From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>, Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>, Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofstedt@intel.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] lockdep: Up MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 16:41:45 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20171129154145.26755-3-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20171129154145.26755-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> cross-release ftl >From Chris: "Fwiw, this isn't cross-release but us reloading the module many times, creating a whole host of new lockclasses. Even more fun is when the module gets a slightly different address and the new lock address hashes into an old lock... "I did think about a module-hook to revoke the stale lockclasses, but that still leaves all the hashed chains. "This particular nuisance was temporarily pushed back by teaching igt not to reload i915.ko on a whim." Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofstedt@intel.com> References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103707 Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> --- kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h b/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h index d459d624ba2a..41630a5385c6 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ enum { #else #define MAX_LOCKDEP_ENTRIES 32768UL -#define MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS 16 +#define MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS 17 /* * Stack-trace: tightly packed array of stack backtrace -- 2.15.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>, Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] lockdep: Up MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 16:41:45 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20171129154145.26755-3-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20171129154145.26755-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> cross-release ftl From Chris: "Fwiw, this isn't cross-release but us reloading the module many times, creating a whole host of new lockclasses. Even more fun is when the module gets a slightly different address and the new lock address hashes into an old lock... "I did think about a module-hook to revoke the stale lockclasses, but that still leaves all the hashed chains. "This particular nuisance was temporarily pushed back by teaching igt not to reload i915.ko on a whim." Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofstedt@intel.com> References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103707 Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> --- kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h b/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h index d459d624ba2a..41630a5385c6 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ enum { #else #define MAX_LOCKDEP_ENTRIES 32768UL -#define MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS 16 +#define MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS 17 /* * Stack-trace: tightly packed array of stack backtrace -- 2.15.0 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-29 15:42 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2017-11-29 15:41 [PATCH 0/2] lockdep cross-release fallout from -rc1 Daniel Vetter 2017-11-29 15:41 ` Daniel Vetter 2017-11-29 15:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] lockdep: finer-grained completion key for kthread Daniel Vetter 2017-11-29 15:41 ` Daniel Vetter 2017-12-04 8:16 ` Daniel Vetter 2017-12-04 8:16 ` Daniel Vetter 2017-11-29 15:41 ` Daniel Vetter [this message] 2017-11-29 15:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] lockdep: Up MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS Daniel Vetter 2017-11-30 7:47 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-11-30 7:47 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-11-30 8:08 ` Daniel Vetter 2017-11-30 8:08 ` Daniel Vetter 2017-11-30 9:19 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for lockdep cross-release fallout from -rc1 Patchwork 2017-11-30 13:37 ` Patchwork -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2017-11-29 9:46 [PATCH 1/2] lockdep: finer-grained completion key for kthread Daniel Vetter 2017-11-29 9:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] lockdep: Up MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS Daniel Vetter 2017-11-29 9:57 ` Chris Wilson 2017-11-29 10:01 ` Chris Wilson 2017-11-29 10:27 ` Daniel Vetter 2017-11-28 17:07 [PATCH 1/2] lockdep: finer-grained completion key for kthread Daniel Vetter 2017-11-28 17:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] lockdep: Up MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS Daniel Vetter 2017-11-28 17:22 ` Chris Wilson 2017-11-29 8:02 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20171129154145.26755-3-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \ --to=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \ --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \ --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=keescook@chromium.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=marta.lofstedt@intel.com \ --cc=mingo@redhat.com \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \ --cc=tj@kernel.org \ --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.