From: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
"Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>, Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/2] vfs: dedupe should return EPERM if permission is not granted
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 14:49:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180807214949.7714-3-mfasheh@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180807214949.7714-1-mfasheh@suse.de>
Right now we return EINVAL if a process does not have permission to dedupe a
file. This was an oversight on my part. EPERM gives a true description of
the nature of our error, and EINVAL is already used for the case that the
filesystem does not support dedupe.
Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
---
fs/read_write.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c
index 71e9077f8bc1..7188982e2733 100644
--- a/fs/read_write.c
+++ b/fs/read_write.c
@@ -2050,7 +2050,7 @@ int vfs_dedupe_file_range(struct file *file, struct file_dedupe_range *same)
if (info->reserved) {
info->status = -EINVAL;
} else if (!allow_file_dedupe(dst_file)) {
- info->status = -EINVAL;
+ info->status = -EPERM;
} else if (file->f_path.mnt != dst_file->f_path.mnt) {
info->status = -EXDEV;
} else if (S_ISDIR(dst->i_mode)) {
--
2.15.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-08 0:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-07 21:49 [RESEND][PATCH v5 0/2] vfs: better dedupe permission check Mark Fasheh
2018-08-07 21:49 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] vfs: allow dedupe of user owned read-only files Mark Fasheh
2018-08-07 21:49 ` Mark Fasheh [this message]
2018-08-07 22:21 ` [RESEND][PATCH v5 0/2] vfs: better dedupe permission check Adam Borowski
2018-09-04 20:40 [RESEND][PATCH v5 0/2] vfs: fix " Mark Fasheh
2018-09-04 20:40 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] vfs: dedupe should return EPERM if permission is not granted Mark Fasheh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180807214949.7714-3-mfasheh@suse.de \
--to=mfasheh@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=kilobyte@angband.pl \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.