All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	"Tamas K Lengyel" <tamas@tklengyel.com>,
	"Mathieu Tarral" <mathieu.tarral@protonmail.com>,
	"Samuel Laurén" <samuel.lauren@iki.fi>,
	"Patrick Colp" <patrick.colp@oracle.com>,
	"Jan Kiszka" <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
	"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"Weijiang Yang" <weijiang.yang@intel.com>,
	Zhang@vger.kernel.org, "Yu C" <yu.c.zhang@intel.com>,
	"Mihai Donțu" <mdontu@bitdefender.com>,
	"Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v6 62/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_HYPERCALL
Date: Fri,  9 Aug 2019 19:00:17 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190809160047.8319-63-alazar@bitdefender.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190809160047.8319-1-alazar@bitdefender.com>

From: Mihai Donțu <mdontu@bitdefender.com>

This event is sent on a specific user hypercall.

It is used by the code residing inside the introspected guest to call the
introspection tool and to report certain details about its operation. For
example, a classic antimalware remediation tool can report what it has
found during a scan.

Signed-off-by: Mihai Donțu <mdontu@bitdefender.com>
Co-developed-by: Adalbert Lazăr <alazar@bitdefender.com>
Signed-off-by: Adalbert Lazăr <alazar@bitdefender.com>
---
 Documentation/virtual/kvm/hypercalls.txt | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
 Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst       | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c                      | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c                       | 16 ++++++++---
 include/linux/kvmi.h                     |  2 ++
 include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h            |  2 ++
 virt/kvm/kvmi.c                          | 22 +++++++++++++++
 virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h                      |  3 +++
 virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c                      | 12 +++++++++
 9 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/hypercalls.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/hypercalls.txt
index da24c138c8d1..1ab59537b2fb 100644
--- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/hypercalls.txt
+++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/hypercalls.txt
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ compute the CLOCK_REALTIME for its clock, at the same instant.
 Returns KVM_EOPNOTSUPP if the host does not use TSC clocksource,
 or if clock type is different than KVM_CLOCK_PAIRING_WALLCLOCK.
 
-6. KVM_HC_SEND_IPI
+7. KVM_HC_SEND_IPI
 ------------------------
 Architecture: x86
 Status: active
@@ -141,3 +141,35 @@ a0 corresponds to the APIC ID in the third argument (a2), bit 1
 corresponds to the APIC ID a2+1, and so on.
 
 Returns the number of CPUs to which the IPIs were delivered successfully.
+
+8. KVM_HC_XEN_HVM_OP
+--------------------
+
+Architecture: x86
+Status: active
+Purpose: To enable communication between a guest agent and a VMI application
+Usage:
+
+An event will be sent to the VMI application (see kvmi.rst) if the following
+registers, which differ between 32bit and 64bit, have the following values:
+
+       32bit       64bit     value
+       ---------------------------
+       ebx (a0)    rdi       KVM_HC_XEN_HVM_OP_GUEST_REQUEST_VM_EVENT
+       ecx (a1)    rsi       0
+
+This specification copies Xen's { __HYPERVISOR_hvm_op,
+HVMOP_guest_request_vm_event } hypercall and can originate from kernel or
+userspace.
+
+It returns 0 if successful, or a negative POSIX.1 error code if it fails. The
+absence of an active VMI application is not signaled in any way.
+
+The following registers are clobbered:
+
+  * 32bit: edx, esi, edi, ebp
+  * 64bit: rdx, r10, r8, r9
+
+In particular, for KVM_HC_XEN_HVM_OP_GUEST_REQUEST_VM_EVENT, the last two
+registers can be poisoned deliberately and cannot be used for passing
+information.
diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst
index da216415bf32..2603813d1ee6 100644
--- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst
+++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst
@@ -1505,3 +1505,34 @@ trying to perform a certain operation (like creating a process).
 ``kvmi_event`` and the guest physical address are sent to the introspector.
 
 The *RETRY* action is used by the introspector for its own breakpoints.
+
+10. KVMI_EVENT_HYPERCALL
+------------------------
+
+:Architectures: x86
+:Versions: >= 1
+:Actions: CONTINUE, CRASH
+:Parameters:
+
+::
+
+	struct kvmi_event;
+
+:Returns:
+
+::
+
+	struct kvmi_vcpu_hdr;
+	struct kvmi_event_reply;
+
+This event is sent on a specific user hypercall when the introspection has
+been enabled for this event (see *KVMI_CONTROL_EVENTS*).
+
+The hypercall number must be ``KVM_HC_XEN_HVM_OP`` with the
+``KVM_HC_XEN_HVM_OP_GUEST_REQUEST_VM_EVENT`` sub-function
+(see hypercalls.txt).
+
+It is used by the code residing inside the introspected guest to call the
+introspection tool and to report certain details about its operation. For
+example, a classic antimalware remediation tool can report what it has
+found during a scan.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c b/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c
index e998223bca1e..02e026ef5ed7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c
@@ -448,6 +448,39 @@ void kvmi_arch_breakpoint_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gva, u8 insn_len)
 	}
 }
 
+#define KVM_HC_XEN_HVM_OP_GUEST_REQUEST_VM_EVENT 24
+bool kvmi_arch_is_agent_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	unsigned long subfunc1, subfunc2;
+	bool longmode = is_64_bit_mode(vcpu);
+
+	if (longmode) {
+		subfunc1 = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RDI);
+		subfunc2 = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RSI);
+	} else {
+		subfunc1 = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RBX);
+		subfunc1 &= 0xFFFFFFFF;
+		subfunc2 = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RCX);
+		subfunc2 &= 0xFFFFFFFF;
+	}
+
+	return (subfunc1 == KVM_HC_XEN_HVM_OP_GUEST_REQUEST_VM_EVENT
+		&& subfunc2 == 0);
+}
+
+void kvmi_arch_hypercall_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	u32 action;
+
+	action = kvmi_msg_send_hypercall(vcpu);
+	switch (action) {
+	case KVMI_EVENT_ACTION_CONTINUE:
+		break;
+	default:
+		kvmi_handle_common_event_actions(vcpu, action, "HYPERCALL");
+	}
+}
+
 bool kvmi_arch_pf_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
 			u8 access)
 {
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index a9da8ac0d2b3..d568e60ae568 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -7231,11 +7231,14 @@ int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	unsigned long nr, a0, a1, a2, a3, ret;
 	int op_64_bit;
+	bool kvmi_hc;
 
