All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bfields@fieldses.org (J. Bruce Fields)
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>,
	Anna Schumaker <schumakeranna@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] rpc: replace rpc_filelist by tree_descr
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 15:08:05 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190515190805.GC11614@fieldses.org> (raw)

From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>

Use a common structure instead of defining our own here.

The only difference is using an int instead of umode_t for the mode
field; I haven't tried to figure out why tree_descr uses int.

Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
---
 net/sunrpc/rpc_pipe.c | 37 ++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

Seems like trivial but reasonable cleanup.  I'm curious whether there
might be more chances to share code between rpc_pipe and libfs, but
haven't investigated any further yet.

--b.

diff --git a/net/sunrpc/rpc_pipe.c b/net/sunrpc/rpc_pipe.c
index 69663681bf9d..9af9f4c8fa1e 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/rpc_pipe.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/rpc_pipe.c
@@ -460,15 +460,6 @@ static const struct file_operations rpc_info_operations = {
 };
 
 
-/*
- * Description of fs contents.
- */
-struct rpc_filelist {
-	const char *name;
-	const struct file_operations *i_fop;
-	umode_t mode;
-};
-
 static struct inode *
 rpc_get_inode(struct super_block *sb, umode_t mode)
 {
@@ -648,7 +639,7 @@ static struct dentry *__rpc_lookup_create_exclusive(struct dentry *parent,
  * FIXME: This probably has races.
  */
 static void __rpc_depopulate(struct dentry *parent,
-			     const struct rpc_filelist *files,
+			     const struct tree_descr *files,
 			     int start, int eof)
 {
 	struct inode *dir = d_inode(parent);
@@ -680,7 +671,7 @@ static void __rpc_depopulate(struct dentry *parent,
 }
 
 static void rpc_depopulate(struct dentry *parent,
-			   const struct rpc_filelist *files,
+			   const struct tree_descr *files,
 			   int start, int eof)
 {
 	struct inode *dir = d_inode(parent);
@@ -691,7 +682,7 @@ static void rpc_depopulate(struct dentry *parent,
 }
 
 static int rpc_populate(struct dentry *parent,
-			const struct rpc_filelist *files,
+			const struct tree_descr *files,
 			int start, int eof,
 			void *private)
 {
@@ -711,7 +702,7 @@ static int rpc_populate(struct dentry *parent,
 			case S_IFREG:
 				err = __rpc_create(dir, dentry,
 						files[i].mode,
-						files[i].i_fop,
+						files[i].ops,
 						private);
 				break;
 			case S_IFDIR:
@@ -1015,10 +1006,10 @@ enum {
 	RPCAUTH_EOF
 };
 
-static const struct rpc_filelist authfiles[] = {
+static const struct tree_descr authfiles[] = {
 	[RPCAUTH_info] = {
 		.name = "info",
-		.i_fop = &rpc_info_operations,
+		.ops = &rpc_info_operations,
 		.mode = S_IFREG | 0400,
 	},
 };
@@ -1076,20 +1067,20 @@ int rpc_remove_client_dir(struct rpc_clnt *rpc_client)
 	return rpc_rmdir_depopulate(dentry, rpc_clntdir_depopulate);
 }
 
-static const struct rpc_filelist cache_pipefs_files[3] = {
+static const struct tree_descr cache_pipefs_files[3] = {
 	[0] = {
 		.name = "channel",
-		.i_fop = &cache_file_operations_pipefs,
+		.ops = &cache_file_operations_pipefs,
 		.mode = S_IFREG | 0600,
 	},
 	[1] = {
 		.name = "content",
-		.i_fop = &content_file_operations_pipefs,
+		.ops = &content_file_operations_pipefs,
 		.mode = S_IFREG | 0400,
 	},
 	[2] = {
 		.name = "flush",
-		.i_fop = &cache_flush_operations_pipefs,
+		.ops = &cache_flush_operations_pipefs,
 		.mode = S_IFREG | 0600,
 	},
 };
@@ -1145,7 +1136,7 @@ enum {
 	RPCAUTH_RootEOF
 };
 
-static const struct rpc_filelist files[] = {
+static const struct tree_descr files[] = {
 	[RPCAUTH_lockd] = {
 		.name = "lockd",
 		.mode = S_IFDIR | 0555,
@@ -1242,7 +1233,7 @@ void rpc_put_sb_net(const struct net *net)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rpc_put_sb_net);
 
-static const struct rpc_filelist gssd_dummy_clnt_dir[] = {
+static const struct tree_descr gssd_dummy_clnt_dir[] = {
 	[0] = {
 		.name = "clntXX",
 		.mode = S_IFDIR | 0555,
@@ -1277,10 +1268,10 @@ rpc_dummy_info_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 }
 DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(rpc_dummy_info);
 
-static const struct rpc_filelist gssd_dummy_info_file[] = {
+static const struct tree_descr gssd_dummy_info_file[] = {
 	[0] = {
 		.name = "info",
-		.i_fop = &rpc_dummy_info_fops,
+		.ops = &rpc_dummy_info_fops,
 		.mode = S_IFREG | 0400,
 	},
 };
-- 
2.21.0


                 reply	other threads:[~2019-05-15 19:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190515190805.GC11614@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schumakeranna@gmail.com \
    --cc=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.