All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	<linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>,
	Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
	Ajay Kumar <ajaykumar.rs@samsung.com>,
	Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>,
	Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma@samsung.com>,
	Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
	Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org>,
	Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>,
	Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>, <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>,
	<eddie.huang@mediatek.com>, <cawa.cheng@mediatek.com>,
	<bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com>, <ck.hu@mediatek.com>,
	<stonea168@163.com>, Ryan Case <ryandcase@chromium.org>
Subject: [v5 6/7] drm/mediatek: change the dsi phytiming calculate method
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:01:14 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190627080116.40264-7-jitao.shi@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190627080116.40264-1-jitao.shi@mediatek.com>

Change the method of frame rate calc which can get more accurate
frame rate.

data rate = pixel_clock * bit_per_pixel / lanes
Adjust hfp_wc to adapt the additional phy_data

if MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST
	hfp_wc = hfp * bpp - data_phy_cycles * lanes - 12 - 6;
else
	hfp_wc = hfp * bpp - data_phy_cycles * lanes - 12;

Note:
//(2: 1 for sync, 1 for phy idle)
data_phy_cycles = T_hs_exit + T_lpx + T_hs_prepare + T_hs_zero + 2;

bpp: bit per pixel

Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
Tested-by: Ryan Case <ryandcase@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
index 1621e8cdacc2..cefdcb1509cb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
@@ -144,12 +144,6 @@
 #define DATA_0				(0xff << 16)
 #define DATA_1				(0xff << 24)
 
-#define T_LPX		5
-#define T_HS_PREP	6
-#define T_HS_TRAIL	8
-#define T_HS_EXIT	7
-#define T_HS_ZERO	10
-
 #define NS_TO_CYCLE(n, c)    ((n) / (c) + (((n) % (c)) ? 1 : 0))
 
 #define MTK_DSI_HOST_IS_READ(type) \
@@ -158,6 +152,25 @@
 	(type == MIPI_DSI_GENERIC_READ_REQUEST_2_PARAM) || \
 	(type == MIPI_DSI_DCS_READ))
 
+struct mtk_phy_timing {
+	u32 lpx;
+	u32 da_hs_prepare;
+	u32 da_hs_zero;
+	u32 da_hs_trail;
+
+	u32 ta_go;
+	u32 ta_sure;
+	u32 ta_get;
+	u32 da_hs_exit;
+
+	u32 clk_hs_zero;
+	u32 clk_hs_trail;
+
+	u32 clk_hs_prepare;
+	u32 clk_hs_post;
+	u32 clk_hs_exit;
+};
+
 struct phy;
 
 struct mtk_dsi_driver_data {
@@ -188,6 +201,7 @@ struct mtk_dsi {
 	enum mipi_dsi_pixel_format format;
 	unsigned int lanes;
 	struct videomode vm;
+	struct mtk_phy_timing phy_timing;
 	int refcount;
 	bool enabled;
 	u32 irq_data;
@@ -221,17 +235,36 @@ static void mtk_dsi_phy_timconfig(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
 {
 	u32 timcon0, timcon1, timcon2, timcon3;
 	u32 ui, cycle_time;
+	struct mtk_phy_timing *timing = &dsi->phy_timing;
+
+	ui = 1000000000 / dsi->data_rate;
+	cycle_time = div_u64(8000000000ULL, dsi->data_rate);
+
+	timing->lpx = NS_TO_CYCLE(60, cycle_time);
+	timing->da_hs_prepare = NS_TO_CYCLE(40 + 5 * ui, cycle_time);
+	timing->da_hs_zero = NS_TO_CYCLE(110 + 6 * ui, cycle_time);
+	timing->da_hs_trail = NS_TO_CYCLE(80 + 4 * ui, cycle_time);
 