-	if (kvm_hv_hypercall_enabled(vcpu->kvm))
+	nr = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RAX);
+	kvmi_hc = (u32)nr == KVM_HC_XEN_HVM_OP;
+
+	if (kvm_hv_hypercall_enabled(vcpu->kvm) && !kvmi_hc)
 		return kvm_hv_hypercall(vcpu);
 
-	nr = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RAX);
 	a0 = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RBX);
 	a1 = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RCX);
 	a2 = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RDX);
@@ -7252,7 +7255,7 @@ int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		a3 &= 0xFFFFFFFF;
 	}
 
-	if (kvm_x86_ops->get_cpl(vcpu) != 0) {
+	if (kvm_x86_ops->get_cpl(vcpu) != 0 && !kvmi_hc) {
 		ret = -KVM_EPERM;
 		goto out;
 	}
@@ -7273,6 +7276,13 @@ int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	case KVM_HC_SEND_IPI:
 		ret = kvm_pv_send_ipi(vcpu->kvm, a0, a1, a2, a3, op_64_bit);
 		break;
+#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_INTROSPECTION
+	case KVM_HC_XEN_HVM_OP:
+		ret = 0;
+		if (!kvmi_hypercall_event(vcpu))
+			ret = -KVM_ENOSYS;
+		break;
+#endif /* CONFIG_KVM_INTROSPECTION */
 	default:
 		ret = -KVM_ENOSYS;
 		break;
diff --git a/include/linux/kvmi.h b/include/linux/kvmi.h
index 13b58b3202bb..59d83d2d0cca 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvmi.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvmi.h
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ int kvmi_ioctl_unhook(struct kvm *kvm, bool force_reset);
 int kvmi_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvmi_vcpu_uninit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 bool kvmi_breakpoint_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gva, u8 insn_len);
+bool kvmi_hypercall_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 bool kvmi_queue_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvmi_trap_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvmi_handle_requests(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
@@ -36,6 +37,7 @@ static inline bool kvmi_breakpoint_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gva,
 			{ return true; }
 static inline void kvmi_vcpu_uninit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { }
 static inline void kvmi_handle_requests(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { }
+static inline bool kvmi_hypercall_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { return false; }
 static inline bool kvmi_queue_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { return true; }
 static inline void kvmi_trap_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { }
 static inline void kvmi_init_emulate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { }
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h
index 553f168331a4..592bda92b6d5 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h
@@ -33,6 +33,8 @@
 #define KVM_HC_CLOCK_PAIRING		9
 #define KVM_HC_SEND_IPI		10
 
+#define KVM_HC_XEN_HVM_OP		34 /* Xen's __HYPERVISOR_hvm_op */
+
 /*
  * hypercalls use architecture specific
  */
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvmi.c b/virt/kvm/kvmi.c
index 4c868a94ac37..d04e13a0b244 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvmi.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvmi.c
@@ -1120,6 +1120,28 @@ bool kvmi_breakpoint_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gva, u8 insn_len)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(kvmi_breakpoint_event);
 
+bool kvmi_hypercall_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	struct kvmi *ikvm;
+	bool ret = false;
+
+	if (!kvmi_arch_is_agent_hypercall(vcpu))
+		return ret;
+
+	ikvm = kvmi_get(vcpu->kvm);
+	if (!ikvm)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (is_event_enabled(vcpu, KVMI_EVENT_HYPERCALL)) {
+		kvmi_arch_hypercall_event(vcpu);
+		ret = true;
+	}
+
+	kvmi_put(vcpu->kvm);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 /*
  * This function returns false if there is an exception or interrupt pending.
  * It returns true in all other cases including KVMI not being initialized.
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h b/virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h
index d039446922e6..793ec269b9fa 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h
@@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ int kvmi_send_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 ev_id,
 		    void *ev, size_t ev_size,
 		    void *rpl, size_t rpl_size, int *action);
 u32 kvmi_msg_send_bp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gpa, u8 insn_len);
+u32 kvmi_msg_send_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 u32 kvmi_msg_send_pf(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gpa, u64 gva, u8 access,
 		     bool *singlestep, bool *rep_complete,
 		     u64 *ctx_addr, u8 *ctx, u32 *ctx_size);
@@ -255,6 +256,8 @@ bool kvmi_arch_pf_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
 bool kvmi_arch_queue_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvmi_arch_trap_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvmi_arch_breakpoint_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gva, u8 insn_len);
+bool kvmi_arch_is_agent_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+void kvmi_arch_hypercall_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 int kvmi_arch_cmd_get_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			    const struct kvmi_get_cpuid *req,
 			    struct kvmi_get_cpuid_reply *rpl);
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c b/virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c
index c7a1fa5f7245..89f63f40f5cc 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c
@@ -1096,6 +1096,18 @@ u32 kvmi_msg_send_bp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gpa, u8 insn_len)
 	return action;
 }
 
+u32 kvmi_msg_send_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	int err, action;
+
+	err = kvmi_send_event(vcpu, KVMI_EVENT_HYPERCALL, NULL, 0,
+			      NULL, 0, &action);
+	if (err)
+		return KVMI_EVENT_ACTION_CONTINUE;
+
+	return action;
+}
+
 u32 kvmi_msg_send_pf(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gpa, u64 gva, u8 access,
 		     bool *singlestep, bool *rep_complete, u64 *ctx_addr,
 		     u8 *ctx_data, u32 *ctx_size)

