All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	"Tamas K Lengyel" <tamas@tklengyel.com>,
	"Mathieu Tarral" <mathieu.tarral@protonmail.com>,
	"Samuel Laurén" <samuel.lauren@iki.fi>,
	"Patrick Colp" <patrick.colp@oracle.com>,
	"Jan Kiszka" <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
	"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"Weijiang Yang" <weijiang.yang@intel.com>,
	Zhang@vger.kernel.org, "Yu C" <yu.c.zhang@intel.com>,
	"Mihai Donțu" <mdontu@bitdefender.com>,
	"Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v6 55/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_CONTROL_MSR and KVMI_EVENT_MSR
Date: Fri,  9 Aug 2019 19:00:10 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190809160047.8319-56-alazar@bitdefender.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190809160047.8319-1-alazar@bitdefender.com>

From: Mihai Donțu <mdontu@bitdefender.com>

The KVMI_CONTROL_MSR is used to enable/disable introspection for a
specific MSR. The KVMI_EVENT_MSR is send when the tracked MSR is going
to be changed. The introspection tool can respond by allowing the guest
to continue with normal execution or by discarding the change.

This is meant to prevent malicious changes to MSR-s
such as MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_EIP.

Signed-off-by: Mihai Donțu <mdontu@bitdefender.com>
Signed-off-by: Adalbert Lazăr <alazar@bitdefender.com>
---
 Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst |  73 +++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h    |   4 +
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvmi_host.h   |   6 ++
 arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvmi.h   |  18 ++++
 arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c                | 127 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/svm.c                 |  15 ++++
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c             |  10 +++
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c                 |  10 +++
 virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h                |   8 +-
 virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c                |  13 +++
 10 files changed, 283 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst
index 2e6e285c8e2e..c41c3edb0134 100644
--- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst
+++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst
@@ -1042,6 +1042,45 @@ ID set.
 * -KVM_EINVAL - padding is not zero
 * -KVM_EAGAIN - the selected vCPU can't be introspected yet
 
+22. KVMI_CONTROL_MSR
+--------------------
+
+:Architectures: x86
+:Versions: >= 1
+:Parameters:
+
+::
+
+	struct kvmi_vcpu_hdr;
+	struct kvmi_control_msr {
+		__u8 enable;
+		__u8 padding1;
+		__u16 padding2;
+		__u32 msr;
+	};
+
+:Returns:
+
+::
+
+	struct kvmi_error_code
+
+Enables/disables introspection for a specific MSR and must be used
+in addition to *KVMI_CONTROL_EVENTS* with the *KVMI_EVENT_MSR* ID set.
+
+Currently, only MSRs within the following two ranges are supported. Trying
+to control events for any other register will fail with -KVM_EINVAL::
+
+	0          ... 0x00001fff
+	0xc0000000 ... 0xc0001fff
+
+:Errors:
+
+* -KVM_EINVAL - the selected vCPU is invalid
+* -KVM_EINVAL - the specified MSR is invalid
+* -KVM_EINVAL - padding is not zero
+* -KVM_EAGAIN - the selected vCPU can't be introspected yet
+
 Events
 ======
 
@@ -1308,3 +1347,37 @@ register (see **KVMI_CONTROL_EVENTS**).
 ``kvmi_event``, the control register number, the old value and the new value
 are sent to the introspector. The *CONTINUE* action will set the ``new_val``.
 
+7. KVMI_EVENT_MSR
+-----------------
+
+:Architectures: x86
+:Versions: >= 1
+:Actions: CONTINUE, CRASH
+:Parameters:
+
+::
+
+	struct kvmi_event;
+	struct kvmi_event_msr {
+		__u32 msr;
+		__u32 padding;
+		__u64 old_value;
+		__u64 new_value;
+	};
+
+:Returns:
+
+::
+
+	struct kvmi_vcpu_hdr;
+	struct kvmi_event_reply;
+	struct kvmi_event_msr_reply {
+		__u64 new_val;
+	};
+
+This event is sent when a model specific register is going to be changed
+and the introspection has been enabled for this event and for this specific
+register (see **KVMI_CONTROL_EVENTS**).
+
+``kvmi_event``, the MSR number, the old value and the new value are
+sent to the introspector. The *CONTINUE* action will set the ``new_val``.
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 22f08f2732cc..91cd43a7a7bf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -1013,6 +1013,8 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops {
 	bool (*has_emulated_msr)(int index);
 	void (*cpuid_update)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 
+	void (*msr_intercept)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int msr,
+				bool enable);
 	void (*cr3_write_exiting)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool enable);
 	bool (*nested_pagefault)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 	bool (*spt_fault)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
@@ -1621,6 +1623,8 @@ static inline int kvm_cpu_get_apicid(int mps_cpu)
 #define put_smstate(type, buf, offset, val)                      \
 	*(type *)((buf) + (offset) - 0x7e00) = val
 
+void kvm_arch_msr_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int msr,
+				bool enable);
 bool kvm_mmu_nested_pagefault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 bool kvm_spt_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvm_control_cr3_write_exiting(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool enable);
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvmi_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvmi_host.h
index 83a098dc8939..8285d1eb0db6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvmi_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvmi_host.h
@@ -11,11 +11,17 @@ struct kvmi_arch_mem_access {
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_INTROSPECTION
 
+bool kvmi_msr_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr);
 bool kvmi_cr_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int cr,
 		   unsigned long old_value, unsigned long *new_value);
 
 #else /* CONFIG_KVM_INTROSPECTION */
 
+static inline bool kvmi_msr_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr)
+{
+	return true;
+}
+
 static inline bool kvmi_cr_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int cr,
 				 unsigned long old_value,
 				 unsigned long *new_value)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvmi.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvmi.h
index c983b4bd2c72..08af2eccbdfb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvmi.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvmi.h
@@ -79,4 +79,22 @@ struct kvmi_event_cr_reply {
 	__u64 new_val;
 };
 
+struct kvmi_control_msr {
+	__u8 enable;
+	__u8 padding1;
+	__u16 padding2;
+	__u32 msr;
+};
+
+struct kvmi_event_msr {
+	__u32 msr;
+	__u32 padding;
+	__u64 old_value;
+	__u64 new_value;
+};
+
+struct kvmi_event_msr_reply {
+	__u64 new_val;
+};
+
 #endif /* _UAPI_ASM_X86_KVMI_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c b/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c
index b3cab0db6a70..5dba4f87afef 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c
@@ -9,6 +9,133 @@
 #include <asm/vmx.h>
 #include "../../../virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h"
 
