All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org,
	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
	Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>,
	Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@vmware.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 04/13] vsock: add 'transport' member in the struct vsock_sock
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 13:26:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190927112703.17745-5-sgarzare@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190927112703.17745-1-sgarzare@redhat.com>

As a preparation to support multiple transports, this patch adds
the 'transport' member at the 'struct vsock_sock'.
This new field is initialized during the creation in the
__vsock_create() function.

This patch also renames the global 'transport' pointer to
'transport_single', since for now we're only supporting a single
transport registered at run-time.

Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
---
 include/net/af_vsock.h   |  1 +
 net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/af_vsock.h b/include/net/af_vsock.h
index c660402b10f2..a5e1e134261d 100644
--- a/include/net/af_vsock.h
+++ b/include/net/af_vsock.h
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ extern spinlock_t vsock_table_lock;
 struct vsock_sock {
 	/* sk must be the first member. */
 	struct sock sk;
+	const struct vsock_transport *transport;
 	struct sockaddr_vm local_addr;
 	struct sockaddr_vm remote_addr;
 	/* Links for the global tables of bound and connected sockets. */
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
index f609434b2794..81ee2561c76f 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static struct proto vsock_proto = {
  */
 #define VSOCK_DEFAULT_CONNECT_TIMEOUT (2 * HZ)
 
-static const struct vsock_transport *transport;
+static const struct vsock_transport *transport_single;
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(vsock_register_mutex);
 
 /**** UTILS ****/
@@ -408,7 +408,9 @@ static bool vsock_is_pending(struct sock *sk)
 
 static int vsock_send_shutdown(struct sock *sk, int mode)
 {
-	return transport->shutdown(vsock_sk(sk), mode);
+	struct vsock_sock *vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
+
+	return vsk->transport->shutdown(vsk, mode);
 }
 
 static void vsock_pending_work(struct work_struct *work)
@@ -518,7 +520,7 @@ static int __vsock_bind_stream(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
 static int __vsock_bind_dgram(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
 			      struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
 {
-	return transport->dgram_bind(vsk, addr);
+	return vsk->transport->dgram_bind(vsk, addr);
 }
 
 static int __vsock_bind(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
@@ -536,7 +538,7 @@ static int __vsock_bind(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
 	 * like AF_INET prevents binding to a non-local IP address (in most
 	 * cases), we only allow binding to the local CID.
 	 */
-	cid = transport->get_local_cid();
+	cid = vsk->transport->get_local_cid();
 	if (addr->svm_cid != cid && addr->svm_cid != VMADDR_CID_ANY)
 		return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
 
@@ -586,6 +588,7 @@ struct sock *__vsock_create(struct net *net,
 		sk->sk_type = type;
 
 	vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
+	vsk->transport = transport_single;
 	vsock_addr_init(&vsk->local_addr, VMADDR_CID_ANY, VMADDR_PORT_ANY);
 	vsock_addr_init(&vsk->remote_addr, VMADDR_CID_ANY, VMADDR_PORT_ANY);
 
@@ -616,7 +619,7 @@ struct sock *__vsock_create(struct net *net,
 		vsk->connect_timeout = VSOCK_DEFAULT_CONNECT_TIMEOUT;
 	}
 
-	if (transport->init(vsk, psk) < 0) {
+	if (vsk->transport->init(vsk, psk) < 0) {
 		sk_free(sk);
 		return NULL;
 	}
@@ -638,7 +641,7 @@ static void __vsock_release(struct sock *sk)
 		vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
 		pending = NULL;	/* Compiler warning. */
 
-		transport->release(vsk);
+		vsk->transport->release(vsk);
 
 		lock_sock(sk);
 		sock_orphan(sk);
@@ -662,7 +665,7 @@ static void vsock_sk_destruct(struct sock *sk)
 {
 	struct vsock_sock *vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
 
-	transport->destruct(vsk);
+	vsk->transport->destruct(vsk);
 
 	/* When clearing these addresses, there's no need to set the family and
 	 * possibly register the address family with the kernel.
@@ -686,13 +689,13 @@ static int vsock_queue_rcv_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 
 s64 vsock_stream_has_data(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
 {
-	return transport->stream_has_data(vsk);
+	return vsk->transport->stream_has_data(vsk);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_stream_has_data);
 
 s64 vsock_stream_has_space(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
 {
-	return transport->stream_has_space(vsk);
+	return vsk->transport->stream_has_space(vsk);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_stream_has_space);
 
@@ -861,6 +864,7 @@ static __poll_t vsock_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock,
 			mask |= EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM | EPOLLWRBAND;
 
 	} else if (sock->type == SOCK_STREAM) {
+		const struct vsock_transport *transport = vsk->transport;
 		lock_sock(sk);
 