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	"Tamas K Lengyel" <tamas@tklengyel.com>,
	"Mathieu Tarral" <mathieu.tarral@protonmail.com>,
	"Samuel Laurén" <samuel.lauren@iki.fi>,
	"Patrick Colp" <patrick.colp@oracle.com>,
	"Jan Kiszka" <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
	"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"Weijiang Yang" <weijiang.yang@intel.com>,
	Zhang@kvack.org, "Yu C" <yu.c.zhang@intel.com>,
	"Mihai Donțu" <mdontu@bitdefender.com>,
	"Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v6 62/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_HYPERCALL
Date: Fri,  9 Aug 2019 19:00:17 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190809160047.8319-63-alazar@bitdefender.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190809160047.8319-1-alazar@bitdefender.com>

From: Mihai Donțu <mdontu@bitdefender.com>

This event is sent on a specific user hypercall.

It is used by the code residing inside the introspected guest to call the
introspection tool and to report certain details about its operation. For
example, a classic antimalware remediation tool can report what it has
found during a scan.

Signed-off-by: Mihai Donțu <mdontu@bitdefender.com>
Co-developed-by: Adalbert Lazăr <alazar@bitdefender.com>
Signed-off-by: Adalbert Lazăr <alazar@bitdefender.com>
---
 Documentation/virtual/kvm/hypercalls.txt | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
 Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst       | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c                      | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c                       | 16 ++++++++---
 include/linux/kvmi.h                     |  2 ++
 include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h            |  2 ++
 virt/kvm/kvmi.c                          | 22 +++++++++++++++
 virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h                      |  3 +++
 virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c                      | 12 +++++++++
 9 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/hypercalls.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/hypercalls.txt
index da24c138c8d1..1ab59537b2fb 100644
--- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/hypercalls.txt
+++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/hypercalls.txt
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ compute the CLOCK_REALTIME for its clock, at the same instant.
 Returns KVM_EOPNOTSUPP if the host does not use TSC clocksource,
 or if clock type is different than KVM_CLOCK_PAIRING_WALLCLOCK.
 
-6. KVM_HC_SEND_IPI
+7. KVM_HC_SEND_IPI
 ------------------------
 Architecture: x86
 Status: active
@@ -141,3 +141,35 @@ a0 corresponds to the APIC ID in the third argument (a2), bit 1
 corresponds to the APIC ID a2+1, and so on.
 
 Returns the number of CPUs to which the IPIs were delivered successfully.
+
+8. KVM_HC_XEN_HVM_OP
+--------------------
+
+Architecture: x86
+Status: active
+Purpose: To enable communication between a guest agent and a VMI application
+Usage:
+
+An event will be sent to the VMI application (see kvmi.rst) if the following
+registers, which differ between 32bit and 64bit, have the following values:
+
+       32bit       64bit     value
+       ---------------------------
+       ebx (a0)    rdi       KVM_HC_XEN_HVM_OP_GUEST_REQUEST_VM_EVENT
+       ecx (a1)    rsi       0
+
+This specification copies Xen's { __HYPERVISOR_hvm_op,
+HVMOP_guest_request_vm_event } hypercall and can originate from kernel or
+userspace.
+
+It returns 0 if successful, or a negative POSIX.1 error code if it fails. The
+absence of an active VMI application is not signaled in any way.
+
+The following registers are clobbered:
+
+  * 32bit: edx, esi, edi, ebp
+  * 64bit: rdx, r10, r8, r9
+
+In particular, for KVM_HC_XEN_HVM_OP_GUEST_REQUEST_VM_EVENT, the last two
+registers can be poisoned deliberately and cannot be used for passing
+information.
diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst
index da216415bf32..2603813d1ee6 100644
--- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst
+++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst
@@ -1505,3 +1505,34 @@ trying to perform a certain operation (like creating a process).
 ``kvmi_event`` and the guest physical address are sent to the introspector.
 
 The *RETRY* action is used by the introspector for its own breakpoints.
+
+10. KVMI_EVENT_HYPERCALL
+------------------------
+
+:Architectures: x86
+:Versions: >= 1
+:Actions: CONTINUE, CRASH
+:Parameters:
+
+::
+
+	struct kvmi_event;
+
+:Returns:
+
+::
+
+	struct kvmi_vcpu_hdr;
+	struct kvmi_event_reply;
+
+This event is sent on a specific user hypercall when the introspection has
+been enabled for this event (see *KVMI_CONTROL_EVENTS*).
+
+The hypercall number must be ``KVM_HC_XEN_HVM_OP`` with the
+``KVM_HC_XEN_HVM_OP_GUEST_REQUEST_VM_EVENT`` sub-function
+(see hypercalls.txt).
+
+It is used by the code residing inside the introspected guest to call the
+introspection tool and to report certain details about its operation. For
+example, a classic antimalware remediation tool can report what it has
+found during a scan.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c b/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c
index e998223bca1e..02e026ef5ed7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c
@@ -448,6 +448,39 @@ void kvmi_arch_breakpoint_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gva, u8 insn_len)
 	}
 }
 
