All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>,
	Vivek Trivedi <t.vivek@samsung.com>,
	Orion Poplawski <orion@nwra.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] fanotify: Use interruptible wait when waiting for permission events
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 15:54:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190213145443.26836-7-jack@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190213145443.26836-1-jack@suse.cz>

When waiting for response to fanotify permission events, we currently
use uninterruptible waits. That makes code simple however it can cause
lots of processes to end up in uninterruptible sleep with hard reboot
being the only alternative in case fanotify listener process stops
responding (e.g. due to a bug in its implementation). Uninterruptible
sleep also makes system hibernation fail if the listener gets frozen
before the process generating fanotify permission event.

Fix these problems by using interruptible sleep for waiting for response
to fanotify event. This is slightly tricky though - we have to
detect when the event got already reported to userspace as in that
case we must not free the event. Instead we push the responsibility for
freeing the event to the process that will write response to the
event.

Reported-by: Orion Poplawski <orion@nwra.com>
Reported-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
 fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.h |  3 ++-
 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
index e725831be161..2e40d5d8660b 100644
--- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
+++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
@@ -57,6 +57,13 @@ static int fanotify_merge(struct list_head *list, struct fsnotify_event *event)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Wait for response to permission event. The function also takes care of
+ * freeing the permission event (or offloads that in case the wait is canceled
+ * by a signal). The function returns 0 in case access got allowed by userspace,
+ * -EPERM in case userspace disallowed the access, and -ERESTARTSYS in case
+ * the wait got interrupted by a signal.
+ */
 static int fanotify_get_response(struct fsnotify_group *group,
 				 struct fanotify_perm_event_info *event,
 				 struct fsnotify_iter_info *iter_info)
@@ -65,8 +72,29 @@ static int fanotify_get_response(struct fsnotify_group *group,
 
 	pr_debug("%s: group=%p event=%p\n", __func__, group, event);
 
-	wait_event(group->fanotify_data.access_waitq,
-		   event->state == FAN_EVENT_ANSWERED);
+	ret = wait_event_interruptible(group->fanotify_data.access_waitq,
+				       event->state == FAN_EVENT_ANSWERED);
+	/* Signal pending? */
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		spin_lock(&group->notification_lock);
+		/* Event reported to userspace and no answer yet? */
+		if (event->state == FAN_EVENT_REPORTED) {
+			/* Event will get freed once userspace answers to it */
+			event->state = FAN_EVENT_CANCELED;
+			spin_unlock(&group->notification_lock);
+			return ret;
+		}
+		/* Event not yet reported? Just remove it. */
+		if (event->state == FAN_EVENT_INIT)
+			fsnotify_remove_queued_event(group, &event->fae.fse);
+		/*
+		 * Event may be also answered in case signal delivery raced
+		 * with wakeup. In that case we have nothing to do besides
+		 * freeing the event and reporting error.
+		 */
+		spin_unlock(&group->notification_lock);
+		goto out;
+	}
 
 	/* userspace responded, convert to something usable */
 	switch (event->response & ~FAN_AUDIT) {
@@ -84,6 +112,8 @@ static int fanotify_get_response(struct fsnotify_group *group,
 
 	pr_debug("%s: group=%p event=%p about to return ret=%d\n", __func__,
 		 group, event, ret);
+out:
+	fsnotify_destroy_event(group, &event->fae.fse);
 	
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -255,7 +285,6 @@ static int fanotify_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,
 	} else if (fanotify_is_perm_event(mask)) {
 		ret = fanotify_get_response(group, FANOTIFY_PE(fsn_event),
 					    iter_info);
-		fsnotify_destroy_event(group, fsn_event);
 	}
 finish:
 	if (fanotify_is_perm_event(mask))
diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.h b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.h
index 98d58939777c..bbdd2adfbf0f 100644
--- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.h
+++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.h
@@ -26,7 +26,8 @@ struct fanotify_event_info {
 enum {
 	FAN_EVENT_INIT,
 	FAN_EVENT_REPORTED,
-	FAN_EVENT_ANSWERED
+	FAN_EVENT_ANSWERED,
+	FAN_EVENT_CANCELED,
 };
 
 /*
-- 
2.16.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-02-13 14:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-13 14:54 [PATCH v2 0/6] fanotify: Make wait for permission event response interruptible Jan Kara
2019-02-13 14:54 ` [PATCH 1/6] fanotify: Fold dequeue_event() into process_access_response() Jan Kara
2019-02-13 19:42   ` Amir Goldstein
2019-02-13 14:54 ` [PATCH 2/6] fanotify: Move locking inside get_one_event() Jan Kara
2019-02-13 20:23   ` Amir Goldstein
2019-02-13 14:54 ` [PATCH 3/6] fsnotify: Create function to remove event from notification list Jan Kara
2019-02-13 20:23   ` Amir Goldstein
2019-02-13 14:54 ` [PATCH 4/6] fanotify: Simplify cleaning of access_list Jan Kara
2019-02-13 20:25   ` Amir Goldstein
2019-02-13 14:54 ` [PATCH 5/6] fanotify: Track permission event state Jan Kara
2019-02-13 20:33   ` Amir Goldstein
2019-02-13 14:54 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2019-02-13 21:02   ` [PATCH 6/6] fanotify: Use interruptible wait when waiting for permission events Amir Goldstein
2019-02-14 18:01     ` Jan Kara
2019-02-14 18:53       ` Amir Goldstein
2019-02-18 11:04         ` Jan Kara
2019-02-20 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] fanotify: Make wait for permission event response interruptible Orion Poplawski
2019-02-21  9:02   ` Marko Rauhamaa
2019-02-21 10:53   ` Jan Kara
2019-02-21 10:55     ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190213145443.26836-7-jack@suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=orion@nwra.com \
    --cc=t.vivek@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.