All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg-uk2M96/98Pc@public.gmane.org>
To: Jerome Glisse <jglisse-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Ralph Campbell
	<rcampbell-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	John Hubbard <jhubbard-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Felix.Kuehling-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli
	<aarcange-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Philip Yang <Philip.Yang-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org,
	linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
	dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org,
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>,
	Ben Skeggs <bskeggs-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 hmm 05/12] mm/hmm: Remove duplicate condition test before wait_event_timeout
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:01:03 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190624210110.5098-6-jgg@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190624210110.5098-1-jgg-uk2M96/98Pc@public.gmane.org>

From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

The wait_event_timeout macro already tests the condition as its first
action, so there is no reason to open code another version of this, all
that does is skip the might_sleep() debugging in common cases, which is
not helpful.

Further, based on prior patches, we can now simplify the required condition
test:
 - If range is valid memory then so is range->hmm
 - If hmm_release() has run then range->valid is set to false
   at the same time as dead, so no reason to check both.
 - A valid hmm has a valid hmm->mm.

Allowing the return value of wait_event_timeout() (along with its internal
barriers) to compute the result of the function.

Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com>
---
v3
- Simplify the wait_event_timeout to not check valid
---
 include/linux/hmm.h | 13 ++-----------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/hmm.h b/include/linux/hmm.h
index 1d97b6d62c5bcf..26e7c477490c4e 100644
--- a/include/linux/hmm.h
+++ b/include/linux/hmm.h
@@ -209,17 +209,8 @@ static inline unsigned long hmm_range_page_size(const struct hmm_range *range)
 static inline bool hmm_range_wait_until_valid(struct hmm_range *range,
 					      unsigned long timeout)
 {
-	/* Check if mm is dead ? */
-	if (range->hmm == NULL || range->hmm->dead || range->hmm->mm == NULL) {
-		range->valid = false;
-		return false;
-	}
-	if (range->valid)
-		return true;
-	wait_event_timeout(range->hmm->wq, range->valid || range->hmm->dead,
-			   msecs_to_jiffies(timeout));
-	/* Return current valid status just in case we get lucky */
-	return range->valid;
+	return wait_event_timeout(range->hmm->wq, range->valid,
+				  msecs_to_jiffies(timeout)) != 0;
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.22.0

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
	John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	Felix.Kuehling@amd.com
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com>,
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 hmm 05/12] mm/hmm: Remove duplicate condition test before wait_event_timeout
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:01:03 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190624210110.5098-6-jgg@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190624210110.5098-1-jgg@ziepe.ca>

From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

The wait_event_timeout macro already tests the condition as its first
action, so there is no reason to open code another version of this, all
that does is skip the might_sleep() debugging in common cases, which is
not helpful.

Further, based on prior patches, we can now simplify the required condition
test:
 - If range is valid memory then so is range->hmm
 - If hmm_release() has run then range->valid is set to false
   at the same time as dead, so no reason to check both.
 - A valid hmm has a valid hmm->mm.

Allowing the return value of wait_event_timeout() (along with its internal
barriers) to compute the result of the function.

Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com>
---
v3
- Simplify the wait_event_timeout to not check valid
---
 include/linux/hmm.h | 13 ++-----------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/hmm.h b/include/linux/hmm.h
index 1d97b6d62c5bcf..26e7c477490c4e 100644
--- a/include/linux/hmm.h
+++ b/include/linux/hmm.h
@@ -209,17 +209,8 @@ static inline unsigned long hmm_range_page_size(const struct hmm_range *range)
 static inline bool hmm_range_wait_until_valid(struct hmm_range *range,
 					      unsigned long timeout)
 {
-	/* Check if mm is dead ? */
-	if (range->hmm == NULL || range->hmm->dead || range->hmm->mm == NULL) {
-		range->valid = false;
-		return false;
-	}
-	if (range->valid)
-		return true;
-	wait_event_timeout(range->hmm->wq, range->valid || range->hmm->dead,
-			   msecs_to_jiffies(timeout));
-	/* Return current valid status just in case we get lucky */
-	return range->valid;
+	return wait_event_timeout(range->hmm->wq, range->valid,
+				  msecs_to_jiffies(timeout)) != 0;
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.22.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-24 21:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-24 21:00 [PATCH v4 hmm 00/12] Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
     [not found] ` <20190624210110.5098-1-jgg-uk2M96/98Pc@public.gmane.org>
2019-06-24 21:00   ` [PATCH v4 hmm 01/12] mm/hmm: fix use after free with struct hmm in the mmu notifiers Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:00     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01   ` [PATCH v4 hmm 02/12] mm/hmm: Use hmm_mirror not mm as an argument for hmm_range_register Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01   ` [PATCH v4 hmm 03/12] mm/hmm: Hold a mmgrab from hmm to mm Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01   ` [PATCH v4 hmm 04/12] mm/hmm: Simplify hmm_get_or_create and make it reliable Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01     ` Jason Gunthorpe
     [not found]     ` <20190624210110.5098-5-jgg-uk2M96/98Pc@public.gmane.org>
2019-06-25  7:02       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-25  7:02         ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-24 21:01   ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2019-06-24 21:01     ` [PATCH v4 hmm 05/12] mm/hmm: Remove duplicate condition test before wait_event_timeout Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01   ` [PATCH v4 hmm 06/12] mm/hmm: Do not use list*_rcu() for hmm->ranges Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01   ` [PATCH v4 hmm 07/12] mm/hmm: Hold on to the mmget for the lifetime of the range Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01   ` [PATCH v4 hmm 08/12] mm/hmm: Use lockdep instead of comments Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01   ` [PATCH v4 hmm 09/12] mm/hmm: Remove racy protection against double-unregistration Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01   ` [PATCH v4 hmm 10/12] mm/hmm: Poison hmm_range during unregister Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01   ` [PATCH v4 hmm 11/12] mm/hmm: Remove confusing comment and logic from hmm_release Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01     ` Jason Gunthorpe
     [not found]     ` <20190624210110.5098-12-jgg-uk2M96/98Pc@public.gmane.org>
2019-06-25  7:03       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-25  7:03         ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-24 21:01   ` [PATCH v4 hmm 12/12] mm/hmm: Fix error flows in hmm_invalidate_range_start Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-24 21:01     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-26 18:18     ` Ralph Campbell
2019-06-26 18:18       ` Ralph Campbell
     [not found]       ` <035fa354-6caa-3738-b84d-20804813009a-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2019-06-27 16:06         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-27 16:06           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-29  1:26 ` [PATCH v4 hmm 00/12] Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-29  1:26   ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190624210110.5098-6-jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --to=jgg-uk2m96/98pc@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=Felix.Kuehling-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=Philip.Yang-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=aarcange-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=bskeggs-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=ira.weiny-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=jgg-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=jglisse-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=jhubbard-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=rcampbell-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.