+#define KVM_HC_XEN_HVM_OP_GUEST_REQUEST_VM_EVENT 24
+bool kvmi_arch_is_agent_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	unsigned long subfunc1, subfunc2;
+	bool longmode = is_64_bit_mode(vcpu);
+
+	if (longmode) {
+		subfunc1 = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RDI);
+		subfunc2 = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RSI);
+	} else {
+		subfunc1 = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RBX);
+		subfunc1 &= 0xFFFFFFFF;
+		subfunc2 = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RCX);
+		subfunc2 &= 0xFFFFFFFF;
+	}
+
+	return (subfunc1 == KVM_HC_XEN_HVM_OP_GUEST_REQUEST_VM_EVENT
+		&& subfunc2 == 0);
+}
+
+void kvmi_arch_hypercall_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	u32 action;
+
+	action = kvmi_msg_send_hypercall(vcpu);
+	switch (action) {
+	case KVMI_EVENT_ACTION_CONTINUE:
+		break;
+	default:
+		kvmi_handle_common_event_actions(vcpu, action, "HYPERCALL");
+	}
+}
+
 bool kvmi_arch_pf_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
 			u8 access)
 {
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index a9da8ac0d2b3..d568e60ae568 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -7231,11 +7231,14 @@ int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	unsigned long nr, a0, a1, a2, a3, ret;
 	int op_64_bit;
+	bool kvmi_hc;
 
-	if (kvm_hv_hypercall_enabled(vcpu->kvm))
+	nr = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RAX);
+	kvmi_hc = (u32)nr == KVM_HC_XEN_HVM_OP;
+
+	if (kvm_hv_hypercall_enabled(vcpu->kvm) && !kvmi_hc)
 		return kvm_hv_hypercall(vcpu);
 
-	nr = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RAX);
 	a0 = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RBX);
 	a1 = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RCX);
 	a2 = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RDX);
@@ -7252,7 +7255,7 @@ int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		a3 &= 0xFFFFFFFF;
 	}
 
-	if (kvm_x86_ops->get_cpl(vcpu) != 0) {
+	if (kvm_x86_ops->get_cpl(vcpu) != 0 && !kvmi_hc) {
 		ret = -KVM_EPERM;
 		goto out;
 	}
@@ -7273,6 +7276,13 @@ int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	case KVM_HC_SEND_IPI:
 		ret = kvm_pv_send_ipi(vcpu->kvm, a0, a1, a2, a3, op_64_bit);
 		break;
+#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_INTROSPECTION
+	case KVM_HC_XEN_HVM_OP:
+		ret = 0;
+		if (!kvmi_hypercall_event(vcpu))
+			ret = -KVM_ENOSYS;
+		break;
+#endif /* CONFIG_KVM_INTROSPECTION */
 	default:
 		ret = -KVM_ENOSYS;
 		break;
diff --git a/include/linux/kvmi.h b/include/linux/kvmi.h
index 13b58b3202bb..59d83d2d0cca 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvmi.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvmi.h
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ int kvmi_ioctl_unhook(struct kvm *kvm, bool force_reset);
 int kvmi_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvmi_vcpu_uninit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 bool kvmi_breakpoint_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gva, u8 insn_len);
+bool kvmi_hypercall_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 bool kvmi_queue_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvmi_trap_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvmi_handle_requests(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
@@ -36,6 +37,7 @@ static inline bool kvmi_breakpoint_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gva,
 			{ return true; }
 static inline void kvmi_vcpu_uninit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { }
 static inline void kvmi_handle_requests(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { }
+static inline bool kvmi_hypercall_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { return false; }
 static inline bool kvmi_queue_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { return true; }
 static inline void kvmi_trap_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { }
 static inline void kvmi_init_emulate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { }
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h
index 553f168331a4..592bda92b6d5 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h
@@ -33,6 +33,8 @@
 #define KVM_HC_CLOCK_PAIRING		9
 #define KVM_HC_SEND_IPI		10
 
+#define KVM_HC_XEN_HVM_OP		34 /* Xen's __HYPERVISOR_hvm_op */
+
 /*
  * hypercalls use architecture specific
  */
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvmi.c b/virt/kvm/kvmi.c
index 4c868a94ac37..d04e13a0b244 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvmi.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvmi.c
@@ -1120,6 +1120,28 @@ bool kvmi_breakpoint_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gva, u8 insn_len)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(kvmi_breakpoint_event);
 
+bool kvmi_hypercall_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	struct kvmi *ikvm;
+	bool ret = false;
+
+	if (!kvmi_arch_is_agent_hypercall(vcpu))
+		return ret;
+
+	ikvm = kvmi_get(vcpu->kvm);
+	if (!ikvm)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (is_event_enabled(vcpu, KVMI_EVENT_HYPERCALL)) {
+		kvmi_arch_hypercall_event(vcpu);
+		ret = true;
+	}
+
+	kvmi_put(vcpu->kvm);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 /*
  * This function returns false if there is an exception or interrupt pending.
  * It returns true in all other cases including KVMI not being initialized.
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h b/virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h
index d039446922e6..793ec269b9fa 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h
@@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ int kvmi_send_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 ev_id,
 		    void *ev, size_t ev_size,
 		    void *rpl, size_t rpl_size, int *action);
 u32 kvmi_msg_send_bp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gpa, u8 insn_len);
+u32 kvmi_msg_send_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 u32 kvmi_msg_send_pf(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gpa, u64 gva, u8 access,
 		     bool *singlestep, bool *rep_complete,
 		     u64 *ctx_addr, u8 *ctx, u32 *ctx_size);
@@ -255,6 +256,8 @@ bool kvmi_arch_pf_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
 bool kvmi_arch_queue_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvmi_arch_trap_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvmi_arch_breakpoint_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gva, u8 insn_len);
+bool kvmi_arch_is_agent_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+void kvmi_arch_hypercall_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 int kvmi_arch_cmd_get_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			    const struct kvmi_get_cpuid *req,
 			    struct kvmi_get_cpuid_reply *rpl);
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c b/virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c
index c7a1fa5f7245..89f63f40f5cc 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c
@@ -1096,6 +1096,18 @@ u32 kvmi_msg_send_bp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gpa, u8 insn_len)
 	return action;
 }
 
