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Chris Wilson" <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Subject: [PATCH 09/11] dma-buf: Restart reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu() after writes
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 08:08:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160829070834.22296-9-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160829070834.22296-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

In order to be completely generic, we have to double check the read
seqlock after acquiring a reference to the fence. If the driver is
allocating fences from a SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU, or similar freelist, then
within an RCU grace period a fence may be freed and reallocated. The RCU
read side critical section does not prevent this reallocation, instead
we have to inspect the reservation's seqlock to double check if the
fences have been reassigned as we were acquiring our reference.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
---
 drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c | 30 ++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c b/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c
index 3369e4668e96..e74493e7332b 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c
@@ -474,12 +474,13 @@ bool reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu(struct reservation_object *obj,
 					  bool test_all)
 {
 	unsigned seq, shared_count;
-	int ret = true;
+	int ret;
 
+	rcu_read_lock();
 retry:
+	ret = true;
 	shared_count = 0;
 	seq = read_seqcount_begin(&obj->seq);
-	rcu_read_lock();
 
 	if (test_all) {
 		unsigned i;
@@ -490,46 +491,35 @@ retry:
 		if (fobj)
 			shared_count = fobj->shared_count;
 
-		if (read_seqcount_retry(&obj->seq, seq))
-			goto unlock_retry;
-
 		for (i = 0; i < shared_count; ++i) {
 			struct fence *fence = rcu_dereference(fobj->shared[i]);
 
 			ret = reservation_object_test_signaled_single(fence);
 			if (ret < 0)
-				goto unlock_retry;
+				goto retry;
 			else if (!ret)
 				break;
 		}
 
-		/*
-		 * There could be a read_seqcount_retry here, but nothing cares
-		 * about whether it's the old or newer fence pointers that are
-		 * signaled. That race could still have happened after checking
-		 * read_seqcount_retry. If you care, use ww_mutex_lock.
-		 */
+		if (read_seqcount_retry(&obj->seq, seq))
+			goto retry;
 	}
 
 	if (!shared_count) {
 		struct fence *fence_excl = rcu_dereference(obj->fence_excl);
 
-		if (read_seqcount_retry(&obj->seq, seq))
-			goto unlock_retry;
-
 		if (fence_excl) {
 			ret = reservation_object_test_signaled_single(
 								fence_excl);
 			if (ret < 0)
-				goto unlock_retry;
+				goto retry;
+
+			if (read_seqcount_retry(&obj->seq, seq))
+				goto retry;
 		}
 	}
 
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return ret;
-
-unlock_retry:
-	rcu_read_unlock();
-	goto retry;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu);
-- 
2.9.3


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 09/11] dma-buf: Restart reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu() after writes
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 08:08:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160829070834.22296-9-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160829070834.22296-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

In order to be completely generic, we have to double check the read
seqlock after acquiring a reference to the fence. If the driver is
allocating fences from a SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU, or similar freelist, then
within an RCU grace period a fence may be freed and reallocated. The RCU
read side critical section does not prevent this reallocation, instead
we have to inspect the reservation's seqlock to double check if the
fences have been reassigned as we were acquiring our reference.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
---
 drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c | 30 ++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c b/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c
index 3369e4668e96..e74493e7332b 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c
@@ -474,12 +474,13 @@ bool reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu(struct reservation_object *obj,
 					  bool test_all)
 {
 	unsigned seq, shared_count;
-	int ret = true;
+	int ret;
 
+	rcu_read_lock();
 retry:
+	ret = true;
 	shared_count = 0;
 	seq = read_seqcount_begin(&obj->seq);
-	rcu_read_lock();
 
 	if (test_all) {
 		unsigned i;
@@ -490,46 +491,35 @@ retry:
 		if (fobj)
 			shared_count = fobj->shared_count;
 
-		if (read_seqcount_retry(&obj->seq, seq))
-			goto unlock_retry;
-
 		for (i = 0; i < shared_count; ++i) {
 			struct fence *fence = rcu_dereference(fobj->shared[i]);
 
 			ret = reservation_object_test_signaled_single(fence);
 			if (ret < 0)
-				goto unlock_retry;
+				goto retry;
 			else if (!ret)
 				break;
 		}
 
-		/*
-		 * There could be a read_seqcount_retry here, but nothing cares
-		 * about whether it's the old or newer fence pointers that are
-		 * signaled. That race could still have happened after checking
-		 * read_seqcount_retry. If you care, use ww_mutex_lock.
-		 */
+		if (read_seqcount_retry(&obj->seq, seq))
+			goto retry;
 	}
 
 	if (!shared_count) {
 		struct fence *fence_excl = rcu_dereference(obj->fence_excl);
 
