From: linux@armlinux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: 4.7.6->4.8.1 Possible regression
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 19:10:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161017181051.GI1041@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1476722858.483756177@f140.i.mail.ru>
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 07:47:38PM +0300, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> Hello.
>
> After a kernel update from 4.7.6 to 4.8.1, the bug appear once kernel run "init".
Please try this patch, thanks:
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/abort-lv4t.S b/arch/arm/mm/abort-lv4t.S
index 6d8e8e3365d1..e81d09f1887d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/abort-lv4t.S
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/abort-lv4t.S
@@ -48,7 +48,10 @@ ENTRY(v4t_late_abort)
/* c */ b do_DataAbort @ ldc rd, [rn], #m @ Same as ldr rd, [rn], #m
/* d */ b do_DataAbort @ ldc rd, [rn, #m]
/* e */ b .data_unknown
-/* f */
+/* f */ b .data_unknown
+
+.data_unknown_r9:
+ ldr r9, [sp], #4
.data_unknown: @ Part of jumptable
mov r0, r4
mov r1, r8
@@ -57,6 +60,7 @@ ENTRY(v4t_late_abort)
.data_arm_ldmstm:
tst r8, #1 << 21 @ check writeback bit
beq do_DataAbort @ no writeback -> no fixup
+ str r9, [sp, #-4]!
mov r7, #0x11
orr r7, r7, #0x1100
and r6, r8, r7
@@ -75,12 +79,14 @@ ENTRY(v4t_late_abort)
subne r7, r7, r6, lsl #2 @ Undo increment
addeq r7, r7, r6, lsl #2 @ Undo decrement
str r7, [r2, r9, lsr #14] @ Put register 'Rn'
+ ldr r9, [sp], #4
b do_DataAbort
.data_arm_lateldrhpre:
tst r8, #1 << 21 @ Check writeback bit
beq do_DataAbort @ No writeback -> no fixup
.data_arm_lateldrhpost:
+ str r9, [sp, #-4]!
and r9, r8, #0x00f @ get Rm / low nibble of immediate value
tst r8, #1 << 22 @ if (immediate offset)
andne r6, r8, #0xf00 @ { immediate high nibble
@@ -93,6 +99,7 @@ ENTRY(v4t_late_abort)
subne r7, r7, r6 @ Undo incrmenet
addeq r7, r7, r6 @ Undo decrement
str r7, [r2, r9, lsr #14] @ Put register 'Rn'
+ ldr r9, [sp], #4
b do_DataAbort
.data_arm_lateldrpreconst:
@@ -101,12 +108,14 @@ ENTRY(v4t_late_abort)
.data_arm_lateldrpostconst:
movs r6, r8, lsl #20 @ Get offset
beq do_DataAbort @ zero -> no fixup
+ str r9, [sp, #-4]!
and r9, r8, #15 << 16 @ Extract 'n' from instruction
ldr r7, [r2, r9, lsr #14] @ Get register 'Rn'
tst r8, #1 << 23 @ Check U bit
subne r7, r7, r6, lsr #20 @ Undo increment
addeq r7, r7, r6, lsr #20 @ Undo decrement
str r7, [r2, r9, lsr #14] @ Put register 'Rn'
+ ldr r9, [sp], #4
b do_DataAbort
.data_arm_lateldrprereg:
@@ -115,6 +124,7 @@ ENTRY(v4t_late_abort)
.data_arm_lateldrpostreg:
and r7, r8, #15 @ Extract 'm' from instruction
ldr r6, [r2, r7, lsl #2] @ Get register 'Rm'
+ str r9, [sp, #-4]!
mov r9, r8, lsr #7 @ get shift count
ands r9, r9, #31
and r7, r8, #0x70 @ get shift type
@@ -126,33 +136,33 @@ ENTRY(v4t_late_abort)
b .data_arm_apply_r6_and_rn
b .data_arm_apply_r6_and_rn @ 1: LSL #0
nop
- b .data_unknown @ 2: MUL?
+ b .data_unknown_r9 @ 2: MUL?
nop
- b .data_unknown @ 3: MUL?
+ b .data_unknown_r9 @ 3: MUL?
nop
mov r6, r6, lsr r9 @ 4: LSR #!0
b .data_arm_apply_r6_and_rn
mov r6, r6, lsr #32 @ 5: LSR #32
b .data_arm_apply_r6_and_rn
- b .data_unknown @ 6: MUL?
+ b .data_unknown_r9 @ 6: MUL?
nop
- b .data_unknown @ 7: MUL?
+ b .data_unknown_r9 @ 7: MUL?
nop
mov r6, r6, asr r9 @ 8: ASR #!0
b .data_arm_apply_r6_and_rn
mov r6, r6, asr #32 @ 9: ASR #32
b .data_arm_apply_r6_and_rn
- b .data_unknown @ A: MUL?
+ b .data_unknown_r9 @ A: MUL?
nop
- b .data_unknown @ B: MUL?
+ b .data_unknown_r9 @ B: MUL?
nop
mov r6, r6, ror r9 @ C: ROR #!0
b .data_arm_apply_r6_and_rn
mov r6, r6, rrx @ D: RRX
b .data_arm_apply_r6_and_rn
- b .data_unknown @ E: MUL?
+ b .data_unknown_r9 @ E: MUL?
nop
- b .data_unknown @ F: MUL?
+ b .data_unknown_r9 @ F: MUL?
.data_thumb_abort:
ldrh r8, [r4] @ read instruction
@@ -190,6 +200,7 @@ ENTRY(v4t_late_abort)
.data_thumb_pushpop:
tst r8, #1 << 10
beq .data_unknown
+ str r9, [sp, #-4]!
and r6, r8, #0x55 @ hweight8(r8) + R bit
and r9, r8, #0xaa
add r6, r6, r9, lsr #1
@@ -204,9 +215,11 @@ ENTRY(v4t_late_abort)
addeq r7, r7, r6, lsl #2 @ increment SP if PUSH
subne r7, r7, r6, lsl #2 @ decrement SP if POP
str r7, [r2, #13 << 2]
+ ldr r9, [sp], #4
b do_DataAbort
.data_thumb_ldmstm:
+ str r9, [sp, #-4]!
and r6, r8, #0x55 @ hweight8(r8)
and r9, r8, #0xaa
add r6, r6, r9, lsr #1
@@ -219,4 +232,5 @@ ENTRY(v4t_late_abort)
and r6, r6, #15 @ number of regs to transfer
sub r7, r7, r6, lsl #2 @ always decrement
str r7, [r2, r9, lsr #6]
+ ldr r9, [sp], #4
b do_DataAbort
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently@9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-17 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-17 16:47 4.7.6->4.8.1 Possible regression Alexander Shiyan
2016-10-17 18:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2016-10-18 8:34 ` Alexander Shiyan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161017181051.GI1041@n2100.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.