From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
Joao Pinto <jpinto@synopsys.com>,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] [v2] dmaengine: dw-edma: fix __iomem type confusion
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 14:44:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190722124457.1093886-2-arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190722124457.1093886-1-arnd@arndb.de>
The new driver mixes up dma_addr_t and __iomem pointers, which results
in warnings on some 32-bit architectures, like:
drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c: In function '__dw_regs':
drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c:28:9: error: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Werror=int-to-pointer-cast]
return (struct dw_edma_v0_regs __iomem *)dw->rg_region.vaddr;
Make it use __iomem pointers consistently here, and avoid using dma_addr_t
for __iomem tokens altogether.
A small complication here is the debugfs code, which passes an __iomem
token as the private data for debugfs files, requiring the use of
extra __force.
Fixes: 7e4b8a4fbe2c ("dmaengine: Add Synopsys eDMA IP version 0 support")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190617131918.2518727-1-arnd@arndb.de/
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
v2: whitespace fixes
---
drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h | 2 +-
drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c | 18 ++++++++--------
drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c | 10 ++++-----
drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-debugfs.c | 27 ++++++++++++------------
4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h
index b6cc90cbc9dc..4e5f9f6e901b 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h
+++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ struct dw_edma_burst {
struct dw_edma_region {
phys_addr_t paddr;
- dma_addr_t vaddr;
+ void __iomem *vaddr;
size_t sz;
};
diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
index 4c96e1c948f2..dc85f55e1bb8 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
@@ -130,19 +130,19 @@ static int dw_edma_pcie_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
chip->id = pdev->devfn;
chip->irq = pdev->irq;
- dw->rg_region.vaddr = (dma_addr_t)pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[pdata->rg_bar];
+ dw->rg_region.vaddr = pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[pdata->rg_bar];
dw->rg_region.vaddr += pdata->rg_off;
dw->rg_region.paddr = pdev->resource[pdata->rg_bar].start;
dw->rg_region.paddr += pdata->rg_off;
dw->rg_region.sz = pdata->rg_sz;
- dw->ll_region.vaddr = (dma_addr_t)pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[pdata->ll_bar];
+ dw->ll_region.vaddr = pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[pdata->ll_bar];
dw->ll_region.vaddr += pdata->ll_off;
dw->ll_region.paddr = pdev->resource[pdata->ll_bar].start;
dw->ll_region.paddr += pdata->ll_off;
dw->ll_region.sz = pdata->ll_sz;
- dw->dt_region.vaddr = (dma_addr_t)pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[pdata->dt_bar];
+ dw->dt_region.vaddr = pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[pdata->dt_bar];
dw->dt_region.vaddr += pdata->dt_off;
dw->dt_region.paddr = pdev->resource[pdata->dt_bar].start;
dw->dt_region.paddr += pdata->dt_off;
@@ -158,17 +158,17 @@ static int dw_edma_pcie_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
pci_dbg(pdev, "Mode:\t%s\n",
dw->mode == EDMA_MODE_LEGACY ? "Legacy" : "Unroll");
- pci_dbg(pdev, "Registers:\tBAR=%u, off=0x%.8lx, sz=0x%zx bytes, addr(v=%pa, p=%pa)\n",
+ pci_dbg(pdev, "Registers:\tBAR=%u, off=0x%.8lx, sz=0x%zx bytes, addr(v=%p, p=%pa)\n",
pdata->rg_bar, pdata->rg_off, pdata->rg_sz,
- &dw->rg_region.vaddr, &dw->rg_region.paddr);
+ dw->rg_region.vaddr, &dw->rg_region.paddr);
- pci_dbg(pdev, "L. List:\tBAR=%u, off=0x%.8lx, sz=0x%zx bytes, addr(v=%pa, p=%pa)\n",
+ pci_dbg(pdev, "L. List:\tBAR=%u, off=0x%.8lx, sz=0x%zx bytes, addr(v=%p, p=%pa)\n",
pdata->ll_bar, pdata->ll_off, pdata->ll_sz,
- &dw->ll_region.vaddr, &dw->ll_region.paddr);
+ dw->ll_region.vaddr, &dw->ll_region.paddr);
- pci_dbg(pdev, "Data:\tBAR=%u, off=0x%.8lx, sz=0x%zx bytes, addr(v=%pa, p=%pa)\n",
+ pci_dbg(pdev, "Data:\tBAR=%u, off=0x%.8lx, sz=0x%zx bytes, addr(v=%p, p=%pa)\n",
pdata->dt_bar, pdata->dt_off, pdata->dt_sz,
- &dw->dt_region.vaddr, &dw->dt_region.paddr);
+ dw->dt_region.vaddr, &dw->dt_region.paddr);