-		if (read_seqcount_retry(&obj->seq, seq))
-			goto unlock_retry;
-
 		if (fence_excl) {
 			ret = reservation_object_test_signaled_single(
 								fence_excl);
 			if (ret < 0)
-				goto unlock_retry;
+				goto retry;
+
+			if (read_seqcount_retry(&obj->seq, seq))
+				goto retry;
 		}
 	}
 
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return ret;
-
-unlock_retry:
-	rcu_read_unlock();
-	goto retry;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu);
-- 
2.9.3

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-08-29  7:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-29  7:08 [PATCH 01/11] drm/amdgpu: Remove call to reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu before wait Chris Wilson
2016-08-29  7:08 ` [PATCH 02/11] drm/etnaviv: Remove manual " Chris Wilson
2016-09-23 12:55   ` Daniel Vetter
2016-10-05 16:15     ` Sumit Semwal
2016-10-10 13:17       ` Lucas Stach
2016-08-29  7:08 ` [PATCH 03/11] drm/msm: Remove " Chris Wilson
2016-09-23 12:55   ` Daniel Vetter
2016-09-23 13:07     ` [Intel-gfx] " Rob Clark
2016-08-29  7:08 ` [PATCH 04/11] drm/nouveau: " Chris Wilson
2016-09-23 12:55   ` Daniel Vetter
2016-10-05 16:05     ` Sumit Semwal
2016-08-29  7:08 ` [PATCH 05/11] drm/vmwgfx: " Chris Wilson
2016-09-23 12:56   ` Daniel Vetter
2016-10-05 16:11     ` [Intel-gfx] " Sumit Semwal
2016-10-05 17:03       ` Sinclair Yeh
2016-08-29  7:08 ` [PATCH 06/11] dma-buf: Introduce fence_get_rcu_safe() Chris Wilson
2016-08-29  7:08   ` Chris Wilson
2016-09-23 12:59   ` Daniel Vetter
2016-09-23 12:59     ` Daniel Vetter
2016-09-23 13:34     ` Markus Heiser
2016-09-23 13:34       ` Markus Heiser
2016-08-29  7:08 ` [PATCH 07/11] dma-buf: Restart reservation_object_get_fences_rcu() after writes Chris Wilson
2016-08-29  7:08   ` Chris Wilson
2016-09-23 13:03   ` Daniel Vetter
2016-09-23 13:03     ` Daniel Vetter
2016-08-29  7:08 ` [PATCH 08/11] dma-buf: Restart reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu() " Chris Wilson
2016-08-29  7:08   ` Chris Wilson
2016-09-23 13:18   ` Daniel Vetter
2016-08-29  7:08 ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2016-08-29  7:08   ` [PATCH 09/11] dma-buf: Restart reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu() " Chris Wilson
2016-09-23 13:43   ` Daniel Vetter
2016-09-23 13:43     ` Daniel Vetter
2016-08-29  7:08 ` [PATCH 10/11] dma-buf: Use seqlock to close RCU race in test_signaled_single Chris Wilson
2016-08-29  7:08   ` Chris Wilson
2016-09-23 13:49   ` [Linaro-mm-sig] " Daniel Vetter
2016-09-23 13:49     ` Daniel Vetter
2016-09-23 14:02     ` Chris Wilson
2016-09-25 20:43       ` Daniel Vetter
2016-09-25 20:43         ` Daniel Vetter
2016-08-29  7:08 ` [PATCH 11/11] dma-buf: Do a fast lockless check for poll with timeout=0 Chris Wilson
2016-08-29  7:08   ` Chris Wilson
2016-08-29 18:16   ` [PATCH] dma-buf/sync-file: Avoid enable fence signaling if poll(.timeout=0) Chris Wilson
2016-08-29 18:16     ` Chris Wilson
2016-08-29 18:26     ` Gustavo Padovan
2016-09-13 14:46       ` Sumit Semwal
2016-09-13 14:46         ` Sumit Semwal
2016-09-15  0:00     ` Rafael Antognolli
2016-09-21  7:26       ` Gustavo Padovan
2016-09-21 11:08         ` Chris Wilson
2016-09-23 13:50   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/11] dma-buf: Do a fast lockless check for poll with timeout=0 Daniel Vetter
2016-09-23 13:50     ` Daniel Vetter
2016-09-23 14:15     ` Chris Wilson
2016-09-23 15:06     ` Chris Wilson
2016-09-23 15:06       ` Chris Wilson
2016-09-23 15:20     ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2016-09-23 17:59       ` Christian König
2016-09-23 17:59         ` Christian König
2016-09-25 20:44         ` Daniel Vetter
2016-09-25 20:44           ` Daniel Vetter
2016-08-29  7:50 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for series starting with [01/11] drm/amdgpu: Remove call to reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu before wait Patchwork
2016-08-29  8:20 ` [PATCH 01/11] " Christian König
2016-09-23 12:54 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-10-05 16:03   ` Sumit Semwal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160829070834.22296-9-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.