All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@mediatek.com>
To: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: James Liao <jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com>,
	Fan Chen <fan.chen@mediatek.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>, Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@mediatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 07/14] soc: mediatek: Refactor sram control
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 16:01:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190319080140.24055-8-weiyi.lu@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190319080140.24055-1-weiyi.lu@mediatek.com>

Put sram enable and disable control in separate functions.

Signed-off-by: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
index 3e9be07a2627..65b734b40098 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
@@ -235,12 +235,55 @@ static void scpsys_clk_disable(struct clk *clk[], int max_num)
 	}
 }
 
+static int scpsys_sram_enable(struct scp_domain *scpd, void __iomem *ctl_addr)
+{
+	u32 val;
+	u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits;
+	int tmp;
+
+	val = readl(ctl_addr) & ~scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits;
+	writel(val, ctl_addr);
+
+	/* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 0 or have a force wait */
+	if (MTK_SCPD_CAPS(scpd, MTK_SCPD_FWAIT_SRAM)) {
+		/*
+		 * Currently, MTK_SCPD_FWAIT_SRAM is necessary only for
+		 * MT7622_POWER_DOMAIN_WB and thus just a trivial setup
+		 * is applied here.
+		 */
+		usleep_range(12000, 12100);
+	} else {
+		/* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 1 or 0 */
+		int ret = readl_poll_timeout(ctl_addr, tmp,
+				(tmp & pdn_ack) == 0,
+				MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int scpsys_sram_disable(struct scp_domain *scpd, void __iomem *ctl_addr)
+{
+	u32 val;
+	u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits;
+	int tmp;
+
+	val = readl(ctl_addr) | scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits;
+	writel(val, ctl_addr);
+
+	/* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 1 or 0 */
+	return readl_poll_timeout(ctl_addr, tmp,
+			(tmp & pdn_ack) == pdn_ack,
+			MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
+}
+
 static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
 {
 	struct scp_domain *scpd = container_of(genpd, struct scp_domain, genpd);
 	struct scp *scp = scpd->scp;
 	void __iomem *ctl_addr = scp->base + scpd->data->ctl_offs;
-	u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits;
 	u32 val;
 	int ret, tmp;
 
@@ -252,6 +295,7 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
 	if (ret)
 		goto err_clk;
 
+	/* subsys power on */
 	val = readl(ctl_addr);
 	val |= PWR_ON_BIT;
 	writel(val, ctl_addr);
@@ -273,24 +317,9 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
 	val |= PWR_RST_B_BIT;
 	writel(val, ctl_addr);
 
-	val &= ~scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits;
-	writel(val, ctl_addr);
-
-	/* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 0 or have a force wait */
-	if (MTK_SCPD_CAPS(scpd, MTK_SCPD_FWAIT_SRAM)) {
-		/*
-		 * Currently, MTK_SCPD_FWAIT_SRAM is necessary only for
-		 * MT7622_POWER_DOMAIN_WB and thus just a trivial setup is
-		 * applied here.
-		 */
-		usleep_range(12000, 12100);
-
-	} else {
-		ret = readl_poll_timeout(ctl_addr, tmp, (tmp & pdn_ack) == 0,
-					 MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
-		if (ret < 0)
-			goto err_pwr_ack;
-	}
+	ret = scpsys_sram_enable(scpd, ctl_addr);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		goto err_pwr_ack;
 
 	if (scpd->data->bus_prot_mask) {
 		ret = mtk_infracfg_clear_bus_protection(scp->infracfg,
@@ -317,7 +346,6 @@ static int scpsys_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
 	struct scp_domain *scpd = container_of(genpd, struct scp_domain, genpd);
 	struct scp *scp = scpd->scp;
 	void __iomem *ctl_addr = scp->base + scpd->data->ctl_offs;
-	u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits;
 	u32 val;
 	int ret, tmp;
 
@@ -329,17 +357,12 @@ static int scpsys_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
 			goto out;
 	}
 
-	val = readl(ctl_addr);
-	val |= scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits;
-	writel(val, ctl_addr);
-
-	/* wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 1 */
-	ret = readl_poll_timeout(ctl_addr, tmp, (tmp & pdn_ack) == pdn_ack,
-				 MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
+	ret = scpsys_sram_disable(scpd, ctl_addr);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
 
