All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigosiqueiramelo@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] drm/vblank: Document and fix vblank count barrier semantics
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 17:23:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190719152314.7706-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw)

Noticed while reviewing code. I'm not sure whether this might or might
not explain some of the missed vblank hilarity we've been seeing. I
think those all go through the vblank completion event, which has
unconditional barriers - it always takes the spinlock. Therefore no
cc stable.

v2:
- Barrriers are hard, put them in in the right order (Chris).
- Improve the comments a bit.

Cc: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigosiqueiramelo@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 include/drm/drm_vblank.h     | 13 +++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
index 603ab105125d..eb2a8304536c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
@@ -295,11 +295,23 @@ static void drm_update_vblank_count(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe,
 static u64 drm_vblank_count(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe)
 {
 	struct drm_vblank_crtc *vblank = &dev->vblank[pipe];
+	u64 count;
 
 	if (WARN_ON(pipe >= dev->num_crtcs))
 		return 0;
 
-	return vblank->count;
+	count = vblank->count;
+
+	/*
+	 * This read barrier corresponds to the implicit write barrier of the
+	 * write seqlock in store_vblank(). Note that this is the only place
+	 * where we need an explicit barrier, since all other access goes
+	 * through drm_vblank_count_and_time(), which already has the required
+	 * read barrier curtesy of the read seqlock.
+	 */
+	smp_rmb();
+
+	return count;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -764,6 +776,14 @@ drm_get_last_vbltimestamp(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe,
  * vblank interrupt (since it only reports the software vblank counter), see
  * drm_crtc_accurate_vblank_count() for such use-cases.
  *
+ * Note that for a given vblank counter value drm_crtc_handle_vblank()
+ * and drm_crtc_vblank_count() or drm_crtc_vblank_count_and_time()
+ * provide a barrier: Any writes done before calling
+ * drm_crtc_handle_vblank() will be visible to callers of the later
+ * functions, iff the vblank count is the same or a later one.
+ *
+ * See also &drm_vblank_crtc.count.
+ *
  * Returns:
  * The software vblank counter.
  */
@@ -818,6 +838,14 @@ static u64 drm_vblank_count_and_time(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe,
  * vblank events since the system was booted, including lost events due to
  * modesetting activity. Returns corresponding system timestamp of the time
  * of the vblank interval that corresponds to the current vblank counter value.
+ *
+ * Note that for a given vblank counter value drm_crtc_handle_vblank()
+ * and drm_crtc_vblank_count() or drm_crtc_vblank_count_and_time()
+ * provide a barrier: Any writes done before calling
+ * drm_crtc_handle_vblank() will be visible to callers of the later
+ * functions, iff the vblank count is the same or a later one.
+ *
+ * See also &drm_vblank_crtc.count.
  */
 u64 drm_crtc_vblank_count_and_time(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
 				   ktime_t *vblanktime)
@@ -1791,6 +1819,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_handle_vblank);
  *
  * This is the native KMS version of drm_handle_vblank().
  *
+ * Note that for a given vblank counter value drm_crtc_handle_vblank()
+ * and drm_crtc_vblank_count() or drm_crtc_vblank_count_and_time()
+ * provide a barrier: Any writes done before calling
+ * drm_crtc_handle_vblank() will be visible to callers of the later
+ * functions, iff the vblank count is the same or a later one.
+ *
+ * See also &drm_vblank_crtc.count.
+ *
  * Returns:
  * True if the event was successfully handled, false on failure.
  */
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_vblank.h b/include/drm/drm_vblank.h
index e528bb2f659d..5ec623740158 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_vblank.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_vblank.h
@@ -110,7 +110,18 @@ struct drm_vblank_crtc {
 	seqlock_t seqlock;
 
 	/**
-	 * @count: Current software vblank counter.
+	 * @count:
+	 *
+	 * Current software vblank counter.
+	 *
+	 * Note that for a given vblank counter value drm_crtc_handle_vblank()
+	 * and drm_crtc_vblank_count() or drm_crtc_vblank_count_and_time()
+	 * provide a barrier: Any writes done before calling
+	 * drm_crtc_handle_vblank() will be visible to callers of the later
+	 * functions, iff the vblank count is the same or a later one.
+	 *
+	 * IMPORTANT: This guarantee requires barriers, therefor never access
+	 * this field directly. Use drm_crtc_vblank_count() instead.
 	 */
 	u64 count;
 	/**
-- 
2.22.0

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

             reply	other threads:[~2019-07-19 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-19 15:23 Daniel Vetter [this message]
2019-07-19 15:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/vkms: Use wait_for_flip_done Daniel Vetter
2019-09-03 12:49   ` Rodrigo Siqueira
2019-09-03 15:12     ` Daniel Vetter
2019-07-19 15:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/vkms: Reduce critical section in vblank_simulate Daniel Vetter
2019-09-03 12:50   ` Rodrigo Siqueira
2019-09-03 15:16     ` Daniel Vetter
2019-07-19 15:46 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/3] drm/vblank: Document and fix vblank count barrier semantics Patchwork
2019-07-19 16:19 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-07-19 17:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] " Ville Syrjälä
2019-07-19 18:33   ` Daniel Vetter
2019-07-19 18:56     ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-07-23 13:13   ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2019-08-19 16:21     ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-09-03 12:47     ` Rodrigo Siqueira
2019-09-03 15:09       ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2019-09-03 15:17         ` Rodrigo Siqueira
2019-09-03 15:46           ` Daniel Vetter
2019-07-19 23:02 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [1/3] " Patchwork
2019-07-23 13:43 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with drm/vblank: Document and fix vblank count barrier semantics (rev2) Patchwork
2019-07-23 14:34 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-07-23 18:18 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190719152314.7706-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --to=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rodrigosiqueiramelo@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.