+static unsigned long *msr_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int *msr)
+{
+	switch (*msr) {
+	case 0 ... 0x1fff:
+		return IVCPU(vcpu)->msr_mask.low;
+	case 0xc0000000 ... 0xc0001fff:
+		*msr &= 0x1fff;
+		return IVCPU(vcpu)->msr_mask.high;
+	}
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static bool test_msr_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int msr)
+{
+	unsigned long *mask = msr_mask(vcpu, &msr);
+
+	if (!mask)
+		return false;
+	if (!test_bit(msr, mask))
+		return false;
+
+	return true;
+}
+
+static int msr_control(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int msr, bool enable)
+{
+	unsigned long *mask = msr_mask(vcpu, &msr);
+
+	if (!mask)
+		return -KVM_EINVAL;
+	if (enable)
+		set_bit(msr, mask);
+	else
+		clear_bit(msr, mask);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+int kvmi_arch_cmd_control_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			      const struct kvmi_control_msr *req)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	if (req->padding1 || req->padding2)
+		return -KVM_EINVAL;
+
+	err = msr_control(vcpu, req->msr, req->enable);
+
+	if (!err && req->enable)
+		kvm_arch_msr_intercept(vcpu, req->msr, req->enable);
+
+	return err;
+}
+
+static u32 kvmi_send_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 old_value,
+			 u64 new_value, u64 *ret_value)
+{
+	struct kvmi_event_msr e = {
+		.msr = msr,
+		.old_value = old_value,
+		.new_value = new_value,
+	};
+	struct kvmi_event_msr_reply r;
+	int err, action;
+
+	err = kvmi_send_event(vcpu, KVMI_EVENT_MSR, &e, sizeof(e),
+			      &r, sizeof(r), &action);
+	if (err) {
+		*ret_value = new_value;
+		return KVMI_EVENT_ACTION_CONTINUE;
+	}
+
+	*ret_value = r.new_val;
+	return action;
+}
+
+static bool __kvmi_msr_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr)
+{
+	struct msr_data old_msr = {
+		.host_initiated = true,
+		.index = msr->index,
+	};
+	bool ret = false;
+	u64 ret_value;
+	u32 action;
+
+	if (!test_msr_mask(vcpu, msr->index))
+		return true;
+	if (kvm_get_msr(vcpu, &old_msr))
+		return true;
+	if (old_msr.data == msr->data)
+		return true;
+
+	action = kvmi_send_msr(vcpu, msr->index, old_msr.data, msr->data,
+			       &ret_value);
+	switch (action) {
+	case KVMI_EVENT_ACTION_CONTINUE:
+		msr->data = ret_value;
+		ret = true;
+		break;
+	default:
+		kvmi_handle_common_event_actions(vcpu, action, "MSR");
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+bool kvmi_msr_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr)
+{
+	struct kvmi *ikvm;
+	bool ret = true;
+
+	if (msr->host_initiated)
+		return true;
+
+	ikvm = kvmi_get(vcpu->kvm);
+	if (!ikvm)
+		return true;
+
+	if (is_event_enabled(vcpu, KVMI_EVENT_MSR))
+		ret = __kvmi_msr_event(vcpu, msr);
+
+	kvmi_put(vcpu->kvm);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static void *alloc_get_registers_reply(const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg,
 				       const struct kvmi_get_registers *req,
 				       size_t *rpl_size)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index fc78b0052dee..cdb315578979 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -7098,6 +7098,20 @@ static int nested_enable_evmcs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return -ENODEV;
 }
 
+static void svm_msr_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int msr,
+				bool enable)
+{
+	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
+	u32 *msrpm = svm->msrpm;
+
+	/*
+	 * The below code enable or disable the msr interception for both
+	 * read and write. The best way will be to get here the current
+	 * bit status for read and send that value as argument.
+	 */
+	set_msr_interception(msrpm, msr, enable, enable);
+}
+
 static bool svm_nested_pagefault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	return false;
@@ -7126,6 +7140,7 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops __ro_after_init = {
 	.has_emulated_msr = svm_has_emulated_msr,
 
 	.cr3_write_exiting = svm_cr3_write_exiting,
+	.msr_intercept = svm_msr_intercept,
 	.nested_pagefault = svm_nested_pagefault,
 	.spt_fault = svm_spt_fault,
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 6450c8c44771..0306c7ef3158 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -7784,6 +7784,15 @@ static __exit void hardware_unsetup(void)
 	free_kvm_area();
 }
 
+static void vmx_msr_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int msr,
+			      bool enable)
+{
+	struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
+	unsigned long *msr_bitmap = vmx->vmcs01.msr_bitmap;
+
+	vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, msr, MSR_TYPE_W, enable);
+}
+
 static void vmx_cr3_write_exiting(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 					 bool enable)
 {
@@ -7844,6 +7853,7 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops vmx_x86_ops __ro_after_init = {
 	.cpu_has_accelerated_tpr = report_flexpriority,
 	.has_emulated_msr = vmx_has_emulated_msr,
 
+	.msr_intercept = vmx_msr_intercept,
 	.cr3_write_exiting = vmx_cr3_write_exiting,
 	.nested_pagefault = vmx_nested_pagefault,
 	.spt_fault = vmx_spt_fault,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 2cd146ccc6ff..ac027471c4f3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -1319,6 +1319,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_enable_efer_bits);
  */
 int kvm_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr)
 {
+	if (!kvmi_msr_event(vcpu, msr))
+		return 1;
+
 	switch (msr->index) {
 	case MSR_FS_BASE:
 	case MSR_GS_BASE:
@@ -10083,6 +10086,13 @@ bool kvm_vector_hashing_enabled(void)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_vector_hashing_enabled);
 
+void kvm_arch_msr_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int msr,
+				bool enable)
+{
+	kvm_x86_ops->msr_intercept(vcpu, msr, enable);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_arch_msr_intercept);
+
 void kvm_control_cr3_write_exiting(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool enable)
 {
 	kvm_x86_ops->cr3_write_exiting(vcpu, enable);
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h b/virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h
index c92be3c2c131..640a78b54947 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
 #define IVCPU(vcpu) ((struct kvmi_vcpu *)((vcpu)->kvmi))
 
 #define KVMI_NUM_CR 9
-
+#define KVMI_NUM_MSR 0x2000
 #define KVMI_CTX_DATA_SIZE FIELD_SIZEOF(struct kvmi_event_pf_reply, ctx_data)
 
 #define KVMI_MSG_SIZE_ALLOC (sizeof(struct kvmi_msg_hdr) + KVMI_MSG_SIZE)
@@ -120,6 +120,10 @@ struct kvmi_vcpu {
 
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(ev_mask, KVMI_NUM_EVENTS);
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(cr_mask, KVMI_NUM_CR);
+	struct {
+		DECLARE_BITMAP(low, KVMI_NUM_MSR);
+		DECLARE_BITMAP(high, KVMI_NUM_MSR);
+	} msr_mask;
 
 	struct list_head job_list;
 	spinlock_t job_lock;
@@ -258,5 +262,7 @@ int kvmi_arch_cmd_inject_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 vector,
 				   u64 address);
 int kvmi_arch_cmd_control_cr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			     const struct kvmi_control_cr *req);
+int kvmi_arch_cmd_control_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			      const struct kvmi_control_msr *req);
 
 #endif
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c b/virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c
index d4f5459722bb..8a8951f13f8e 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ static const char *const msg_IDs[] = {
 	[KVMI_CONTROL_CMD_RESPONSE]  = "KVMI_CONTROL_CMD_RESPONSE",
 	[KVMI_CONTROL_CR]            = "KVMI_CONTROL_CR",
 	[KVMI_CONTROL_EVENTS]        = "KVMI_CONTROL_EVENTS",
+	[KVMI_CONTROL_MSR]           = "KVMI_CONTROL_MSR",
 	[KVMI_CONTROL_SPP]           = "KVMI_CONTROL_SPP",
 	[KVMI_CONTROL_VM_EVENTS]     = "KVMI_CONTROL_VM_EVENTS",
 	[KVMI_EVENT]                 = "KVMI_EVENT",
@@ -674,6 +675,17 @@ static int handle_control_cr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return reply_cb(vcpu, msg, ec, NULL, 0);
 }
 