pci_dbg(pdev, "Nr. IRQs:\t%u\n", dw->nr_irqs);
diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c
index 8a3180ed49a6..97e3fd41c8a8 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ enum dw_edma_control {
static inline struct dw_edma_v0_regs __iomem *__dw_regs(struct dw_edma *dw)
{
- return (struct dw_edma_v0_regs __iomem *)dw->rg_region.vaddr;
+ return dw->rg_region.vaddr;
}
#define SET(dw, name, value) \
@@ -192,13 +192,13 @@ u32 dw_edma_v0_core_status_abort_int(struct dw_edma *dw, enum dw_edma_dir dir)
static void dw_edma_v0_core_write_chunk(struct dw_edma_chunk *chunk)
{
struct dw_edma_burst *child;
- struct dw_edma_v0_lli *lli;
- struct dw_edma_v0_llp *llp;
+ struct dw_edma_v0_lli __iomem *lli;
+ struct dw_edma_v0_llp __iomem *llp;
u32 control = 0, i = 0;
u64 sar, dar, addr;
int j;
- lli = (struct dw_edma_v0_lli *)chunk->ll_region.vaddr;
+ lli = chunk->ll_region.vaddr;
if (chunk->cb)
control = DW_EDMA_V0_CB;
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ static void dw_edma_v0_core_write_chunk(struct dw_edma_chunk *chunk)
i++;
}
- llp = (struct dw_edma_v0_llp *)&lli[i];
+ llp = (void __iomem *)&lli[i];
control = DW_EDMA_V0_LLP | DW_EDMA_V0_TCB;
if (!chunk->cb)
control |= DW_EDMA_V0_CB;
diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-debugfs.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-debugfs.c
index 5728b6fe938c..42739508c0d8 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-debugfs.c
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
#include "dw-edma-core.h"
#define REGS_ADDR(name) \
- ((dma_addr_t *)®s->name)
+ ((void __force *)®s->name)
#define REGISTER(name) \
{ #name, REGS_ADDR(name) }
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
static struct dentry *base_dir;
static struct dw_edma *dw;
-static struct dw_edma_v0_regs *regs;
+static struct dw_edma_v0_regs __iomem *regs;
static struct {
- void *start;
- void *end;
+ void __iomem *start;
+ void __iomem *end;
} lim[2][EDMA_V0_MAX_NR_CH];
struct debugfs_entries {
@@ -54,22 +54,23 @@ struct debugfs_entries {
static int dw_edma_debugfs_u32_get(void *data, u64 *val)
{
+ void __iomem *reg = (void __force __iomem *)data;
if (dw->mode == EDMA_MODE_LEGACY &&
- data >= (void *)®s->type.legacy.ch) {
- void *ptr = (void *)®s->type.legacy.ch;
+ reg >= (void __iomem *)®s->type.legacy.ch) {
+ void __iomem *ptr = ®s->type.legacy.ch;
u32 viewport_sel = 0;
unsigned long flags;
u16 ch;
for (ch = 0; ch < dw->wr_ch_cnt; ch++)
- if (lim[0][ch].start >= data && data < lim[0][ch].end) {
- ptr += (data - lim[0][ch].start);
+ if (lim[0][ch].start >= reg && reg < lim[0][ch].end) {
+ ptr += (reg - lim[0][ch].start);
goto legacy_sel_wr;
}
for (ch = 0; ch < dw->rd_ch_cnt; ch++)
- if (lim[1][ch].start >= data && data < lim[1][ch].end) {
- ptr += (data - lim[1][ch].start);
+ if (lim[1][ch].start >= reg && reg < lim[1][ch].end) {
+ ptr += (reg - lim[1][ch].start);
goto legacy_sel_rd;
}
@@ -86,7 +87,7 @@ static int dw_edma_debugfs_u32_get(void *data, u64 *val)
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dw->lock, flags);
} else {
- *val = readl(data);
+ *val = readl(reg);
}
return 0;
@@ -105,7 +106,7 @@ static void dw_edma_debugfs_create_x32(const struct debugfs_entries entries[],
}
}
-static void dw_edma_debugfs_regs_ch(struct dw_edma_v0_ch_regs *regs,
+static void dw_edma_debugfs_regs_ch(struct dw_edma_v0_ch_regs __iomem *regs,
struct dentry *dir)
{
int nr_entries;
@@ -288,7 +289,7 @@ void dw_edma_v0_debugfs_on(struct dw_edma_chip *chip)
if (!dw)
return;
- regs = (struct dw_edma_v0_regs *)dw->rg_region.vaddr;
+ regs = dw->rg_region.vaddr;
if (!regs)
return;
--
2.20.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-22 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-22 12:44 [PATCH 1/3] [v2] dmaengine: dw-edma: fix unnecessary stack usage Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-22 12:44 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2019-07-22 12:44 ` [PATCH 3/3] [v2] dmaengine: dw-edma: fix endianess confusion Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-22 13:34 ` Gustavo Pimentel
2019-07-22 13:33 ` [PATCH 1/3] [v2] dmaengine: dw-edma: fix unnecessary stack usage Gustavo Pimentel
2019-07-22 14:21 ` Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190722124457.1093886-2-arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com \
--cc=jpinto@synopsys.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.