-	ui = 1000 / dsi->data_rate + 0x01;
-	cycle_time = 8000 / dsi->data_rate + 0x01;
+	timing->ta_go = 4 * timing->lpx;
+	timing->ta_sure = 3 * timing->lpx / 2;
+	timing->ta_get = 5 * timing->lpx;
+	timing->da_hs_exit = 2 * timing->lpx;
 
-	timcon0 = T_LPX | T_HS_PREP << 8 | T_HS_ZERO << 16 | T_HS_TRAIL << 24;
-	timcon1 = 4 * T_LPX | (3 * T_LPX / 2) << 8 | 5 * T_LPX << 16 |
-		  T_HS_EXIT << 24;
-	timcon2 = ((NS_TO_CYCLE(0x64, cycle_time) + 0xa) << 24) |
-		  (NS_TO_CYCLE(0x150, cycle_time) << 16);
-	timcon3 = NS_TO_CYCLE(0x40, cycle_time) | (2 * T_LPX) << 16 |
-		  NS_TO_CYCLE(80 + 52 * ui, cycle_time) << 8;
+	timing->clk_hs_zero = NS_TO_CYCLE(336, cycle_time);
+	timing->clk_hs_trail = NS_TO_CYCLE(100, cycle_time) + 10;
+
+	timing->clk_hs_prepare = NS_TO_CYCLE(64, cycle_time);
+	timing->clk_hs_post = NS_TO_CYCLE(80 + 52 * ui, cycle_time);
+	timing->clk_hs_exit = 2 * timing->lpx;
+
+	timcon0 = timing->lpx | timing->da_hs_prepare << 8 |
+		  timing->da_hs_zero << 16 | timing->da_hs_trail << 24;
+	timcon1 = timing->ta_go | timing->ta_sure << 8 |
+		  timing->ta_get << 16 | timing->da_hs_exit << 24;
+	timcon2 = 1 << 8 | timing->clk_hs_zero << 16 |
+		  timing->clk_hs_trail << 24;
+	timcon3 = timing->clk_hs_prepare | timing->clk_hs_post << 8 |
+		  timing->clk_hs_exit << 16;
 
 	writel(timcon0, dsi->regs + DSI_PHY_TIMECON0);
 	writel(timcon1, dsi->regs + DSI_PHY_TIMECON1);
@@ -418,7 +451,8 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
 	u32 horizontal_sync_active_byte;
 	u32 horizontal_backporch_byte;
 	u32 horizontal_frontporch_byte;
-	u32 dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
+	u32 dsi_tmp_buf_bpp, data_phy_cycles;
+	struct mtk_phy_timing *timing = &dsi->phy_timing;
 
 	struct videomode *vm = &dsi->vm;
 
@@ -445,7 +479,34 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
 		horizontal_backporch_byte = ((vm->hback_porch + vm->hsync_len) *
 			dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10);
 
-	horizontal_frontporch_byte = (vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 12);
+	data_phy_cycles = timing->lpx + timing->da_hs_prepare +
+				  timing->da_hs_zero + timing->da_hs_exit + 2;
+
+	if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST) {
+		if (vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
+		    data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) {
+			horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
+						     dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
+						     data_phy_cycles *
+						     dsi->lanes - 18;
+		} else {
+			DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will under 60Hz\n");
+			horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
+						     dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
+		}
+	} else {
+		if (vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
+		    data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) {
+			horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
+						     dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
+						     data_phy_cycles *
+						     dsi->lanes - 12;
+		} else {
+			DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will under 60Hz\n");
+			horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
+						     dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
+		}
+	}
 
 	writel(horizontal_sync_active_byte, dsi->regs + DSI_HSA_WC);
 	writel(horizontal_backporch_byte, dsi->regs + DSI_HBP_WC);
@@ -545,8 +606,7 @@ static int mtk_dsi_poweron(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
 {
 	struct device *dev = dsi->->host.dev;
 	int ret;
-	u64 pixel_clock, total_bits;
-	u32 htotal, htotal_bits, bit_per_pixel, overhead_cycles, overhead_bits;
+	u32 bit_per_pixel;
 
 	if (++dsi->refcount != 1)
 		return 0;
@@ -565,24 +625,7 @@ static int mtk_dsi_poweron(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
 		break;
 	}
 
