All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <dsterba@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/6] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: Fix false alert on missing chunk or dev extent
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 13:56:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170531055610.11606-6-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170531055610.11606-1-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>

When checking chunk or dev extent, lowmem mode uses chunk length as dev
extent length, and if they mismatch, report missing chunk or dev extent
like:
------
ERROR: chunk[256 4324327424) stripe 0 did not find the related dev extent
ERROR: chunk[256 4324327424) stripe 1 did not find the related dev extent
ERROR: chunk[256 4324327424) stripe 2 did not find the related dev extent
------

However, only for Single/DUP/RAID1 profiles chunk length is the same as
dev extent length.
For other profiles, this will cause tons of false alert.

Fix it by using correct stripe length when checking chunk and dev extent
items.

This fixes the mkfs test failure when using lowmem mode check.

Reported-by: Kai Krakow <hurikhan77@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 cmds-check.c | 11 +++++++++--
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/cmds-check.c b/cmds-check.c
index b19d5a28..52091325 100644
--- a/cmds-check.c
+++ b/cmds-check.c
@@ -10920,7 +10920,12 @@ static int check_dev_extent_item(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 
 	l = path.nodes[0];
 	chunk = btrfs_item_ptr(l, path.slots[0], struct btrfs_chunk);
-	if (btrfs_chunk_length(l, chunk) != length)
+	ret = btrfs_check_chunk_valid(chunk_root, l, chunk, path.slots[0],
+				      chunk_key.offset);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		goto out;
+
+	if (btrfs_stripe_length(fs_info, l, chunk) != length)
 		goto out;
 
 	num_stripes = btrfs_chunk_num_stripes(l, chunk);
@@ -11160,6 +11165,7 @@ static int check_chunk_item(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 	struct btrfs_dev_extent *ptr;
 	u64 length;
 	u64 chunk_end;
+	u64 stripe_len;
 	u64 type;
 	int num_stripes;
 	u64 offset;
@@ -11209,6 +11215,7 @@ static int check_chunk_item(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 	}
 
 	num_stripes = btrfs_chunk_num_stripes(eb, chunk);
+	stripe_len = btrfs_stripe_length(fs_info, eb, chunk);
 	for (i = 0; i < num_stripes; i++) {
 		btrfs_release_path(&path);
 		btrfs_init_path(&path);
@@ -11228,7 +11235,7 @@ static int check_chunk_item(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 		offset = btrfs_dev_extent_chunk_offset(leaf, ptr);
 		if (objectid != chunk_key.objectid ||
 		    offset != chunk_key.offset ||
-		    btrfs_dev_extent_length(leaf, ptr) != length)
+		    btrfs_dev_extent_length(leaf, ptr) != stripe_len)
 			goto not_match_dev;
 		continue;
 not_match_dev:
-- 
2.13.0




  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-05-31  5:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-31  5:56 [PATCH v2 0/6] Lowmem mode check check fix for mulit-device Qu Wenruo
2017-05-31  5:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] btrfs-progs: Cleanup open-coded btrfs_chunk_item_size Qu Wenruo
2017-05-31  5:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] btrfs-progs: Enhance chunk item validation check Qu Wenruo
2017-05-31  5:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] btrfs-progs: check: Reuse btrfs_check_chunk_valid in lowmem mode Qu Wenruo
2017-05-31  5:56 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] btrfs-progs: Introduce function to get correct stripe length Qu Wenruo
2017-05-31  5:56 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2017-05-31  5:56 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] btrfs-progs: test: Introduce functions to prepare and cleanup loop device Qu Wenruo
2017-06-02 14:05   ` David Sterba
2017-06-02 13:53 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Lowmem mode check check fix for mulit-device David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170531055610.11606-6-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.