[PATCH 2/4] arm: Use generic mmap top-down layout

From: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>,
	James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] arm: Use generic mmap top-down layout
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 03:42:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190322074225.22282-3-alex@ghiti.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190322074225.22282-1-alex@ghiti.fr>

arm uses a top-down layout by default that fits the generic functions.
At the same time, this commit allows to fix the following problems:

- one uncovered and not fixed for arm here:
https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1429066.html

- the use of TASK_SIZE instead of STACK_TOP in mmap_base which, when
  address space of a task is 26 bits, would assign mmap base way too high.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>
---
 arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h |  2 +-
 arch/arm/mm/mmap.c               | 52 --------------------------------
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 53 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h
index 57fe73ea0f72..03837d325a2f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static inline void prefetchw(const void *ptr)
 #endif
 #endif
 
-#define HAVE_ARCH_PICK_MMAP_LAYOUT
+#define ARCH_WANT_DEFAULT_TOPDOWN_MMAP_LAYOUT
 
 #endif
 
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmap.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmap.c
index f866870db749..b8d912ac9e61 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmap.c
@@ -17,33 +17,6 @@
 	((((addr)+SHMLBA-1)&~(SHMLBA-1)) +	\
 	 (((pgoff)<<PAGE_SHIFT) & (SHMLBA-1)))
 
-/* gap between mmap and stack */
-#define MIN_GAP (128*1024*1024UL)
-#define MAX_GAP ((TASK_SIZE)/6*5)
-
-static int mmap_is_legacy(struct rlimit *rlim_stack)
-{
-	if (current->personality & ADDR_COMPAT_LAYOUT)
-		return 1;
-
-	if (rlim_stack->rlim_cur == RLIM_INFINITY)
-		return 1;
-
-	return sysctl_legacy_va_layout;
-}
-
-static unsigned long mmap_base(unsigned long rnd, struct rlimit *rlim_stack)
-{
-	unsigned long gap = rlim_stack->rlim_cur;
-
-	if (gap < MIN_GAP)
-		gap = MIN_GAP;
-	else if (gap > MAX_GAP)
-		gap = MAX_GAP;
-
-	return PAGE_ALIGN(TASK_SIZE - gap - rnd);
-}
-
 /*
  * We need to ensure that shared mappings are correctly aligned to
  * avoid aliasing issues with VIPT caches.  We need to ensure that
@@ -171,31 +144,6 @@ arch_get_unmapped_area_topdown(struct file *filp, const unsigned long addr0,
 	return addr;
 }
 
-unsigned long arch_mmap_rnd(void)
-{
-	unsigned long rnd;
-
-	rnd = get_random_long() & ((1UL << mmap_rnd_bits) - 1);
-
-	return rnd << PAGE_SHIFT;
-}
-
-void arch_pick_mmap_layout(struct mm_struct *mm, struct rlimit *rlim_stack)
-{
-	unsigned long random_factor = 0UL;
-
-	if (current->flags & PF_RANDOMIZE)
-		random_factor = arch_mmap_rnd();
-
-	if (mmap_is_legacy(rlim_stack)) {
-		mm->mmap_base = TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE + random_factor;
-		mm->get_unmapped_area = arch_get_unmapped_area;
-	} else {
-		mm->mmap_base = mmap_base(random_factor, rlim_stack);
-		mm->get_unmapped_area = arch_get_unmapped_area_topdown;
-	}
-}
-
 /*
  * You really shouldn't be using read() or write() on /dev/mem.  This
  * might go away in the future.
-- 
2.20.1

