All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: [PATCH 10/13] drm/i915: Annotate dma_fence waits
Date: Wed,  7 Nov 2018 16:30:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181107153019.26401-10-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181107153019.26401-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

i915_request_wait is simply our i915-optimized version of
dma_fence_wait. They both use the exact same code. To help lockdep
discovering all the dependencies, annotate it.

v2: We do opportunistic retiring of dma-fences while holding
struct_mutex. The recursion this causes is intentional, and we do have
other paths which (hopefully) do depend upon the struct_mutex. 2nd
option to fix these annotations (and probably even better) would be
creating a dma_fence_signal_opportunistic, which doesnt have the
lockdep annotations. But that also doesn't guarantee that we'll
actually manage to signal fences without depending upon struct_mutex
somewhere, so might as well go with this trick here.

Aside, for non-i915 people: struct_mutex is our bkl. The locking rules
are ... complicated.

Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
index 71107540581d..0f800b8967a4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
@@ -30,6 +30,10 @@
 
 #include "i915_drv.h"
 
+static long __i915_request_wait(struct i915_request *rq,
+				unsigned int flags,
+				long timeout);
+
 static const char *i915_fence_get_driver_name(struct dma_fence *fence)
 {
 	return "i915";
@@ -66,7 +70,7 @@ static signed long i915_fence_wait(struct dma_fence *fence,
 				   bool interruptible,
 				   signed long timeout)
 {
-	return i915_request_wait(to_request(fence), interruptible, timeout);
+	return __i915_request_wait(to_request(fence), interruptible, timeout);
 }
 
 static void i915_fence_release(struct dma_fence *fence)
@@ -1201,6 +1205,21 @@ static bool __i915_wait_request_check_and_reset(struct i915_request *request)
 long i915_request_wait(struct i915_request *rq,
 		       unsigned int flags,
 		       long timeout)
+{
+	long ret;
+
+	if (!lockdep_is_held(&rq->i915->drm.struct_mutex))
+		dma_fence_wait_acquire();
+	ret = __i915_request_wait(rq, flags, timeout);
+	if (!lockdep_is_held(&rq->i915->drm.struct_mutex))
+		dma_fence_wait_release();
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static long __i915_request_wait(struct i915_request *rq,
+				unsigned int flags,
+				long timeout)
 {
 	const int state = flags & I915_WAIT_INTERRUPTIBLE ?
 		TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE : TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
-- 
2.19.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-11-07 15:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-07 15:30 [PATCH 01/13] locking/lockdep: restore cross-release checks Daniel Vetter
2018-11-07 15:30 ` [PATCH 02/13] kthread: finer-grained lockdep/cross-release completion Daniel Vetter
2018-11-07 15:30 ` [PATCH 03/13] lockdep: Remove GFP_NOLOCKDEP annotation Daniel Vetter
2018-11-07 15:30 ` [PATCH 04/13] kernel/lockdep: Make cross-release a config option Daniel Vetter
2018-11-07 15:30 ` [PATCH 05/13] mm: Check if mmu notifier callbacks are allowed to fail Daniel Vetter
2018-11-07 15:30 ` [PATCH 06/13] mm, notifier: Catch sleeping/blocking for !blockable Daniel Vetter
2018-11-07 15:30 ` [PATCH 07/13] mm, notifier: Add a lockdep map for invalidate_range_start Daniel Vetter
2018-11-07 15:30 ` [PATCH 08/13] dma-fence: cross-release annotations Daniel Vetter
2018-11-07 15:30 ` [PATCH 09/13] reservation: Annotate dma_fence waits Daniel Vetter
2018-11-07 15:30 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2018-11-07 15:30 ` [PATCH 11/13] drm/i915: annotate intel_atomic_commit_fence_wait Daniel Vetter
2018-11-07 15:30 ` [PATCH 12/13] HAX FOR CI: Enable cross-release Daniel Vetter
2018-11-08  9:31   ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2018-11-08  9:41     ` Chris Wilson
2018-11-20 11:00       ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-20 10:58     ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-22 16:35       ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-23  8:53         ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-23 12:45           ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-23 13:24             ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-07 15:30 ` [PATCH 13/13] Revert "locking/lockdep, cpu/hotplug: Annotate AP thread" Daniel Vetter
2018-11-07 16:51 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/13] locking/lockdep: restore cross-release checks Patchwork
2018-11-07 16:57 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-11-07 17:07 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2018-11-08 10:04 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/13] locking/lockdep: restore cross-release checks (rev2) Patchwork
2018-11-08 10:10 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-11-08 10:21 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2018-11-20 12:33 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/13] locking/lockdep: restore cross-release checks (rev3) Patchwork
2018-11-20 12:39 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-11-20 12:53 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2018-11-22 16:39 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [01/13] locking/lockdep: restore cross-release checks (rev4) Patchwork
2018-11-23  8:57 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [01/13] locking/lockdep: restore cross-release checks (rev5) Patchwork
2018-11-23 12:51 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/13] locking/lockdep: restore cross-release checks (rev6) Patchwork
2018-11-23 12:57 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-11-23 13:08 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2018-11-23 13:55 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/13] locking/lockdep: restore cross-release checks (rev7) Patchwork
2018-11-23 14:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-11-23 14:12 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181107153019.26401-10-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --to=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.