[PATCH -next 10/15] drm/vmwgfx: Use a mutex to protect gui positioning in vmw_display_unit

[Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>]

From: Deepak Rawat <drawat@vmware.com>

To avoid race condition between update_layout ioctl and modeset ioctl
for access to gui_x/y positioning added a new mutex
requested_layout_mutex.

Also used drm_for_each_connector_iter to iterate over connector list.

Signed-off-by: Deepak Rawat <drawat@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.h |  9 +++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c
index 4f18304226bc..45dfff7733d6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c
@@ -644,6 +644,7 @@ static int vmw_driver_load(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned long chipset)
 	mutex_init(&dev_priv->cmdbuf_mutex);
 	mutex_init(&dev_priv->release_mutex);
 	mutex_init(&dev_priv->binding_mutex);
+	mutex_init(&dev_priv->requested_layout_mutex);
 	mutex_init(&dev_priv->global_kms_state_mutex);
 	rwlock_init(&dev_priv->resource_lock);
 	ttm_lock_init(&dev_priv->reservation_sem);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.h
index 769d72fabb56..a38318c3efe4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.h
@@ -411,6 +411,15 @@ struct vmw_private {
 
 	uint32_t num_displays;
 
+	/*
+	 * Currently requested_layout_mutex is used to protect the gui
+	 * positionig state in display unit. With that use case currently this
+	 * mutex is only taken during layout ioctl and atomic check_modeset.
+	 * Other display unit state can be protected with this mutex but that
+	 * needs careful consideration.
+	 */
+	struct mutex requested_layout_mutex;
+
 	/*
 	 * Framebuffer info.
 	 */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c
index f0ae0b2ee2e6..a592d10e5c76 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c
@@ -1577,6 +1577,7 @@ static int vmw_kms_check_display_memory(struct drm_device *dev,
 static int vmw_kms_check_topology(struct drm_device *dev,
 				  struct drm_atomic_state *state)
 {
+	struct vmw_private *dev_priv = vmw_priv(dev);
 	struct drm_crtc_state *old_crtc_state, *new_crtc_state;
 	struct drm_rect *rects;
 	struct drm_crtc *crtc;
@@ -1588,6 +1589,8 @@ static int vmw_kms_check_topology(struct drm_device *dev,
 	if (!rects)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
+	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->requested_layout_mutex);
+
 	drm_for_each_crtc(crtc, dev) {
 		struct vmw_display_unit *du = vmw_crtc_to_du(crtc);
 		struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state = crtc->state;
@@ -1595,10 +1598,6 @@ static int vmw_kms_check_topology(struct drm_device *dev,
 		i = drm_crtc_index(crtc);
 
 		if (crtc_state && crtc_state->enable) {
-			/*
-			 * There could be a race condition with update of gui_x/
-			 * gui_y. Those are protected by dev->mode_config.mutex.
-			 */
 			rects[i].x1 = du->gui_x;
 			rects[i].y1 = du->gui_y;
 			rects[i].x2 = du->gui_x + crtc_state->mode.hdisplay;
@@ -1636,6 +1635,7 @@ static int vmw_kms_check_topology(struct drm_device *dev,
 					   rects);
 
 clean:
+	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->requested_layout_mutex);
 	kfree(rects);
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -1987,10 +1987,14 @@ static int vmw_du_update_layout(struct vmw_private *dev_priv,
 	struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev;
 	struct vmw_display_unit *du;
 	struct drm_connector *con;
+	struct drm_connector_list_iter conn_iter;
 
-	mutex_lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
-
-	list_for_each_entry(con, &dev->mode_config.connector_list, head) {
+	/*
+	 * Currently only gui_x/y is protected with requested_layout_mutex.
+	 */
+	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->requested_layout_mutex);
+	drm_connector_list_iter_begin(dev, &conn_iter);
+	drm_for_each_connector_iter(con, &conn_iter) {
 		du = vmw_connector_to_du(con);
 		if (num_rects > du->unit) {
 			du->pref_width = drm_rect_width(&rects[du->unit]);
@@ -1998,6 +2002,21 @@ static int vmw_du_update_layout(struct vmw_private *dev_priv,
 			du->pref_active = true;
 			du->gui_x = rects[du->unit].x1;
 			du->gui_y = rects[du->unit].y1;
+		} else {
+			du->pref_width = 800;
+			du->pref_height = 600;
+			du->pref_active = false;
+			du->gui_x = 0;
+			du->gui_y = 0;
+		}
+	}
+	drm_connector_list_iter_end(&conn_iter);
+	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->requested_layout_mutex);
+
+	mutex_lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
+	list_for_each_entry(con, &dev->mode_config.connector_list, head) {
+		du = vmw_connector_to_du(con);
+		if (num_rects > du->unit) {
 			drm_object_property_set_value
 			  (&con->base, dev->mode_config.suggested_x_property,
 			   du->gui_x);
@@ -2005,9 +2024,6 @@ static int vmw_du_update_layout(struct vmw_private *dev_priv,
 			  (&con->base, dev->mode_config.suggested_y_property,
 			   du->gui_y);
 		} else {
-			du->pref_width = 800;
-			du->pref_height = 600;
-			du->pref_active = false;
 			drm_object_property_set_value
 			  (&con->base, dev->mode_config.suggested_x_property,
 			   0);
@@ -2017,8 +2033,8 @@ static int vmw_du_update_layout(struct vmw_private *dev_priv,
 		}
 		con->status = vmw_du_connector_detect(con, true);
 	}
-
 	mutex_unlock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
+
 	drm_sysfs_hotplug_event(dev);
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.18.0.rc1

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel