All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@oracle.com>,
	Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/4] userfaultfd: selftest: Skip test if a feature isn't supported
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 14:26:07 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180828172608.30075-4-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180828172608.30075-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com>

If userfaultfd runs on a system that doesn't support some feature it is
trying to test, it currently ends with error code 1 which indicates
test failure:

  # ./userfaultfd anon 10 10
  nr_pages: 160, nr_pages_per_cpu: 80
  bounces: 9, mode: rnd poll, userfaults: 7 59
  bounces: 8, mode: poll, userfaults: 0 0
  bounces: 7, mode: rnd racing ver, userfaults: 45 2
  bounces: 6, mode: racing ver, userfaults: 3 1
  bounces: 5, mode: rnd ver, userfaults: 55 32
  bounces: 4, mode: ver, userfaults: 69 0
  bounces: 3, mode: rnd racing, userfaults: 1 1
  bounces: 2, mode: racing, userfaults: 65 0
  bounces: 1, mode: rnd, userfaults: 44 1
  bounces: 0, mode:, userfaults: 3 2
  testing UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE: done.
  testing signal delivery: UFFDIO_API
  # echo $?
  1

Make each test return KSFT_SKIP instead, which is more accurate since it is
not a real test failure and try to run the other tests which may still
work:

  # ./userfaultfd anon 10 10
  nr_pages: 160, nr_pages_per_cpu: 80
  bounces: 9, mode: rnd poll, userfaults: 65 27
  bounces: 8, mode: poll, userfaults: 0 0
  bounces: 7, mode: rnd racing ver, userfaults: 60 29
  bounces: 6, mode: racing ver, userfaults: 58 1
  bounces: 5, mode: rnd ver, userfaults: 69 3
  bounces: 4, mode: ver, userfaults: 35 27
  bounces: 3, mode: rnd racing, userfaults: 44 0
  bounces: 2, mode: racing, userfaults: 40 25
  bounces: 1, mode: rnd, userfaults: 2 1
  bounces: 0, mode:, userfaults: 0 1
  testing UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE: done.
  testing signal delivery: UFFDIO_API: Invalid argument
  testing events (fork, remap, remove): userfaults: 160
  # echo $?
  0

While at it, also improve the error message of the ioctl(UFFDIO_API) call.

Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
index d728bd1cb33c..c84e44ddf314 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
@@ -647,8 +647,11 @@ static int userfaultfd_open(int features)
 	uffdio_api.api = UFFD_API;
 	uffdio_api.features = features;
 	if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_API, &uffdio_api)) {
-		fprintf(stderr, "UFFDIO_API\n");
-		return 1;
+		int errnum = errno;
+
+		perror("UFFDIO_API");
+
+		return errnum == EINVAL ? KSFT_SKIP : 1;
 	}
 	if (uffdio_api.api != UFFD_API) {
 		fprintf(stderr, "UFFDIO_API error %Lu\n", uffdio_api.api);
@@ -854,6 +857,7 @@ static int userfaultfd_zeropage_test(void)
 {
 	struct uffdio_register uffdio_register;
 	unsigned long expected_ioctls;
+	int err;
 
 	printf("testing UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE: ");
 	fflush(stdout);
@@ -861,8 +865,10 @@ static int userfaultfd_zeropage_test(void)
 	if (uffd_test_ops->release_pages(area_dst))
 		return 1;
 
-	if (userfaultfd_open(0))
-		return 1;
+	err = userfaultfd_open(0);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
 	uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long) area_dst;
 	uffdio_register.range.len = nr_pages * page_size;
 	uffdio_register.mode = UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING;
@@ -904,8 +910,10 @@ static int userfaultfd_events_test(void)
 
 	features = UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_FORK | UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_REMAP |
 		UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_REMOVE;
-	if (userfaultfd_open(features))
-		return 1;
+	err = userfaultfd_open(features);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
 	fcntl(uffd, F_SETFL, uffd_flags | O_NONBLOCK);
 
 	uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long) area_dst;
@@ -963,8 +971,9 @@ static int userfaultfd_sig_test(void)
 		return 1;
 
 	features = UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_FORK|UFFD_FEATURE_SIGBUS;
-	if (userfaultfd_open(features))
-		return 1;
+	err = userfaultfd_open(features);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
 	fcntl(uffd, F_SETFL, uffd_flags | O_NONBLOCK);
 
 	uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long) area_dst;
@@ -1029,8 +1038,9 @@ static int userfaultfd_stress(void)
 	if (!area_dst)
 		return 1;
 