+u32 kvmi_msg_send_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	int err, action;
+
+	err = kvmi_send_event(vcpu, KVMI_EVENT_HYPERCALL, NULL, 0,
+			      NULL, 0, &action);
+	if (err)
+		return KVMI_EVENT_ACTION_CONTINUE;
+
+	return action;
+}
+
 u32 kvmi_msg_send_pf(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gpa, u64 gva, u8 access,
 		     bool *singlestep, bool *rep_complete, u64 *ctx_addr,
 		     u8 *ctx_data, u32 *ctx_size)


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Tamas K Lengyel" <tamas@tklengyel.com>,
	"Weijiang Yang" <weijiang.yang@intel.com>,
	"Yu C" <yu.c.zhang@intel.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	"Jan Kiszka" <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
	"Samuel Laurén" <samuel.lauren@iki.fi>,
	"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	"Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, "Patrick Colp" <patrick.colp@oracle.com>,
	"Mathieu Tarral" <mathieu.tarral@protonmail.com>,
	"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Zhang@mail.linuxfoundation.org,
	"Mihai Donțu" <mdontu@bitdefender.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v6 62/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_HYPERCALL
Date: Fri,  9 Aug 2019 19:00:17 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190809160047.8319-63-alazar@bitdefender.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190809160047.8319-1-alazar@bitdefender.com>

From: Mihai Donțu <mdontu@bitdefender.com>

This event is sent on a specific user hypercall.

It is used by the code residing inside the introspected guest to call the
introspection tool and to report certain details about its operation. For
example, a classic antimalware remediation tool can report what it has
found during a scan.

Signed-off-by: Mihai Donțu <mdontu@bitdefender.com>
Co-developed-by: Adalbert Lazăr <alazar@bitdefender.com>
Signed-off-by: Adalbert Lazăr <alazar@bitdefender.com>
---
 Documentation/virtual/kvm/hypercalls.txt | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
 Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst       | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c                      | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c                       | 16 ++++++++---
 include/linux/kvmi.h                     |  2 ++
 include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h            |  2 ++
 virt/kvm/kvmi.c                          | 22 +++++++++++++++
 virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h                      |  3 +++
 virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c                      | 12 +++++++++
 9 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/hypercalls.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/hypercalls.txt
index da24c138c8d1..1ab59537b2fb 100644
--- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/hypercalls.txt
+++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/hypercalls.txt
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ compute the CLOCK_REALTIME for its clock, at the same instant.
 Returns KVM_EOPNOTSUPP if the host does not use TSC clocksource,
 or if clock type is different than KVM_CLOCK_PAIRING_WALLCLOCK.
 
-6. KVM_HC_SEND_IPI
+7. KVM_HC_SEND_IPI
 ------------------------
 Architecture: x86
 Status: active
@@ -141,3 +141,35 @@ a0 corresponds to the APIC ID in the third argument (a2), bit 1
 corresponds to the APIC ID a2+1, and so on.
 
 Returns the number of CPUs to which the IPIs were delivered successfully.
+
+8. KVM_HC_XEN_HVM_OP
+--------------------
+
+Architecture: x86
+Status: active
+Purpose: To enable communication between a guest agent and a VMI application
+Usage:
+
+An event will be sent to the VMI application (see kvmi.rst) if the following
+registers, which differ between 32bit and 64bit, have the following values:
+
+       32bit       64bit     value
+       ---------------------------
+       ebx (a0)    rdi       KVM_HC_XEN_HVM_OP_GUEST_REQUEST_VM_EVENT
+       ecx (a1)    rsi       0
+
+This specification copies Xen's { __HYPERVISOR_hvm_op,
+HVMOP_guest_request_vm_event } hypercall and can originate from kernel or
+userspace.
+
+It returns 0 if successful, or a negative POSIX.1 error code if it fails. The
+absence of an active VMI application is not signaled in any way.
+
+The following registers are clobbered:
+
+  * 32bit: edx, esi, edi, ebp
+  * 64bit: rdx, r10, r8, r9
+
+In particular, for KVM_HC_XEN_HVM_OP_GUEST_REQUEST_VM_EVENT, the last two
+registers can be poisoned deliberately and cannot be used for passing
+information.
diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst
index da216415bf32..2603813d1ee6 100644
--- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst
+++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/kvmi.rst
@@ -1505,3 +1505,34 @@ trying to perform a certain operation (like creating a process).
 ``kvmi_event`` and the guest physical address are sent to the introspector.
 
 The *RETRY* action is used by the introspector for its own breakpoints.
+
+10. KVMI_EVENT_HYPERCALL
+------------------------
+
+:Architectures: x86
+:Versions: >= 1
+:Actions: CONTINUE, CRASH
+:Parameters:
+
+::
+
+	struct kvmi_event;
+
+:Returns:
+
+::
+
+	struct kvmi_vcpu_hdr;
+	struct kvmi_event_reply;
+
+This event is sent on a specific user hypercall when the introspection has
+been enabled for this event (see *KVMI_CONTROL_EVENTS*).
+
+The hypercall number must be ``KVM_HC_XEN_HVM_OP`` with the
+``KVM_HC_XEN_HVM_OP_GUEST_REQUEST_VM_EVENT`` sub-function
+(see hypercalls.txt).
+
+It is used by the code residing inside the introspected guest to call the
+introspection tool and to report certain details about its operation. For
+example, a classic antimalware remediation tool can report what it has
+found during a scan.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c b/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c
index e998223bca1e..02e026ef5ed7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c
@@ -448,6 +448,39 @@ void kvmi_arch_breakpoint_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gva, u8 insn_len)
 	}
 }
 