-	val |= PWR_ISO_BIT;
+	/* subsys power off */
+	val = readl(ctl_addr) | PWR_ISO_BIT;
 	writel(val, ctl_addr);
 
 	val &= ~PWR_RST_B_BIT;
-- 
2.18.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@mediatek.com>
To: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: James Liao <jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com>,
	Fan Chen <fan.chen@mediatek.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@mediatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 07/14] soc: mediatek: Refactor sram control
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 16:01:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190319080140.24055-8-weiyi.lu@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190319080140.24055-1-weiyi.lu@mediatek.com>

Put sram enable and disable control in separate functions.

Signed-off-by: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
index 3e9be07a2627..65b734b40098 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
@@ -235,12 +235,55 @@ static void scpsys_clk_disable(struct clk *clk[], int max_num)
 	}
 }
 
+static int scpsys_sram_enable(struct scp_domain *scpd, void __iomem *ctl_addr)
+{
+	u32 val;
+	u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits;
+	int tmp;
+
+	val = readl(ctl_addr) & ~scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits;
+	writel(val, ctl_addr);
+
+	/* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 0 or have a force wait */
+	if (MTK_SCPD_CAPS(scpd, MTK_SCPD_FWAIT_SRAM)) {
+		/*
+		 * Currently, MTK_SCPD_FWAIT_SRAM is necessary only for
+		 * MT7622_POWER_DOMAIN_WB and thus just a trivial setup
+		 * is applied here.
+		 */
+		usleep_range(12000, 12100);
+	} else {
+		/* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 1 or 0 */
+		int ret = readl_poll_timeout(ctl_addr, tmp,
+				(tmp & pdn_ack) == 0,
+				MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int scpsys_sram_disable(struct scp_domain *scpd, void __iomem *ctl_addr)
+{
+	u32 val;
+	u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits;
+	int tmp;
+
+	val = readl(ctl_addr) | scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits;
+	writel(val, ctl_addr);
+
+	/* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 1 or 0 */
+	return readl_poll_timeout(ctl_addr, tmp,
+			(tmp & pdn_ack) == pdn_ack,
+			MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
+}
+
 static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
 {
 	struct scp_domain *scpd = container_of(genpd, struct scp_domain, genpd);
 	struct scp *scp = scpd->scp;
 	void __iomem *ctl_addr = scp->base + scpd->data->ctl_offs;
-	u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits;
 	u32 val;
 	int ret, tmp;
 
@@ -252,6 +295,7 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
 	if (ret)
 		goto err_clk;
 
+	/* subsys power on */
 	val = readl(ctl_addr);
 	val |= PWR_ON_BIT;
 	writel(val, ctl_addr);
@@ -273,24 +317,9 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
 	val |= PWR_RST_B_BIT;
 	writel(val, ctl_addr);
 
-	val &= ~scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits;
-	writel(val, ctl_addr);
-
-	/* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 0 or have a force wait */
-	if (MTK_SCPD_CAPS(scpd, MTK_SCPD_FWAIT_SRAM)) {
-		/*
-		 * Currently, MTK_SCPD_FWAIT_SRAM is necessary only for
-		 * MT7622_POWER_DOMAIN_WB and thus just a trivial setup is
-		 * applied here.
-		 */
-		usleep_range(12000, 12100);
-
-	} else {
-		ret = readl_poll_timeout(ctl_addr, tmp, (tmp & pdn_ack) == 0,
-					 MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
-		if (ret < 0)
-			goto err_pwr_ack;
-	}
+	ret = scpsys_sram_enable(scpd, ctl_addr);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		goto err_pwr_ack;
 
 	if (scpd->data->bus_prot_mask) {
 		ret = mtk_infracfg_clear_bus_protection(scp->infracfg,
@@ -317,7 +346,6 @@ static int scpsys_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
 	struct scp_domain *scpd = container_of(genpd, struct scp_domain, genpd);
 	struct scp *scp = scpd->scp;
 	void __iomem *ctl_addr = scp->base + scpd->data->ctl_offs;
-	u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits;
 	u32 val;
 	int ret, tmp;
 
