All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
	John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
	Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
	"Schaufler, Casey" <casey.schaufler@intel.com>,
	LSM <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH security-next v2 19/26] LSM: Introduce CONFIG_LSM_ORDER
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 09:23:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180920162338.21060-20-keescook@chromium.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180920162338.21060-1-keescook@chromium.org>

This provides a way to declare LSM initialization order via Kconfig.

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
 security/Kconfig    | 11 +++++++++++
 security/security.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/Kconfig b/security/Kconfig
index 27d8b2688f75..de8202886c1d 100644
--- a/security/Kconfig
+++ b/security/Kconfig
@@ -276,5 +276,16 @@ config DEFAULT_SECURITY
 	default "apparmor" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR
 	default "" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_DAC
 
+config LSM_ORDER
+	string "Default initialization order of builtin LSMs"
+	default "integrity"
+	help
+	  A comma-separated list of LSMs, in initialization order.
+	  Any LSMs left off this list will be link-order initialized
+	  after any listed LSMs. Any LSMs listed here but not built in
+	  the kernel will be ignored.
+
+	  If unsure, leave this as the default.
+
 endmenu
 
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index 2541a512a0f7..063ee2466e58 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -44,6 +44,8 @@ char *lsm_names;
 /* Boot-time LSM user choice */
 static __initdata const char *chosen_major_lsm;
 
+static __initconst const char * const builtin_lsm_order = CONFIG_LSM_ORDER;
+
 /* Ordered list of LSMs to initialize. */
 static __initdata struct lsm_info **ordered_lsms;
 
@@ -108,14 +110,44 @@ static void __init append_ordered_lsm(struct lsm_info *lsm, const char *from)
 		   (!lsm->enabled || *lsm->enabled) ? "en" : "dis");
 }
 
-/* Populate ordered LSMs list from hard-coded list of LSMs. */
+/* Populate ordered LSMs list from given string. */
+static void __init parse_lsm_order(const char *order, const char *origin)
+{
+	struct lsm_info *lsm;
+	char *sep, *name, *next;
+
+	sep = kstrdup(order, GFP_KERNEL);
+	next = sep;
+	/* Walk the list, looking for matching LSMs. */
+	while ((name = strsep(&next, ",")) != NULL) {
+		bool found = false;
+
+		for (lsm = __start_lsm_info; lsm < __end_lsm_info; lsm++) {
+			if ((lsm->flags & LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR) == 0 &&
+			    strcmp(lsm->name, name) == 0) {
+				append_ordered_lsm(lsm, origin);
+				found = true;
+			}
+		}
+
+		if (!found)
+			init_debug("%s ignored: %s\n", origin, name);
+	}
+	kfree(sep);
+}
+
+/* Populate ordered LSMs list from builtin list of LSMs. */
 static void __init prepare_lsm_order(void)
 {
 	struct lsm_info *lsm;
 
+	/* Parse order from builtin list. */
+	parse_lsm_order(builtin_lsm_order, "builtin");
+
+	/* Add any missing LSMs, in link order. */
 	for (lsm = __start_lsm_info; lsm < __end_lsm_info; lsm++) {
-		if (strcmp(lsm->name, "integrity") == 0)
-			append_ordered_lsm(lsm, "builtin");
+		if ((lsm->flags & LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR) == 0)
+			append_ordered_lsm(lsm, "link-time");
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.17.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: keescook@chromium.org (Kees Cook)
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH security-next v2 19/26] LSM: Introduce CONFIG_LSM_ORDER
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 09:23:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180920162338.21060-20-keescook@chromium.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180920162338.21060-1-keescook@chromium.org>

This provides a way to declare LSM initialization order via Kconfig.