+static int handle_control_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			      const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg, const void *req,
+			      vcpu_reply_fct reply_cb)
+{
+	int ec;
+
+	ec = kvmi_arch_cmd_control_msr(vcpu, req);
+
+	return reply_cb(vcpu, msg, ec, NULL, 0);
+}
+
 static int handle_get_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			    const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg,
 			    const void *req, vcpu_reply_fct reply_cb)
@@ -699,6 +711,7 @@ static int(*const msg_vcpu[])(struct kvm_vcpu *,
 			      vcpu_reply_fct) = {
 	[KVMI_CONTROL_CR]       = handle_control_cr,
 	[KVMI_CONTROL_EVENTS]   = handle_control_events,
+	[KVMI_CONTROL_MSR]      = handle_control_msr,
 	[KVMI_EVENT_REPLY]      = handle_event_reply,
 	[KVMI_GET_CPUID]        = handle_get_cpuid,
 	[KVMI_GET_REGISTERS]    = handle_get_registers,

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	"Tamas K Lengyel" <tamas@tklengyel.com>,
	"Mathieu Tarral" <mathieu.tarral@protonmail.com>,
	"Samuel Laurén" <samuel.lauren@iki.fi>,
	"Patrick Colp" <patrick.colp@oracle.com>,
	"Jan Kiszka" <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
	"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"Weijiang Yang" <weijiang.yang@intel.com>,
	Zhang@kvack.org, "Yu C" <yu.c.zhang@intel.com>,
	"Mihai Donțu" <mdontu@bitdefender.com>,
	"Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v6 55/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_CONTROL_MSR and KVMI_EVENT_MSR
Date: Fri,  9 Aug 2019 19:00:10 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190809160047.8319-56-alazar@bitdefender.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190809160047.8319-1-alazar@bitdefender.com>

From: Mihai Donțu <mdontu@bitdefender.com>

The KVMI_CONTROL_MSR is used to enable/disable introspection for a
specific MSR. The KVMI_EVENT_MSR is send when the tracked MSR is going
to be changed. The introspection tool can respond by allowing the guest
to continue with normal execution or by discarding the change.

This is meant to prevent malicious changes to MSR-s
such as MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_EIP.

Signed-off-by: Mihai Donțu <mdontu@bitdefender.com>
Signed-off-by: Adalbert Lazăr <alazar@bitdefender.com>
---
 Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst |  73 +++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h    |   4 +
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvmi_host.h   |   6 ++
 arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvmi.h   |  18 ++++
 arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c                | 127 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/svm.c                 |  15 ++++
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c             |  10 +++
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c                 |  10 +++
 virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h                |   8 +-
 virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c                |  13 +++
 10 files changed, 283 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst
index 2e6e285c8e2e..c41c3edb0134 100644
--- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst
+++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst
@@ -1042,6 +1042,45 @@ ID set.
 * -KVM_EINVAL - padding is not zero
 * -KVM_EAGAIN - the selected vCPU can't be introspected yet
 
+22. KVMI_CONTROL_MSR
+--------------------
+
+:Architectures: x86
+:Versions: >= 1
+:Parameters:
+
+::
+
+	struct kvmi_vcpu_hdr;
+	struct kvmi_control_msr {
+		__u8 enable;
+		__u8 padding1;
+		__u16 padding2;
+		__u32 msr;
+	};
+
+:Returns:
+
+::
+
+	struct kvmi_error_code
+
+Enables/disables introspection for a specific MSR and must be used
+in addition to *KVMI_CONTROL_EVENTS* with the *KVMI_EVENT_MSR* ID set.
+
+Currently, only MSRs within the following two ranges are supported. Trying
+to control events for any other register will fail with -KVM_EINVAL::
+
+	0          ... 0x00001fff
+	0xc0000000 ... 0xc0001fff
+
+:Errors:
+
+* -KVM_EINVAL - the selected vCPU is invalid
+* -KVM_EINVAL - the specified MSR is invalid
+* -KVM_EINVAL - padding is not zero
+* -KVM_EAGAIN - the selected vCPU can't be introspected yet
+
 Events
 ======
 
@@ -1308,3 +1347,37 @@ register (see **KVMI_CONTROL_EVENTS**).
 ``kvmi_event``, the control register number, the old value and the new value
 are sent to the introspector. The *CONTINUE* action will set the ``new_val``.
 
+7. KVMI_EVENT_MSR
+-----------------
+
+:Architectures: x86
+:Versions: >= 1
+:Actions: CONTINUE, CRASH
+:Parameters:
+
+::
+
+	struct kvmi_event;
+	struct kvmi_event_msr {
+		__u32 msr;
+		__u32 padding;
+		__u64 old_value;
+		__u64 new_value;
+	};
+
+:Returns:
+
+::
+
+	struct kvmi_vcpu_hdr;
+	struct kvmi_event_reply;
+	struct kvmi_event_msr_reply {
+		__u64 new_val;
+	};
+
+This event is sent when a model specific register is going to be changed
+and the introspection has been enabled for this event and for this specific
+register (see **KVMI_CONTROL_EVENTS**).
+
+``kvmi_event``, the MSR number, the old value and the new value are
+sent to the introspector. The *CONTINUE* action will set the ``new_val``.
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 22f08f2732cc..91cd43a7a7bf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -1013,6 +1013,8 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops {
 	bool (*has_emulated_msr)(int index);
 	void (*cpuid_update)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 
+	void (*msr_intercept)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int msr,
+				bool enable);
 	void (*cr3_write_exiting)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool enable);
 	bool (*nested_pagefault)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 	bool (*spt_fault)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
@@ -1621,6 +1623,8 @@ static inline int kvm_cpu_get_apicid(int mps_cpu)
 #define put_smstate(type, buf, offset, val)                      \
 	*(type *)((buf) + (offset) - 0x7e00) = val
 
+void kvm_arch_msr_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int msr,
+				bool enable);
 bool kvm_mmu_nested_pagefault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 bool kvm_spt_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvm_control_cr3_write_exiting(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool enable);
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvmi_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvmi_host.h
index 83a098dc8939..8285d1eb0db6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvmi_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvmi_host.h
@@ -11,11 +11,17 @@ struct kvmi_arch_mem_access {
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_INTROSPECTION
 
+bool kvmi_msr_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr);
 bool kvmi_cr_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int cr,
 		   unsigned long old_value, unsigned long *new_value);
 
 #else /* CONFIG_KVM_INTROSPECTION */
 
+static inline bool kvmi_msr_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr)
+{
+	return true;
+}
+
 static inline bool kvmi_cr_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int cr,
 				 unsigned long old_value,
 				 unsigned long *new_value)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvmi.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvmi.h
index c983b4bd2c72..08af2eccbdfb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvmi.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvmi.h
@@ -79,4 +79,22 @@ struct kvmi_event_cr_reply {
 	__u64 new_val;
 };
 