@@ -329,17 +357,12 @@ static int scpsys_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
 			goto out;
 	}
 
-	val = readl(ctl_addr);
-	val |= scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits;
-	writel(val, ctl_addr);
-
-	/* wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 1 */
-	ret = readl_poll_timeout(ctl_addr, tmp, (tmp & pdn_ack) == pdn_ack,
-				 MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
+	ret = scpsys_sram_disable(scpd, ctl_addr);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
 
-	val |= PWR_ISO_BIT;
+	/* subsys power off */
+	val = readl(ctl_addr) | PWR_ISO_BIT;
 	writel(val, ctl_addr);
 
 	val &= ~PWR_RST_B_BIT;
-- 
2.18.0

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@mediatek.com>
To: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: James Liao <jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com>,
	Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@mediatek.com>,
	srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Fan Chen <fan.chen@mediatek.com>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 07/14] soc: mediatek: Refactor sram control
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 16:01:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190319080140.24055-8-weiyi.lu@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190319080140.24055-1-weiyi.lu@mediatek.com>

Put sram enable and disable control in separate functions.

Signed-off-by: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
index 3e9be07a2627..65b734b40098 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
@@ -235,12 +235,55 @@ static void scpsys_clk_disable(struct clk *clk[], int max_num)
 	}
 }
 
+static int scpsys_sram_enable(struct scp_domain *scpd, void __iomem *ctl_addr)
+{
+	u32 val;
+	u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits;
+	int tmp;
+
+	val = readl(ctl_addr) & ~scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits;
+	writel(val, ctl_addr);
+
+	/* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 0 or have a force wait */
+	if (MTK_SCPD_CAPS(scpd, MTK_SCPD_FWAIT_SRAM)) {
+		/*
+		 * Currently, MTK_SCPD_FWAIT_SRAM is necessary only for
+		 * MT7622_POWER_DOMAIN_WB and thus just a trivial setup
+		 * is applied here.
+		 */
+		usleep_range(12000, 12100);
+	} else {
+		/* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 1 or 0 */
+		int ret = readl_poll_timeout(ctl_addr, tmp,
+				(tmp & pdn_ack) == 0,
+				MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int scpsys_sram_disable(struct scp_domain *scpd, void __iomem *ctl_addr)
+{
+	u32 val;
+	u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits;
+	int tmp;
+
+	val = readl(ctl_addr) | scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits;
+	writel(val, ctl_addr);
+
+	/* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 1 or 0 */
+	return readl_poll_timeout(ctl_addr, tmp,
+			(tmp & pdn_ack) == pdn_ack,
+			MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
+}
+
 static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
 {
 	struct scp_domain *scpd = container_of(genpd, struct scp_domain, genpd);
 	struct scp *scp = scpd->scp;
 	void __iomem *ctl_addr = scp->base + scpd->data->ctl_offs;
-	u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits;
 	u32 val;
 	int ret, tmp;
 
@@ -252,6 +295,7 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
 	if (ret)
 		goto err_clk;
 
+	/* subsys power on */
 	val = readl(ctl_addr);
 	val |= PWR_ON_BIT;
 	writel(val, ctl_addr);
@@ -273,24 +317,9 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
 	val |= PWR_RST_B_BIT;
 	writel(val, ctl_addr);
 
-	val &= ~scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits;
-	writel(val, ctl_addr);
-
-	/* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 0 or have a force wait */
-	if (MTK_SCPD_CAPS(scpd, MTK_SCPD_FWAIT_SRAM)) {
-		/*
-		 * Currently, MTK_SCPD_FWAIT_SRAM is necessary only for
-		 * MT7622_POWER_DOMAIN_WB and thus just a trivial setup is
-		 * applied here.
-		 */
-		usleep_range(12000, 12100);
-
-	} else {
-		ret = readl_poll_timeout(ctl_addr, tmp, (tmp & pdn_ack) == 0,
-					 MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
-		if (ret < 0)
-			goto err_pwr_ack;
-	}
+	ret = scpsys_sram_enable(scpd, ctl_addr);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		goto err_pwr_ack;
 
 	if (scpd->data->bus_prot_mask) {
 		ret = mtk_infracfg_clear_bus_protection(scp->infracfg,
@@ -317,7 +346,6 @@ static int scpsys_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
 	struct scp_domain *scpd = container_of(genpd, struct scp_domain, genpd);
 	struct scp *scp = scpd->scp;
 	void __iomem *ctl_addr = scp->base + scpd->data->ctl_offs;
-	u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits;
 	u32 val;
 	int ret, tmp;
 
