All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Marty E. Plummer" <hanetzer-zVALfsKDk1AS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org>
To: "Dr. Philipp Tomsich"
	<philipp.tomsich-SN7IsUiht6C/RdPyistoZJqQE7yCjDx5@public.gmane.org>
Cc: vagrant-8fiUuRrzOP0dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	u-boot-0aAXYlwwYIKGBzrmiIFOJg@public.gmane.org,
	Kever Yang <kever.yang-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] rockchip: fix incorrect detection of ram size
Date: Mon, 7 May 2018 19:52:16 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180508005215.s3uivl43jfaryv7j@proprietary-killer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <791299C0-EEC0-4DB1-97C4-A8DAD3B1A481-SN7IsUiht6C/RdPyistoZJqQE7yCjDx5@public.gmane.org>

On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 11:16:28AM +0200, Dr. Philipp Tomsich wrote:
> 
> > On 7 May 2018, at 04:34, Marty E. Plummer <hanetzer-zVALfsKDk1AS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 10:20:55AM +0800, Kever Yang wrote:
> >> Hi Marty,
> >> 
> >> 
> >> On 05/06/2018 10:25 PM, Marty E. Plummer wrote:
> >>> Taken from coreboot's src/soc/rockchip/rk3288/sdram.c
> >>> 
> >>> Without this change, my u-boot build for the asus c201 chromebook (4GiB)
> >>> is incorrectly detected as 0 Bytes of ram.
> >> 
> >> I know the root cause for this issue, and I have a local patch for it.
> >> The rk3288 is 32bit, and 4GB size is just out of range, so we need to before
> >> the max size before return with '<<20'. Sorry for forgot to send it out.
> >> 
> >>> 
> >>> Signed-off-by: Marty E. Plummer <hanetzer-zVALfsKDk1AS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org>
> >>> ---
> >>> arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++-----------
> >>> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> >>> 
> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c
> >>> index 76dbdc8715..a9c9f970a4 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c
> >>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c
> >>> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
> >>> #include <asm/io.h>
> >>> #include <asm/arch/sdram_common.h>
> >>> #include <dm/uclass-internal.h>
> >>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> >>> +#include <linux/sizes.h>
> >>> 
> >>> DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
> >>> size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
> >>> @@ -19,34 +21,44 @@ size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
> >>> 	size_t size_mb = 0;
> >>> 	u32 ch;
> >>> 
> >>> -	u32 sys_reg = readl(reg);
> >>> -	u32 ch_num = 1 + ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_NUM_CH_SHIFT)
> >>> -		       & SYS_REG_NUM_CH_MASK);
> >>> +	if (!size_mb) {
> >> 
> >> I don't understand this and follow up changes, we don't really need it,
> >> isn't it?
> >> I think don't need the changes before here.
> > Yeah, that was just another level of indentation for the if (!size_mb)
> > guard, but I've reworked the patch to not do that as it was pointed out
> > that since size_mb is initialized to 0 prior.
> >>> +		/*
> >>> +		 * we use the 0x00000000~0xfeffffff space
> >>> +		 * since 0xff000000~0xffffffff is soc register space
> >>> +		 * so we reserve it
> >>> +		 */
> >>> +		size_mb = min(size_mb, 0xff000000/SZ_1M);
> >> 
> >> This is what we really need, as Klaus point out, we need to use
> >> SDRAM_MAX_SIZE
> >> instead of hard code.
> > Yeah, I've got a rework on that which uses SDRAM_MAX_SIZE as instructed,
> > build and boot tested on my hardware.
> 
> In that case you just masked the problem but didn???t solve it: assuming size_mb
> is size_t (I???ll assume this is 64bit, but did not check), then your 4GB is 0x1_0000_0000 )
> which overflows to 0x0 when converted to a u32.
> 
> In other words: we need to figure out where the truncation occurs (image what
> happens if a new 32bit processor with LPAE comes out???).
> 
A very valid point. With the following patch to sdram_common.c and
sdram_rk3288.c applied I get the debug output that follows it:
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c
index 232a7fa655..0fe69bf558 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
  * SPDX-License-Identifier:     GPL-2.0+
  */
 