+struct kvmi_control_msr {
+	__u8 enable;
+	__u8 padding1;
+	__u16 padding2;
+	__u32 msr;
+};
+
+struct kvmi_event_msr {
+	__u32 msr;
+	__u32 padding;
+	__u64 old_value;
+	__u64 new_value;
+};
+
+struct kvmi_event_msr_reply {
+	__u64 new_val;
+};
+
 #endif /* _UAPI_ASM_X86_KVMI_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c b/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c
index b3cab0db6a70..5dba4f87afef 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c
@@ -9,6 +9,133 @@
 #include <asm/vmx.h>
 #include "../../../virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h"
 
+static unsigned long *msr_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int *msr)
+{
+	switch (*msr) {
+	case 0 ... 0x1fff:
+		return IVCPU(vcpu)->msr_mask.low;
+	case 0xc0000000 ... 0xc0001fff:
+		*msr &= 0x1fff;
+		return IVCPU(vcpu)->msr_mask.high;
+	}
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static bool test_msr_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int msr)
+{
+	unsigned long *mask = msr_mask(vcpu, &msr);
+
+	if (!mask)
+		return false;
+	if (!test_bit(msr, mask))
+		return false;
+
+	return true;
+}
+
+static int msr_control(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int msr, bool enable)
+{
+	unsigned long *mask = msr_mask(vcpu, &msr);
+
+	if (!mask)
+		return -KVM_EINVAL;
+	if (enable)
+		set_bit(msr, mask);
+	else
+		clear_bit(msr, mask);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+int kvmi_arch_cmd_control_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			      const struct kvmi_control_msr *req)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	if (req->padding1 || req->padding2)
+		return -KVM_EINVAL;
+
+	err = msr_control(vcpu, req->msr, req->enable);
+
+	if (!err && req->enable)
+		kvm_arch_msr_intercept(vcpu, req->msr, req->enable);
+
+	return err;
+}
+
+static u32 kvmi_send_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 old_value,
+			 u64 new_value, u64 *ret_value)
+{
+	struct kvmi_event_msr e = {
+		.msr = msr,
+		.old_value = old_value,
+		.new_value = new_value,
+	};
+	struct kvmi_event_msr_reply r;
+	int err, action;
+
+	err = kvmi_send_event(vcpu, KVMI_EVENT_MSR, &e, sizeof(e),
+			      &r, sizeof(r), &action);
+	if (err) {
+		*ret_value = new_value;
+		return KVMI_EVENT_ACTION_CONTINUE;
+	}
+
+	*ret_value = r.new_val;
+	return action;
+}
+
+static bool __kvmi_msr_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr)
+{
+	struct msr_data old_msr = {
+		.host_initiated = true,
+		.index = msr->index,
+	};
+	bool ret = false;
+	u64 ret_value;
+	u32 action;
+
+	if (!test_msr_mask(vcpu, msr->index))
+		return true;
+	if (kvm_get_msr(vcpu, &old_msr))
+		return true;
+	if (old_msr.data == msr->data)
+		return true;
+
+	action = kvmi_send_msr(vcpu, msr->index, old_msr.data, msr->data,
+			       &ret_value);
+	switch (action) {
+	case KVMI_EVENT_ACTION_CONTINUE:
+		msr->data = ret_value;
+		ret = true;
+		break;
+	default:
+		kvmi_handle_common_event_actions(vcpu, action, "MSR");
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+bool kvmi_msr_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr)
+{
+	struct kvmi *ikvm;
+	bool ret = true;
+
+	if (msr->host_initiated)
+		return true;
+
+	ikvm = kvmi_get(vcpu->kvm);
+	if (!ikvm)
+		return true;
+
+	if (is_event_enabled(vcpu, KVMI_EVENT_MSR))
+		ret = __kvmi_msr_event(vcpu, msr);
+
+	kvmi_put(vcpu->kvm);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static void *alloc_get_registers_reply(const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg,
 				       const struct kvmi_get_registers *req,
 				       size_t *rpl_size)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index fc78b0052dee..cdb315578979 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -7098,6 +7098,20 @@ static int nested_enable_evmcs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return -ENODEV;
 }
 
+static void svm_msr_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int msr,
+				bool enable)
+{
+	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
+	u32 *msrpm = svm->msrpm;
+
+	/*
+	 * The below code enable or disable the msr interception for both
+	 * read and write. The best way will be to get here the current
+	 * bit status for read and send that value as argument.
+	 */
+	set_msr_interception(msrpm, msr, enable, enable);
+}
+
 static bool svm_nested_pagefault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	return false;
@@ -7126,6 +7140,7 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops __ro_after_init = {
 	.has_emulated_msr = svm_has_emulated_msr,
 
 	.cr3_write_exiting = svm_cr3_write_exiting,
+	.msr_intercept = svm_msr_intercept,
 	.nested_pagefault = svm_nested_pagefault,
 	.spt_fault = svm_spt_fault,
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 6450c8c44771..0306c7ef3158 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -7784,6 +7784,15 @@ static __exit void hardware_unsetup(void)
 	free_kvm_area();
 }
 
+static void vmx_msr_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int msr,
+			      bool enable)
+{
+	struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
+	unsigned long *msr_bitmap = vmx->vmcs01.msr_bitmap;
+
+	vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, msr, MSR_TYPE_W, enable);
+}
+
 static void vmx_cr3_write_exiting(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 					 bool enable)
 {
@@ -7844,6 +7853,7 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops vmx_x86_ops __ro_after_init = {
 	.cpu_has_accelerated_tpr = report_flexpriority,
 	.has_emulated_msr = vmx_has_emulated_msr,
 
+	.msr_intercept = vmx_msr_intercept,
 	.cr3_write_exiting = vmx_cr3_write_exiting,
 	.nested_pagefault = vmx_nested_pagefault,
 	.spt_fault = vmx_spt_fault,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 2cd146ccc6ff..ac027471c4f3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -1319,6 +1319,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_enable_efer_bits);
  */
 int kvm_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr)
 {
+	if (!kvmi_msr_event(vcpu, msr))
+		return 1;
+
 	switch (msr->index) {
 	case MSR_FS_BASE:
 	case MSR_GS_BASE:
@@ -10083,6 +10086,13 @@ bool kvm_vector_hashing_enabled(void)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_vector_hashing_enabled);
 
+void kvm_arch_msr_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int msr,
+				bool enable)
+{
+	kvm_x86_ops->msr_intercept(vcpu, msr, enable);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_arch_msr_intercept);
+
 void kvm_control_cr3_write_exiting(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool enable)
 {
 	kvm_x86_ops->cr3_write_exiting(vcpu, enable);
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h b/virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h
index c92be3c2c131..640a78b54947 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
 #define IVCPU(vcpu) ((struct kvmi_vcpu *)((vcpu)->kvmi))
 
 #define KVMI_NUM_CR 9
-
+#define KVMI_NUM_MSR 0x2000
 #define KVMI_CTX_DATA_SIZE FIELD_SIZEOF(struct kvmi_event_pf_reply, ctx_data)
 
 #define KVMI_MSG_SIZE_ALLOC (sizeof(struct kvmi_msg_hdr) + KVMI_MSG_SIZE)
@@ -120,6 +120,10 @@ struct kvmi_vcpu {
 
