From: Casey Schaufler <casey.schaufler@intel.com> To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, casey.schaufler@intel.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, deneen.t.dock@intel.com, kristen@linux.intel.com, arjan@linux.intel.com Subject: [PATCH v5 3/5] SELinux: Prepare for PTRACE_MODE_SCHED Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 13:34:44 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20180926203446.2004-4-casey.schaufler@intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20180926203446.2004-1-casey.schaufler@intel.com> From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> A ptrace access check with mode PTRACE_MODE_SCHED gets called from process switching code. This precludes the use of audit or avc, as the locking is incompatible. The only available check that can be made without using avc is a comparison of the secids. This is not very satisfactory as it will indicate possible vulnerabilies much too aggressively. Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey.schaufler@intel.com> --- security/selinux/hooks.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c index ad9a9b8e9979..160239791007 100644 --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c @@ -2267,6 +2267,8 @@ static int selinux_ptrace_access_check(struct task_struct *child, u32 sid = current_sid(); u32 csid = task_sid(child); + if (mode & PTRACE_MODE_SCHED) + return sid == csid ? 0 : -EACCES; if (mode & PTRACE_MODE_READ) return avc_has_perm(&selinux_state, sid, csid, SECCLASS_FILE, FILE__READ, NULL); -- 2.17.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: casey.schaufler@intel.com (Casey Schaufler) To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v5 3/5] SELinux: Prepare for PTRACE_MODE_SCHED Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 13:34:44 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20180926203446.2004-4-casey.schaufler@intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20180926203446.2004-1-casey.schaufler@intel.com> From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> A ptrace access check with mode PTRACE_MODE_SCHED gets called from process switching code. This precludes the use of audit or avc, as the locking is incompatible. The only available check that can be made without using avc is a comparison of the secids. This is not very satisfactory as it will indicate possible vulnerabilies much too aggressively. Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey.schaufler@intel.com> --- security/selinux/hooks.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c index ad9a9b8e9979..160239791007 100644 --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c @@ -2267,6 +2267,8 @@ static int selinux_ptrace_access_check(struct task_struct *child, u32 sid = current_sid(); u32 csid = task_sid(child); + if (mode & PTRACE_MODE_SCHED) + return sid == csid ? 0 : -EACCES; if (mode & PTRACE_MODE_READ) return avc_has_perm(&selinux_state, sid, csid, SECCLASS_FILE, FILE__READ, NULL); -- 2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-26 20:35 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-09-26 20:34 [PATCH v5 0/5] LSM: Support ptrace sidechannel access checks Casey Schaufler 2018-09-26 20:34 ` Casey Schaufler 2018-09-26 20:34 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] AppArmor: Prepare for PTRACE_MODE_SCHED Casey Schaufler 2018-09-26 20:34 ` Casey Schaufler 2018-09-26 21:16 ` Jann Horn 2018-09-26 21:16 ` Jann Horn 2018-09-26 21:18 ` Jann Horn 2018-09-26 21:18 ` Jann Horn 2018-09-26 22:47 ` Schaufler, Casey 2018-09-26 22:47 ` Schaufler, Casey 2018-09-26 20:34 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] Smack: " Casey Schaufler 2018-09-26 20:34 ` Casey Schaufler 2018-09-26 21:30 ` Jann Horn 2018-09-26 21:30 ` Jann Horn 2018-09-26 22:53 ` Schaufler, Casey 2018-09-26 22:53 ` Schaufler, Casey 2018-09-26 22:58 ` Jann Horn 2018-09-26 22:58 ` Jann Horn 2018-10-04 7:47 ` Jiri Kosina 2018-10-04 11:36 ` Jann Horn 2018-10-16 11:44 ` Jiri Kosina 2018-09-26 20:34 ` Casey Schaufler [this message] 2018-09-26 20:34 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] SELinux: " Casey Schaufler 2018-09-27 1:53 ` Stephen Smalley 2018-09-27 15:50 ` Stephen Smalley 2018-09-27 15:50 ` Stephen Smalley 2018-09-27 16:23 ` Schaufler, Casey 2018-09-27 16:23 ` Schaufler, Casey 2018-09-27 16:23 ` Schaufler, Casey 2018-09-26 20:34 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] Capability: Complete PTRACE_MODE_SCHED Casey Schaufler 2018-09-26 20:34 ` Casey Schaufler 2018-09-26 21:26 ` Jann Horn 2018-09-26 21:26 ` Jann Horn 2018-09-26 22:24 ` Schaufler, Casey 2018-09-26 22:24 ` Schaufler, Casey 2018-09-26 20:34 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] sidechannel: Linux Security Module for sidechannel Casey Schaufler 2018-09-26 20:34 ` Casey Schaufler 2018-09-27 21:45 ` James Morris 2018-09-27 21:45 ` James Morris 2018-09-27 22:39 ` Casey Schaufler 2018-09-27 22:39 ` Casey Schaufler 2018-09-27 22:47 ` James Morris 2018-09-27 22:47 ` James Morris 2018-09-27 23:19 ` Schaufler, Casey 2018-09-27 23:19 ` Schaufler, Casey 2018-09-27 23:19 ` Schaufler, Casey 2018-09-27 23:43 ` James Morris 2018-09-27 23:43 ` James Morris 2018-09-27 23:43 ` James Morris 2018-09-27 23:47 ` Jann Horn 2018-09-27 23:47 ` Jann Horn 2018-09-28 16:33 ` James Morris 2018-09-28 16:33 ` James Morris 2018-09-28 17:40 ` Schaufler, Casey 2018-09-28 17:40 ` Schaufler, Casey
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20180926203446.2004-4-casey.schaufler@intel.com \ --to=casey.schaufler@intel.com \ --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \ --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \ --cc=deneen.t.dock@intel.com \ --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \ --cc=kristen@linux.intel.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.