All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
	James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"AKASHI, Takahiro" <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
	Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 06/18] ima: Improvements in ima_appraise_measurement
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 22:53:19 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171018005331.2688-7-bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171018005331.2688-1-bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Replace nested ifs in the EVM xattr verification logic with a switch
statement, making the code easier to understand.

Also, add comments to the if statements in the out section.

Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 security/integrity/ima/ima.h          |  5 +++++
 security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
index d52b487ad259..4e61d3189b72 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
@@ -155,6 +155,11 @@ unsigned long ima_get_binary_runtime_size(void);
 int ima_init_template(void);
 void ima_init_template_list(void);
 
+static inline bool is_ima_sig(const struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_value)
+{
+	return xattr_value && xattr_value->type == EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG;
+}
+
 /*
  * used to protect h_table and sha_table
  */
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
index 58c6a60c7e83..2c069f47eeec 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func,
 			     int xattr_len, int opened)
 {
 	static const char op[] = "appraise_data";
-	char *cause = "unknown";
+	const char *cause = "unknown";
 	struct dentry *dentry = file_dentry(file);
 	struct inode *inode = d_backing_inode(dentry);
 	enum integrity_status status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
@@ -229,11 +229,16 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func,
 	}
 
 	status = evm_verifyxattr(dentry, XATTR_NAME_IMA, xattr_value, rc, iint);
-	if (status != INTEGRITY_PASS && status != INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN) {
-		if (status == INTEGRITY_NOLABEL || status == INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS)
-			cause = "missing-HMAC";
-		else if (status == INTEGRITY_FAIL)
-			cause = "invalid-HMAC";
+	switch (status) {
+	case INTEGRITY_PASS:
+	case INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN:
+		break;
+	case INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS:	/* No EVM protected xattrs. */
+	case INTEGRITY_NOLABEL:		/* No security.evm xattr. */
+		cause = "missing-HMAC";
+		goto out;
+	case INTEGRITY_FAIL:		/* Invalid HMAC/signature. */
+		cause = "invalid-HMAC";
 		goto out;
 	}
 	switch (xattr_value->type) {
@@ -287,17 +292,19 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func,
 
 out:
 	if (status != INTEGRITY_PASS) {
+		/* Fix mode, but don't replace file signatures. */
 		if ((ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_FIX) &&
-		    (!xattr_value ||
-		     xattr_value->type != EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG)) {
+		    !is_ima_sig(xattr_value)) {
 			if (!ima_fix_xattr(dentry, iint))
 				status = INTEGRITY_PASS;
-		} else if (inode->i_size == 0 &&
-			   (iint->flags & IMA_NEW_FILE) &&
-			   xattr_value &&
-			   xattr_value->type == EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG) {
+		}
+
+		/* Permit new files with file signatures, but without data. */
+		if (inode->i_size == 0 && (iint->flags & IMA_NEW_FILE) &&
+		    is_ima_sig(xattr_value)) {
 			status = INTEGRITY_PASS;
 		}
+
 		integrity_audit_msg(AUDIT_INTEGRITY_DATA, inode, filename,
 				    op, cause, rc, 0);
 	} else {
@@ -404,7 +411,7 @@ int ima_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name,
 		if (!xattr_value_len || xvalue->type >= IMA_XATTR_LAST)
 			return -EINVAL;
 		ima_reset_appraise_flags(d_backing_inode(dentry),
-			xvalue->type == EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG);
+					 is_ima_sig(xvalue));
 		result = 0;
 	}
 	return result;


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
	James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"AKASHI, Takahiro" <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
	Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 06/18] ima: Improvements in ima_appraise_measurement
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 00:53:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171018005331.2688-7-bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171018005331.2688-1-bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Replace nested ifs in the EVM xattr verification logic with a switch
statement, making the code easier to understand.

Also, add comments to the if statements in the out section.

Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 security/integrity/ima/ima.h          |  5 +++++
 security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
index d52b487ad259..4e61d3189b72 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
@@ -155,6 +155,11 @@ unsigned long ima_get_binary_runtime_size(void);
 int ima_init_template(void);
 void ima_init_template_list(void);
 
+static inline bool is_ima_sig(const struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_value)
+{
+	return xattr_value && xattr_value->type = EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG;
+}
+
 /*
  * used to protect h_table and sha_table
  */
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
index 58c6a60c7e83..2c069f47eeec 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func,
 			     int xattr_len, int opened)
 {
 	static const char op[] = "appraise_data";
-	char *cause = "unknown";
+	const char *cause = "unknown";
 	struct dentry *dentry = file_dentry(file);
 	struct inode *inode = d_backing_inode(dentry);
 	enum integrity_status status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
@@ -229,11 +229,16 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func,
 	}
 
 	status = evm_verifyxattr(dentry, XATTR_NAME_IMA, xattr_value, rc, iint);
-	if (status != INTEGRITY_PASS && status != INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN) {
-		if (status = INTEGRITY_NOLABEL || status = INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS)
-			cause = "missing-HMAC";
-		else if (status = INTEGRITY_FAIL)
-			cause = "invalid-HMAC";
+	switch (status) {
+	case INTEGRITY_PASS:
+	case INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN:
+		break;
+	case INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS:	/* No EVM protected xattrs. */
+	case INTEGRITY_NOLABEL:		/* No security.evm xattr. */
+		cause = "missing-HMAC";
+		goto out;
+	case INTEGRITY_FAIL:		/* Invalid HMAC/signature. */
+		cause = "invalid-HMAC";
 		goto out;
 	}
 	switch (xattr_value->type) {
@@ -287,17 +292,19 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func,
 
 out:
 	if (status != INTEGRITY_PASS) {
+		/* Fix mode, but don't replace file signatures. */
 		if ((ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_FIX) &&
-		    (!xattr_value ||
-		     xattr_value->type != EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG)) {
+		    !is_ima_sig(xattr_value)) {
 			if (!ima_fix_xattr(dentry, iint))
 				status = INTEGRITY_PASS;
-		} else if (inode->i_size = 0 &&
-			   (iint->flags & IMA_NEW_FILE) &&
-			   xattr_value &&
-			   xattr_value->type = EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG) {
+		}
+
+		/* Permit new files with file signatures, but without data. */
+		if (inode->i_size = 0 && (iint->flags & IMA_NEW_FILE) &&
+		    is_ima_sig(xattr_value)) {
 			status = INTEGRITY_PASS;
 		}
+
 		integrity_audit_msg(AUDIT_INTEGRITY_DATA, inode, filename,
 				    op, cause, rc, 0);
 	} else {
@@ -404,7 +411,7 @@ int ima_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name,
 		if (!xattr_value_len || xvalue->type >= IMA_XATTR_LAST)
 			return -EINVAL;
 		ima_reset_appraise_flags(d_backing_inode(dentry),
-			xvalue->type = EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG);
+					 is_ima_sig(xvalue));
 		result = 0;
 	}
 	return result;


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Thiago Jung Bauermann)
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 06/18] ima: Improvements in ima_appraise_measurement
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 22:53:19 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171018005331.2688-7-bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171018005331.2688-1-bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Replace nested ifs in the EVM xattr verification logic with a switch
statement, making the code easier to understand.

Also, add comments to the if statements in the out section.

Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 security/integrity/ima/ima.h          |  5 +++++
 security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
index d52b487ad259..4e61d3189b72 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
@@ -155,6 +155,11 @@ unsigned long ima_get_binary_runtime_size(void);
 int ima_init_template(void);
 void ima_init_template_list(void);
 
+static inline bool is_ima_sig(const struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_value)
+{
+	return xattr_value && xattr_value->type == EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG;
+}
+
 /*
  * used to protect h_table and sha_table
  */
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
index 58c6a60c7e83..2c069f47eeec 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func,
 			     int xattr_len, int opened)
 {
 	static const char op[] = "appraise_data";
-	char *cause = "unknown";
+	const char *cause = "unknown";
 	struct dentry *dentry = file_dentry(file);
 	struct inode *inode = d_backing_inode(dentry);
 	enum integrity_status status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
@@ -229,11 +229,16 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func,
 	}
 
 	status = evm_verifyxattr(dentry, XATTR_NAME_IMA, xattr_value, rc, iint);
-	if (status != INTEGRITY_PASS && status != INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN) {
-		if (status == INTEGRITY_NOLABEL || status == INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS)
-			cause = "missing-HMAC";
-		else if (status == INTEGRITY_FAIL)
-			cause = "invalid-HMAC";
+	switch (status) {
+	case INTEGRITY_PASS:
+	case INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN:
+		break;
+	case INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS:	/* No EVM protected xattrs. */
+	case INTEGRITY_NOLABEL:		/* No security.evm xattr. */
+		cause = "missing-HMAC";
+		goto out;
+	case INTEGRITY_FAIL:		/* Invalid HMAC/signature. */
+		cause = "invalid-HMAC";
 		goto out;
 	}
 	switch (xattr_value->type) {
@@ -287,17 +292,19 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func,
 
