All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bo Zhang <bozhang.zhang@broadcom.com>,
	Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>,
	Volodymyr Babchuk <volodymyr_babchuk@epam.com>,
	Gaku Inami <gaku.inami.xh@renesas.com>,
	Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 10/10] firmware: arm_scmi: Use asynchronous CLOCK_RATE_SET when possible
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 14:51:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190726135138.9858-11-sudeep.holla@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190726135138.9858-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com>

CLOCK_PROTOCOL_ATTRIBUTES provides attributes to indicate the maximum
number of pending asynchronous clock rate changes supported by the
platform. If it's non-zero, then we should be able to use asynchronous
clock rate set for any clocks until the maximum limit is reached.

Tracking the current count of pending asynchronous clock set rate
requests, we can decide if the incoming/new request for clock set rate
can be handled asynchronously or not until the maximum limit is
reached.

Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
---
 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c
index dd215bd11a58..4a32ae1822a3 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ struct scmi_msg_resp_clock_describe_rates {
 struct scmi_clock_set_rate {
 	__le32 flags;
 #define CLOCK_SET_ASYNC		BIT(0)
-#define CLOCK_SET_DELAYED	BIT(1)
+#define CLOCK_SET_IGNORE_RESP	BIT(1)
 #define CLOCK_SET_ROUND_UP	BIT(2)
 #define CLOCK_SET_ROUND_AUTO	BIT(3)
 	__le32 id;
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ struct scmi_clock_set_rate {
 struct clock_info {
 	int num_clocks;
 	int max_async_req;
+	atomic_t cur_async_req;
 	struct scmi_clock_info *clk;
 };
 
@@ -221,21 +222,33 @@ static int scmi_clock_rate_set(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 clk_id,
 			       u64 rate)
 {
 	int ret;
+	u32 flags = 0;
 	struct scmi_xfer *t;
 	struct scmi_clock_set_rate *cfg;
+	struct clock_info *ci = handle->clk_priv;
 
 	ret = scmi_xfer_get_init(handle, CLOCK_RATE_SET, SCMI_PROTOCOL_CLOCK,
 				 sizeof(*cfg), 0, &t);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	if (ci->max_async_req &&
+	    atomic_inc_return(&ci->cur_async_req) < ci->max_async_req)
+		flags |= CLOCK_SET_ASYNC;
+
 	cfg = t->tx.buf;
-	cfg->flags = cpu_to_le32(0);
+	cfg->flags = cpu_to_le32(flags);
 	cfg->id = cpu_to_le32(clk_id);
 	cfg->value_low = cpu_to_le32(rate & 0xffffffff);
 	cfg->value_high = cpu_to_le32(rate >> 32);
 
-	ret = scmi_do_xfer(handle, t);
+	if (flags & CLOCK_SET_ASYNC)
+		ret = scmi_do_xfer_with_response(handle, t);
+	else
+		ret = scmi_do_xfer(handle, t);
+
+	if (ci->max_async_req)
+		atomic_dec(&ci->cur_async_req);
 
 	scmi_xfer_put(handle, t);
 	return ret;
-- 
2.17.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>,
	Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bo Zhang <bozhang.zhang@broadcom.com>,
	Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Gaku Inami <gaku.inami.xh@renesas.com>,
	Volodymyr Babchuk <volodymyr_babchuk@epam.com>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 10/10] firmware: arm_scmi: Use asynchronous CLOCK_RATE_SET when possible
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 14:51:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190726135138.9858-11-sudeep.holla@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190726135138.9858-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com>

CLOCK_PROTOCOL_ATTRIBUTES provides attributes to indicate the maximum
number of pending asynchronous clock rate changes supported by the
platform. If it's non-zero, then we should be able to use asynchronous
clock rate set for any clocks until the maximum limit is reached.

Tracking the current count of pending asynchronous clock set rate
requests, we can decide if the incoming/new request for clock set rate
can be handled asynchronously or not until the maximum limit is
reached.

Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
---
 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c
index dd215bd11a58..4a32ae1822a3 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ struct scmi_msg_resp_clock_describe_rates {
 struct scmi_clock_set_rate {
 	__le32 flags;
 #define CLOCK_SET_ASYNC		BIT(0)
-#define CLOCK_SET_DELAYED	BIT(1)
+#define CLOCK_SET_IGNORE_RESP	BIT(1)
 #define CLOCK_SET_ROUND_UP	BIT(2)
 #define CLOCK_SET_ROUND_AUTO	BIT(3)
 	__le32 id;
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ struct scmi_clock_set_rate {
 struct clock_info {
 	int num_clocks;
 	int max_async_req;
+	atomic_t cur_async_req;
 	struct scmi_clock_info *clk;
 };
 
@@ -221,21 +222,33 @@ static int scmi_clock_rate_set(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 clk_id,
 			       u64 rate)
 {
 	int ret;
+	u32 flags = 0;
 	struct scmi_xfer *t;
 	struct scmi_clock_set_rate *cfg;
+	struct clock_info *ci = handle->clk_priv;
 
 	ret = scmi_xfer_get_init(handle, CLOCK_RATE_SET, SCMI_PROTOCOL_CLOCK,
 				 sizeof(*cfg), 0, &t);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	if (ci->max_async_req &&
+	    atomic_inc_return(&ci->cur_async_req) < ci->max_async_req)
+		flags |= CLOCK_SET_ASYNC;
+
 	cfg = t->tx.buf;
-	cfg->flags = cpu_to_le32(0);
+	cfg->flags = cpu_to_le32(flags);
 	cfg->id = cpu_to_le32(clk_id);
 	cfg->value_low = cpu_to_le32(rate & 0xffffffff);
 	cfg->value_high = cpu_to_le32(rate >> 32);
 
-	ret = scmi_do_xfer(handle, t);
+	if (flags & CLOCK_SET_ASYNC)
+		ret = scmi_do_xfer_with_response(handle, t);
+	else
+		ret = scmi_do_xfer(handle, t);
+
+	if (ci->max_async_req)
+		atomic_dec(&ci->cur_async_req);
 
 	scmi_xfer_put(handle, t);
 	return ret;
-- 
2.17.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-07-26 13:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-26 13:51 [PATCH v2 00/10] firmware: arm_scmi: Add support for Rx channels, async commands and delayed response Sudeep Holla
2019-07-26 13:51 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-07-26 13:51 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] firmware: arm_scmi: Reorder some functions to avoid forward declarations Sudeep Holla
2019-07-26 13:51   ` Sudeep Holla
2019-07-26 13:51 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] firmware: arm_scmi: Segregate tx channel handling and prepare to add rx Sudeep Holla
2019-07-26 13:51   ` Sudeep Holla
2019-07-26 13:51 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] firmware: arm_scmi: Add receive channel support for notifications Sudeep Holla
2019-07-26 13:51   ` Sudeep Holla
2019-07-26 13:51 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] firmware: arm_scmi: Separate out tx buffer handling and prepare to add rx Sudeep Holla
2019-07-26 13:51   ` Sudeep Holla
2019-07-26 13:51 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] firmware: arm_scmi: Add mechanism to unpack message headers Sudeep Holla
2019-07-26 13:51   ` Sudeep Holla
2019-07-26 13:51 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] firmware: arm_scmi: Add support for asynchronous commands and delayed response Sudeep Holla
2019-07-26 13:51   ` Sudeep Holla
2019-07-26 13:51 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] firmware: arm_scmi: Drop async flag in sensor_ops->reading_get Sudeep Holla
2019-07-26 13:51   ` Sudeep Holla
2019-07-26 13:51 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] firmware: arm_scmi: Add asynchronous sensor read if it supports Sudeep Holla
2019-07-26 13:51   ` Sudeep Holla
2019-07-26 13:51 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] firmware: arm_scmi: Drop config flag in clk_ops->rate_set Sudeep Holla
2019-07-26 13:51   ` Sudeep Holla
2019-07-26 13:51 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2019-07-26 13:51   ` [PATCH v2 10/10] firmware: arm_scmi: Use asynchronous CLOCK_RATE_SET when possible Sudeep Holla
2019-07-26 16:22   ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-26 16:22     ` Stephen Boyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190726135138.9858-11-sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=bozhang.zhang@broadcom.com \
    --cc=etienne.carriere@linaro.org \
    --cc=gaku.inami.xh@renesas.com \
    --cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=volodymyr_babchuk@epam.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.