+#define KVM_HC_XEN_HVM_OP_GUEST_REQUEST_VM_EVENT 24
+bool kvmi_arch_is_agent_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	unsigned long subfunc1, subfunc2;
+	bool longmode = is_64_bit_mode(vcpu);
+
+	if (longmode) {
+		subfunc1 = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RDI);
+		subfunc2 = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RSI);
+	} else {
+		subfunc1 = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RBX);
+		subfunc1 &= 0xFFFFFFFF;
+		subfunc2 = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RCX);
+		subfunc2 &= 0xFFFFFFFF;
+	}
+
+	return (subfunc1 == KVM_HC_XEN_HVM_OP_GUEST_REQUEST_VM_EVENT
+		&& subfunc2 == 0);
+}
+
+void kvmi_arch_hypercall_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	u32 action;
+
+	action = kvmi_msg_send_hypercall(vcpu);
+	switch (action) {
+	case KVMI_EVENT_ACTION_CONTINUE:
+		break;
+	default:
+		kvmi_handle_common_event_actions(vcpu, action, "HYPERCALL");
+	}
+}
+
 bool kvmi_arch_pf_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
 			u8 access)
 {
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index a9da8ac0d2b3..d568e60ae568 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -7231,11 +7231,14 @@ int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	unsigned long nr, a0, a1, a2, a3, ret;
 	int op_64_bit;
+	bool kvmi_hc;
 
-	if (kvm_hv_hypercall_enabled(vcpu->kvm))
+	nr = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RAX);
+	kvmi_hc = (u32)nr == KVM_HC_XEN_HVM_OP;
+
+	if (kvm_hv_hypercall_enabled(vcpu->kvm) && !kvmi_hc)
 		return kvm_hv_hypercall(vcpu);
 
-	nr = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RAX);
 	a0 = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RBX);
 	a1 = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RCX);
 	a2 = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RDX);
@@ -7252,7 +7255,7 @@ int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		a3 &= 0xFFFFFFFF;
 	}
 
-	if (kvm_x86_ops->get_cpl(vcpu) != 0) {
+	if (kvm_x86_ops->get_cpl(vcpu) != 0 && !kvmi_hc) {
 		ret = -KVM_EPERM;
 		goto out;
 	}
@@ -7273,6 +7276,13 @@ int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	case KVM_HC_SEND_IPI:
 		ret = kvm_pv_send_ipi(vcpu->kvm, a0, a1, a2, a3, op_64_bit);
 		break;
+#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_INTROSPECTION
+	case KVM_HC_XEN_HVM_OP:
+		ret = 0;
+		if (!kvmi_hypercall_event(vcpu))
+			ret = -KVM_ENOSYS;
+		break;
+#endif /* CONFIG_KVM_INTROSPECTION */
 	default:
 		ret = -KVM_ENOSYS;
 		break;
diff --git a/include/linux/kvmi.h b/include/linux/kvmi.h
index 13b58b3202bb..59d83d2d0cca 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvmi.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvmi.h
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ int kvmi_ioctl_unhook(struct kvm *kvm, bool force_reset);
 int kvmi_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvmi_vcpu_uninit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 bool kvmi_breakpoint_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gva, u8 insn_len);
+bool kvmi_hypercall_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 bool kvmi_queue_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvmi_trap_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvmi_handle_requests(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
@@ -36,6 +37,7 @@ static inline bool kvmi_breakpoint_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gva,
 			{ return true; }
 static inline void kvmi_vcpu_uninit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { }
 static inline void kvmi_handle_requests(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { }
+static inline bool kvmi_hypercall_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { return false; }
 static inline bool kvmi_queue_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { return true; }
 static inline void kvmi_trap_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { }
 static inline void kvmi_init_emulate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { }
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h
index 553f168331a4..592bda92b6d5 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h
@@ -33,6 +33,8 @@
 #define KVM_HC_CLOCK_PAIRING		9
 #define KVM_HC_SEND_IPI		10
 
+#define KVM_HC_XEN_HVM_OP		34 /* Xen's __HYPERVISOR_hvm_op */
+
 /*
  * hypercalls use architecture specific
  */
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvmi.c b/virt/kvm/kvmi.c
index 4c868a94ac37..d04e13a0b244 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvmi.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvmi.c
@@ -1120,6 +1120,28 @@ bool kvmi_breakpoint_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gva, u8 insn_len)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(kvmi_breakpoint_event);
 
+bool kvmi_hypercall_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	struct kvmi *ikvm;
+	bool ret = false;
+
+	if (!kvmi_arch_is_agent_hypercall(vcpu))
+		return ret;
+
+	ikvm = kvmi_get(vcpu->kvm);
+	if (!ikvm)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (is_event_enabled(vcpu, KVMI_EVENT_HYPERCALL)) {
+		kvmi_arch_hypercall_event(vcpu);
+		ret = true;
+	}
+
+	kvmi_put(vcpu->kvm);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 /*
  * This function returns false if there is an exception or interrupt pending.
  * It returns true in all other cases including KVMI not being initialized.
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h b/virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h
index d039446922e6..793ec269b9fa 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvmi_int.h
@@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ int kvmi_send_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 ev_id,
 		    void *ev, size_t ev_size,
 		    void *rpl, size_t rpl_size, int *action);
 u32 kvmi_msg_send_bp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gpa, u8 insn_len);
+u32 kvmi_msg_send_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 u32 kvmi_msg_send_pf(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gpa, u64 gva, u8 access,
 		     bool *singlestep, bool *rep_complete,
 		     u64 *ctx_addr, u8 *ctx, u32 *ctx_size);
@@ -255,6 +256,8 @@ bool kvmi_arch_pf_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
 bool kvmi_arch_queue_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvmi_arch_trap_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvmi_arch_breakpoint_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gva, u8 insn_len);
+bool kvmi_arch_is_agent_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+void kvmi_arch_hypercall_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 int kvmi_arch_cmd_get_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			    const struct kvmi_get_cpuid *req,
 			    struct kvmi_get_cpuid_reply *rpl);
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c b/virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c
index c7a1fa5f7245..89f63f40f5cc 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvmi_msg.c
@@ -1096,6 +1096,18 @@ u32 kvmi_msg_send_bp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gpa, u8 insn_len)
 	return action;
 }
 
