All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: anna.schumaker@netapp.com
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] xprtrdma: Fix disconnect regression
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2018 10:46:47 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180728144051.3612.82362.stgit@manet.1015granger.net> (raw)

I found that injecting disconnects with v4.18-rc resulted in
random failures of the multi-threaded git regression test.

The root cause appears to be that, after a reconnect, the
RPC/RDMA transport is waking pending RPCs before the transport has
posted enough Receive buffers to receive the Replies. If a Reply
arrives before enough Receive buffers are posted, the connection
is dropped. A few connection drops happen in quick succession as
the client and server struggle to regain credit synchronization.

This regression was introduced with commit 7c8d9e7c8863 ("xprtrdma:
Move Receive posting to Receive handler"). The client is supposed to
post a single Receive when a connection is established because
it's not supposed to send more than one RPC Call before it gets
a fresh credit grant in the first RPC Reply [RFC 8166, Section
3.3.3].

Unfortunately there appears to be a longstanding bug in the Linux
client's credit accounting mechanism. On connect, it simply dumps
all pending RPC Calls onto the new connection. It's possible it has
done this ever since the RPC/RDMA transport was added to the kernel
ten years ago.

Servers have so far been tolerant of this bad behavior. Currently no
server implementation ever changes its credit grant over reconnects,
and servers always repost enough Receives before connections are
fully established.

The Linux client implementation used to post a Receive before each
of these Calls. This has covered up the flooding send behavior.

I could try to correct this old bug so that the client sends exactly
one RPC Call and waits for a Reply. Since we are so close to the
next merge window, I'm going to instead provide a simple patch to
post enough Receives before a reconnect completes (based on the
number of credits granted to the previous connection).

The spurious disconnects will be gone, but the client will still
send multiple RPC Calls immediately after a reconnect.

Addressing the latter problem will wait for a merge window because
a) I expect it to be a large change requiring lots of testing, and
b) obviously the Linux client has interoperated successfully since
day zero while still being broken.

Fixes: 7c8d9e7c8863 ("xprtrdma: Move Receive posting to ... ")
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
---
 net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/verbs.c |    5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Hi Anna-

Would it be possible to get this into linux-next and then v4.18-rc ?
I know this is very late, but I found this issue only recently and
it took a few days to nail down a simple fix.


diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/verbs.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/verbs.c
index 16161a3..e8d1024 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/verbs.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/verbs.c
@@ -280,7 +280,6 @@
 		++xprt->rx_xprt.connect_cookie;
 		connstate = -ECONNABORTED;
 connected:
-		xprt->rx_buf.rb_credits = 1;
 		ep->rep_connected = connstate;
 		rpcrdma_conn_func(ep);
 		wake_up_all(&ep->rep_connect_wait);
@@ -755,6 +754,7 @@
 	}
 
 	ep->rep_connected = 0;
+	rpcrdma_post_recvs(r_xprt, true);
 
 	rc = rdma_connect(ia->ri_id, &ep->rep_remote_cma);
 	if (rc) {
@@ -773,8 +773,6 @@
 
 	dprintk("RPC:       %s: connected\n", __func__);
 
-	rpcrdma_post_recvs(r_xprt, true);
-
 out:
 	if (rc)
 		ep->rep_connected = rc;
@@ -1171,6 +1169,7 @@ struct rpcrdma_req *
 		list_add(&req->rl_list, &buf->rb_send_bufs);
 	}
 
+	buf->rb_credits = 1;
 	buf->rb_posted_receives = 0;
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&buf->rb_recv_bufs);
 


             reply	other threads:[~2018-07-28 16:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-28 14:46 Chuck Lever [this message]
2018-08-06 14:00 ` [PATCH] xprtrdma: Fix disconnect regression Chuck Lever
2018-08-06 15:22   ` Anna Schumaker
2018-08-27 23:29 Chuck Lever
2018-08-28  5:19 ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180728144051.3612.82362.stgit@manet.1015granger.net \
    --to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.