-	/**
-	 * htotal_time = htotal * byte_per_pixel / num_lanes
-	 * overhead_time = lpx + hs_prepare + hs_zero + hs_trail + hs_exit
-	 * mipi_ratio = (htotal_time + overhead_time) / htotal_time
-	 * data_rate = pixel_clock * bit_per_pixel * mipi_ratio / num_lanes;
-	 */
-	pixel_clock = dsi->vm.pixelclock;
-	htotal = dsi->vm.hactive + dsi->vm.hback_porch + dsi->vm.hfront_porch +
-			dsi->vm.hsync_len;
-	htotal_bits = htotal * bit_per_pixel;
-
-	overhead_cycles = T_LPX + T_HS_PREP + T_HS_ZERO + T_HS_TRAIL +
-			T_HS_EXIT;
-	overhead_bits = overhead_cycles * dsi->lanes * 8;
-	total_bits = htotal_bits + overhead_bits;
-
-	dsi->data_rate = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(pixel_clock * total_bits,
-					  htotal * dsi->lanes);
+	dsi->data_rate = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(dsi->vm.pixelclock * bit_per_pixel, dsi->lanes);
 
 	ret = clk_set_rate(dsi->hs_clk, dsi->data_rate);
 	if (ret < 0) {
-- 
2.21.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>,
	Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
	Ajay Kumar <ajaykumar.rs@samsung.com>,
	Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>,
	Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma@samsung.com>,
	Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
	Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org>,
	Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com,
	Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com, eddie.huang@mediatek.com,
	cawa.cheng@mediatek.com, bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com, ck.hu@mediate
Subject: [v5 6/7] drm/mediatek: change the dsi phytiming calculate method
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:01:14 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190627080116.40264-7-jitao.shi@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190627080116.40264-1-jitao.shi@mediatek.com>

Change the method of frame rate calc which can get more accurate
frame rate.

data rate = pixel_clock * bit_per_pixel / lanes
Adjust hfp_wc to adapt the additional phy_data

if MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST
	hfp_wc = hfp * bpp - data_phy_cycles * lanes - 12 - 6;
else
	hfp_wc = hfp * bpp - data_phy_cycles * lanes - 12;

Note:
//(2: 1 for sync, 1 for phy idle)
data_phy_cycles = T_hs_exit + T_lpx + T_hs_prepare + T_hs_zero + 2;

bpp: bit per pixel

Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
Tested-by: Ryan Case <ryandcase@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
index 1621e8cdacc2..cefdcb1509cb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
@@ -144,12 +144,6 @@
 #define DATA_0				(0xff << 16)
 #define DATA_1				(0xff << 24)
 
-#define T_LPX		5
-#define T_HS_PREP	6
-#define T_HS_TRAIL	8
-#define T_HS_EXIT	7
-#define T_HS_ZERO	10
-
 #define NS_TO_CYCLE(n, c)    ((n) / (c) + (((n) % (c)) ? 1 : 0))
 
 #define MTK_DSI_HOST_IS_READ(type) \
@@ -158,6 +152,25 @@
 	(type == MIPI_DSI_GENERIC_READ_REQUEST_2_PARAM) || \
 	(type == MIPI_DSI_DCS_READ))
 