+u32 kvmi_msg_send_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	int err, action;
+
+	err = kvmi_send_event(vcpu, KVMI_EVENT_HYPERCALL, NULL, 0,
+			      NULL, 0, &action);
+	if (err)
+		return KVMI_EVENT_ACTION_CONTINUE;
+
+	return action;
+}
+
 u32 kvmi_msg_send_pf(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gpa, u64 gva, u8 access,
 		     bool *singlestep, bool *rep_complete, u64 *ctx_addr,
 		     u8 *ctx_data, u32 *ctx_size)
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-08-09 16:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 423+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-09 15:59 [RFC PATCH v6 00/92] VM introspection Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 01/92] kvm: introduce KVMI (VM introspection subsystem) Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-12 20:20   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-12 20:20     ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-13  9:11     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13  9:11       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 11:57     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13 11:57     ` Adalbert Lazăr
     [not found]     ` <5d52a5ae.1c69fb81.5c260.1573SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2019-08-13 12:09       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 12:09         ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 15:01         ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-13 15:01           ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-13 21:03           ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 21:03             ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-14  9:48           ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-14  9:48           ` Adalbert Lazăr
     [not found]           ` <5d53d8d1.1c69fb81.7d32.0bedSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2019-08-14 10:37             ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-14 10:37               ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 02/92] kvm: introspection: add basic ioctls (hook/unhook) Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  8:44   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13  8:44     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 14:24     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13 14:24     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 03/92] kvm: introspection: add permission access ioctls Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 04/92] kvm: introspection: add the read/dispatch message function Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 05/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_VERSION Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 06/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_CONTROL_CMD_RESPONSE Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  9:15   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13  9:15     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 17:08     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13 17:08     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 07/92] kvm: introspection: honor the reply option when handling the KVMI_GET_VERSION command Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  9:16   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13  9:16     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 08/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_CHECK_COMMAND and KVMI_CHECK_EVENT Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 09/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_GUEST_INFO Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 10/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_CONTROL_VM_EVENTS Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 11/92] kvm: introspection: add vCPU related data Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 12/92] kvm: introspection: add a jobs list to every introspected vCPU Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 13/92] kvm: introspection: make the vCPU wait even when its jobs list is empty Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  8:43   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13  8:43     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 14:19     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13 14:19     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 14/92] kvm: introspection: handle introspection commands before returning to guest Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  8:26   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13  8:26     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 13:54     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13 13:54     ` Adalbert Lazăr
     [not found]     ` <5d52c10e.1c69fb81.26904.fd34SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2019-08-13 14:45       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 14:45         ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-14  9:39         ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-14  9:39         ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 15/92] kvm: introspection: handle vCPU related introspection commands Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 16/92] kvm: introspection: handle events and event replies Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  8:55   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13  8:55     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 15:25     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13 15:25     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 17/92] kvm: introspection: introduce event actions Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 18/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_UNHOOK Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 19/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_CREATE_VCPU Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 20/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_VCPU_INFO Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 21/92] kvm: page track: add track_create_slot() callback Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 22/92] kvm: x86: provide all page tracking hooks with the guest virtual address Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 23/92] kvm: page track: add support for preread, prewrite and preexec Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 24/92] kvm: x86: wire in the preread/prewrite/preexec page trackers Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 25/92] kvm: x86: intercept the write access on sidt and other emulated instructions Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 26/92] kvm: x86: add kvm_mmu_nested_pagefault() Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  8:12   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13  8:12     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 27/92] kvm: introspection: use page track Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  9:06   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13  9:06     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 28/92] kvm: x86: consult the page tracking from kvm_mmu_get_page() and __direct_map() Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 29/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_CONTROL_EVENTS Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 30/92] kvm: x86: add kvm_spt_fault() Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 31/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_PF Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 32/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_PAGE_ACCESS Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 33/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_SET_PAGE_ACCESS Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 34/92] Documentation: Introduce EPT based Subpage Protection Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 35/92] KVM: VMX: Add control flags for SPP enabling Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 36/92] KVM: VMX: Implement functions for SPPT paging setup Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 37/92] KVM: VMX: Introduce SPP access bitmap and operation functions Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 38/92] KVM: VMX: Add init/set/get functions for SPP Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 39/92] KVM: VMX: Introduce SPP user-space IOCTLs Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 40/92] KVM: VMX: Handle SPP induced vmexit and page fault Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 41/92] KVM: MMU: Enable Lazy mode SPPT setup Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 42/92] KVM: MMU: Handle host memory remapping and reclaim Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 43/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_CONTROL_SPP Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v6 44/92] kvm: introspection: extend the internal database of tracked pages with write_bitmap info Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 15:59   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 45/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_PAGE_WRITE_BITMAP Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 46/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_SET_PAGE_WRITE_BITMAP Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 47/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_READ_PHYSICAL and KVMI_WRITE_PHYSICAL Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 48/92] kvm: add kvm_vcpu_kick_and_wait() Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 49/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_PAUSE_VCPU and KVMI_EVENT_PAUSE_VCPU Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 50/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_REGISTERS Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 51/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_SET_REGISTERS Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 52/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_CPUID Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 53/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_INJECT_EXCEPTION + KVMI_EVENT_TRAP Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 54/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_CONTROL_CR and KVMI_EVENT_CR Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 55/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_CONTROL_MSR and KVMI_EVENT_MSR Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-12 21:05   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-12 21:05     ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-15  6:36     ` Nicusor CITU
2019-08-19 18:36       ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-19 18:36         ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-20  8:44         ` Nicusor CITU
2019-08-20 11:43           ` Mihai Donțu
