From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> To: x86@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>, jdike@addtoit.com, Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@arm.com>, Haibo Xu <haibo.xu@arm.com>, Bin Lu <bin.lu@arm.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Subject: [PATCH v3 2/4] x86: simplify _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU handling Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 18:05:18 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20190430170520.29470-3-sudeep.holla@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20190430170520.29470-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> The usage of emulated/_TIF_SYSCALL_EMU flags in syscall_trace_enter seems to be bit overcomplicated than required. Let's simplify it. Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> --- arch/x86/entry/common.c | 17 ++++++----------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/common.c b/arch/x86/entry/common.c index 7bc105f47d21..c647ddfd5579 100644 --- a/arch/x86/entry/common.c +++ b/arch/x86/entry/common.c @@ -70,23 +70,18 @@ static long syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs) struct thread_info *ti = current_thread_info(); unsigned long ret = 0; - bool emulated = false; u32 work; if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_ENTRY)) BUG_ON(regs != task_pt_regs(current)); - work = READ_ONCE(ti->flags) & _TIF_WORK_SYSCALL_ENTRY; + work = READ_ONCE(ti->flags); - if (unlikely(work & _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)) - emulated = true; - - if ((emulated || (work & _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE)) && - tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs)) - return -1L; - - if (emulated) - return -1L; + if (work & (_TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE | _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)) { + ret = tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs); + if (ret || (work & _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)) + return -1L; + } #ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP /* -- 2.17.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> To: x86@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Haibo Xu <haibo.xu@arm.com>, Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@arm.com>, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>, jdike@addtoit.com, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Bin Lu <bin.lu@arm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Subject: [PATCH v3 2/4] x86: simplify _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU handling Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 18:05:18 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20190430170520.29470-3-sudeep.holla@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20190430170520.29470-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> The usage of emulated/_TIF_SYSCALL_EMU flags in syscall_trace_enter seems to be bit overcomplicated than required. Let's simplify it. Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> --- arch/x86/entry/common.c | 17 ++++++----------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/common.c b/arch/x86/entry/common.c index 7bc105f47d21..c647ddfd5579 100644 --- a/arch/x86/entry/common.c +++ b/arch/x86/entry/common.c @@ -70,23 +70,18 @@ static long syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs) struct thread_info *ti = current_thread_info(); unsigned long ret = 0; - bool emulated = false; u32 work; if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_ENTRY)) BUG_ON(regs != task_pt_regs(current)); - work = READ_ONCE(ti->flags) & _TIF_WORK_SYSCALL_ENTRY; + work = READ_ONCE(ti->flags); - if (unlikely(work & _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)) - emulated = true; - - if ((emulated || (work & _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE)) && - tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs)) - return -1L; - - if (emulated) - return -1L; + if (work & (_TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE | _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)) { + ret = tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs); + if (ret || (work & _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)) + return -1L; + } #ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP /* -- 2.17.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-30 17:05 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-04-30 17:05 [PATCH v3 0/4] ptrace: cleanup PTRACE_SYSEMU handling and add support for arm64 Sudeep Holla 2019-04-30 17:05 ` Sudeep Holla 2019-04-30 17:05 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] ptrace: move clearing of TIF_SYSCALL_EMU flag to core Sudeep Holla 2019-04-30 17:05 ` Sudeep Holla 2019-05-01 16:13 ` Oleg Nesterov 2019-05-01 16:13 ` Oleg Nesterov 2019-05-01 16:17 ` Sudeep Holla 2019-05-01 16:17 ` Sudeep Holla 2019-05-02 16:13 ` Oleg Nesterov 2019-05-02 16:13 ` Oleg Nesterov 2019-05-02 16:45 ` Will Deacon 2019-05-02 16:45 ` Will Deacon 2019-05-03 14:14 ` Oleg Nesterov 2019-05-03 14:14 ` Oleg Nesterov 2019-04-30 17:05 ` Sudeep Holla [this message] 2019-04-30 17:05 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] x86: simplify _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU handling Sudeep Holla 2019-05-01 16:12 ` Oleg Nesterov 2019-05-01 16:12 ` Oleg Nesterov 2019-04-30 17:05 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] arm64: add PTRACE_SYSEMU{,SINGLESTEP} definations to uapi headers Sudeep Holla 2019-04-30 17:05 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] arm64: add PTRACE_SYSEMU{, SINGLESTEP} " Sudeep Holla 2019-04-30 17:05 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: ptrace: add support for syscall emulation Sudeep Holla 2019-04-30 17:05 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20190430170520.29470-3-sudeep.holla@arm.com \ --to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \ --cc=Steve.Capper@arm.com \ --cc=bin.lu@arm.com \ --cc=bp@alien8.de \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=haibo.xu@arm.com \ --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=luto@kernel.org \ --cc=mingo@redhat.com \ --cc=oleg@redhat.com \ --cc=richard@nod.at \ --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \ --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \ --cc=x86@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.