-	if (userfaultfd_open(0))
-		return 1;
+	err = userfaultfd_open(0);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
 
 	count_verify = malloc(nr_pages * sizeof(unsigned long long));
 	if (!count_verify) {
@@ -1201,8 +1211,16 @@ static int userfaultfd_stress(void)
 		return err;
 
 	close(uffd);
-	return userfaultfd_zeropage_test() || userfaultfd_sig_test()
-		|| userfaultfd_events_test();
+
+	err = userfaultfd_zeropage_test();
+	if (err && err != KSFT_SKIP)
+		return err;
+
+	err = userfaultfd_sig_test();
+	if (err && err != KSFT_SKIP)
+		return err;
+
+	return userfaultfd_events_test();
 }
 
 /*


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: bauerman at linux.ibm.com (Thiago Jung Bauermann)
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/4] userfaultfd: selftest: Skip test if a feature isn't supported
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 14:26:07 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180828172608.30075-4-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180828172608.30075-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com>

If userfaultfd runs on a system that doesn't support some feature it is
trying to test, it currently ends with error code 1 which indicates
test failure:

  # ./userfaultfd anon 10 10
  nr_pages: 160, nr_pages_per_cpu: 80
  bounces: 9, mode: rnd poll, userfaults: 7 59
  bounces: 8, mode: poll, userfaults: 0 0
  bounces: 7, mode: rnd racing ver, userfaults: 45 2
  bounces: 6, mode: racing ver, userfaults: 3 1
  bounces: 5, mode: rnd ver, userfaults: 55 32
  bounces: 4, mode: ver, userfaults: 69 0
  bounces: 3, mode: rnd racing, userfaults: 1 1
  bounces: 2, mode: racing, userfaults: 65 0
  bounces: 1, mode: rnd, userfaults: 44 1
  bounces: 0, mode:, userfaults: 3 2
  testing UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE: done.
  testing signal delivery: UFFDIO_API
  # echo $?
  1

Make each test return KSFT_SKIP instead, which is more accurate since it is
not a real test failure and try to run the other tests which may still
work:

  # ./userfaultfd anon 10 10
  nr_pages: 160, nr_pages_per_cpu: 80
  bounces: 9, mode: rnd poll, userfaults: 65 27
  bounces: 8, mode: poll, userfaults: 0 0
  bounces: 7, mode: rnd racing ver, userfaults: 60 29
  bounces: 6, mode: racing ver, userfaults: 58 1
  bounces: 5, mode: rnd ver, userfaults: 69 3
  bounces: 4, mode: ver, userfaults: 35 27
  bounces: 3, mode: rnd racing, userfaults: 44 0
  bounces: 2, mode: racing, userfaults: 40 25
  bounces: 1, mode: rnd, userfaults: 2 1
  bounces: 0, mode:, userfaults: 0 1
  testing UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE: done.
  testing signal delivery: UFFDIO_API: Invalid argument
  testing events (fork, remap, remove): userfaults: 160
  # echo $?
  0

While at it, also improve the error message of the ioctl(UFFDIO_API) call.

Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman at linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
index d728bd1cb33c..c84e44ddf314 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
@@ -647,8 +647,11 @@ static int userfaultfd_open(int features)
 	uffdio_api.api = UFFD_API;
 	uffdio_api.features = features;
 	if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_API, &uffdio_api)) {
-		fprintf(stderr, "UFFDIO_API\n");
-		return 1;
+		int errnum = errno;
+
+		perror("UFFDIO_API");
+
+		return errnum == EINVAL ? KSFT_SKIP : 1;
 	}
 	if (uffdio_api.api != UFFD_API) {
 		fprintf(stderr, "UFFDIO_API error %Lu\n", uffdio_api.api);
@@ -854,6 +857,7 @@ static int userfaultfd_zeropage_test(void)
 {
 	struct uffdio_register uffdio_register;
 	unsigned long expected_ioctls;
+	int err;
 
 	printf("testing UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE: ");
 	fflush(stdout);
@@ -861,8 +865,10 @@ static int userfaultfd_zeropage_test(void)
 	if (uffd_test_ops->release_pages(area_dst))
 		return 1;
 
