All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
	Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>,
	Jerry Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>,
	Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [WIP PATCH 05/15] drm/dp_mst: Fix payload deallocation on hotplugs using malloc refs
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 20:25:34 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181214012604.13746-6-lyude@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181214012604.13746-1-lyude@redhat.com>

Up until now, freeing payloads on remote MST hubs that just had ports
removed has almost never worked because we've been relying on port
validation in order to stop us from accessing ports that have already
been freed from memory, but ports which need their payloads released due
to being removed will never be a valid part of the topology after
they've been removed.

Since we've introduced malloc refs, we can replace all of the validation
logic in payload helpers which are used for deallocation with some
well-placed malloc krefs. This ensures that regardless of whether or not
the ports are still valid and in the topology, any port which has an
allocated payload will remain allocated in memory until it's payloads
have been removed - finally allowing us to actually release said
payloads correctly.

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 54 +++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
index ae9d019af9f2..93f08bfd2ab3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
@@ -1989,10 +1989,6 @@ static int drm_dp_payload_send_msg(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
 	u8 sinks[DRM_DP_MAX_SDP_STREAMS];
 	int i;
 
-	port = drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated(mgr, port);
-	if (!port)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	port_num = port->port_num;
 	mstb = drm_dp_mst_topology_get_mstb_validated(mgr, port->parent);
 	if (!mstb) {
@@ -2000,10 +1996,8 @@ static int drm_dp_payload_send_msg(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
 							       port->parent,
 							       &port_num);
 
-		if (!mstb) {
-			drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port);
+		if (!mstb)
 			return -EINVAL;
-		}
 	}
 
 	txmsg = kzalloc(sizeof(*txmsg), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -2032,7 +2026,6 @@ static int drm_dp_payload_send_msg(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
 	kfree(txmsg);
 fail_put:
 	drm_dp_mst_topology_put_mstb(mstb);
-	drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -2137,15 +2130,16 @@ static int drm_dp_destroy_payload_step2(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
  */
 int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
 {
-	int i, j;
-	int cur_slots = 1;
 	struct drm_dp_payload req_payload;
 	struct drm_dp_mst_port *port;
+	int i, j;
+	int cur_slots = 1;
 
 	mutex_lock(&mgr->payload_lock);
 	for (i = 0; i < mgr->max_payloads; i++) {
 		struct drm_dp_vcpi *vcpi = mgr->proposed_vcpis[i];
 		struct drm_dp_payload *payload = &mgr->payloads[i];
+		bool put_port = false;
 
 		/* solve the current payloads - compare to the hw ones
 		   - update the hw view */
@@ -2153,12 +2147,20 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
 		if (vcpi) {
 			port = container_of(vcpi, struct drm_dp_mst_port,
 					    vcpi);
-			port = drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated(mgr,
-								      port);
-			if (!port) {
-				mutex_unlock(&mgr->payload_lock);
-				return -EINVAL;
+
+			/* Validated ports don't matter if we're releasing
+			 * VCPI
+			 */
+			if (vcpi->num_slots) {
+				port = drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated(
+				    mgr, port);
+				if (!port) {
+					mutex_unlock(&mgr->payload_lock);
+					return -EINVAL;
+				}
+				put_port = true;
 			}
+
 			req_payload.num_slots = vcpi->num_slots;
 			req_payload.vcpi = vcpi->vcpi;
 		} else {
@@ -2190,7 +2192,7 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
 		}
 		cur_slots += req_payload.num_slots;
 
-		if (port)
+		if (put_port)
 			drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port);
 	}
 
@@ -3005,6 +3007,8 @@ bool drm_dp_mst_allocate_vcpi(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
 	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("initing vcpi for pbn=%d slots=%d\n",
 		      pbn, port->vcpi.num_slots);
 
+	/* Keep port allocated until it's payload has been removed */
+	drm_dp_mst_get_port_malloc(port);
 	drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port);
 	return true;
 out:
@@ -3034,11 +3038,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_mst_get_vcpi_slots);
  */
 void drm_dp_mst_reset_vcpi_slots(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, struct drm_dp_mst_port *port)
 {
-	port = drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated(mgr, port);
-	if (!port)
-		return;
+	/*
+	 * A port with VCPI will remain allocated until it's VCPI is
+	 * released, no verified ref needed
+	 */
+
 	port->vcpi.num_slots = 0;
-	drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_mst_reset_vcpi_slots);
 
@@ -3050,16 +3055,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_mst_reset_vcpi_slots);
 void drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
 				struct drm_dp_mst_port *port)
 {
-	port = drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated(mgr, port);
-	if (!port)
-		return;
+	/*
+	 * A port with VCPI will remain allocated until it's VCPI is
+	 * released, no verified ref needed
+	 */
 
 	drm_dp_mst_put_payload_id(mgr, port->vcpi.vcpi);
 	port->vcpi.num_slots = 0;
 	port->vcpi.pbn = 0;
 	port->vcpi.aligned_pbn = 0;
 	port->vcpi.vcpi = 0;
-	drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port);
+	drm_dp_mst_put_port_malloc(port);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi);
 
