All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krish Sadhukhan <krish.sadhukhan@oracle.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: rkrcmar@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, jmattson@google.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] kvm-unit-test nVMX: Test Host Segment Registers and Descriptor Tables on vmentry of nested guests
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 18:14:47 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190628221447.23498-3-krish.sadhukhan@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190628221447.23498-1-krish.sadhukhan@oracle.com>

According to section "Checks on Host Segment and Descriptor-Table
Registers" in Intel SDM vol 3C, the following checks are performed on
vmentry of nested guests:

    - In the selector field for each of CS, SS, DS, ES, FS, GS and TR, the
      RPL (bits 1:0) and the TI flag (bit 2) must be 0.
    - The selector fields for CS and TR cannot be 0000H.
    - The selector field for SS cannot be 0000H if the "host address-space
      size" VM-exit control is 0.
    - On processors that support Intel 64 architecture, the base-address
      fields for FS, GS, GDTR, IDTR, and TR must contain canonical
      addresses.

Signed-off-by: Krish Sadhukhan <krish.sadhukhan@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Karl Heubaum <karl.heubaum@oracle.com>
---
 lib/x86/processor.h |   5 ++
 x86/vmx_tests.c     | 159 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 164 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/x86/processor.h b/lib/x86/processor.h
index 4fef0bc..c6edc26 100644
--- a/lib/x86/processor.h
+++ b/lib/x86/processor.h
@@ -461,6 +461,11 @@ static inline void write_pkru(u32 pkru)
         : : "a" (eax), "c" (ecx), "d" (edx));
 }
 