+struct mtk_phy_timing {
+	u32 lpx;
+	u32 da_hs_prepare;
+	u32 da_hs_zero;
+	u32 da_hs_trail;
+
+	u32 ta_go;
+	u32 ta_sure;
+	u32 ta_get;
+	u32 da_hs_exit;
+
+	u32 clk_hs_zero;
+	u32 clk_hs_trail;
+
+	u32 clk_hs_prepare;
+	u32 clk_hs_post;
+	u32 clk_hs_exit;
+};
+
 struct phy;
 
 struct mtk_dsi_driver_data {
@@ -188,6 +201,7 @@ struct mtk_dsi {
 	enum mipi_dsi_pixel_format format;
 	unsigned int lanes;
 	struct videomode vm;
+	struct mtk_phy_timing phy_timing;
 	int refcount;
 	bool enabled;
 	u32 irq_data;
@@ -221,17 +235,36 @@ static void mtk_dsi_phy_timconfig(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
 {
 	u32 timcon0, timcon1, timcon2, timcon3;
 	u32 ui, cycle_time;
+	struct mtk_phy_timing *timing = &dsi->phy_timing;
+
+	ui = 1000000000 / dsi->data_rate;
+	cycle_time = div_u64(8000000000ULL, dsi->data_rate);
+
+	timing->lpx = NS_TO_CYCLE(60, cycle_time);
+	timing->da_hs_prepare = NS_TO_CYCLE(40 + 5 * ui, cycle_time);
+	timing->da_hs_zero = NS_TO_CYCLE(110 + 6 * ui, cycle_time);
+	timing->da_hs_trail = NS_TO_CYCLE(80 + 4 * ui, cycle_time);
 
-	ui = 1000 / dsi->data_rate + 0x01;
-	cycle_time = 8000 / dsi->data_rate + 0x01;
+	timing->ta_go = 4 * timing->lpx;
+	timing->ta_sure = 3 * timing->lpx / 2;
+	timing->ta_get = 5 * timing->lpx;
+	timing->da_hs_exit = 2 * timing->lpx;
 
-	timcon0 = T_LPX | T_HS_PREP << 8 | T_HS_ZERO << 16 | T_HS_TRAIL << 24;
-	timcon1 = 4 * T_LPX | (3 * T_LPX / 2) << 8 | 5 * T_LPX << 16 |
-		  T_HS_EXIT << 24;
-	timcon2 = ((NS_TO_CYCLE(0x64, cycle_time) + 0xa) << 24) |
-		  (NS_TO_CYCLE(0x150, cycle_time) << 16);
-	timcon3 = NS_TO_CYCLE(0x40, cycle_time) | (2 * T_LPX) << 16 |
-		  NS_TO_CYCLE(80 + 52 * ui, cycle_time) << 8;
+	timing->clk_hs_zero = NS_TO_CYCLE(336, cycle_time);
+	timing->clk_hs_trail = NS_TO_CYCLE(100, cycle_time) + 10;
+
+	timing->clk_hs_prepare = NS_TO_CYCLE(64, cycle_time);
+	timing->clk_hs_post = NS_TO_CYCLE(80 + 52 * ui, cycle_time);
+	timing->clk_hs_exit = 2 * timing->lpx;
+
+	timcon0 = timing->lpx | timing->da_hs_prepare << 8 |
+		  timing->da_hs_zero << 16 | timing->da_hs_trail << 24;
+	timcon1 = timing->ta_go | timing->ta_sure << 8 |
+		  timing->ta_get << 16 | timing->da_hs_exit << 24;
+	timcon2 = 1 << 8 | timing->clk_hs_zero << 16 |
+		  timing->clk_hs_trail << 24;
+	timcon3 = timing->clk_hs_prepare | timing->clk_hs_post << 8 |
+		  timing->clk_hs_exit << 16;
 
 	writel(timcon0, dsi->regs + DSI_PHY_TIMECON0);
 	writel(timcon1, dsi->regs + DSI_PHY_TIMECON1);
@@ -418,7 +451,8 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
 	u32 horizontal_sync_active_byte;
 	u32 horizontal_backporch_byte;
 	u32 horizontal_frontporch_byte;
-	u32 dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
+	u32 dsi_tmp_buf_bpp, data_phy_cycles;
+	struct mtk_phy_timing *timing = &dsi->phy_timing;
 
 	struct videomode *vm = &dsi->vm;
 