-- 
2.19.2


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lyude Paul <lyude-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org,
	nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org,
	intel-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org,
	amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
Cc: Sean Paul <sean-p7yTbzM4H96eqtR555YLDQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Maxime Ripard
	<maxime.ripard-LDxbnhwyfcJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Maarten Lankhorst
	<maarten.lankhorst-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	David Airlie <airlied-cv59FeDIM0c@public.gmane.org>,
	Jerry Zuo <Jerry.Zuo-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel-/w4YWyX8dFk@public.gmane.org>,
	Harry Wentland <harry.wentland-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
Subject: [WIP PATCH 05/15] drm/dp_mst: Fix payload deallocation on hotplugs using malloc refs
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 20:25:34 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181214012604.13746-6-lyude@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181214012604.13746-1-lyude-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

Up until now, freeing payloads on remote MST hubs that just had ports
removed has almost never worked because we've been relying on port
validation in order to stop us from accessing ports that have already
been freed from memory, but ports which need their payloads released due
to being removed will never be a valid part of the topology after
they've been removed.

Since we've introduced malloc refs, we can replace all of the validation
logic in payload helpers which are used for deallocation with some
well-placed malloc krefs. This ensures that regardless of whether or not
the ports are still valid and in the topology, any port which has an
allocated payload will remain allocated in memory until it's payloads
have been removed - finally allowing us to actually release said
payloads correctly.

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 54 +++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
index ae9d019af9f2..93f08bfd2ab3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
@@ -1989,10 +1989,6 @@ static int drm_dp_payload_send_msg(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
 	u8 sinks[DRM_DP_MAX_SDP_STREAMS];
 	int i;
 
-	port = drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated(mgr, port);
-	if (!port)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	port_num = port->port_num;
 	mstb = drm_dp_mst_topology_get_mstb_validated(mgr, port->parent);
 	if (!mstb) {
@@ -2000,10 +1996,8 @@ static int drm_dp_payload_send_msg(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
 							       port->parent,
 							       &port_num);
 
-		if (!mstb) {
-			drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port);
+		if (!mstb)
 			return -EINVAL;
-		}
 	}
 
 	txmsg = kzalloc(sizeof(*txmsg), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -2032,7 +2026,6 @@ static int drm_dp_payload_send_msg(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
 	kfree(txmsg);
 fail_put:
 	drm_dp_mst_topology_put_mstb(mstb);
-	drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -2137,15 +2130,16 @@ static int drm_dp_destroy_payload_step2(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
  */
 int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
 {
-	int i, j;
-	int cur_slots = 1;
 	struct drm_dp_payload req_payload;
 	struct drm_dp_mst_port *port;
+	int i, j;
+	int cur_slots = 1;
 
 	mutex_lock(&mgr->payload_lock);
 	for (i = 0; i < mgr->max_payloads; i++) {
 		struct drm_dp_vcpi *vcpi = mgr->proposed_vcpis[i];
 		struct drm_dp_payload *payload = &mgr->payloads[i];
+		bool put_port = false;
 
 		/* solve the current payloads - compare to the hw ones
 		   - update the hw view */
@@ -2153,12 +2147,20 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
 		if (vcpi) {
 			port = container_of(vcpi, struct drm_dp_mst_port,
 					    vcpi);
-			port = drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated(mgr,
-								      port);
-			if (!port) {
-				mutex_unlock(&mgr->payload_lock);
-				return -EINVAL;
+
+			/* Validated ports don't matter if we're releasing
+			 * VCPI
+			 */
+			if (vcpi->num_slots) {
+				port = drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated(
+				    mgr, port);
+				if (!port) {
+					mutex_unlock(&mgr->payload_lock);
+					return -EINVAL;
+				}
+				put_port = true;
 			}
+
 			req_payload.num_slots = vcpi->num_slots;
 			req_payload.vcpi = vcpi->vcpi;
 		} else {
@@ -2190,7 +2192,7 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
 		}
 		cur_slots += req_payload.num_slots;
 
-		if (port)
+		if (put_port)
 			drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port);
 	}
 
@@ -3005,6 +3007,8 @@ bool drm_dp_mst_allocate_vcpi(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
 	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("initing vcpi for pbn=%d slots=%d\n",
 		      pbn, port->vcpi.num_slots);
 
+	/* Keep port allocated until it's payload has been removed */
+	drm_dp_mst_get_port_malloc(port);
 	drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port);
 	return true;
 out:
@@ -3034,11 +3038,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_mst_get_vcpi_slots);
  */
 void drm_dp_mst_reset_vcpi_slots(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, struct drm_dp_mst_port *port)
 {
-	port = drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated(mgr, port);
-	if (!port)
-		return;
+	/*
+	 * A port with VCPI will remain allocated until it's VCPI is
+	 * released, no verified ref needed
+	 */
+
 	port->vcpi.num_slots = 0;
-	drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_mst_reset_vcpi_slots);
 