+#define DEBUG 1
 #include <common.h>
 #include <dm.h>
 #include <ram.h>
@@ -39,16 +40,19 @@ size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
 			SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_MASK;
 
 		chipsize_mb = (1 << (cs0_row + col + bk + bw - 20));
+		debug("%s: %d: chipsize_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, chipsize_mb);
 
 		if (rank > 1)
 			chipsize_mb += chipsize_mb >> (cs0_row - cs1_row);
 		if (row_3_4)
 			chipsize_mb = chipsize_mb * 3 / 4;
 		size_mb += chipsize_mb;
+		debug("%s: %d: size_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, size_mb);
 		debug("rank %d col %d bk %d cs0_row %d bw %d row_3_4 %d\n",
 		      rank, col, bk, cs0_row, bw, row_3_4);
 	}
 
+	debug("%s: %d: size_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, size_mb);
 	size_mb = min(size_mb, SDRAM_MAX_SIZE/SZ_1M);
 
 	return (size_t)size_mb << 20;
diff --git a/drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3288.c b/drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3288.c
index d99bf12476..9738eb088f 100644
--- a/drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3288.c
+++ b/drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3288.c
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
  * Adapted from coreboot.
  */
 
+#define DEBUG 1
 #include <common.h>
 #include <clk.h>
 #include <dm.h>

---
U-Boot SPL 2018.05-rc3-02370-g309384e84b-dirty (May 07 2018 - 19:42:15 -0500)
Trying to boot from SPI


U-Boot 2018.05-rc3-02370-g309384e84b-dirty (May 07 2018 - 19:42:15 -0500)

Model: Google Speedy
DRAM:  rockchip_sdram_size ff73009c 3c50dc50
rockchip_sdram_size: 42: chipsize_mb 400
rockchip_sdram_size: 49: size_mb 800
rank 2 col 11 bk 3 cs0_row 14 bw 2 row_3_4 0
rockchip_sdram_size: 42: chipsize_mb 400
rockchip_sdram_size: 49: size_mb 1000
rank 2 col 11 bk 3 cs0_row 14 bw 2 row_3_4 0
rockchip_sdram_size: 54: size_mb 1000
SDRAM base=0, size=fe000000
4 GiB
MMC:   dwmmc@ff0c0000: 1, dwmmc@ff0d0000: 2, dwmmc@ff0f0000: 0
In:    cros-ec-keyb
Out:   vidconsole
Err:   vidconsole
Model: Google Speedy
rockchip_dnl_key_pressed: adc_channel_single_shot fail!
Net:   Net Initialization Skipped
No ethernet found.
Hit any key to stop autoboot:  0
I guess we need to change the size_t to something larger; unless I'm
mistaken, that's a 32 bit value, right? and 0x100000000 is at least 40
bits, unless I'm missing the issue here somewhere. However, that would
take a change to include/ram.h, and would impact far more than just
rk3288/rockchip devices across the board, so I'm unsure how to proceed.

Use the min macro here for now, and begin work migrating the ram_info
size member to a 64-bit container?
> >> 
> >> Thanks,
> >> - Kever
> >>> 	}
> >>> 
> >>> 	return (size_t)size_mb << 20;
> >> 
> >> 
> > _______________________________________________
> > U-Boot mailing list
> > U-Boot-0aAXYlwwYIKGBzrmiIFOJg@public.gmane.org <mailto:U-Boot-0aAXYlwwYIKGBzrmiIFOJg@public.gmane.org>
> > https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot <https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marty E. Plummer <hanetzer@startmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] rockchip: fix incorrect detection of ram size
Date: Mon, 7 May 2018 19:52:16 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180508005215.s3uivl43jfaryv7j@proprietary-killer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <791299C0-EEC0-4DB1-97C4-A8DAD3B1A481@theobroma-systems.com>