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(ev_mask, KVMI_NUM_EVENTS);
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(cr_mask, KVMI_NUM_CR);
+	struct {
+		DECLARE_BITMAP(low, KVMI_NUM_MSR);
+		DECLARE_BITMAP(high, KVMI_NUM_MSR);
+	} msr_mask;
 
 	struct list_head job_list;
 	spinlock_t job_lock;
@@ -258,5 +262,7 @@ int kvmi_arch_cmd_inject_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 vector,
 				   u64 address);
 int kvmi_arch_cmd_control_cr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			     const struct kvmi_control_cr *req);
+int kvmi_arch_cmd_control_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			      const struct kvmi_control_msr *req);
 
 #endif
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c b/virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c
index d4f5459722bb..8a8951f13f8e 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ static const char *const msg_IDs[] = {
 	[KVMI_CONTROL_CMD_RESPONSE]  = "KVMI_CONTROL_CMD_RESPONSE",
 	[KVMI_CONTROL_CR]            = "KVMI_CONTROL_CR",
 	[KVMI_CONTROL_EVENTS]        = "KVMI_CONTROL_EVENTS",
+	[KVMI_CONTROL_MSR]           = "KVMI_CONTROL_MSR",
 	[KVMI_CONTROL_SPP]           = "KVMI_CONTROL_SPP",
 	[KVMI_CONTROL_VM_EVENTS]     = "KVMI_CONTROL_VM_EVENTS",
 	[KVMI_EVENT]                 = "KVMI_EVENT",
@@ -674,6 +675,17 @@ static int handle_control_cr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return reply_cb(vcpu, msg, ec, NULL, 0);
 }
 
+static int handle_control_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			      const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg, const void *req,
+			      vcpu_reply_fct reply_cb)
+{
+	int ec;
+
+	ec = kvmi_arch_cmd_control_msr(vcpu, req);
+
+	return reply_cb(vcpu, msg, ec, NULL, 0);
+}
+
 static int handle_get_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			    const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg,
 			    const void *req, vcpu_reply_fct reply_cb)
@@ -699,6 +711,7 @@ static int(*const msg_vcpu[])(struct kvm_vcpu *,
 			      vcpu_reply_fct) = {
 	[KVMI_CONTROL_CR]       = handle_control_cr,
 	[KVMI_CONTROL_EVENTS]   = handle_control_events,
+	[KVMI_CONTROL_MSR]      = handle_control_msr,
 	[KVMI_EVENT_REPLY]      = handle_event_reply,
 	[KVMI_GET_CPUID]        = handle_get_cpuid,
 	[KVMI_GET_REGISTERS]    = handle_get_registers,


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Tamas K Lengyel" <tamas@tklengyel.com>,
	"Weijiang Yang" <weijiang.yang@intel.com>,
	"Yu C" <yu.c.zhang@intel.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	"Jan Kiszka" <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
	"Samuel Laurén" <samuel.lauren@iki.fi>,
	"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	"Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, "Patrick Colp" <patrick.colp@oracle.com>,
	"Mathieu Tarral" <mathieu.tarral@protonmail.com>,
	"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Zhang@mail.linuxfoundation.org,
	"Mihai Donțu" <mdontu@bitdefender.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v6 55/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_CONTROL_MSR and KVMI_EVENT_MSR
Date: Fri,  9 Aug 2019 19:00:10 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190809160047.8319-56-alazar@bitdefender.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190809160047.8319-1-alazar@bitdefender.com>

From: Mihai Donțu <mdontu@bitdefender.com>

The KVMI_CONTROL_MSR is used to enable/disable introspection for a
specific MSR. The KVMI_EVENT_MSR is send when the tracked MSR is going
to be changed. The introspection tool can respond by allowing the guest
to continue with normal execution or by discarding the change.

This is meant to prevent malicious changes to MSR-s
such as MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_EIP.

Signed-off-by: Mihai Donțu <mdontu@bitdefender.com>
Signed-off-by: Adalbert Lazăr <alazar@bitdefender.com>
---
 Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst |  73 +++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h    |   4 +
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvmi_host.h   |   6 ++
 arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvmi.h   |  18 ++++
 arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c                | 127 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/svm.c                 |  15 ++++
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c             |  10 +++
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c                 |  10 +++
 virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h                |   8 +-
 virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c                |  13 +++
 10 files changed, 283 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst
index 2e6e285c8e2e..c41c3edb0134 100644
--- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst
+++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst
@@ -1042,6 +1042,45 @@ ID set.
 * -KVM_EINVAL - padding is not zero
 * -KVM_EAGAIN - the selected vCPU can't be introspected yet
 
+22. KVMI_CONTROL_MSR
+--------------------
+
+:Architectures: x86
+:Versions: >= 1
+:Parameters:
+
+::
+
+	struct kvmi_vcpu_hdr;
+	struct kvmi_control_msr {
+		__u8 enable;
+		__u8 padding1;
+		__u16 padding2;
+		__u32 msr;
+	};
+
+:Returns:
+
+::
+
+	struct kvmi_error_code
+
+Enables/disables introspection for a specific MSR and must be used
+in addition to *KVMI_CONTROL_EVENTS* with the *KVMI_EVENT_MSR* ID set.
+
+Currently, only MSRs within the following two ranges are supported. Trying
+to control events for any other register will fail with -KVM_EINVAL::
+
+	0          ... 0x00001fff
+	0xc0000000 ... 0xc0001fff
+
+:Errors:
+
+* -KVM_EINVAL - the selected vCPU is invalid
+* -KVM_EINVAL - the specified MSR is invalid
+* -KVM_EINVAL - padding is not zero
+* -KVM_EAGAIN - the selected vCPU can't be introspected yet
+
 Events
 ======
 
@@ -1308,3 +1347,37 @@ register (see **KVMI_CONTROL_EVENTS**).
 ``kvmi_event``, the control register number, the old value and the new value
 are sent to the introspector. The *CONTINUE* action will set the ``new_val``.
 
+7. KVMI_EVENT_MSR
+-----------------
+
+:Architectures: x86
+:Versions: >= 1
+:Actions: CONTINUE, CRASH
+:Parameters:
+
+::
+
+	struct kvmi_event;
+	struct kvmi_event_msr {
+		__u32 msr;
+		__u32 padding;
+		__u64 old_value;
+		__u64 new_value;
+	};
+
+:Returns:
+
+::
+
+	struct kvmi_vcpu_hdr;
+	struct kvmi_event_reply;
+	struct kvmi_event_msr_reply {
+		__u64 new_val;
+	};
+
+This event is sent when a model specific register is going to be changed
+and the introspection has been enabled for this event and for this specific
+register (see **KVMI_CONTROL_EVENTS**).
+
+``kvmi_event``, the MSR number, the old value and the new value are
+sent to the introspector. The *CONTINUE* action will set the ``new_val``.
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 22f08f2732cc..91cd43a7a7bf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -1013,6 +1013,8 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops {
 	bool (*has_emulated_msr)(int index);
 	void (*cpuid_update)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 
+	void (*msr_intercept)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int msr,
+				bool enable);
 	void (*cr3_write_exiting)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool enable);
 	bool (*nested_pagefault)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 	bool (*spt_fault)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
@@ -1621,6 +1623,8 @@ static inline int kvm_cpu_get_apicid(int mps_cpu)
 #define put_smstate(type, buf, offset, val)                      \
 	*(type *)((buf) + (offset) - 0x7e00) = val
 
