From: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: Change wrong print type to display the real value for i386-PAE Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2018 11:34:50 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20181226033450.5098-1-fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw) There is a wrong display for memory address of NUMA node in i386-PAE. That may mislead developers. Here is a debian9-32bit with PAE in QEMU guest whose total memory is more than 4G: qemu-system-i386 \ -hda /var/lib/libvirt/images/debian32.qcow2 \ -m 5G \ -enable-kvm \ -smp 10 \ -numa node,mem=512M,nodeid=0,cpus=0 \ -numa node,mem=512M,nodeid=1,cpus=1 \ -numa node,mem=512M,nodeid=2,cpus=2 \ -numa node,mem=512M,nodeid=3,cpus=3 \ -numa node,mem=512M,nodeid=4,cpus=4 \ -numa node,mem=512M,nodeid=5,cpus=5 \ -numa node,mem=512M,nodeid=6,cpus=6 \ -numa node,mem=512M,nodeid=7,cpus=7 \ -numa node,mem=512M,nodeid=8,cpus=8 \ -numa node,mem=512M,nodeid=9,cpus=9 \ -serial stdio Because of the wrong value type, it prints as below: [ 0.021049] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x0 length 0xa0000) in proximity domain 0 enabled [ 0.021740] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x100000 length 0x1ff00000) in proximity domain 0 enabled [ 0.022425] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x20000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 1 enabled [ 0.023092] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x40000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 2 enabled [ 0.023764] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x60000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 3 enabled [ 0.024431] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x80000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 4 enabled [ 0.025104] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0xa0000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 5 enabled [ 0.025791] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x0 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 6 enabled [ 0.026412] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x20000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 7 enabled [ 0.027118] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x40000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 8 enabled [ 0.027802] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x60000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 9 enabled The upper half of start address from domain 6 to domain 9 was cut so that developers get a wrong value. Fix the value type, it prints as below: [ 0.023698] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x0 length 0xa0000) in proximity domain 0 enabled [ 0.024325] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x100000 length 0x1ff00000) in proximity domain 0 enabled [ 0.024981] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x20000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 1 enabled [ 0.025659] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x40000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 2 enabled [ 0.026317] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x60000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 3 enabled [ 0.026980] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x80000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 4 enabled [ 0.027635] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0xa0000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 5 enabled [ 0.028311] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x100000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 6 enabled [ 0.028985] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x120000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 7 enabled [ 0.029667] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x140000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 8 enabled [ 0.030334] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x160000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 9 enabled The start address from domain 6 to domain 9 is the real value. Signed-off-by: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> --- drivers/acpi/numa.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa.c b/drivers/acpi/numa.c index 274699463b4f..7bbbf8256a41 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/numa.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa.c @@ -146,9 +146,9 @@ acpi_table_print_srat_entry(struct acpi_subtable_header *header) { struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity *p = (struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity *)header; - pr_debug("SRAT Memory (0x%lx length 0x%lx) in proximity domain %d %s%s%s\n", - (unsigned long)p->base_address, - (unsigned long)p->length, + pr_debug("SRAT Memory (0x%llx length 0x%llx) in proximity domain %d %s%s%s\n", + (unsigned long long)p->base_address, + (unsigned long long)p->length, p->proximity_domain, (p->flags & ACPI_SRAT_MEM_ENABLED) ? "enabled" : "disabled", -- 2.19.2
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> Cc: <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, <lenb@kernel.org>, <rafael@kernel.org> Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: Change wrong print type to display the real value for i386-PAE Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2018 11:34:50 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20181226033450.5098-1-fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw) There is a wrong display for memory address of NUMA node in i386-PAE. That may mislead developers. Here is a debian9-32bit with PAE in QEMU guest whose total memory is more than 4G: qemu-system-i386 \ -hda /var/lib/libvirt/images/debian32.qcow2 \ -m 5G \ -enable-kvm \ -smp 10 \ -numa node,mem=512M,nodeid=0,cpus=0 \ -numa node,mem=512M,nodeid=1,cpus=1 \ -numa node,mem=512M,nodeid=2,cpus=2 \ -numa node,mem=512M,nodeid=3,cpus=3 \ -numa node,mem=512M,nodeid=4,cpus=4 \ -numa node,mem=512M,nodeid=5,cpus=5 \ -numa node,mem=512M,nodeid=6,cpus=6 \ -numa node,mem=512M,nodeid=7,cpus=7 \ -numa node,mem=512M,nodeid=8,cpus=8 \ -numa node,mem=512M,nodeid=9,cpus=9 \ -serial stdio Because of the wrong value type, it prints as below: [ 0.021049] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x0 length 0xa0000) in proximity domain 0 enabled [ 0.021740] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x100000 length 0x1ff00000) in proximity domain 0 enabled [ 0.022425] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x20000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 1 enabled [ 0.023092] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x40000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 2 enabled [ 0.023764] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x60000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 3 enabled [ 0.024431] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x80000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 4 enabled [ 0.025104] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0xa0000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 5 enabled [ 0.025791] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x0 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 6 enabled [ 0.026412] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x20000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 7 enabled [ 0.027118] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x40000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 8 enabled [ 0.027802] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x60000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 9 enabled The upper half of start address from domain 6 to domain 9 was cut so that developers get a wrong value. Fix the value type, it prints as below: [ 0.023698] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x0 length 0xa0000) in proximity domain 0 enabled [ 0.024325] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x100000 length 0x1ff00000) in proximity domain 0 enabled [ 0.024981] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x20000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 1 enabled [ 0.025659] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x40000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 2 enabled [ 0.026317] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x60000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 3 enabled [ 0.026980] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x80000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 4 enabled [ 0.027635] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0xa0000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 5 enabled [ 0.028311] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x100000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 6 enabled [ 0.028985] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x120000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 7 enabled [ 0.029667] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x140000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 8 enabled [ 0.030334] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x160000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 9 enabled The start address from domain 6 to domain 9 is the real value. Signed-off-by: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> --- drivers/acpi/numa.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa.c b/drivers/acpi/numa.c index 274699463b4f..7bbbf8256a41 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/numa.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa.c @@ -146,9 +146,9 @@ acpi_table_print_srat_entry(struct acpi_subtable_header *header) { struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity *p = (struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity *)header; - pr_debug("SRAT Memory (0x%lx length 0x%lx) in proximity domain %d %s%s%s\n", - (unsigned long)p->base_address, - (unsigned long)p->length, + pr_debug("SRAT Memory (0x%llx length 0x%llx) in proximity domain %d %s%s%s\n", + (unsigned long long)p->base_address, + (unsigned long long)p->length, p->proximity_domain, (p->flags & ACPI_SRAT_MEM_ENABLED) ? "enabled" : "disabled", -- 2.19.2
next reply other threads:[~2018-12-26 3:34 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-12-26 3:34 Chao Fan [this message] 2018-12-26 3:34 ` [PATCH] ACPI: Change wrong print type to display the real value for i386-PAE Chao Fan 2019-01-11 10:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20181226033450.5098-1-fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \ --to=fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \ --cc=lenb@kernel.org \ --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=rafael@kernel.org \ --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.