From: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: fstests@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
guaneryu@gmail.com, darrick.wong@oracle.com, zlang@redhat.com,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH V5 11/20] xfs/325: Inject free_extent error after CoW operation
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 20:49:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180924151942.8220-12-chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180924151942.8220-1-chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On a 64k blocksized filesystem, when the test CoWs the file2's offset
range [10 * 64k, 19 * 64k], the call to xfs_bmapi_reserve_delalloc()
allocates 32 64k blocks. This is because XFS_DEFAULT_COWEXTSZ_HINT has
the value of 32 and xfs_get_cowextsz_hint() uses this to compute the
extent alignment. This leads to xfs_bmapi_reserve_delalloc() to reserve
space corresponding to the file range [0, 32 * 64k] in the inode's
cow fork area. On completion of write I/O corresponding to file2's range
[10 * 64k, 19 * 64k], xfs_end_io() moves 10 out of the originally
allocated 32 64k blocks to the data fork area. The remaining 22 64k
blocks linger on in cow fork area of the inode.
Later, when servicing the exit() syscall for the xfs_io process,
xfs_free_eofblocks() ends up invoking xfs_reflink_cancel_cow_blocks()
since i_delayed_blks has the value 22. xfs_reflink_cancel_cow_blocks()
indirectly invokes __xfs_free_extent() which returns EIO since
XFS_ERRTAG_FREE_EXTENT has been set. This leads to the filesystem to be
shutdown. The "rm" command invoked later ends up returning an
error and hence the test fails. The test actually requires that the
filesystem gets shutdown when executing the "rm" command.
To fix the problem, this commit injects the free_extent error after we
CoW file2's [10 * 64k, 19 * 64k] range.
Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
tests/xfs/325 | 5 +++--
tests/xfs/325.out | 2 +-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/xfs/325 b/tests/xfs/325
index b156de9..6795901 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/325
+++ b/tests/xfs/325
@@ -54,11 +54,12 @@ echo "Check files"
md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/file1 | _filter_scratch
md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/file2 | _filter_scratch
+echo "CoW a few blocks"
+$XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -W -S 0x67 $((10 * blksz)) $((10 * blksz))" $SCRATCH_MNT/file2 >> $seqres.full
+
echo "Inject error"
_scratch_inject_error "free_extent"
-echo "CoW a few blocks"
-$XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -W -S 0x67 $((10 * blksz)) $((10 * blksz))" $SCRATCH_MNT/file2 >> $seqres.full
rm $SCRATCH_MNT/file1
sync
diff --git a/tests/xfs/325.out b/tests/xfs/325.out
index 4e25d2b..92027cd 100644
--- a/tests/xfs/325.out
+++ b/tests/xfs/325.out
@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ Create files
Check files
d5a0ed0305c8df4180cb2bf975ecffe8 SCRATCH_MNT/file1
d5a0ed0305c8df4180cb2bf975ecffe8 SCRATCH_MNT/file2
-Inject error
CoW a few blocks
+Inject error
FS should be shut down, touch will fail
touch: cannot touch 'SCRATCH_MNT/badfs': Input/output error
Remount to replay log
--
2.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-24 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-24 15:19 [PATCH V5 00/20] Fix tests to work on non-4k block sized fs instances Chandan Rajendra
2018-09-24 15:19 ` [PATCH V5 01/20] Fix xfs/009 to work with 64k block size Chandan Rajendra
2018-09-24 15:19 ` [PATCH V5 02/20] xfs/050: Fix "Push past soft inode limit" case Chandan Rajendra
2018-09-24 15:19 ` [PATCH V5 03/20] Fix xfs/050 to work with 64k block size Chandan Rajendra
2018-09-24 15:19 ` [PATCH V5 04/20] Fix xfs/074 " Chandan Rajendra
2018-09-24 15:19 ` [PATCH V5 05/20] Fix xfs/127 " Chandan Rajendra
2018-09-24 15:19 ` [PATCH V5 06/20] Fix xfs/139 " Chandan Rajendra
2018-10-06 0:33 ` Dave Chinner
2018-10-06 6:51 ` Chandan Rajendra
2018-09-24 15:19 ` [PATCH V5 07/20] Fix xfs/140 " Chandan Rajendra
2018-09-24 15:19 ` [PATCH V5 08/20] Fix xfs/190 " Chandan Rajendra
2018-09-24 15:19 ` [PATCH V5 09/20] xfs/299: Fix "Push past soft inode limit" case Chandan Rajendra
2018-09-24 15:19 ` [PATCH V5 10/20] Fix xfs/299 to work with 64k block size Chandan Rajendra
2018-09-24 15:19 ` Chandan Rajendra [this message]
2018-09-24 15:19 ` [PATCH V5 12/20] Fix generic/102 " Chandan Rajendra
2018-09-24 15:19 ` [PATCH V5 13/20] Fix generic/172 " Chandan Rajendra
2018-09-24 15:19 ` [PATCH V5 14/20] Filter fiemap output by FS " Chandan Rajendra
2018-09-24 15:19 ` [PATCH V5 15/20] Fix generic/177 to work with 64k " Chandan Rajendra
2018-09-24 15:19 ` [PATCH V5 16/20] Fix generic/230 " Chandan Rajendra
2018-09-24 15:19 ` [PATCH V5 17/20] Fix generic/235 " Chandan Rajendra
2018-09-24 15:19 ` [PATCH V5 18/20] Fix generic/459 " Chandan Rajendra
2018-09-24 15:19 ` [PATCH V5 19/20] Fix generic/018 " Chandan Rajendra
2018-09-24 15:19 ` [PATCH V5 20/20] Fix generic/108 " Chandan Rajendra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180924151942.8220-12-chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guaneryu@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.