All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>,
	Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
	Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Subject: [PULL 01/14] s390/cio: Squash cp_free() and cp_unpin_free()
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 16:33:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190621143355.29175-2-cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190621143355.29175-1-cohuck@redhat.com>

From: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>

The routine cp_free() does nothing but call cp_unpin_free(), and while
most places call cp_free() there is one caller of cp_unpin_free() used
when the cp is guaranteed to have not been marked initialized.

This seems like a dubious way to make a distinction, so let's combine
these routines and make cp_free() do all the work.

Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190606202831.44135-2-farman@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c | 36 +++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
index f73cfcfdd032..47cd7f94f42f 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
@@ -412,23 +412,6 @@ static void ccwchain_cda_free(struct ccwchain *chain, int idx)
 	kfree((void *)(u64)ccw->cda);
 }
 
-/* Unpin the pages then free the memory resources. */
-static void cp_unpin_free(struct channel_program *cp)
-{
-	struct ccwchain *chain, *temp;
-	int i;
-
-	cp->initialized = false;
-	list_for_each_entry_safe(chain, temp, &cp->ccwchain_list, next) {
-		for (i = 0; i < chain->ch_len; i++) {
-			pfn_array_table_unpin_free(chain->ch_pat + i,
-						   cp->mdev);
-			ccwchain_cda_free(chain, i);
-		}
-		ccwchain_free(chain);
-	}
-}
-
 /**
  * ccwchain_calc_length - calculate the length of the ccw chain.
  * @iova: guest physical address of the target ccw chain
@@ -796,7 +779,7 @@ int cp_init(struct channel_program *cp, struct device *mdev, union orb *orb)
 	/* Now loop for its TICs. */
 	ret = ccwchain_loop_tic(chain, cp);
 	if (ret)
-		cp_unpin_free(cp);
+		cp_free(cp);
 	/* It is safe to force: if not set but idals used
 	 * ccwchain_calc_length returns an error.
 	 */
@@ -819,8 +802,21 @@ int cp_init(struct channel_program *cp, struct device *mdev, union orb *orb)
  */
 void cp_free(struct channel_program *cp)
 {
-	if (cp->initialized)
-		cp_unpin_free(cp);
+	struct ccwchain *chain, *temp;
+	int i;
+
+	if (!cp->initialized)
+		return;
+
+	cp->initialized = false;
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(chain, temp, &cp->ccwchain_list, next) {
+		for (i = 0; i < chain->ch_len; i++) {
+			pfn_array_table_unpin_free(chain->ch_pat + i,
+						   cp->mdev);
+			ccwchain_cda_free(chain, i);
+		}
+		ccwchain_free(chain);
+	}
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.20.1

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-21 14:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-21 14:33 [PULL 00/14] more vfio-ccw updates for 5.3 Cornelia Huck
2019-06-21 14:33 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2019-06-21 14:33 ` [PULL 02/14] s390/cio: Refactor the routine that handles TIC CCWs Cornelia Huck
2019-06-21 14:33 ` [PULL 03/14] s390/cio: Generalize the TIC handler Cornelia Huck
2019-06-21 14:33 ` [PULL 04/14] s390/cio: Use generalized CCW handler in cp_init() Cornelia Huck
2019-06-21 14:33 ` [PULL 05/14] vfio-ccw: Rearrange pfn_array and pfn_array_table arrays Cornelia Huck
2019-06-21 14:33 ` [PULL 06/14] vfio-ccw: Adjust the first IDAW outside of the nested loops Cornelia Huck
2019-06-21 14:33 ` [PULL 07/14] vfio-ccw: Remove pfn_array_table Cornelia Huck
2019-06-21 19:13   ` Eric Farman
2019-06-21 14:33 ` [PULL 08/14] vfio-ccw: Rearrange IDAL allocation in direct CCW Cornelia Huck
2019-06-21 14:33 ` [PULL 09/14] s390/cio: Combine direct and indirect CCW paths Cornelia Huck
2019-06-21 14:33 ` [PULL 10/14] vfio-ccw: Move guest_cp storage into common struct Cornelia Huck
2019-06-21 14:33 ` [PULL 11/14] vfio-ccw: Skip second copy of guest cp to host Cornelia Huck
2019-06-21 14:33 ` [PULL 12/14] vfio-ccw: Copy CCW data outside length calculation Cornelia Huck
2019-06-21 14:33 ` [PULL 13/14] vfio-ccw: Factor out the ccw0-to-ccw1 transition Cornelia Huck
2019-06-21 19:13   ` Eric Farman
2019-06-22  8:38     ` Heiko Carstens
2019-06-21 14:33 ` [PULL 14/14] vfio-ccw: Remove copy_ccw_from_iova() Cornelia Huck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190621143355.29175-2-cohuck@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.