On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 11:16:28AM +0200, Dr. Philipp Tomsich wrote:
> 
> > On 7 May 2018, at 04:34, Marty E. Plummer <hanetzer@startmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 10:20:55AM +0800, Kever Yang wrote:
> >> Hi Marty,
> >> 
> >> 
> >> On 05/06/2018 10:25 PM, Marty E. Plummer wrote:
> >>> Taken from coreboot's src/soc/rockchip/rk3288/sdram.c
> >>> 
> >>> Without this change, my u-boot build for the asus c201 chromebook (4GiB)
> >>> is incorrectly detected as 0 Bytes of ram.
> >> 
> >> I know the root cause for this issue, and I have a local patch for it.
> >> The rk3288 is 32bit, and 4GB size is just out of range, so we need to before
> >> the max size before return with '<<20'. Sorry for forgot to send it out.
> >> 
> >>> 
> >>> Signed-off-by: Marty E. Plummer <hanetzer@startmail.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++-----------
> >>> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> >>> 
> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c
> >>> index 76dbdc8715..a9c9f970a4 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c
> >>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c
> >>> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
> >>> #include <asm/io.h>
> >>> #include <asm/arch/sdram_common.h>
> >>> #include <dm/uclass-internal.h>
> >>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> >>> +#include <linux/sizes.h>
> >>> 
> >>> DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
> >>> size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
> >>> @@ -19,34 +21,44 @@ size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
> >>> 	size_t size_mb = 0;
> >>> 	u32 ch;
> >>> 
> >>> -	u32 sys_reg = readl(reg);
> >>> -	u32 ch_num = 1 + ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_NUM_CH_SHIFT)
> >>> -		       & SYS_REG_NUM_CH_MASK);
> >>> +	if (!size_mb) {
> >> 
> >> I don't understand this and follow up changes, we don't really need it,
> >> isn't it?
> >> I think don't need the changes before here.
> > Yeah, that was just another level of indentation for the if (!size_mb)
> > guard, but I've reworked the patch to not do that as it was pointed out
> > that since size_mb is initialized to 0 prior.
> >>> +		/*
> >>> +		 * we use the 0x00000000~0xfeffffff space
> >>> +		 * since 0xff000000~0xffffffff is soc register space
> >>> +		 * so we reserve it
> >>> +		 */
> >>> +		size_mb = min(size_mb, 0xff000000/SZ_1M);
> >> 
> >> This is what we really need, as Klaus point out, we need to use
> >> SDRAM_MAX_SIZE
> >> instead of hard code.
> > Yeah, I've got a rework on that which uses SDRAM_MAX_SIZE as instructed,
> > build and boot tested on my hardware.
> 
> In that case you just masked the problem but didn???t solve it: assuming size_mb
> is size_t (I???ll assume this is 64bit, but did not check), then your 4GB is 0x1_0000_0000 )
> which overflows to 0x0 when converted to a u32.
> 
> In other words: we need to figure out where the truncation occurs (image what
> happens if a new 32bit processor with LPAE comes out???).
> 
A very valid point. With the following patch to sdram_common.c and
sdram_rk3288.c applied I get the debug output that follows it:
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c
index 232a7fa655..0fe69bf558 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
  * SPDX-License-Identifier:     GPL-2.0+
  */
 
+#define DEBUG 1
 #include <common.h>
 #include <dm.h>
 #include <ram.h>
@@ -39,16 +40,19 @@ size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
 			SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_MASK;
 
 		chipsize_mb = (1 << (cs0_row + col + bk + bw - 20));
+		debug("%s: %d: chipsize_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, chipsize_mb);
 
 		if (rank > 1)
 			chipsize_mb += chipsize_mb >> (cs0_row - cs1_row);
 		if (row_3_4)
 			chipsize_mb = chipsize_mb * 3 / 4;
 		size_mb += chipsize_mb;
+		debug("%s: %d: size_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, size_mb);
 		debug("rank %d col %d bk %d cs0_row %d bw %d row_3_4 %d\n",
 		      rank, col, bk, cs0_row, bw, row_3_4);
 	}
 