+void kvm_arch_msr_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int msr,
+				bool enable);
 bool kvm_mmu_nested_pagefault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 bool kvm_spt_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvm_control_cr3_write_exiting(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool enable);
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvmi_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvmi_host.h
index 83a098dc8939..8285d1eb0db6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvmi_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvmi_host.h
@@ -11,11 +11,17 @@ struct kvmi_arch_mem_access {
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_INTROSPECTION
 
+bool kvmi_msr_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr);
 bool kvmi_cr_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int cr,
 		   unsigned long old_value, unsigned long *new_value);
 
 #else /* CONFIG_KVM_INTROSPECTION */
 
+static inline bool kvmi_msr_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr)
+{
+	return true;
+}
+
 static inline bool kvmi_cr_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int cr,
 				 unsigned long old_value,
 				 unsigned long *new_value)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvmi.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvmi.h
index c983b4bd2c72..08af2eccbdfb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvmi.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvmi.h
@@ -79,4 +79,22 @@ struct kvmi_event_cr_reply {
 	__u64 new_val;
 };
 
+struct kvmi_control_msr {
+	__u8 enable;
+	__u8 padding1;
+	__u16 padding2;
+	__u32 msr;
+};
+
+struct kvmi_event_msr {
+	__u32 msr;
+	__u32 padding;
+	__u64 old_value;
+	__u64 new_value;
+};
+
+struct kvmi_event_msr_reply {
+	__u64 new_val;
+};
+
 #endif /* _UAPI_ASM_X86_KVMI_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c b/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c
index b3cab0db6a70..5dba4f87afef 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c
@@ -9,6 +9,133 @@
 #include <asm/vmx.h>
 #include "../../../virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h"
 
+static unsigned long *msr_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int *msr)
+{
+	switch (*msr) {
+	case 0 ... 0x1fff:
+		return IVCPU(vcpu)->msr_mask.low;
+	case 0xc0000000 ... 0xc0001fff:
+		*msr &= 0x1fff;
+		return IVCPU(vcpu)->msr_mask.high;
+	}
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static bool test_msr_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int msr)
+{
+	unsigned long *mask = msr_mask(vcpu, &msr);
+
+	if (!mask)
+		return false;
+	if (!test_bit(msr, mask))
+		return false;
+
+	return true;
+}
+
+static int msr_control(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int msr, bool enable)
+{
+	unsigned long *mask = msr_mask(vcpu, &msr);
+
+	if (!mask)
+		return -KVM_EINVAL;
+	if (enable)
+		set_bit(msr, mask);
+	else
+		clear_bit(msr, mask);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+int kvmi_arch_cmd_control_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			      const struct kvmi_control_msr *req)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	if (req->padding1 || req->padding2)
+		return -KVM_EINVAL;
+
+	err = msr_control(vcpu, req->msr, req->enable);
+
+	if (!err && req->enable)
+		kvm_arch_msr_intercept(vcpu, req->msr, req->enable);
+
+	return err;
+}
+
+static u32 kvmi_send_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 old_value,
+			 u64 new_value, u64 *ret_value)
+{
+	struct kvmi_event_msr e = {
+		.msr = msr,
+		.old_value = old_value,
+		.new_value = new_value,
+	};
+	struct kvmi_event_msr_reply r;
+	int err, action;
+
+	err = kvmi_send_event(vcpu, KVMI_EVENT_MSR, &e, sizeof(e),
+			      &r, sizeof(r), &action);
+	if (err) {
+		*ret_value = new_value;
+		return KVMI_EVENT_ACTION_CONTINUE;
+	}
+
+	*ret_value = r.new_val;
+	return action;
+}
+
+static bool __kvmi_msr_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr)
+{
+	struct msr_data old_msr = {
+		.host_initiated = true,
+		.index = msr->index,
+	};
+	bool ret = false;
+	u64 ret_value;
+	u32 action;
+
+	if (!test_msr_mask(vcpu, msr->index))
+		return true;
+	if (kvm_get_msr(vcpu, &old_msr))
+		return true;
+	if (old_msr.data == msr->data)
+		return true;
+
+	action = kvmi_send_msr(vcpu, msr->index, old_msr.data, msr->data,
+			       &ret_value);
+	switch (action) {
+	case KVMI_EVENT_ACTION_CONTINUE:
+		msr->data = ret_value;
+		ret = true;
+		break;
+	default:
+		kvmi_handle_common_event_actions(vcpu, action, "MSR");
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+bool kvmi_msr_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr)
+{
+	struct kvmi *ikvm;
+	bool ret = true;
+
+	if (msr->host_initiated)
+		return true;
+
+	ikvm = kvmi_get(vcpu->kvm);
+	if (!ikvm)
+		return true;
+
+	if (is_event_enabled(vcpu, KVMI_EVENT_MSR))
+		ret = __kvmi_msr_event(vcpu, msr);
+
+	kvmi_put(vcpu->kvm);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static void *alloc_get_registers_reply(const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg,
 				       const struct kvmi_get_registers *req,
 				       size_t *rpl_size)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index fc78b0052dee..cdb315578979 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -7098,6 +7098,20 @@ static int nested_enable_evmcs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return -ENODEV;
 }
 
+static void svm_msr_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int msr,
+				bool enable)
+{
+	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
+	u32 *msrpm = svm->msrpm;
+
+	/*
+	 * The below code enable or disable the msr interception for both
+	 * read and write. The best way will be to get here the current
+	 * bit status for read and send that value as argument.
+	 */
+	set_msr_interception(msrpm, msr, enable, enable);
+}
+
 static bool svm_nested_pagefault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	return false;
@@ -7126,6 +7140,7 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops __ro_after_init = {
 	.has_emulated_msr = svm_has_emulated_msr,
 
 	.cr3_write_exiting = svm_cr3_write_exiting,
+	.msr_intercept = svm_msr_intercept,
 	.nested_pagefault = svm_nested_pagefault,
 	.spt_fault = svm_spt_fault,
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 6450c8c44771..0306c7ef3158 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -7784,6 +7784,15 @@ static __exit void hardware_unsetup(void)
 	free_kvm_area();
 }
 
+static void vmx_msr_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int msr,
+			      bool enable)
+{
+	struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
+	unsigned long *msr_bitmap = vmx->vmcs01.msr_bitmap;
+
+	vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, msr, MSR_TYPE_W, enable);
+}
+
 static void vmx_cr3_write_exiting(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 					 bool enable)
 {
@@ -7844,6 +7853,7 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops vmx_x86_ops __ro_after_init = {
 	.cpu_has_accelerated_tpr = report_flexpriority,
 	.has_emulated_msr = vmx_has_emulated_msr,
 
+	.msr_intercept = vmx_msr_intercept,
 	.cr3_write_exiting = vmx_cr3_write_exiting,
 	.nested_pagefault = vmx_nested_pagefault,
 	.spt_fault = vmx_spt_fault,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 2cd146ccc6ff..ac027471c4f3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -1319,6 +1319,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_enable_efer_bits);
  */
 int kvm_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr)
 {
+	if (!kvmi_msr_event(vcpu, msr))
+		return 1;
+
 	switch (msr->index) {
 	case MSR_FS_BASE:
 	case MSR_GS_BASE:
@@ -10083,6 +10086,13 @@ bool kvm_vector_hashing_enabled(void)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_vector_hashing_enabled);
 