2019-08-21 15:18             ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-21 15:18               ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-19 18:52   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-19 18:52     ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 56/92] kvm: x86: block any attempt to disable MSR interception if tracked by introspection Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 57/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_XSAVE Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 58/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_GET_MTRR_TYPE Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 59/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_XSETBV Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 60/92] kvm: x86: add kvm_arch_vcpu_set_guest_debug() Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 61/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_BREAKPOINT Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` Adalbert Lazăr [this message]
2019-08-09 16:00   ` [RFC PATCH v6 62/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_HYPERCALL Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 63/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_DESCRIPTOR Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 64/92] kvm: introspection: add single-stepping Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-12 20:50   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-12 20:50     ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-13 12:51     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13 12:51     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-14 12:36     ` Nicusor CITU
2019-08-14 12:53       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-14 12:53         ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 65/92] kvm: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_SINGLESTEP Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 66/92] kvm: introspection: add custom input when single-stepping a vCPU Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 67/92] kvm: introspection: use single stepping on unimplemented instructions Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 68/92] kvm: x86: emulate a guest page table walk on SPT violations due to A/D bit updates Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 69/92] kvm: x86: keep the page protected if tracked by the introspection tool Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-09-10 14:26   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2019-09-10 14:26     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2019-09-10 16:28     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-09-10 16:28       ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 70/92] kvm: x86: filter out access rights only when " Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  9:08   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13  9:08     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 16:06     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13 16:06     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 71/92] mm: add support for remote mapping Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:24   ` DANGER WILL ROBINSON, DANGER Matthew Wilcox
2019-08-09 16:24     ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-08-13  9:29     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13  9:29       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 11:24       ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-08-13 11:24         ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-08-13 12:02         ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 12:02           ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 11:01     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13 11:01     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-15 19:19       ` Jerome Glisse
2019-08-15 19:19         ` Jerome Glisse
2019-08-15 20:16         ` Jerome Glisse
2019-08-15 20:16           ` Jerome Glisse
2019-08-16 17:45           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-16 17:45             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-23 12:39           ` Mircea CIRJALIU - MELIU
2019-09-05 18:09             ` Jerome Glisse
2019-09-05 18:09               ` Jerome Glisse
2019-09-09 17:00               ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-09-09 17:00                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-09-10  7:49                 ` Mircea CIRJALIU - MELIU
2019-10-02 19:27                   ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-02 19:27                     ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-02 13:46                     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-02 13:46                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-02 14:15                       ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-02 14:15                         ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-02 16:18                         ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-02 16:18                           ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-02 17:04                           ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-02 17:04                             ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-02 20:10                             ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-02 20:10                               ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-03 15:42                               ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-03 15:42                                 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-03 15:50                                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-03 15:50                                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-03 16:42                                   ` Mircea CIRJALIU - MELIU
2019-10-03 18:31                                     ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-03 18:31                                       ` Jerome Glisse
2019-10-03 19:38                                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-03 19:38                                         ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-04  9:41                                         ` Mircea CIRJALIU - MELIU
2019-10-04 11:46                                           ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-04 11:46                                             ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-03 16:36                               ` Mircea CIRJALIU - MELIU
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 72/92] kvm: introspection: add memory map/unmap support on the guest side Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 73/92] kvm: introspection: use remote mapping Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 74/92] kvm: x86: do not unconditionally patch the hypercall instruction during emulation Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  9:20   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13  9:20     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-14 12:07     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-14 12:07     ` Adalbert Lazăr
     [not found]     ` <5d53f965.1c69fb81.cd952.035bSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2019-08-14 12:33       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-14 12:33         ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 75/92] kvm: x86: disable gpa_available optimization in emulator_read_write_onepage() Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  8:47   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13  8:47     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 14:33     ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13 14:33     ` Adalbert Lazăr
     [not found]     ` <5d52ca22.1c69fb81.4ceb8.e90bSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2019-08-13 14:35       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 14:35         ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 76/92] kvm: x86: disable EPT A/D bits if introspection is present Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  9:18   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13  9:18     ` Paolo Bonzini
     [not found]     ` <0550f8d65bb97486e98d88255ea45d490da6b802.camel@bitdefender.com>
2019-08-13 21:05       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-14  8:53         ` Mihai Donțu
2019-08-14 10:36           ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 77/92] kvm: introspection: add trace functions Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 78/92] kvm: x86: add tracepoints for interrupt and exception injections Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 79/92] kvm: x86: emulate movsd xmm, m64 Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-13  9:17   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13  9:17     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 80/92] kvm: x86: emulate movss xmm, m32 Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 81/92] kvm: x86: emulate movq xmm, m64 Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 82/92] kvm: x86: emulate movq r, xmm Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 83/92] kvm: x86: emulate movd xmm, m32 Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 84/92] kvm: x86: enable the half part of movss, movsd, movups Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 85/92] kvm: x86: emulate lfence Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 86/92] kvm: x86: emulate xorpd xmm2/m128, xmm1 Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 87/92] kvm: x86: emulate xorps xmm/m128, xmm Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 88/92] kvm: x86: emulate fst/fstp m64fp Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 89/92] kvm: x86: make lock cmpxchg r, r/m atomic Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 90/92] kvm: x86: emulate lock cmpxchg8b atomically Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 91/92] kvm: x86: emulate lock cmpxchg16b m128 Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH v6 92/92] kvm: x86: fallback to the single-step on multipage CMPXCHG emulation Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-09 16:00   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2019-08-12 18:23 ` [RFC PATCH v6 00/92] VM introspection Sean Christopherson
2019-08-12 18:23   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-12 21:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-12 21:40   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-08-13  9:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13  9:34   ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190809160047.8319-63-alazar@bitdefender.com \
    --to=alazar@bitdefender.com \
    --cc=Zhang@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mathieu.tarral@protonmail.com \
    --cc=mdontu@bitdefender.com \
    --cc=patrick.colp@oracle.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=samuel.lauren@iki.fi \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=tamas@tklengyel.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=weijiang.yang@intel.com \
    --cc=yu.c.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.