@@ -445,7 +479,34 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
 		horizontal_backporch_byte = ((vm->hback_porch + vm->hsync_len) *
 			dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10);
 
-	horizontal_frontporch_byte = (vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 12);
+	data_phy_cycles = timing->lpx + timing->da_hs_prepare +
+				  timing->da_hs_zero + timing->da_hs_exit + 2;
+
+	if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST) {
+		if (vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
+		    data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) {
+			horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
+						     dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
+						     data_phy_cycles *
+						     dsi->lanes - 18;
+		} else {
+			DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will under 60Hz\n");
+			horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
+						     dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
+		}
+	} else {
+		if (vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
+		    data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) {
+			horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
+						     dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
+						     data_phy_cycles *
+						     dsi->lanes - 12;
+		} else {
+			DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will under 60Hz\n");
+			horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
+						     dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
+		}
+	}
 
 	writel(horizontal_sync_active_byte, dsi->regs + DSI_HSA_WC);
 	writel(horizontal_backporch_byte, dsi->regs + DSI_HBP_WC);
@@ -545,8 +606,7 @@ static int mtk_dsi_poweron(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
 {
 	struct device *dev = dsi->->host.dev;
 	int ret;
-	u64 pixel_clock, total_bits;
-	u32 htotal, htotal_bits, bit_per_pixel, overhead_cycles, overhead_bits;
+	u32 bit_per_pixel;
 
 	if (++dsi->refcount != 1)
 		return 0;
@@ -565,24 +625,7 @@ static int mtk_dsi_poweron(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
 		break;
 	}
 
-	/**
-	 * htotal_time = htotal * byte_per_pixel / num_lanes
-	 * overhead_time = lpx + hs_prepare + hs_zero + hs_trail + hs_exit
-	 * mipi_ratio = (htotal_time + overhead_time) / htotal_time
-	 * data_rate = pixel_clock * bit_per_pixel * mipi_ratio / num_lanes;
-	 */
-	pixel_clock = dsi->vm.pixelclock;
-	htotal = dsi->vm.hactive + dsi->vm.hback_porch + dsi->vm.hfront_porch +
-			dsi->vm.hsync_len;
-	htotal_bits = htotal * bit_per_pixel;
-
-	overhead_cycles = T_LPX + T_HS_PREP + T_HS_ZERO + T_HS_TRAIL +
-			T_HS_EXIT;
-	overhead_bits = overhead_cycles * dsi->lanes * 8;
-	total_bits = htotal_bits + overhead_bits;
-
-	dsi->data_rate = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(pixel_clock * total_bits,
-					  htotal * dsi->lanes);
+	dsi->data_rate = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(dsi->vm.pixelclock * bit_per_pixel, dsi->lanes);
 
 	ret = clk_set_rate(dsi->hs_clk, dsi->data_rate);
 	if (ret < 0) {
-- 
2.21.0

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	<linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: stonea168@163.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>,
	Ajay Kumar <ajaykumar.rs@samsung.com>,
	Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org>,
	cawa.cheng@mediatek.com, bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com,
	ck.hu@mediatek.com, Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com,
	eddie.huang@mediatek.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma@samsung.com>,
	srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ryan Case <ryandcase@chromium.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Subject: [v5 6/7] drm/mediatek: change the dsi phytiming calculate method
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:01:14 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190627080116.40264-7-jitao.shi@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190627080116.40264-1-jitao.shi@mediatek.com>

Change the method of frame rate calc which can get more accurate
frame rate.

data rate = pixel_clock * bit_per_pixel / lanes
Adjust hfp_wc to adapt the additional phy_data

if MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST
	hfp_wc = hfp * bpp - data_phy_cycles * lanes - 12 - 6;
else
	hfp_wc = hfp * bpp - data_phy_cycles * lanes - 12;

Note:
//(2: 1 for sync, 1 for phy idle)
data_phy_cycles = T_hs_exit + T_lpx + T_hs_prepare + T_hs_zero + 2;

bpp: bit per pixel

Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
Tested-by: Ryan Case <ryandcase@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
index 1621e8cdacc2..cefdcb1509cb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
@@ -144,12 +144,6 @@
 #define DATA_0				(0xff << 16)
 #define DATA_1				(0xff << 24)
 
-#define T_LPX		5
-#define T_HS_PREP	6
-#define T_HS_TRAIL	8
-#define T_HS_EXIT	7
-#define T_HS_ZERO	10
-
 #define NS_TO_CYCLE(n, c)    ((n) / (c) + (((n) % (c)) ? 1 : 0))
 
 #define MTK_DSI_HOST_IS_READ(type) \
@@ -158,6 +152,25 @@
 	(type == MIPI_DSI_GENERIC_READ_REQUEST_2_PARAM) || \
 	(type == MIPI_DSI_DCS_READ))
 
+struct mtk_phy_timing {
+	u32 lpx;
+	u32 da_hs_prepare;
+	u32 da_hs_zero;
+	u32 da_hs_trail;
+
+	u32 ta_go;
+	u32 ta_sure;
+	u32 ta_get;
+	u32 da_hs_exit;
+
+	u32 clk_hs_zero;
+	u32 clk_hs_trail;
+
+	u32 clk_hs_prepare;
+	u32 clk_hs_post;
+	u32 clk_hs_exit;
+};
+
 struct phy;
 
 struct mtk_dsi_driver_data {
@@ -188,6 +201,7 @@ struct mtk_dsi {
 	enum mipi_dsi_pixel_format format;
 	unsigned int lanes;
 	struct videomode vm;
+	struct mtk_phy_timing phy_timing;
 	int refcount;
 	bool enabled;
 	u32 irq_data;
@@ -221,17 +235,36 @@ static void mtk_dsi_phy_timconfig(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
 {
 	u32 timcon0, timcon1, timcon2, timcon3;
 	u32 ui, cycle_time;
+	struct mtk_phy_timing *timing = &dsi->phy_timing;
+
+	ui = 1000000000 / dsi->data_rate;
+	cycle_time = div_u64(8000000000ULL, dsi->data_rate);
+
+	timing->lpx = NS_TO_CYCLE(60, cycle_time);
+	timing->da_hs_prepare = NS_TO_CYCLE(40 + 5 * ui, cycle_time);
+	timing->da_hs_zero = NS_TO_CYCLE(110 + 6 * ui, cycle_time);
+	timing->da_hs_trail = NS_TO_CYCLE(80 + 4 * ui, cycle_time);
 
-	ui = 1000 / dsi->data_rate + 0x01;
-	cycle_time = 8000 / dsi->data_rate + 0x01;
+	timing->ta_go = 4 * timing->lpx;
+	timing->ta_sure = 3 * timing->lpx / 2;
+	timing->ta_get = 5 * timing->lpx;
+	timing->da_hs_exit = 2 * timing->lpx;
 