 		/* Listening sockets that have connections in their accept
@@ -936,6 +940,7 @@ static int vsock_dgram_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
 	struct sock *sk;
 	struct vsock_sock *vsk;
 	struct sockaddr_vm *remote_addr;
+	const struct vsock_transport *transport;
 
 	if (msg->msg_flags & MSG_OOB)
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -944,6 +949,7 @@ static int vsock_dgram_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
 	err = 0;
 	sk = sock->sk;
 	vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
+	transport = vsk->transport;
 
 	lock_sock(sk);
 
@@ -1028,8 +1034,8 @@ static int vsock_dgram_connect(struct socket *sock,
 	if (err)
 		goto out;
 
-	if (!transport->dgram_allow(remote_addr->svm_cid,
-				    remote_addr->svm_port)) {
+	if (!vsk->transport->dgram_allow(remote_addr->svm_cid,
+					 remote_addr->svm_port)) {
 		err = -EINVAL;
 		goto out;
 	}
@@ -1045,7 +1051,9 @@ static int vsock_dgram_connect(struct socket *sock,
 static int vsock_dgram_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
 			       size_t len, int flags)
 {
-	return transport->dgram_dequeue(vsock_sk(sock->sk), msg, len, flags);
+	struct vsock_sock *vsk = vsock_sk(sock->sk);
+
+	return vsk->transport->dgram_dequeue(vsk, msg, len, flags);
 }
 
 static const struct proto_ops vsock_dgram_ops = {
@@ -1071,6 +1079,8 @@ static const struct proto_ops vsock_dgram_ops = {
 
 static int vsock_transport_cancel_pkt(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
 {
+	const struct vsock_transport *transport = vsk->transport;
+
 	if (!transport->cancel_pkt)
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
@@ -1107,6 +1117,7 @@ static int vsock_stream_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr,
 	int err;
 	struct sock *sk;
 	struct vsock_sock *vsk;
+	const struct vsock_transport *transport;
 	struct sockaddr_vm *remote_addr;
 	long timeout;
 	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
@@ -1114,6 +1125,7 @@ static int vsock_stream_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr,
 	err = 0;
 	sk = sock->sk;
 	vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
+	transport = vsk->transport;
 
 	lock_sock(sk);
 
@@ -1357,6 +1369,7 @@ static int vsock_stream_setsockopt(struct socket *sock,
 	int err;
 	struct sock *sk;
 	struct vsock_sock *vsk;
+	const struct vsock_transport *transport;
 	u64 val;
 
 	if (level != AF_VSOCK)
@@ -1377,6 +1390,7 @@ static int vsock_stream_setsockopt(struct socket *sock,
 	err = 0;
 	sk = sock->sk;
 	vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
+	transport = vsk->transport;
 
 	lock_sock(sk);
 
@@ -1434,6 +1448,7 @@ static int vsock_stream_getsockopt(struct socket *sock,
 	int len;
 	struct sock *sk;
 	struct vsock_sock *vsk;
+	const struct vsock_transport *transport;
 	u64 val;
 
 	if (level != AF_VSOCK)
@@ -1457,6 +1472,7 @@ static int vsock_stream_getsockopt(struct socket *sock,
 	err = 0;
 	sk = sock->sk;
 	vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
+	transport = vsk->transport;
 
 	switch (optname) {
 	case SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_SIZE:
@@ -1501,6 +1517,7 @@ static int vsock_stream_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
 {
 	struct sock *sk;
 	struct vsock_sock *vsk;
+	const struct vsock_transport *transport;
 	ssize_t total_written;
 	long timeout;
 	int err;
@@ -1509,6 +1526,7 @@ static int vsock_stream_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
 
 	sk = sock->sk;
 	vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
+	transport = vsk->transport;
 	total_written = 0;
 	err = 0;
 
@@ -1640,6 +1658,7 @@ vsock_stream_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
 {
 	struct sock *sk;
 	struct vsock_sock *vsk;
+	const struct vsock_transport *transport;
 	int err;
 	size_t target;
 	ssize_t copied;
@@ -1650,6 +1669,7 @@ vsock_stream_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
 
 	sk = sock->sk;
 	vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
+	transport = vsk->transport;
 	err = 0;
 
 	lock_sock(sk);
@@ -1864,7 +1884,7 @@ static long vsock_dev_do_ioctl(struct file *filp,
 
 	switch (cmd) {
 	case IOCTL_VM_SOCKETS_GET_LOCAL_CID:
-		if (put_user(transport->get_local_cid(), p) != 0)
+		if (put_user(transport_single->get_local_cid(), p) != 0)
 			retval = -EFAULT;
 		break;
 