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
 security/Kconfig    | 11 +++++++++++
 security/security.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/Kconfig b/security/Kconfig
index 27d8b2688f75..de8202886c1d 100644
--- a/security/Kconfig
+++ b/security/Kconfig
@@ -276,5 +276,16 @@ config DEFAULT_SECURITY
 	default "apparmor" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR
 	default "" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_DAC
 
+config LSM_ORDER
+	string "Default initialization order of builtin LSMs"
+	default "integrity"
+	help
+	  A comma-separated list of LSMs, in initialization order.
+	  Any LSMs left off this list will be link-order initialized
+	  after any listed LSMs. Any LSMs listed here but not built in
+	  the kernel will be ignored.
+
+	  If unsure, leave this as the default.
+
 endmenu
 
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index 2541a512a0f7..063ee2466e58 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -44,6 +44,8 @@ char *lsm_names;
 /* Boot-time LSM user choice */
 static __initdata const char *chosen_major_lsm;
 
+static __initconst const char * const builtin_lsm_order = CONFIG_LSM_ORDER;
+
 /* Ordered list of LSMs to initialize. */
 static __initdata struct lsm_info **ordered_lsms;
 
@@ -108,14 +110,44 @@ static void __init append_ordered_lsm(struct lsm_info *lsm, const char *from)
 		   (!lsm->enabled || *lsm->enabled) ? "en" : "dis");
 }
 
-/* Populate ordered LSMs list from hard-coded list of LSMs. */
+/* Populate ordered LSMs list from given string. */
+static void __init parse_lsm_order(const char *order, const char *origin)
+{
+	struct lsm_info *lsm;
+	char *sep, *name, *next;
+
+	sep = kstrdup(order, GFP_KERNEL);
+	next = sep;
+	/* Walk the list, looking for matching LSMs. */
+	while ((name = strsep(&next, ",")) != NULL) {
+		bool found = false;
+
+		for (lsm = __start_lsm_info; lsm < __end_lsm_info; lsm++) {
+			if ((lsm->flags & LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR) == 0 &&
+			    strcmp(lsm->name, name) == 0) {
+				append_ordered_lsm(lsm, origin);
+				found = true;
+			}
+		}
+
+		if (!found)
+			init_debug("%s ignored: %s\n", origin, name);
+	}
+	kfree(sep);
+}
+
+/* Populate ordered LSMs list from builtin list of LSMs. */
 static void __init prepare_lsm_order(void)
 {
 	struct lsm_info *lsm;
 
