All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
To: target-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 04/11] target: Avoid that EXTENDED COPY commands triggers lock inversion
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 18:03:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171031180319.19258-5-bart.vanassche@wdc.com> (raw)

This patch prevents that lockdep reports the following complaint:

===========================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
4.12.0-rc1-dbg+ #1 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
rmdir/12053 is trying to acquire lock:
 (device_mutex#2){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa010afce>] target_free_device+0xae/0xf0 [target_core_mod]

but task is already holding lock:
 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#14){++++++}, at: [<ffffffff811c5c30>] vfs_rmdir+0x50/0x140

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#14){++++++}:
       lock_acquire+0x59/0x80
       down_write+0x36/0x70
       configfs_depend_item+0x3a/0xb0 [configfs]
       target_depend_item+0x13/0x20 [target_core_mod]
       target_xcopy_locate_se_dev_e4_iter+0x87/0x100 [target_core_mod]
       target_devices_idr_iter+0x16/0x20 [target_core_mod]
       idr_for_each+0x39/0xc0
       target_for_each_device+0x36/0x50 [target_core_mod]
       target_xcopy_locate_se_dev_e4+0x28/0x80 [target_core_mod]
       target_xcopy_do_work+0x2e9/0xdd0 [target_core_mod]
       process_one_work+0x1ca/0x3f0
       worker_thread+0x49/0x3b0
       kthread+0x109/0x140
       ret_from_fork+0x31/0x40

-> #0 (device_mutex#2){+.+.+.}:
       __lock_acquire+0x101f/0x11d0
       lock_acquire+0x59/0x80
       __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x950
       mutex_lock_nested+0x16/0x20
       target_free_device+0xae/0xf0 [target_core_mod]
       target_core_dev_release+0x10/0x20 [target_core_mod]
       config_item_put+0x6e/0xb0 [configfs]
       configfs_rmdir+0x1a6/0x300 [configfs]
       vfs_rmdir+0xb7/0x140
       do_rmdir+0x1f4/0x200
       SyS_rmdir+0x11/0x20
       entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc2

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#14);
                               lock(device_mutex#2);
                               lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#14);
  lock(device_mutex#2);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

3 locks held by rmdir/12053:
 #0:  (sb_writers#10){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff811e223f>] mnt_want_write+0x1f/0x50
 #1:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#14/1){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff811cb97e>] do_rmdir+0x15e/0x200
 #2:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#14){++++++}, at: [<ffffffff811c5c30>] vfs_rmdir+0x50/0x140

stack backtrace:
CPU: 3 PID: 12053 Comm: rmdir Not tainted 4.12.0-rc1-dbg+ #1
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.0.0-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0x86/0xcf
 print_circular_bug+0x1c7/0x220
 __lock_acquire+0x101f/0x11d0
 lock_acquire+0x59/0x80
 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x950
 mutex_lock_nested+0x16/0x20
 target_free_device+0xae/0xf0 [target_core_mod]
 target_core_dev_release+0x10/0x20 [target_core_mod]
 config_item_put+0x6e/0xb0 [configfs]
 configfs_rmdir+0x1a6/0x300 [configfs]
 vfs_rmdir+0xb7/0x140
 do_rmdir+0x1f4/0x200
 SyS_rmdir+0x11/0x20
 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc2

Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Cc: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Cc: Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/target/target_core_configfs.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
 include/target/target_core_base.h     |  1 +
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_configfs.c b/drivers/target/target_core_configfs.c
index 7e87d952bb7a..7d0971789f12 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_configfs.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_configfs.c
@@ -2251,13 +2251,29 @@ static struct configfs_attribute *target_core_dev_attrs[] = {
 	NULL,
 };
 
+static void target_core_dev_release_work(struct work_struct *release_work)
+{
+	struct se_device *dev +		container_of(release_work, struct se_device, release_work);
+
+	target_free_device(dev);
+}
+
 static void target_core_dev_release(struct config_item *item)
 {
 	struct config_group *dev_cg = to_config_group(item);
 	struct se_device *dev  		container_of(dev_cg, struct se_device, dev_group);
 
-	target_free_device(dev);
+	/*
+	 * Call target_free_device() asynchronously to avoid lock inversion
+	 * against the configfs_depend_item() call from
+	 * target_xcopy_locate_se_dev_e4_iter(). That call namely occurs with
+	 * device_mutex held. This function is called from inside vfs_rmdir
+	 * and hence is called with i_rwsem held.
+	 */
+	INIT_WORK(&dev->release_work, target_core_dev_release_work);
+	schedule_work(&dev->release_work);
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/include/target/target_core_base.h b/include/target/target_core_base.h
index 516764febeb7..19da905dd2ca 100644
--- a/include/target/target_core_base.h
+++ b/include/target/target_core_base.h
@@ -793,6 +793,7 @@ struct se_device {
 	struct list_head	dev_tmr_list;
 	struct workqueue_struct *tmr_wq;
 	struct work_struct	qf_work_queue;
+	struct work_struct	release_work;
 	struct list_head	delayed_cmd_list;
 	struct list_head	state_list;
 	struct list_head	qf_cmd_list;
-- 
2.14.2


             reply	other threads:[~2017-10-31 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-31 18:03 Bart Van Assche [this message]
2017-11-02 13:59 [PATCH 04/11] target: Avoid that EXTENDED COPY commands triggers lock inversion Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171031180319.19258-5-bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
    --to=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
    --cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.