@@ -329,17 +357,12 @@ static int scpsys_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
 			goto out;
 	}
 
-	val = readl(ctl_addr);
-	val |= scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits;
-	writel(val, ctl_addr);
-
-	/* wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 1 */
-	ret = readl_poll_timeout(ctl_addr, tmp, (tmp & pdn_ack) == pdn_ack,
-				 MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
+	ret = scpsys_sram_disable(scpd, ctl_addr);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
 
-	val |= PWR_ISO_BIT;
+	/* subsys power off */
+	val = readl(ctl_addr) | PWR_ISO_BIT;
 	writel(val, ctl_addr);
 
 	val &= ~PWR_RST_B_BIT;
-- 
2.18.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-03-19  8:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-19  8:01 [PATCH v5 00/14] Mediatek MT8183 scpsys support Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01 ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01 ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01 ` [PATCH v5 01/14] dt-bindings: mediatek: Add property to mt8183 smi-common Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01   ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01   ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01 ` [PATCH v5 02/14] dt-bindings: soc: Add MT8183 power dt-bindings Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01   ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01   ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01 ` [PATCH v5 03/14] soc: mediatek: Switch to SPDX license identifier Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01   ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01   ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01 ` [PATCH v5 04/14] soc: mediatek: Refactor polling timeout and documentation Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01   ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01   ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19 11:45   ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-03-19 11:45     ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-03-19 11:45     ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-06-19  9:11     ` Weiyi Lu
2019-06-19  9:11       ` Weiyi Lu
2019-06-19  9:11       ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01 ` [PATCH v5 05/14] soc: mediatek: Refactor regulator control Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01   ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01   ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01 ` [PATCH v5 06/14] soc: mediatek: Refactor clock control Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01   ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01   ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19 12:02   ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-03-19 12:02     ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-03-19 12:02     ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-06-19  9:19     ` Weiyi Lu
2019-06-19  9:19       ` Weiyi Lu
2019-06-19  9:19       ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01 ` Weiyi Lu [this message]
2019-03-19  8:01   ` [PATCH v5 07/14] soc: mediatek: Refactor sram control Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01   ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19 12:07   ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-03-19 12:07     ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-03-19 12:07     ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-06-19  9:30     ` Weiyi Lu
2019-06-19  9:30       ` Weiyi Lu
2019-06-19  9:30       ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01 ` [PATCH v5 08/14] soc: mediatek: Refactor bus protection control Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01   ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01   ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19 12:09   ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-03-19 12:09     ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-03-19 12:09     ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-06-19  9:31     ` Weiyi Lu
2019-06-19  9:31       ` Weiyi Lu
2019-06-19  9:31       ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01 ` [PATCH v5 09/14] soc: mediatek: Add basic_clk_name to scp_power_data Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01   ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01   ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-21  6:02   ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-03-21  6:02     ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-03-21  6:02     ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-06-19  9:36     ` Weiyi Lu
2019-06-19  9:36       ` Weiyi Lu
2019-06-19  9:36       ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01 ` [PATCH v5 10/14] soc: mediatek: Add multiple step bus protection control Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01   ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01   ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-21  5:57   ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-03-21  5:57     ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-03-21  5:57     ` Nicolas Boichat
2019-06-19  9:43     ` Weiyi Lu
2019-06-19  9:43       ` Weiyi Lu
2019-06-19  9:43       ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01 ` [PATCH v5 11/14] soc: mediatek: Add subsys clock control for bus protection Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01   ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01   ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01 ` [PATCH v5 12/14] soc: mediatek: Add extra sram control Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01   ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01   ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01 ` [PATCH v5 13/14] soc: mediatek: Add MT8183 scpsys support Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01   ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01   ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01 ` [PATCH v5 14/14] arm64: dts: Add power controller device node of MT8183 Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01   ` Weiyi Lu
2019-03-19  8:01   ` Weiyi Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190319080140.24055-8-weiyi.lu@mediatek.com \
    --to=weiyi.lu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
    --cc=fan.chen@mediatek.com \
    --cc=jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.