+static u64 make_non_canonical(u64 addr)
+{
+	return (addr | 1ull << 48);
+}
+
 static inline bool is_canonical(u64 addr)
 {
 	return (s64)(addr << 16) >> 16 == addr;
diff --git a/x86/vmx_tests.c b/x86/vmx_tests.c
index b50d858..5911a60 100644
--- a/x86/vmx_tests.c
+++ b/x86/vmx_tests.c
@@ -6938,6 +6938,163 @@ static void test_load_host_pat(void)
 	test_pat(HOST_PAT, "HOST_PAT", EXI_CONTROLS, EXI_LOAD_PAT);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Test a value for the given VMCS field.
+ *
+ *  "field" - VMCS field
+ *  "field_name" - string name of VMCS field
+ *  "bit_start" - starting bit
+ *  "bit_end" - ending bit
+ *  "val" - value that the bit range must or must not contain
+ *  "valid_val" - whether value given in 'val' must be valid or not
+ *  "error" - expected VMCS error when vmentry fails for an invalid value
+ */
+static void test_vmcs_field(u64 field, const char *field_name, u32 bit_start,
+			    u32 bit_end, u64 val, bool valid_val, u32 error)
+{
+	u64 field_saved = vmcs_read(field);
+	u32 i;
+	u64 tmp;
+	u32 bit_on;
+	u64 mask = ~0ull;
+
+	mask = (mask >> bit_end) << bit_end;
+	mask = mask | ((1 << bit_start) - 1);
+	tmp = (field_saved & mask) | (val << bit_start);
+
+	vmcs_write(field, tmp);
+	report_prefix_pushf("%s %lx", field_name, tmp);
+	if (valid_val)
+		test_vmx_vmlaunch(0, false);
+	else
+		test_vmx_vmlaunch(error, false);
+	report_prefix_pop();
+
+	for (i = bit_start; i <= bit_end; i = i + 2) {
+		bit_on = ((1ull < i) & (val << bit_start)) ? 0 : 1;
+		if (bit_on)
+			tmp = field_saved | (1ull << i);
+		else
+			tmp = field_saved & ~(1ull << i);
+		vmcs_write(field, tmp);
+		report_prefix_pushf("%s %lx", field_name, tmp);
+		if (valid_val)
+			test_vmx_vmlaunch(error, false);
+		else
+			test_vmx_vmlaunch(0, false);
+		report_prefix_pop();
+	}
+
+	vmcs_write(field, field_saved);
+}
+
+static void test_canonical(u64 field, const char * field_name)
+{
+	u64 addr_saved = vmcs_read(field);
+	u64 addr = addr_saved;
+
+	report_prefix_pushf("%s %lx", field_name, addr);
+	if (is_canonical(addr)) {
+		test_vmx_vmlaunch(0, false);
+		report_prefix_pop();
+
+		addr = make_non_canonical(addr);
+		vmcs_write(field, addr);
+		report_prefix_pushf("%s %lx", field_name, addr);
+		test_vmx_vmlaunch(VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_HOST_STATE_FIELD,
+				  false);
+
+		vmcs_write(field, addr_saved);
+	} else {
+		test_vmx_vmlaunch(VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_HOST_STATE_FIELD,
+				  false);
+	}
+	report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
+/*
+ * 1. In the selector field for each of CS, SS, DS, ES, FS, GS and TR, the
+ *    RPL (bits 1:0) and the TI flag (bit 2) must be 0.
+ * 2. The selector fields for CS and TR cannot be 0000H.
+ * 3. The selector field for SS cannot be 0000H if the "host address-space
+ *    size" VM-exit control is 0.
+ * 4. On processors that support Intel 64 architecture, the base-address
+ *    fields for FS, GS and TR must contain canonical addresses.
+ */
+static void test_host_segment_regs(void)
+{
+	u32 exit_ctrl_saved = vmcs_read(EXI_CONTROLS);
+	u16 selector_saved;
+
+	/*
+	 * Test RPL and TI flags
+	 */
+	test_vmcs_field(HOST_SEL_CS, "HOST_SEL_CS", 0, 2, 0x0, true,
+		     VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_HOST_STATE_FIELD);
+	test_vmcs_field(HOST_SEL_SS, "HOST_SEL_SS", 0, 2, 0x0, true,
+		     VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_HOST_STATE_FIELD);
+	test_vmcs_field(HOST_SEL_DS, "HOST_SEL_DS", 0, 2, 0x0, true,
+		     VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_HOST_STATE_FIELD);
+	test_vmcs_field(HOST_SEL_ES, "HOST_SEL_ES", 0, 2, 0x0, true,
+		     VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_HOST_STATE_FIELD);
+	test_vmcs_field(HOST_SEL_FS, "HOST_SEL_FS", 0, 2, 0x0, true,
+		     VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_HOST_STATE_FIELD);
+	test_vmcs_field(HOST_SEL_GS, "HOST_SEL_GS", 0, 2, 0x0, true,
+		     VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_HOST_STATE_FIELD);
+	test_vmcs_field(HOST_SEL_TR, "HOST_SEL_TR", 0, 2, 0x0, true,
+		     VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_HOST_STATE_FIELD);
+
+	/*
+	 * Test that CS and TR fields can not be 0x0000
+	 */
+	test_vmcs_field(HOST_SEL_CS, "HOST_SEL_CS", 3, 15, 0x0000, false,
+			     VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_HOST_STATE_FIELD);
+	test_vmcs_field(HOST_SEL_TR, "HOST_SEL_TR", 3, 15, 0x0000, false,
+			     VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_HOST_STATE_FIELD);
+
+	/*
+	 * SS field can not be 0x0000 if "host address-space size" VM-exit
+	 * control is 0
+	 */
+	selector_saved = vmcs_read(HOST_SEL_SS);
+	vmcs_write(HOST_SEL_SS, 0);
+	if (exit_ctrl_saved & EXI_HOST_64) {
+		report_prefix_pushf("HOST_SEL_SS 0");
+		test_vmx_vmlaunch(0, false);
+		report_prefix_pop();
+
+		vmcs_write(EXI_CONTROLS, exit_ctrl_saved & ~EXI_HOST_64);
+	}
+
+	report_prefix_pushf("HOST_SEL_SS 0");
+	test_vmx_vmlaunch(VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_HOST_STATE_FIELD, false);
+	report_prefix_pop();
+
+	vmcs_write(HOST_SEL_SS, selector_saved);
+	vmcs_write(EXI_CONTROLS, exit_ctrl_saved);
+
+#ifdef __x86_64__
+	/*
+	 * Base address for FS, GS and TR must be canonical
+	 */
+	test_canonical(HOST_BASE_FS, "HOST_BASE_FS");
+	test_canonical(HOST_BASE_GS, "HOST_BASE_GS");
+	test_canonical(HOST_BASE_TR, "HOST_BASE_TR");
+#endif
+}
+
+/*
+ *  On processors that support Intel 64 architecture, the base-address
+ *  fields for GDTR and IDTR must contain canonical addresses.
+ */
+static void test_host_desc_tables(void)
+{
+#ifdef __x86_64__
+	test_canonical(HOST_BASE_GDTR, "HOST_BASE_GDTR");
+	test_canonical(HOST_BASE_IDTR, "HOST_BASE_IDTR");
+#endif
+}
+
 /*
  * Check that the virtual CPU checks the VMX Host State Area as
  * documented in the Intel SDM.
@@ -6958,6 +7115,8 @@ static void vmx_host_state_area_test(void)
 
 	test_host_efer();
 	test_load_host_pat();
+	test_host_segment_regs();
+	test_host_desc_tables();
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.20.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-28 22:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-28 22:14 [PATCH 0/2] nVMX: Check Host Segment Registers and Descriptor Tables on vmentry of nested guests Krish Sadhukhan
2019-06-28 22:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM " Krish Sadhukhan
2019-07-02 16:25   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-03 23:57     ` Krish Sadhukhan
2019-06-28 22:14 ` Krish Sadhukhan [this message]
2019-06-29  2:00   ` [PATCH 2/2] kvm-unit-test nVMX: Test " Nadav Amit
2019-06-29  2:30     ` Nadav Amit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190628221447.23498-3-krish.sadhukhan@oracle.com \
    --to=krish.sadhukhan@oracle.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.