-	if (userfaultfd_open(0))
-		return 1;
+	err = userfaultfd_open(0);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
 	uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long) area_dst;
 	uffdio_register.range.len = nr_pages * page_size;
 	uffdio_register.mode = UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING;
@@ -904,8 +910,10 @@ static int userfaultfd_events_test(void)
 
 	features = UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_FORK | UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_REMAP |
 		UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_REMOVE;
-	if (userfaultfd_open(features))
-		return 1;
+	err = userfaultfd_open(features);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
 	fcntl(uffd, F_SETFL, uffd_flags | O_NONBLOCK);
 
 	uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long) area_dst;
@@ -963,8 +971,9 @@ static int userfaultfd_sig_test(void)
 		return 1;
 
 	features = UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_FORK|UFFD_FEATURE_SIGBUS;
-	if (userfaultfd_open(features))
-		return 1;
+	err = userfaultfd_open(features);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
 	fcntl(uffd, F_SETFL, uffd_flags | O_NONBLOCK);
 
 	uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long) area_dst;
@@ -1029,8 +1038,9 @@ static int userfaultfd_stress(void)
 	if (!area_dst)
 		return 1;
 
-	if (userfaultfd_open(0))
-		return 1;
+	err = userfaultfd_open(0);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
 
 	count_verify = malloc(nr_pages * sizeof(unsigned long long));
 	if (!count_verify) {
@@ -1201,8 +1211,16 @@ static int userfaultfd_stress(void)
 		return err;
 
 	close(uffd);
-	return userfaultfd_zeropage_test() || userfaultfd_sig_test()
-		|| userfaultfd_events_test();
+
+	err = userfaultfd_zeropage_test();
+	if (err && err != KSFT_SKIP)
+		return err;
+
+	err = userfaultfd_sig_test();
+	if (err && err != KSFT_SKIP)
+		return err;
+
+	return userfaultfd_events_test();
 }
 
 /*

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: bauerman@linux.ibm.com (Thiago Jung Bauermann)
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/4] userfaultfd: selftest: Skip test if a feature isn't supported
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 14:26:07 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180828172608.30075-4-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20180828172607.eZhSOjyysQOtZNlx3-x6XXHeKkkvthNlCbJ4YX2L43g@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180828172608.30075-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com>

If userfaultfd runs on a system that doesn't support some feature it is
trying to test, it currently ends with error code 1 which indicates
test failure:

  # ./userfaultfd anon 10 10
  nr_pages: 160, nr_pages_per_cpu: 80
  bounces: 9, mode: rnd poll, userfaults: 7 59
  bounces: 8, mode: poll, userfaults: 0 0
  bounces: 7, mode: rnd racing ver, userfaults: 45 2
  bounces: 6, mode: racing ver, userfaults: 3 1
  bounces: 5, mode: rnd ver, userfaults: 55 32
  bounces: 4, mode: ver, userfaults: 69 0
  bounces: 3, mode: rnd racing, userfaults: 1 1
  bounces: 2, mode: racing, userfaults: 65 0
  bounces: 1, mode: rnd, userfaults: 44 1
  bounces: 0, mode:, userfaults: 3 2
  testing UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE: done.
  testing signal delivery: UFFDIO_API
  # echo $?
  1

Make each test return KSFT_SKIP instead, which is more accurate since it is
not a real test failure and try to run the other tests which may still
work:

  # ./userfaultfd anon 10 10
  nr_pages: 160, nr_pages_per_cpu: 80
  bounces: 9, mode: rnd poll, userfaults: 65 27
  bounces: 8, mode: poll, userfaults: 0 0
  bounces: 7, mode: rnd racing ver, userfaults: 60 29
  bounces: 6, mode: racing ver, userfaults: 58 1
  bounces: 5, mode: rnd ver, userfaults: 69 3
  bounces: 4, mode: ver, userfaults: 35 27
  bounces: 3, mode: rnd racing, userfaults: 44 0
  bounces: 2, mode: racing, userfaults: 40 25
  bounces: 1, mode: rnd, userfaults: 2 1
  bounces: 0, mode:, userfaults: 0 1
  testing UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE: done.
  testing signal delivery: UFFDIO_API: Invalid argument
  testing events (fork, remap, remove): userfaults: 160
  # echo $?
  0

While at it, also improve the error message of the ioctl(UFFDIO_API) call.

Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman at linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
index d728bd1cb33c..c84e44ddf314 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
@@ -647,8 +647,11 @@ static int userfaultfd_open(int features)
 	uffdio_api.api = UFFD_API;
 	uffdio_api.features = features;
 	if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_API, &uffdio_api)) {
-		fprintf(stderr, "UFFDIO_API\n");
-		return 1;
+		int errnum = errno;
+
+		perror("UFFDIO_API");
+
+		return errnum == EINVAL ? KSFT_SKIP : 1;
 	}
 	if (uffdio_api.api != UFFD_API) {
 		fprintf(stderr, "UFFDIO_API error %Lu\n", uffdio_api.api);
@@ -854,6 +857,7 @@ static int userfaultfd_zeropage_test(void)
 {
 	struct uffdio_register uffdio_register;
 	unsigned long expected_ioctls;
+	int err;
 
 	printf("testing UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE: ");
 	fflush(stdout);
@@ -861,8 +865,10 @@ static int userfaultfd_zeropage_test(void)
 	if (uffd_test_ops->release_pages(area_dst))
 		return 1;
 
-	if (userfaultfd_open(0))
-		return 1;
+	err = userfaultfd_open(0);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
 	uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long) area_dst;
 	uffdio_register.range.len = nr_pages * page_size;
 	uffdio_register.mode = UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING;
@@ -904,8 +910,10 @@ static int userfaultfd_events_test(void)
 
 	features = UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_FORK | UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_REMAP |
 		UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_REMOVE;
-	if (userfaultfd_open(features))
-		return 1;
+	err = userfaultfd_open(features);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
 	fcntl(uffd, F_SETFL, uffd_flags | O_NONBLOCK);
 
 	uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long) area_dst;
@@ -963,8 +971,9 @@ static int userfaultfd_sig_test(void)
 		return 1;
 
 	features = UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_FORK|UFFD_FEATURE_SIGBUS;
-	if (userfaultfd_open(features))
-		return 1;
+	err = userfaultfd_open(features);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
 	fcntl(uffd, F_SETFL, uffd_flags | O_NONBLOCK);
 
 	uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long) area_dst;
@@ -1029,8 +1038,9 @@ static int userfaultfd_stress(void)
 	if (!area_dst)
 		return 1;
 
-	if (userfaultfd_open(0))
-		return 1;
+	err = userfaultfd_open(0);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
 
 	count_verify = malloc(nr_pages * sizeof(unsigned long long));
 	if (!count_verify) {
@@ -1201,8 +1211,16 @@ static int userfaultfd_stress(void)
 		return err;
 
 	close(uffd);
-	return userfaultfd_zeropage_test() || userfaultfd_sig_test()
-		|| userfaultfd_events_test();
+
+	err = userfaultfd_zeropage_test();
+	if (err && err != KSFT_SKIP)
+		return err;
+
+	err = userfaultfd_sig_test();
+	if (err && err != KSFT_SKIP)
+		return err;
+
+	return userfaultfd_events_test();
 }
 
 /*

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-08-28 17:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-28 17:26 [PATCH v3 0/4] userfaultfd: selftest: Improve behavior with older kernels Thiago Jung Bauermann
2018-08-28 17:26 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2018-08-28 17:26 ` bauerman
2018-08-28 17:26 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] userfaultfd: selftest: Fix checking of userfaultfd_open() result Thiago Jung Bauermann
2018-08-28 17:26   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2018-08-28 17:26   ` bauerman
2018-08-28 17:26 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] userfaultfd: selftest: Skip test if userfaultfd() syscall not supported Thiago Jung Bauermann
2018-08-28 17:26   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2018-08-28 17:26   ` bauerman
2018-08-28 17:26 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann [this message]
2018-08-28 17:26   ` [PATCH v3 3/4] userfaultfd: selftest: Skip test if a feature isn't supported Thiago Jung Bauermann
2018-08-28 17:26   ` bauerman
2018-08-28 17:26 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] userfaultfd: selftest: make supported range ioctl verification more robust Thiago Jung Bauermann
2018-08-28 17:26   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2018-08-28 17:26   ` bauerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180828172608.30075-4-bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=prakash.sangappa@oracle.com \
    --cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.