+void kvm_arch_msr_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int msr,
+				bool enable)
+{
+	kvm_x86_ops->msr_intercept(vcpu, msr, enable);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_arch_msr_intercept);
+
 void kvm_control_cr3_write_exiting(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool enable)
 {
 	kvm_x86_ops->cr3_write_exiting(vcpu, enable);
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h b/virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h
index c92be3c2c131..640a78b54947 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
 #define IVCPU(vcpu) ((struct kvmi_vcpu *)((vcpu)->kvmi))
 
 #define KVMI_NUM_CR 9
-
+#define KVMI_NUM_MSR 0x2000
 #define KVMI_CTX_DATA_SIZE FIELD_SIZEOF(struct kvmi_event_pf_reply, ctx_data)
 
 #define KVMI_MSG_SIZE_ALLOC (sizeof(struct kvmi_msg_hdr) + KVMI_MSG_SIZE)
@@ -120,6 +120,10 @@ struct kvmi_vcpu {
 
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(ev_mask, KVMI_NUM_EVENTS);
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(cr_mask, KVMI_NUM_CR);
+	struct {
+		DECLARE_BITMAP(low, KVMI_NUM_MSR);
+		DECLARE_BITMAP(high, KVMI_NUM_MSR);
+	} msr_mask;
 
 	struct list_head job_list;
 	spinlock_t job_lock;
@@ -258,5 +262,7 @@ int kvmi_arch_cmd_inject_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 vector,
 				   u64 address);
 int kvmi_arch_cmd_control_cr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			     const struct kvmi_control_cr *req);
+int kvmi_arch_cmd_control_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			      const struct kvmi_control_msr *req);
 
 #endif
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c b/virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c
index d4f5459722bb..8a8951f13f8e 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ static const char *const msg_IDs[] = {
 	[KVMI_CONTROL_CMD_RESPONSE]  = "KVMI_CONTROL_CMD_RESPONSE",
 	[KVMI_CONTROL_CR]            = "KVMI_CONTROL_CR",
 	[KVMI_CONTROL_EVENTS]        = "KVMI_CONTROL_EVENTS",
+	[KVMI_CONTROL_MSR]           = "KVMI_CONTROL_MSR",
 	[KVMI_CONTROL_SPP]           = "KVMI_CONTROL_SPP",
 	[KVMI_CONTROL_VM_EVENTS]     = "KVMI_CONTROL_VM_EVENTS",
 	[KVMI_EVENT]                 = "KVMI_EVENT",
@@ -674,6 +675,17 @@ static int handle_control_cr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return reply_cb(vcpu, msg, ec, NULL, 0);
 }
 