@@ -3050,16 +3055,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_mst_reset_vcpi_slots);
 void drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
 				struct drm_dp_mst_port *port)
 {
-	port = drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated(mgr, port);
-	if (!port)
-		return;
+	/*
+	 * A port with VCPI will remain allocated until it's VCPI is
+	 * released, no verified ref needed
+	 */
 
 	drm_dp_mst_put_payload_id(mgr, port->vcpi.vcpi);
 	port->vcpi.num_slots = 0;
 	port->vcpi.pbn = 0;
 	port->vcpi.aligned_pbn = 0;
 	port->vcpi.vcpi = 0;
-	drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port);
+	drm_dp_mst_put_port_malloc(port);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi);
 
-- 
2.19.2

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-12-14  1:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-14  1:25 [WIP PATCH 00/15] MST refcounting/atomic helpers cleanup Lyude Paul
2018-12-14  1:25 ` [WIP PATCH 01/15] drm/dp_mst: Remove bogus conditional in drm_dp_update_payload_part1() Lyude Paul
2018-12-14  8:42   ` Daniel Vetter
2018-12-17 20:09     ` Wentland, Harry
2018-12-17 20:09       ` Wentland, Harry
2018-12-14  1:25 ` [WIP PATCH 02/15] drm/dp_mst: Refactor drm_dp_update_payload_part1() Lyude Paul
2018-12-14  8:47   ` Daniel Vetter
2018-12-14  8:47     ` Daniel Vetter
2018-12-17 20:27     ` Wentland, Harry
2018-12-17 20:27       ` Wentland, Harry
2018-12-14  1:25 ` [WIP PATCH 03/15] drm/dp_mst: Introduce new refcounting scheme for mstbs and ports Lyude Paul
2018-12-14  1:25   ` Lyude Paul
2018-12-14  9:29   ` Daniel Vetter
2018-12-14  9:29     ` Daniel Vetter
2018-12-18 21:27     ` Lyude Paul
2018-12-18 21:27       ` Lyude Paul
2018-12-19 12:48       ` Daniel Vetter
2018-12-19 12:48         ` Daniel Vetter
2018-12-19 18:36         ` Lyude Paul
2018-12-14  1:25 ` [WIP PATCH 04/15] drm/dp_mst: Stop releasing VCPI when removing ports from topology Lyude Paul
2018-12-14  9:40   ` Daniel Vetter
2018-12-14  1:25 ` Lyude Paul [this message]
2018-12-14  1:25   ` [WIP PATCH 05/15] drm/dp_mst: Fix payload deallocation on hotplugs using malloc refs Lyude Paul
2018-12-14  9:38   ` Daniel Vetter
2018-12-14  9:38     ` Daniel Vetter
2018-12-18 22:02     ` Lyude Paul
2018-12-18 22:02       ` Lyude Paul
2018-12-14  1:25 ` [WIP PATCH 06/15] drm/i915: Keep malloc references to MST ports Lyude Paul
2018-12-14  1:25   ` Lyude Paul
2018-12-14  9:32   ` Daniel Vetter
2018-12-18 21:52     ` Lyude Paul
2018-12-18 21:52       ` Lyude Paul
2018-12-19 13:20       ` Daniel Vetter
2018-12-14  1:25 ` [WIP PATCH 07/15] drm/nouveau: Remove bogus cleanup in nv50_mstm_add_connector() Lyude Paul
2018-12-14  1:25 ` [WIP PATCH 08/15] drm/nouveau: Remove unnecessary VCPI checks in nv50_msto_cleanup() Lyude Paul
2018-12-14  1:25 ` [WIP PATCH 09/15] drm/nouveau: Fix potential use-after-frees for MSTCs Lyude Paul
2018-12-14  1:25   ` Lyude Paul
2018-12-14  1:25 ` [WIP PATCH 10/15] drm/nouveau: Stop unsetting mstc->port, use malloc refs Lyude Paul
2018-12-14  1:25   ` Lyude Paul
2018-12-14  1:25 ` [WIP PATCH 11/15] drm/nouveau: Grab payload lock in nv50_msto_payload() Lyude Paul
2018-12-14  1:25   ` Lyude Paul
2018-12-14  1:25 ` [WIP PATCH 12/15] drm/dp_mst: Add some atomic state iterator macros Lyude Paul
2018-12-14  1:25   ` Lyude Paul
2018-12-14  1:25 ` [WIP PATCH 13/15] drm/dp_mst: Start tracking per-port VCPI allocations Lyude Paul
2018-12-14  1:25   ` Lyude Paul
2018-12-14 16:37   ` Daniel Vetter
2018-12-14 16:37     ` Daniel Vetter
2018-12-14  1:25 ` [WIP PATCH 14/15] drm/dp_mst: Check payload count in drm_dp_mst_atomic_check() Lyude Paul
2018-12-14  1:25 ` [WIP PATCH 15/15] drm/nouveau: Use atomic VCPI helpers for MST Lyude Paul
2018-12-14  1:38 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for MST refcounting/atomic helpers cleanup Patchwork
2018-12-14  1:42 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-12-14  2:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181214012604.13746-6-lyude@redhat.com \
    --to=lyude@redhat.com \
    --cc=Jerry.Zuo@amd.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=harry.wentland@amd.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@bootlin.com \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=sean@poorly.run \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.