 out:
 	if (status != INTEGRITY_PASS) {
+		/* Fix mode, but don't replace file signatures. */
 		if ((ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_FIX) &&
-		    (!xattr_value ||
-		     xattr_value->type != EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG)) {
+		    !is_ima_sig(xattr_value)) {
 			if (!ima_fix_xattr(dentry, iint))
 				status = INTEGRITY_PASS;
-		} else if (inode->i_size == 0 &&
-			   (iint->flags & IMA_NEW_FILE) &&
-			   xattr_value &&
-			   xattr_value->type == EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG) {
+		}
+
+		/* Permit new files with file signatures, but without data. */
+		if (inode->i_size == 0 && (iint->flags & IMA_NEW_FILE) &&
+		    is_ima_sig(xattr_value)) {
 			status = INTEGRITY_PASS;
 		}
+
 		integrity_audit_msg(AUDIT_INTEGRITY_DATA, inode, filename,
 				    op, cause, rc, 0);
 	} else {
@@ -404,7 +411,7 @@ int ima_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name,
 		if (!xattr_value_len || xvalue->type >= IMA_XATTR_LAST)
 			return -EINVAL;
 		ima_reset_appraise_flags(d_backing_inode(dentry),
-			xvalue->type == EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG);
+					 is_ima_sig(xvalue));
 		result = 0;
 	}
 	return result;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-10-18  0:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-18  0:53 [PATCH v5 00/18] Appended signatures support for IMA appraisal Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53 ` [PATCH v5 01/18] ima: Remove redundant conditional operator Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53 ` [PATCH v5 02/18] ima: Remove some superfluous parentheses Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53 ` [PATCH v5 03/18] evm, ima: Remove " Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53 ` [PATCH v5 04/18] evm, ima: Remove more " Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53 ` [PATCH v5 05/18] ima: Simplify ima_eventsig_init Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann [this message]
2017-10-18  0:53   ` [PATCH v5 06/18] ima: Improvements in ima_appraise_measurement Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53 ` [PATCH v5 07/18] integrity: Introduce struct evm_xattr Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53 ` [PATCH v5 08/18] integrity: Select CONFIG_KEYS instead of depending on it Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53 ` [PATCH v5 09/18] ima: Don't pass xattr value to EVM xattr verification Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53 ` [PATCH v5 10/18] ima: Store measurement after appraisal Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53 ` [PATCH v5 11/18] ima: Export func_tokens Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53 ` [PATCH v5 12/18] MODSIGN: Export module signature definitions Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-26 20:12   ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-26 20:12     ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-26 20:12     ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-26 20:12     ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-26 22:47     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-26 22:47       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-26 22:47       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-26 23:13       ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-26 23:13         ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-26 23:13         ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-18  0:53 ` [PATCH v5 13/18] PKCS#7: Introduce pkcs7_get_message_sig and verify_pkcs7_message_sig Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-26 20:12   ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-26 20:12     ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-26 20:12     ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-18  0:53 ` [PATCH v5 14/18] integrity: Introduce integrity_keyring_from_id Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53 ` [PATCH v5 15/18] ima: Add modsig appraise_type option for module-style appended signatures Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53 ` [PATCH v5 16/18] ima: Add functions to read and verify a modsig signature Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53 ` [PATCH v5 17/18] ima: Implement support for module-style appended signatures Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-31 13:31   ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-31 13:31     ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-31 13:31     ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-31 13:31     ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-18  0:53 ` [PATCH v5 18/18] ima: Write modsig to the measurement list Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-18  0:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-26 20:07   ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-26 20:07     ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-26 20:07     ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-26 20:07     ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-26 22:02     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-26 22:02       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-26 22:02       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-10-26 20:53 ` [PATCH v5 00/18] Appended signatures support for IMA appraisal Mimi Zohar
2017-10-26 20:53   ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-26 20:53   ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-26 20:53   ` Mimi Zohar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171018005331.2688-7-bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=james.l.morris@oracle.com \
    --cc=jeyu@redhat.com \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
    --cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.