From: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, quintela@redhat.com, dgilbert@redhat.com, Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] migration/ram.c: start of migration_bitmap_sync_range is always 0 Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 11:44:10 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20190430034412.12935-2-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20190430034412.12935-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> We can eliminate to pass 0. Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> --- migration/ram.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c index 35bd6213e9..9948b2d021 100644 --- a/migration/ram.c +++ b/migration/ram.c @@ -1643,10 +1643,10 @@ static inline bool migration_bitmap_clear_dirty(RAMState *rs, } static void migration_bitmap_sync_range(RAMState *rs, RAMBlock *rb, - ram_addr_t start, ram_addr_t length) + ram_addr_t length) { rs->migration_dirty_pages += - cpu_physical_memory_sync_dirty_bitmap(rb, start, length, + cpu_physical_memory_sync_dirty_bitmap(rb, 0, length, &rs->num_dirty_pages_period); } @@ -1735,7 +1735,7 @@ static void migration_bitmap_sync(RAMState *rs) qemu_mutex_lock(&rs->bitmap_mutex); rcu_read_lock(); RAMBLOCK_FOREACH_NOT_IGNORED(block) { - migration_bitmap_sync_range(rs, block, 0, block->used_length); + migration_bitmap_sync_range(rs, block, block->used_length); } ram_counters.remaining = ram_bytes_remaining(); rcu_read_unlock(); @@ -4156,7 +4156,7 @@ static void colo_flush_ram_cache(void) memory_global_dirty_log_sync(); rcu_read_lock(); RAMBLOCK_FOREACH_NOT_IGNORED(block) { - migration_bitmap_sync_range(ram_state, block, 0, block->used_length); + migration_bitmap_sync_range(ram_state, block, block->used_length); } rcu_read_unlock(); -- 2.19.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>, dgilbert@redhat.com, quintela@redhat.com Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] migration/ram.c: start of migration_bitmap_sync_range is always 0 Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 11:44:10 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20190430034412.12935-2-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> (raw) Message-ID: <20190430034410.i-qkE18XzHxMBYwujYEnO2SWTywx2TWzJLKJhPiiYCY@z> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20190430034412.12935-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> We can eliminate to pass 0. Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> --- migration/ram.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c index 35bd6213e9..9948b2d021 100644 --- a/migration/ram.c +++ b/migration/ram.c @@ -1643,10 +1643,10 @@ static inline bool migration_bitmap_clear_dirty(RAMState *rs, } static void migration_bitmap_sync_range(RAMState *rs, RAMBlock *rb, - ram_addr_t start, ram_addr_t length) + ram_addr_t length) { rs->migration_dirty_pages += - cpu_physical_memory_sync_dirty_bitmap(rb, start, length, + cpu_physical_memory_sync_dirty_bitmap(rb, 0, length, &rs->num_dirty_pages_period); } @@ -1735,7 +1735,7 @@ static void migration_bitmap_sync(RAMState *rs) qemu_mutex_lock(&rs->bitmap_mutex); rcu_read_lock(); RAMBLOCK_FOREACH_NOT_IGNORED(block) { - migration_bitmap_sync_range(rs, block, 0, block->used_length); + migration_bitmap_sync_range(rs, block, block->used_length); } ram_counters.remaining = ram_bytes_remaining(); rcu_read_unlock(); @@ -4156,7 +4156,7 @@ static void colo_flush_ram_cache(void) memory_global_dirty_log_sync(); rcu_read_lock(); RAMBLOCK_FOREACH_NOT_IGNORED(block) { - migration_bitmap_sync_range(ram_state, block, 0, block->used_length); + migration_bitmap_sync_range(ram_state, block, block->used_length); } rcu_read_unlock(); -- 2.19.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-30 3:46 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-04-30 3:44 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Cleanup migration/ram.c Wei Yang 2019-04-30 3:44 ` Wei Yang 2019-04-30 3:44 ` Wei Yang [this message] 2019-04-30 3:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] migration/ram.c: start of migration_bitmap_sync_range is always 0 Wei Yang 2019-05-14 14:15 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert 2019-05-14 14:27 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert 2019-05-15 6:41 ` Wei Yang 2019-05-15 8:04 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert 2019-05-15 8:54 ` Wei Yang 2019-04-30 3:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] migration/ram.c: start of cpu_physical_memory_sync_dirty_bitmap " Wei Yang 2019-04-30 3:44 ` Wei Yang 2019-05-14 14:21 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert 2019-05-31 0:54 ` Wei Yang 2019-06-21 7:43 ` Wei Yang 2019-07-17 1:13 ` Wei Yang 2019-07-17 9:16 ` Paolo Bonzini 2019-07-18 1:07 ` Wei Yang 2019-04-30 3:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] ram: RAMBlock->offset is always aligned to a word Wei Yang 2019-04-30 3:44 ` Wei Yang 2019-07-17 9:17 ` Paolo Bonzini 2019-07-18 1:11 ` Wei Yang 2019-05-01 22:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Cleanup migration/ram.c no-reply 2019-05-01 22:53 ` no-reply 2019-05-02 0:10 ` Wei Yang 2019-05-02 0:10 ` Wei Yang 2019-05-02 4:24 ` no-reply 2019-05-02 4:24 ` no-reply 2019-05-02 5:32 ` Wei Yang 2019-05-02 5:32 ` Wei Yang 2019-05-02 8:35 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert 2019-05-02 8:35 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert 2019-05-02 22:34 ` Wei Yang 2019-05-02 22:34 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20190430034412.12935-2-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \ --to=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \ --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \ --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \ --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \ --cc=quintela@redhat.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.