+static int handle_control_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			      const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg, const void *req,
+			      vcpu_reply_fct reply_cb)
+{
+	int ec;
+
+	ec = kvmi_arch_cmd_control_msr(vcpu, req);
+
+	return reply_cb(vcpu, msg, ec, NULL, 0);
+}
+
 static int handle_get_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			    const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg,
 			    const void *req, vcpu_reply_fct reply_cb)
@@ -699,6 +711,7 @@ static int(*const msg_vcpu[])(struct kvm_vcpu *,
 			      vcpu_reply_fct) = {
 	[KVMI_CONTROL_CR]       = handle_control_cr,
 	[KVMI_CONTROL_EVENTS]   = handle_control_events,
+	[KVMI_CONTROL_MSR]      = handle_control_msr,
 	[KVMI_EVENT_REPLY]      = handle_event_reply,
 	[KVMI_GET_CPUID]        = handle_get_cpuid,
 	[KVMI_GET_REGISTERS]    = handle_get_registers,
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-08-09 16:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 423+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-09 15:59 [RFC PATCH v6 00/92] VM introspection Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 01/92] kvm: introduce KVMI (VM introspection subsystem) Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-12 20:20   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-12 20:20     ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-13  9:11     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13  9:11       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 11:57     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13 11:57     ` Adalbert Lazăr
     [not found]     ` <5d52a5ae.1c69fb81.5c260.1573SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2019-08-13 12:09       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 12:09         ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 15:01         ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-13 15:01           ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-13 21:03           ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 21:03             ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-14  9:48           ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-14  9:48           ` Adalbert Lazăr
     [not found]           ` <5d53d8d1.1c69fb81.7d32.0bedSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2019-08-14 10:37             ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-14 10:37               ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 02/92] kvm: introspection: add basic ioctls (hook/unhook) Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  8:44   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13  8:44     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 14:24     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13 14:24     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 03/92] kvm: introspection: add permission access ioctls Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 04/92] kvm: introspection: add the read/dispatch message function Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 05/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_VERSION Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 06/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_CONTROL_CMD_RESPONSE Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  9:15   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13  9:15     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 17:08     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13 17:08     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 07/92] kvm: introspection: honor the reply option when handling the KVMI_GET_VERSION command Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  9:16   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13  9:16     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 08/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_CHECK_COMMAND and KVMI_CHECK_EVENT Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 09/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_GUEST_INFO Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 10/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_CONTROL_VM_EVENTS Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 11/92] kvm: introspection: add vCPU related data Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 12/92] kvm: introspection: add a jobs list to every introspected vCPU Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 13/92] kvm: introspection: make the vCPU wait even when its jobs list is empty Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  8:43   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13  8:43     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 14:19     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13 14:19     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 14/92] kvm: introspection: handle introspection commands before returning to guest Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  8:26   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13  8:26     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 13:54     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13 13:54     ` Adalbert Lazăr
     [not found]     ` <5d52c10e.1c69fb81.26904.fd34SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2019-08-13 14:45       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 14:45         ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-14  9:39         ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-14  9:39         ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 15/92] kvm: introspection: handle vCPU related introspection commands Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 16/92] kvm: introspection: handle events and event replies Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  8:55   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13  8:55     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 15:25     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13 15:25     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 17/92] kvm: introspection: introduce event actions Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 18/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_UNHOOK Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 19/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_CREATE_VCPU Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 20/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_VCPU_INFO Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 21/92] kvm: page track: add track_create_slot() callback Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 22/92] kvm: x86: provide all page tracking hooks with the guest virtual address Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 23/92] kvm: page track: add support for preread, prewrite and preexec Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 24/92] kvm: x86: wire in the preread/prewrite/preexec page trackers Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 25/92] kvm: x86: intercept the write access on sidt and other emulated instructions Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 26/92] kvm: x86: add kvm_mmu_nested_pagefault() Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  8:12   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13  8:12     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 27/92] kvm: introspection: use page track Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  9:06   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13  9:06     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 28/92] kvm: x86: consult the page tracking from kvm_mmu_get_page() and __direct_map() Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 29/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_CONTROL_EVENTS Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 30/92] kvm: x86: add kvm_spt_fault() Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 31/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_PF Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 32/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_PAGE_ACCESS Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 33/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_SET_PAGE_ACCESS Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 34/92] Documentation: Introduce EPT based Subpage Protection Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 35/92] KVM: VMX: Add control flags for SPP enabling Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 36/92] KVM: VMX: Implement functions for SPPT paging setup Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 37/92] KVM: VMX: Introduce SPP access bitmap and operation functions Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 38/92] KVM: VMX: Add init/set/get functions for SPP Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 39/92] KVM: VMX: Introduce SPP user-space IOCTLs Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 40/92] KVM: VMX: Handle SPP induced vmexit and page fault Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 41/92] KVM: MMU: Enable Lazy mode SPPT setup Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 42/92] KVM: MMU: Handle host memory remapping and reclaim Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 43/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_CONTROL_SPP Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 44/92] kvm: introspection: extend the internal database of tracked pages with write_bitmap info Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 45/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_PAGE_WRITE_BITMAP Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 46/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_SET_PAGE_WRITE_BITMAP Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 47/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_READ_PHYSICAL and KVMI_WRITE_PHYSICAL Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 48/92] kvm: add kvm_vcpu_kick_and_wait() Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 49/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_PAUSE_VCPU and KVMI_EVENT_PAUSE_VCPU Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 50/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_REGISTERS Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 51/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_SET_REGISTERS Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 52/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_CPUID Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 53/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_INJECT_EXCEPTION + KVMI_EVENT_TRAP Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 54/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_CONTROL_CR and KVMI_EVENT_CR Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` Adalbert Lazăr [this message]
2019-08-09 16:00   ` [RFC PATCH v6 55/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_CONTROL_MSR and KVMI_EVENT_MSR Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-12 21:05   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-12 21:05     ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-15  6:36     ` Nicusor CITU
2019-08-19 18:36       ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-19 18:36         ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-20  8:44         ` Nicusor CITU
2019-08-20 11:43           ` Mihai Donțu
2019-08-21 15:18             ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-21 15:18               ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-19 18:52   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-19 18:52     ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 56/92] kvm: x86: block any attempt to disable MSR interception if tracked by introspection Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 57/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_XSAVE Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 58/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_MTRR_TYPE Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 59/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_XSETBV Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 60/92] kvm: x86: add kvm_arch_vcpu_set_guest_debug() Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 61/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_BREAKPOINT Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 62/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_HYPERCALL Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 63/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_DESCRIPTOR Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 64/92] kvm: introspection: add single-stepping Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-12 20:50   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-12 20:50     ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-13 12:51     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13 12:51     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-14 12:36     ` Nicusor CITU
2019-08-14 12:53       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-14 12:53         ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 65/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_SINGLESTEP Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 66/92] kvm: introspection: add custom input when single-stepping a vCPU Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 67/92] kvm: introspection: use single stepping on unimplemented instructions Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 68/92] kvm: x86: emulate a guest page table walk on SPT violations due to A/D bit updates Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 69/92] kvm: x86: keep the page protected if tracked by the introspection tool Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-09-10 14:26   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2019-09-10 14:26     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2019-09-10 16:28     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-09-10 16:28       ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 70/92] kvm: x86: filter out access rights only when " Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  9:08   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13  9:08     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 16:06     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13 16:06     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 71/92] mm: add support for remote mapping Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:24   ` DANGER WILL ROBINSON, DANGER Matthew Wilcox
2019-08-09 16:24     ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-08-13  9:29     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13  9:29       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 11:24       ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-08-13 11:24         ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-08-13 12:02         ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 12:02           ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 11:01     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13 11:01     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-15 19:19       ` Jerome Glisse
2019-08-15 19:19         ` Jerome Glisse
2019-08-15 20:16         ` Jerome Glisse
2019-08-15 20:16           ` Jerome Glisse
2019-08-16 17:45           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-16 17:45             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-23 12:39           ` Mircea CIRJALIU - MELIU
2019-09-05 18:09             ` Jerome Glisse
2019-09-05 18:09               ` Jerome Glisse
2019-09-09 17:00               ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-09-09 17:00                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-09-10  7:49                 ` Mircea CIRJALIU - MELIU
2019-10-02 19:27                   ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-02 19:27                     ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-02 13:46                     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-02 13:46                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-02 14:15                       ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-02 14:15                         ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-02 16:18                         ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-02 16:18                           ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-02 17:04                           ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-02 17:04                             ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-02 20:10                             ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-02 20:10                               ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-03 15:42                               ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-03 15:42                                 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-03 15:50                                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-03 15:50                                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-03 16:42                                   ` Mircea CIRJALIU - MELIU
2019-10-03 18:31                                     ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-03 18:31                                       ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-03 19:38                                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-03 19:38                                         ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-04  9:41                                         ` Mircea CIRJALIU - MELIU
2019-10-04 11:46                                           ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-04 11:46                                             ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-03 16:36                               ` Mircea CIRJALIU - MELIU
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 72/92] kvm: introspection: add memory map/unmap support on the guest side Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 73/92] kvm: introspection: use remote mapping Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 74/92] kvm: x86: do not unconditionally patch the hypercall instruction during emulation Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  9:20   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13  9:20     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-14 12:07     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-14 12:07     ` Adalbert Lazăr
     [not found]     ` <5d53f965.1c69fb81.cd952.035bSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2019-08-14 12:33       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-14 12:33         ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 75/92] kvm: x86: disable gpa_available optimization in emulator_read_write_onepage() Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  8:47   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13  8:47     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 14:33     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13 14:33     ` Adalbert Lazăr
     [not found]     ` <5d52ca22.1c69fb81.4ceb8.e90bSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2019-08-13 14:35       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 14:35         ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 76/92] kvm: x86: disable EPT A/D bits if introspection is present Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  9:18   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13  9:18     ` Paolo Bonzini
     [not found]     ` <0550f8d65bb97486e98d88255ea45d490da6b802.camel@bitdefender.com>
2019-08-13 21:05       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-14  8:53         ` Mihai Donțu
2019-08-14 10:36           ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 77/92] kvm: introspection: add trace functions Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 78/92] kvm: x86: add tracepoints for interrupt and exception injections Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 79/92] kvm: x86: emulate movsd xmm, m64 Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  9:17   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13  9:17     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 80/92] kvm: x86: emulate movss xmm, m32 Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 81/92] kvm: x86: emulate movq xmm, m64 Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 82/92] kvm: x86: emulate movq r, xmm Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 83/92] kvm: x86: emulate movd xmm, m32 Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 84/92] kvm: x86: enable the half part of movss, movsd, movups Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 85/92] kvm: x86: emulate lfence Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 86/92] kvm: x86: emulate xorpd xmm2/m128, xmm1 Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 87/92] kvm: x86: emulate xorps xmm/m128, xmm Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 88/92] kvm: x86: emulate fst/fstp m64fp Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 89/92] kvm: x86: make lock cmpxchg r, r/m atomic Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 90/92] kvm: x86: emulate lock cmpxchg8b atomically Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 91/92] kvm: x86: emulate lock cmpxchg16b m128 Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 92/92] kvm: x86: fallback to the single-step on multipage CMPXCHG emulation Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-12 18:23 ` [RFC PATCH v6 00/92] VM introspection Sean Christopherson
2019-08-12 18:23   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-12 21:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-12 21:40   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-13  9:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13  9:34   ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190809160047.8319-56-alazar@bitdefender.com \
    --to=alazar@bitdefender.com \
    --cc=Zhang@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mathieu.tarral@protonmail.com \
    --cc=mdontu@bitdefender.com \
    --cc=patrick.colp@oracle.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=samuel.lauren@iki.fi \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=tamas@tklengyel.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=weijiang.yang@intel.com \
    --cc=yu.c.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.