+	/* Parse order from builtin list. */
+	parse_lsm_order(builtin_lsm_order, "builtin");
+
+	/* Add any missing LSMs, in link order. */
 	for (lsm = __start_lsm_info; lsm < __end_lsm_info; lsm++) {
-		if (strcmp(lsm->name, "integrity") == 0)
-			append_ordered_lsm(lsm, "builtin");
+		if ((lsm->flags & LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR) == 0)
+			append_ordered_lsm(lsm, "link-time");
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.17.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-09-20 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-20 16:23 [PATCH security-next v2 00/26] LSM: Explict LSM ordering Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23 ` Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23 ` [PATCH security-next v2 01/26] LSM: Correctly announce start of LSM initialization Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23   ` Kees Cook
2018-09-20 23:39   ` Casey Schaufler
2018-09-20 23:39     ` Casey Schaufler
2018-09-20 16:23 ` [PATCH security-next v2 02/26] vmlinux.lds.h: Avoid copy/paste of security_init section Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23   ` Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23 ` [PATCH security-next v2 03/26] LSM: Rename .security_initcall section to .lsm_info Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23   ` Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23 ` [PATCH security-next v2 04/26] LSM: Remove initcall tracing Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23   ` Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23 ` [PATCH security-next v2 05/26] LSM: Convert from initcall to struct lsm_info Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23   ` Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23 ` [PATCH security-next v2 06/26] vmlinux.lds.h: Move LSM_TABLE into INIT_DATA Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23   ` Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23 ` [PATCH security-next v2 07/26] LSM: Convert security_initcall() into DEFINE_LSM() Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23   ` Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23 ` [PATCH security-next v2 08/26] LSM: Record LSM name in struct lsm_info Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23   ` Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23 ` [PATCH security-next v2 09/26] LSM: Provide init debugging infrastructure Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23   ` Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23 ` [PATCH security-next v2 10/26] LSM: Don't ignore initialization failures Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23   ` Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23 ` [PATCH security-next v2 11/26] LSM: Introduce LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23   ` Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23 ` [PATCH security-next v2 12/26] LSM: Provide separate ordered initialization Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23   ` Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23 ` [PATCH security-next v2 13/26] LSM: Plumb visibility into optional "enabled" state Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23   ` Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23 ` [PATCH security-next v2 14/26] LSM: Lift LSM selection out of individual LSMs Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23   ` Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23 ` [PATCH security-next v2 15/26] LSM: Introduce lsm.enable= and lsm.disable= Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23   ` Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23 ` [PATCH security-next v2 16/26] LSM: Prepare for reorganizing "security=" logic Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23   ` Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23 ` [PATCH security-next v2 17/26] LSM: Refactor "security=" in terms of enable/disable Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23   ` Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23 ` [PATCH security-next v2 18/26] LSM: Build ordered list of ordered LSMs for init Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23   ` Kees Cook
2018-09-21  0:04   ` Casey Schaufler
2018-09-21  0:04     ` Casey Schaufler
2018-09-21  0:37     ` Kees Cook
2018-09-21  0:37       ` Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2018-09-20 16:23   ` [PATCH security-next v2 19/26] LSM: Introduce CONFIG_LSM_ORDER Kees Cook
2018-09-21  0:10   ` Casey Schaufler
2018-09-21  0:10     ` Casey Schaufler
2018-09-21  0:14     ` Casey Schaufler
2018-09-21  0:14       ` Casey Schaufler
2018-09-20 16:23 ` [PATCH security-next v2 20/26] LSM: Introduce "lsm.order=" for boottime ordering Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23   ` Kees Cook
2018-09-21  0:12   ` Casey Schaufler
2018-09-21  0:12     ` Casey Schaufler
2018-09-21  0:40     ` Kees Cook
2018-09-21  0:40       ` Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23 ` [PATCH security-next v2 21/26] LoadPin: Initialize as ordered LSM Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23   ` Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23 ` [PATCH security-next v2 22/26] Yama: " Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23   ` Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23 ` [PATCH security-next v2 23/26] LSM: Introduce enum lsm_order Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23   ` Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23 ` [PATCH security-next v2 24/26] capability: Mark as LSM_ORDER_FIRST Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23   ` Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23 ` [PATCH security-next v2 25/26] LSM: Separate idea of "major" LSM from "exclusive" LSM Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23   ` Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23 ` [PATCH security-next v2 26/26] LSM: Add all exclusive LSMs to ordered initialization Kees Cook
2018-09-20 16:23   ` Kees Cook
2018-09-21  0:25   ` Casey Schaufler
2018-09-21  0:25     ` Casey Schaufler
2018-09-21  0:45     ` Kees Cook
2018-09-21  0:45       ` Kees Cook
2018-09-21  1:10       ` Casey Schaufler
2018-09-21  1:10         ` Casey Schaufler
2018-09-21  1:39         ` John Johansen
2018-09-21  1:39           ` John Johansen
2018-09-21  2:05           ` Kees Cook
2018-09-21  2:05             ` Kees Cook
2018-09-21  2:14             ` John Johansen
2018-09-21  2:14               ` John Johansen
2018-09-21  3:02               ` Kees Cook
2018-09-21  3:02                 ` Kees Cook
2018-09-21 13:19                 ` John Johansen
2018-09-21 13:19                   ` John Johansen
2018-09-21 14:57                   ` Casey Schaufler
2018-09-21 14:57                     ` Casey Schaufler
2018-09-20 20:14 ` [PATCH security-next v2 00/26] LSM: Explict LSM ordering Martin Steigerwald
2018-09-20 20:14   ` Martin Steigerwald
2018-09-20 21:55   ` Kees Cook
2018-09-20 21:55     ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180920162338.21060-20-keescook@chromium.org \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.