From: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org> To: joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Cc: mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-msm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org Subject: [RESEND PATCH v4 1/1] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add binding doc for Qcom smmu-500 Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 14:35:07 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20181213090507.6269-1-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> (raw) Qcom's implementation of arm,mmu-500 works well with current arm-smmu driver implementation. Adding a soc specific compatible along with arm,mmu-500 makes the bindings future safe. Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> --- Hi Joerg, I am picking this out separately from the sdm845 smmu support series [1], so that this can go through iommu tree. The dt patch from the series [1] can be taken through arm-soc tree. Hi Will, As asked [2], here's the resend version of dt binding patch for sdm845. Kindly ack this so that Joerg can pull this in. Thanks Vivek [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/10636359/ [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10636363/ Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.txt | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.txt index a6504b37cc21..3133f3ba7567 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.txt @@ -27,6 +27,10 @@ conditions. "qcom,msm8996-smmu-v2", "qcom,smmu-v2", "qcom,sdm845-smmu-v2", "qcom,smmu-v2". + Qcom SoCs implementing "arm,mmu-500" must also include, + as below, SoC-specific compatibles: + "qcom,sdm845-smmu-500", "arm,mmu-500" + - reg : Base address and size of the SMMU. - #global-interrupts : The number of global interrupts exposed by the -- QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> To: joro@8bytes.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Subject: [RESEND PATCH v4 1/1] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add binding doc for Qcom smmu-500 Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 14:35:07 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20181213090507.6269-1-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> (raw) Qcom's implementation of arm,mmu-500 works well with current arm-smmu driver implementation. Adding a soc specific compatible along with arm,mmu-500 makes the bindings future safe. Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> --- Hi Joerg, I am picking this out separately from the sdm845 smmu support series [1], so that this can go through iommu tree. The dt patch from the series [1] can be taken through arm-soc tree. Hi Will, As asked [2], here's the resend version of dt binding patch for sdm845. Kindly ack this so that Joerg can pull this in. Thanks Vivek [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/10636359/ [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10636363/ Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.txt | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.txt index a6504b37cc21..3133f3ba7567 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.txt @@ -27,6 +27,10 @@ conditions. "qcom,msm8996-smmu-v2", "qcom,smmu-v2", "qcom,sdm845-smmu-v2", "qcom,smmu-v2". + Qcom SoCs implementing "arm,mmu-500" must also include, + as below, SoC-specific compatibles: + "qcom,sdm845-smmu-500", "arm,mmu-500" + - reg : Base address and size of the SMMU. - #global-interrupts : The number of global interrupts exposed by the -- QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
next reply other threads:[~2018-12-13 9:05 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-12-13 9:05 Vivek Gautam [this message] 2018-12-13 9:05 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 1/1] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add binding doc for Qcom smmu-500 Vivek Gautam 2018-12-13 10:45 ` Will Deacon 2018-12-17 5:33 ` Vivek Gautam 2018-12-17 5:33 ` Vivek Gautam 2018-12-17 9:17 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20181213090507.6269-1-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org \ --to=vivek.gautam-sgv2jx0feol9jmxxk+q4oq@public.gmane.org \ --cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \ --cc=iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \ --cc=joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \ --cc=linux-arm-msm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \ --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \ --cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \ --cc=robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \ --cc=will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.