+	debug("%s: %d: size_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, size_mb);
 	size_mb = min(size_mb, SDRAM_MAX_SIZE/SZ_1M);
 
 	return (size_t)size_mb << 20;
diff --git a/drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3288.c b/drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3288.c
index d99bf12476..9738eb088f 100644
--- a/drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3288.c
+++ b/drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3288.c
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
  * Adapted from coreboot.
  */
 
+#define DEBUG 1
 #include <common.h>
 #include <clk.h>
 #include <dm.h>

---
U-Boot SPL 2018.05-rc3-02370-g309384e84b-dirty (May 07 2018 - 19:42:15 -0500)
Trying to boot from SPI


U-Boot 2018.05-rc3-02370-g309384e84b-dirty (May 07 2018 - 19:42:15 -0500)

Model: Google Speedy
DRAM:  rockchip_sdram_size ff73009c 3c50dc50
rockchip_sdram_size: 42: chipsize_mb 400
rockchip_sdram_size: 49: size_mb 800
rank 2 col 11 bk 3 cs0_row 14 bw 2 row_3_4 0
rockchip_sdram_size: 42: chipsize_mb 400
rockchip_sdram_size: 49: size_mb 1000
rank 2 col 11 bk 3 cs0_row 14 bw 2 row_3_4 0
rockchip_sdram_size: 54: size_mb 1000
SDRAM base=0, size=fe000000
4 GiB
MMC:   dwmmc at ff0c0000: 1, dwmmc at ff0d0000: 2, dwmmc at ff0f0000: 0
In:    cros-ec-keyb
Out:   vidconsole
Err:   vidconsole
Model: Google Speedy
rockchip_dnl_key_pressed: adc_channel_single_shot fail!
Net:   Net Initialization Skipped
No ethernet found.
Hit any key to stop autoboot:  0
I guess we need to change the size_t to something larger; unless I'm
mistaken, that's a 32 bit value, right? and 0x100000000 is at least 40
bits, unless I'm missing the issue here somewhere. However, that would
take a change to include/ram.h, and would impact far more than just
rk3288/rockchip devices across the board, so I'm unsure how to proceed.

