From: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: "Manasi Navare" <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>, "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>, "Gustavo Padovan" <gustavo@padovan.org>, "Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>, "Sean Paul" <seanpaul@chromium.org>, "David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v8 01/10] drm/atomic: Print debug message on atomic check failure Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 19:42:40 -0400 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20180411234302.2896-2-lyude@redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20180411234302.2896-1-lyude@redhat.com> Does what it says on the label, it's a little confusing debugging atomic check failures otherwise. Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c index 7d25c42f22db..972a7e9634ab 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c @@ -1705,8 +1705,11 @@ int drm_atomic_check_only(struct drm_atomic_state *state) if (config->funcs->atomic_check) ret = config->funcs->atomic_check(state->dev, state); - if (ret) + if (ret) { + DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("atomic driver check for %p failed: %d\n", + state, ret); return ret; + } if (!state->allow_modeset) { for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) { -- 2.14.3
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: [PATCH v8 01/10] drm/atomic: Print debug message on atomic check failure Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 19:42:40 -0400 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20180411234302.2896-2-lyude@redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20180411234302.2896-1-lyude@redhat.com> Does what it says on the label, it's a little confusing debugging atomic check failures otherwise. Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c index 7d25c42f22db..972a7e9634ab 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c @@ -1705,8 +1705,11 @@ int drm_atomic_check_only(struct drm_atomic_state *state) if (config->funcs->atomic_check) ret = config->funcs->atomic_check(state->dev, state); - if (ret) + if (ret) { + DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("atomic driver check for %p failed: %d\n", + state, ret); return ret; + } if (!state->allow_modeset) { for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) { -- 2.14.3 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-11 23:43 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-04-11 23:42 [PATCH v8 00/10] drm/i915: Implement proper fallback training for MST Lyude Paul 2018-04-11 23:42 ` Lyude Paul 2018-04-11 23:42 ` Lyude Paul [this message] 2018-04-11 23:42 ` [PATCH v8 01/10] drm/atomic: Print debug message on atomic check failure Lyude Paul 2018-04-24 20:18 ` [Intel-gfx] " Dhinakaran Pandiyan 2018-04-24 20:18 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan 2018-04-11 23:42 ` [PATCH v8 02/10] drm/i915: Move DP modeset retry work into intel_dp Lyude Paul 2018-04-11 23:42 ` Lyude Paul 2018-04-11 23:42 ` [PATCH v8 03/10] drm/dp_mst: Fix naming on drm_atomic_get_mst_topology_state() Lyude Paul 2018-04-11 23:42 ` Lyude Paul 2018-04-11 23:42 ` [PATCH v8 04/10] drm/dp_mst: Remove all evil duplicate state pointers Lyude Paul 2018-04-11 23:42 ` Lyude Paul 2018-04-11 23:42 ` [PATCH v8 05/10] drm/dp_mst: Make drm_dp_mst_topology_state subclassable Lyude Paul 2018-04-11 23:42 ` Lyude Paul 2018-04-11 23:42 ` [PATCH v8 06/10] drm/dp_mst: Add reset_state callback to topology mgr Lyude Paul 2018-04-11 23:42 ` Lyude Paul 2018-04-11 23:42 ` [PATCH v8 07/10] drm/i915: Only use one link bw config for MST topologies Lyude Paul 2018-04-11 23:42 ` Lyude Paul 2018-04-11 23:42 ` [PATCH v8 08/10] drm/i915: Make intel_dp_mst_atomic_check() idempotent Lyude Paul 2018-04-11 23:42 ` [PATCH v8 09/10] drm/dp_mst: Add MST fallback retraining helpers Lyude Paul 2018-04-11 23:42 ` [PATCH v8 10/10] drm/i915: Implement proper fallback training for MST Lyude Paul 2018-04-12 0:26 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Implement proper fallback training for MST (rev3) Patchwork 2018-04-12 4:30 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20180411234302.2896-2-lyude@redhat.com \ --to=lyude@redhat.com \ --cc=airlied@linux.ie \ --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=gustavo@padovan.org \ --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \ --cc=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \ --cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \ --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.