-	timcon0 = T_LPX | T_HS_PREP << 8 | T_HS_ZERO << 16 | T_HS_TRAIL << 24;
-	timcon1 = 4 * T_LPX | (3 * T_LPX / 2) << 8 | 5 * T_LPX << 16 |
-		  T_HS_EXIT << 24;
-	timcon2 = ((NS_TO_CYCLE(0x64, cycle_time) + 0xa) << 24) |
-		  (NS_TO_CYCLE(0x150, cycle_time) << 16);
-	timcon3 = NS_TO_CYCLE(0x40, cycle_time) | (2 * T_LPX) << 16 |
-		  NS_TO_CYCLE(80 + 52 * ui, cycle_time) << 8;
+	timing->clk_hs_zero = NS_TO_CYCLE(336, cycle_time);
+	timing->clk_hs_trail = NS_TO_CYCLE(100, cycle_time) + 10;
+
+	timing->clk_hs_prepare = NS_TO_CYCLE(64, cycle_time);
+	timing->clk_hs_post = NS_TO_CYCLE(80 + 52 * ui, cycle_time);
+	timing->clk_hs_exit = 2 * timing->lpx;
+
+	timcon0 = timing->lpx | timing->da_hs_prepare << 8 |
+		  timing->da_hs_zero << 16 | timing->da_hs_trail << 24;
+	timcon1 = timing->ta_go | timing->ta_sure << 8 |
+		  timing->ta_get << 16 | timing->da_hs_exit << 24;
+	timcon2 = 1 << 8 | timing->clk_hs_zero << 16 |
+		  timing->clk_hs_trail << 24;
+	timcon3 = timing->clk_hs_prepare | timing->clk_hs_post << 8 |
+		  timing->clk_hs_exit << 16;
 
 	writel(timcon0, dsi->regs + DSI_PHY_TIMECON0);
 	writel(timcon1, dsi->regs + DSI_PHY_TIMECON1);
@@ -418,7 +451,8 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
 	u32 horizontal_sync_active_byte;
 	u32 horizontal_backporch_byte;
 	u32 horizontal_frontporch_byte;
-	u32 dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
+	u32 dsi_tmp_buf_bpp, data_phy_cycles;
+	struct mtk_phy_timing *timing = &dsi->phy_timing;
 
 	struct videomode *vm = &dsi->vm;
 
@@ -445,7 +479,34 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
 		horizontal_backporch_byte = ((vm->hback_porch + vm->hsync_len) *
 			dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10);
 
-	horizontal_frontporch_byte = (vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 12);
+	data_phy_cycles = timing->lpx + timing->da_hs_prepare +
+				  timing->da_hs_zero + timing->da_hs_exit + 2;
+
+	if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST) {
+		if (vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
+		    data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) {
+			horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
+						     dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
+						     data_phy_cycles *
+						     dsi->lanes - 18;
+		} else {
+			DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will under 60Hz\n");
+			horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
+						     dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
+		}
+	} else {
+		if (vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
+		    data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) {
+			horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
+						     dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
+						     data_phy_cycles *
+						     dsi->lanes - 12;
+		} else {
+			DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will under 60Hz\n");
+			horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
+						     dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
+		}
+	}
 
 	writel(horizontal_sync_active_byte, dsi->regs + DSI_HSA_WC);
 	writel(horizontal_backporch_byte, dsi->regs + DSI_HBP_WC);
@@ -545,8 +606,7 @@ static int mtk_dsi_poweron(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
 {
 	struct device *dev = dsi->->host.dev;
 	int ret;
-	u64 pixel_clock, total_bits;
-	u32 htotal, htotal_bits, bit_per_pixel, overhead_cycles, overhead_bits;
+	u32 bit_per_pixel;
 
 	if (++dsi->refcount != 1)
 		return 0;
@@ -565,24 +625,7 @@ static int mtk_dsi_poweron(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
 		break;
 	}
 
-	/**
-	 * htotal_time = htotal * byte_per_pixel / num_lanes
-	 * overhead_time = lpx + hs_prepare + hs_zero + hs_trail + hs_exit
-	 * mipi_ratio = (htotal_time + overhead_time) / htotal_time
-	 * data_rate = pixel_clock * bit_per_pixel * mipi_ratio / num_lanes;
-	 */
-	pixel_clock = dsi->vm.pixelclock;
-	htotal = dsi->vm.hactive + dsi->vm.hback_porch + dsi->vm.hfront_porch +
-			dsi->vm.hsync_len;
-	htotal_bits = htotal * bit_per_pixel;
-
-	overhead_cycles = T_LPX + T_HS_PREP + T_HS_ZERO + T_HS_TRAIL +
-			T_HS_EXIT;
-	overhead_bits = overhead_cycles * dsi->lanes * 8;
-	total_bits = htotal_bits + overhead_bits;
-
-	dsi->data_rate = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(pixel_clock * total_bits,
-					  htotal * dsi->lanes);
+	dsi->data_rate = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(dsi->vm.pixelclock * bit_per_pixel, dsi->lanes);
 