Use the min macro here for now, and begin work migrating the ram_info
size member to a 64-bit container?
> >> 
> >> Thanks,
> >> - Kever
> >>> 	}
> >>> 
> >>> 	return (size_t)size_mb << 20;
> >> 
> >> 
> > _______________________________________________
> > U-Boot mailing list
> > U-Boot at lists.denx.de <mailto:U-Boot@lists.denx.de>
> > https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot <https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-08  0:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-06 14:25 [PATCH 0/3] add support for the asus C201 chromebook (4GiB) Marty E. Plummer
2018-05-06 14:25 ` [U-Boot] " Marty E. Plummer
     [not found] ` <20180506142513.19911-1-hanetzer-zVALfsKDk1AS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org>
2018-05-06 14:25   ` [PATCH 1/3] sf: Add GigaDevice gd25q32b entry Marty E. Plummer
2018-05-06 14:25     ` [U-Boot] " Marty E. Plummer
2018-05-09  8:57     ` [U-Boot,1/3] " Philipp Tomsich
2018-05-09  8:57       ` [U-Boot] " Philipp Tomsich
2018-05-06 14:25   ` [PATCH 2/3] rockchip: add support for veyron-speedy (ASUS Chromebook C201) Marty E. Plummer
2018-05-06 14:25     ` [U-Boot] " Marty E. Plummer
2018-05-06 22:12     ` klaus.goger at theobroma-systems.com
2018-05-07  0:20       ` Marty E. Plummer
2018-07-13 10:31         ` Dr. Philipp Tomsich
2018-07-24  5:12           ` Marty E. Plummer
2018-07-24  8:05             ` Dr. Philipp Tomsich
2018-05-06 14:25   ` [PATCH 3/3] rockchip: fix incorrect detection of ram size Marty E. Plummer
2018-05-06 14:25     ` [U-Boot] " Marty E. Plummer
2018-05-06 18:39     ` klaus.goger at theobroma-systems.com
2018-05-06 19:08       ` Marty E. Plummer
2018-05-06 20:03         ` Marty E. Plummer
2018-05-06 20:21           ` klaus.goger at theobroma-systems.com
2018-05-06 20:41             ` Marty E. Plummer
2018-05-06 22:19     ` Dr. Philipp Tomsich
2018-05-06 22:19       ` [U-Boot] " Dr. Philipp Tomsich
2018-05-07  0:25       ` Marty E. Plummer
2018-05-07  0:25         ` [U-Boot] " Marty E. Plummer
2018-05-07  2:20     ` Kever Yang
2018-05-07  2:20       ` [U-Boot] " Kever Yang
2018-05-07  2:34       ` Marty E. Plummer
2018-05-07  2:34         ` [U-Boot] " Marty E. Plummer
2018-05-07  9:16         ` Dr. Philipp Tomsich
2018-05-07  9:16           ` [U-Boot] " Dr. Philipp Tomsich
     [not found]           ` <791299C0-EEC0-4DB1-97C4-A8DAD3B1A481-SN7IsUiht6C/RdPyistoZJqQE7yCjDx5@public.gmane.org>
2018-05-08  0:52             ` Marty E. Plummer [this message]
2018-05-08  0:52               ` Marty E. Plummer
2018-05-08 10:21               ` Dr. Philipp Tomsich
2018-05-08 10:21                 ` [U-Boot] " Dr. Philipp Tomsich
2018-05-08 10:23                 ` Dr. Philipp Tomsich
2018-05-08 10:23                   ` [U-Boot] " Dr. Philipp Tomsich
2018-05-08 19:21                 ` Marty E. Plummer
2018-05-08 19:21                   ` [U-Boot] " Marty E. Plummer
2018-05-08 21:08                   ` Dr. Philipp Tomsich
2018-05-08 21:08                     ` [U-Boot] " Dr. Philipp Tomsich
     [not found]                     ` <C5B7DFAE-C5CA-4D9E-B6CB-C44E9AD974E9-SN7IsUiht6C/RdPyistoZJqQE7yCjDx5@public.gmane.org>
2018-05-09  5:29                       ` Marty E. Plummer
2018-05-09  5:29                         ` Marty E. Plummer
2018-05-09  7:24                         ` Dr. Philipp Tomsich
2018-05-09  7:24                           ` [U-Boot] " Dr. Philipp Tomsich
2018-05-14 15:56                           ` Dr. Philipp Tomsich
2018-05-14 15:56                             ` [U-Boot] " Dr. Philipp Tomsich
2018-05-19 10:40                             ` Marty E. Plummer
2018-05-19 12:08                               ` Dr. Philipp Tomsich
2018-07-06  3:11                                 ` Marty E. Plummer
2018-07-24  8:07                                   ` Dr. Philipp Tomsich
2018-07-25 16:28                                     ` Carlo Caione
2018-07-10 14:41                 ` Simon Glass
2018-07-10 14:41                   ` [U-Boot] " Simon Glass
2018-07-10 18:55                   ` Dr. Philipp Tomsich
2018-07-10 18:55                     ` [U-Boot] " Dr. Philipp Tomsich
2018-05-07  0:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/3] add support for the asus C201 chromebook (4GiB) Marty E. Plummer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180508005215.s3uivl43jfaryv7j@proprietary-killer \
    --to=hanetzer-zvalfskdk1as+fvcfc7uqw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kever.yang-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=philipp.tomsich-SN7IsUiht6C/RdPyistoZJqQE7yCjDx5@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=u-boot-0aAXYlwwYIKGBzrmiIFOJg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=vagrant-8fiUuRrzOP0dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.