All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
To: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
	David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Subject: [PATCH] clk: don't call __of_clk_get_by_name() unnecessarily from clk_get()
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 15:24:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180212142439.15885-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> (raw)

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>

The way this function is implemented caused some confusion when
converting the TI DaVinci platform to using the common clock framework.

Current kernel supports booting DaVinci boards both in device tree as
well as legacy, board-file mode. In the latter, we always end up
calling clk_get_sys() as of_node is NULL and __of_clk_get_by_name()
returns -ENOENT.

It was not obvious at first glance how clk_get(dev, NULL) will work in
board-file mode since we always call __of_clk_get_by_name(). Let's make
it clearer by checking if of_node is NULL and skipping right to
clk_get_sys().

Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Cc: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
---
 drivers/clk/clkdev.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clkdev.c b/drivers/clk/clkdev.c
index 7513411140b6..f394e8964909 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clkdev.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clkdev.c
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ struct clk *clk_get(struct device *dev, const char *con_id)
 	const char *dev_id = dev ? dev_name(dev) : NULL;
 	struct clk *clk;
 
-	if (dev) {
+	if (dev && dev->of_node) {
 		clk = __of_clk_get_by_name(dev->of_node, dev_id, con_id);
 		if (!IS_ERR(clk) || PTR_ERR(clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
 			return clk;
-- 
2.16.1

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: brgl@bgdev.pl (Bartosz Golaszewski)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] clk: don't call __of_clk_get_by_name() unnecessarily from clk_get()
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 15:24:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180212142439.15885-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> (raw)

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>

The way this function is implemented caused some confusion when
converting the TI DaVinci platform to using the common clock framework.

Current kernel supports booting DaVinci boards both in device tree as
well as legacy, board-file mode. In the latter, we always end up
calling clk_get_sys() as of_node is NULL and __of_clk_get_by_name()
returns -ENOENT.

It was not obvious at first glance how clk_get(dev, NULL) will work in
board-file mode since we always call __of_clk_get_by_name(). Let's make
it clearer by checking if of_node is NULL and skipping right to
clk_get_sys().

Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Cc: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
---
 drivers/clk/clkdev.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clkdev.c b/drivers/clk/clkdev.c
index 7513411140b6..f394e8964909 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clkdev.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clkdev.c
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ struct clk *clk_get(struct device *dev, const char *con_id)
 	const char *dev_id = dev ? dev_name(dev) : NULL;
 	struct clk *clk;
 
-	if (dev) {
+	if (dev && dev->of_node) {
 		clk = __of_clk_get_by_name(dev->of_node, dev_id, con_id);
 		if (!IS_ERR(clk) || PTR_ERR(clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
 			return clk;
-- 
2.16.1

             reply	other threads:[~2018-02-12 14:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-12 14:24 Bartosz Golaszewski [this message]
2018-02-12 14:24 ` [PATCH] clk: don't call __of_clk_get_by_name() unnecessarily from clk_get() Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-02-12 20:51 ` David Lechner
2018-02-12 20:51   ` David Lechner
2018-02-12 21:00   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-02-12 21:00     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-02-12 21:19     ` David Lechner
2018-02-12 21:19       ` David Lechner
2018-03-19 15:42     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-19 15:42       ` Bartosz Golaszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180212142439.15885-1-brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --to=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=david@lechnology.com \
    --cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.