All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: [GIT PULL 5/6] KVM: s390: use switch vs jump table in intercept.c
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 15:56:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180214155636.60405-6-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180214155636.60405-1-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>

Instead of having huge jump tables for function selection,
let's use normal switch/case statements for the instruction
handlers in intercept.c We can now also get rid of
intercept_handler_t.

This allows the compiler to make the right decision depending
on the situation (e.g. avoid jump-tables for thunks).

Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h  |  2 --
 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c b/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
index 9c7d70715862..07c6e81163bf 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
@@ -22,22 +22,6 @@
 #include "trace.h"
 #include "trace-s390.h"
 
-
-static const intercept_handler_t instruction_handlers[256] = {
-	[0x01] = kvm_s390_handle_01,
-	[0x82] = kvm_s390_handle_lpsw,
-	[0x83] = kvm_s390_handle_diag,
-	[0xaa] = kvm_s390_handle_aa,
-	[0xae] = kvm_s390_handle_sigp,
-	[0xb2] = kvm_s390_handle_b2,
-	[0xb6] = kvm_s390_handle_stctl,
-	[0xb7] = kvm_s390_handle_lctl,
-	[0xb9] = kvm_s390_handle_b9,
-	[0xe3] = kvm_s390_handle_e3,
-	[0xe5] = kvm_s390_handle_e5,
-	[0xeb] = kvm_s390_handle_eb,
-};
-
 u8 kvm_s390_get_ilen(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct kvm_s390_sie_block *sie_block = vcpu->arch.sie_block;
@@ -129,16 +113,39 @@ static int handle_validity(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 static int handle_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-	intercept_handler_t handler;
-
 	vcpu->stat.exit_instruction++;
 	trace_kvm_s390_intercept_instruction(vcpu,
 					     vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipa,
 					     vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb);
-	handler = instruction_handlers[vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipa >> 8];
-	if (handler)
-		return handler(vcpu);
-	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+	switch (vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipa >> 8) {
+	case 0x01:
+		return kvm_s390_handle_01(vcpu);
+	case 0x82:
+		return kvm_s390_handle_lpsw(vcpu);
+	case 0x83:
+		return kvm_s390_handle_diag(vcpu);
+	case 0xaa:
+		return kvm_s390_handle_aa(vcpu);
+	case 0xae:
+		return kvm_s390_handle_sigp(vcpu);
+	case 0xb2:
+		return kvm_s390_handle_b2(vcpu);
+	case 0xb6:
+		return kvm_s390_handle_stctl(vcpu);
+	case 0xb7:
+		return kvm_s390_handle_lctl(vcpu);
+	case 0xb9:
+		return kvm_s390_handle_b9(vcpu);
+	case 0xe3:
+		return kvm_s390_handle_e3(vcpu);
+	case 0xe5:
+		return kvm_s390_handle_e5(vcpu);
+	case 0xeb:
+		return kvm_s390_handle_eb(vcpu);
+	default:
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
 }
 
 static int inject_prog_on_prog_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
index bd31b37b0e6f..3c0a975c2477 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
@@ -19,8 +19,6 @@
 #include <asm/processor.h>
 #include <asm/sclp.h>
 
-typedef int (*intercept_handler_t)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
-
 /* Transactional Memory Execution related macros */
 #define IS_TE_ENABLED(vcpu)	((vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecb & ECB_TE))
 #define TDB_FORMAT1		1
-- 
2.14.3

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-02-14 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-14 15:56 [GIT PULL 0/6] KVM: s390: Fixes and improvements for 4.16 Christian Borntraeger
2018-02-14 15:56 ` [GIT PULL 1/6] KVM: s390: optimize wakeup for exitless interrupts Christian Borntraeger
2018-02-14 15:56 ` [GIT PULL 2/6] KVM: s390: do not set intervention requests for GISA interrupts Christian Borntraeger
2018-02-14 15:56 ` [GIT PULL 3/6] KVM: s390: force bp isolation for VSIE Christian Borntraeger
2018-02-14 15:56 ` [GIT PULL 4/6] KVM: s390: use switch vs jump table in priv.c Christian Borntraeger
2018-02-14 15:56 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2018-02-14 15:56 ` [GIT PULL 6/6] KVM: s390: use switch vs jump table in interrupt.c Christian Borntraeger
2018-02-14 16:19 ` [GIT PULL 0/6] KVM: s390: Fixes and improvements for 4.16 Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180214155636.60405-6-borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.