 	ret = clk_set_rate(dsi->hs_clk, dsi->data_rate);
 	if (ret < 0) {
-- 
2.21.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-27  8:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-27  8:01 [v5 0/7] Support dsi for mt8183 Jitao Shi
2019-06-27  8:01 ` Jitao Shi
2019-06-27  8:01 ` Jitao Shi
2019-06-27  8:01 ` [v5 1/7] drm/mediatek: move mipi_dsi_host_register to probe Jitao Shi
2019-06-27  8:01   ` Jitao Shi
2019-06-27  8:01   ` Jitao Shi
2019-06-28  6:10   ` CK Hu
2019-06-28  6:10     ` CK Hu
2019-06-28  6:10     ` CK Hu
2019-07-17 21:48     ` Ryan Case
2019-07-17 21:48       ` Ryan Case
2019-07-17 21:48       ` Ryan Case
2019-06-27  8:01 ` [v5 2/7] drm/mediatek: fixes CMDQ reg address of mt8173 is different with mt2701 Jitao Shi
2019-06-27  8:01   ` Jitao Shi
2019-06-27  8:01   ` Jitao Shi
2019-06-28  5:57   ` CK Hu
2019-06-28  5:57     ` CK Hu
2019-06-28  5:57     ` CK Hu
2019-06-27  8:01 ` [v5 3/7] drm/mediatek: add dsi reg commit disable control Jitao Shi
2019-06-27  8:01   ` Jitao Shi
2019-06-27  8:01   ` Jitao Shi
2019-06-27  8:01 ` [v5 4/7] drm/mediatek: add frame size control Jitao Shi
2019-06-27  8:01   ` Jitao Shi
2019-06-27  8:01   ` Jitao Shi
2019-07-01  1:29   ` CK Hu
2019-07-01  1:29     ` CK Hu
2019-07-01  1:29     ` CK Hu
2019-06-27  8:01 ` [v5 5/7] drm/mediatek: add mt8183 dsi driver support Jitao Shi
2019-06-27  8:01   ` Jitao Shi
2019-06-27  8:01   ` Jitao Shi
2019-06-27  8:01 ` Jitao Shi [this message]
2019-06-27  8:01   ` [v5 6/7] drm/mediatek: change the dsi phytiming calculate method Jitao Shi
2019-06-27  8:01   ` Jitao Shi
2019-07-01  1:43   ` CK Hu
2019-07-01  1:43     ` CK Hu
2019-07-01  1:43     ` CK Hu
2019-07-17 22:03     ` Ryan Case
2019-07-17 22:03       ` Ryan Case
2019-07-17 22:03       ` Ryan Case
2019-06-27  8:01 ` [v5 7/7] drm: mediatek: adjust dsi and mipi_tx probe sequence Jitao Shi
2019-06-27  8:01   ` Jitao Shi
2019-06-27  8:01   ` Jitao Shi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190627080116.40264-7-jitao.shi@mediatek.com \
    --to=jitao.shi@mediatek.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=ajaykumar.rs@samsung.com \
    --cc=andy.yan@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com \
    --cc=cawa.cheng@mediatek.com \
    --cc=ck.hu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=eddie.huang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=inki.dae@samsung.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=rahul.sharma@samsung.com \
    --cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryandcase@chromium.org \
    --cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
    --cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
    --cc=stonea168@163.com \
    --cc=treding@nvidia.com \
    --cc=vpalatin@chromium.org \
    --cc=yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.