@@ -1911,7 +1931,7 @@ int __vsock_core_init(const struct vsock_transport *t, struct module *owner)
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	if (transport) {
+	if (transport_single) {
 		err = -EBUSY;
 		goto err_busy;
 	}
@@ -1920,7 +1940,7 @@ int __vsock_core_init(const struct vsock_transport *t, struct module *owner)
 	 * unload while there are open sockets.
 	 */
 	vsock_proto.owner = owner;
-	transport = t;
+	transport_single = t;
 
 	vsock_device.minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR;
 	err = misc_register(&vsock_device);
@@ -1950,7 +1970,7 @@ int __vsock_core_init(const struct vsock_transport *t, struct module *owner)
 err_deregister_misc:
 	misc_deregister(&vsock_device);
 err_reset_transport:
-	transport = NULL;
+	transport_single = NULL;
 err_busy:
 	mutex_unlock(&vsock_register_mutex);
 	return err;
@@ -1967,7 +1987,7 @@ void vsock_core_exit(void)
 
 	/* We do not want the assignment below re-ordered. */
 	mb();
-	transport = NULL;
+	transport_single = NULL;
 
 	mutex_unlock(&vsock_register_mutex);
 }
@@ -1978,7 +1998,7 @@ const struct vsock_transport *vsock_core_get_transport(void)
 	/* vsock_register_mutex not taken since only the transport uses this
 	 * function and only while registered.
 	 */
-	return transport;
+	return transport_single;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_core_get_transport);
 
-- 
2.21.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-09-27 11:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-27 11:26 [RFC PATCH 00/13] vsock: add multi-transports support Stefano Garzarella
2019-09-27 11:26 ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-09-27 11:26 ` [RFC PATCH 01/13] vsock/vmci: remove unused VSOCK_DEFAULT_CONNECT_TIMEOUT Stefano Garzarella
2019-09-27 11:26   ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-10-09 11:41   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-09 11:41   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-09-27 11:26 ` [RFC PATCH 02/13] vsock: remove vm_sockets_get_local_cid() Stefano Garzarella
2019-10-09 11:42   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-09 11:42   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-09-27 11:26 ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-09-27 11:26 ` [RFC PATCH 03/13] vsock: remove include/linux/vm_sockets.h file Stefano Garzarella
2019-09-27 11:26 ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-10-09 11:43   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-09 11:43   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-09-27 11:26 ` Stefano Garzarella [this message]
2019-10-09 11:46   ` [RFC PATCH 04/13] vsock: add 'transport' member in the struct vsock_sock Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-09 11:46   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-09-27 11:26 ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-09-27 11:26 ` [RFC PATCH 05/13] vsock/virtio: add transport parameter to the virtio_transport_reset_no_sock() Stefano Garzarella
2019-09-27 11:26 ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-10-09 11:52   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-09 11:52   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-09-27 11:26 ` [RFC PATCH 06/13] vsock: add 'struct vsock_sock *' param to vsock_core_get_transport() Stefano Garzarella
2019-10-09 11:54   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-10  8:50     ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-10-10  8:50       ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-10-09 11:54   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-09-27 11:26 ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-09-27 11:26 ` [RFC PATCH 07/13] vsock: handle buffer_size sockopts in the core Stefano Garzarella
2019-10-03 20:11   ` Dexuan Cui
2019-10-09 12:30   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-09 12:30   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-10  9:32     ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-10-10  9:32     ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-10-11  8:27       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-11  8:51         ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-10-11  8:51         ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-10-11  8:27       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-09-27 11:26 ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-09-27 11:26 ` [RFC PATCH 08/13] vsock: move vsock_insert_unbound() in the vsock_create() Stefano Garzarella
2019-10-03 20:17   ` Dexuan Cui
2019-10-09 12:34   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-09 12:34   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-10  9:52     ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-10-10  9:52     ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-09-27 11:26 ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-09-27 11:26 ` [RFC PATCH 09/13] hv_sock: set VMADDR_CID_HOST in the hvs_remote_addr_init() Stefano Garzarella
2019-09-27 11:26 ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-10-03 19:36   ` Dexuan Cui
2019-10-09 12:35   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-09 12:35     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-09-27 11:27 ` [RFC PATCH 10/13] vsock: add multi-transports support Stefano Garzarella
2019-10-09 13:11   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-09 13:11   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-10 12:55     ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-10-10 12:55     ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-09-27 11:27 ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-09-27 11:27 ` [RFC PATCH 11/13] vsock: add 'transport_hg' to handle g2h\h2g transports Stefano Garzarella
2019-09-27 11:27 ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-10-09  9:44   ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-10-09  9:44   ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-10-09 13:16   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-10 13:04     ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-10-10 13:04     ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-10-09 13:16   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-09-27 11:27 ` [RFC PATCH 12/13] vsock: prevent transport modules unloading Stefano Garzarella
2019-09-27 11:27 ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-10-09 13:28   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-09 13:28   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-09-27 11:27 ` [RFC PATCH 13/13] vsock: fix bind() behaviour taking care of CID Stefano Garzarella
2019-09-27 11:27 ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-10-09 13:29   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-09 13:29   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-04  0:04 ` [RFC PATCH 00/13] vsock: add multi-transports support Dexuan Cui
2019-10-04  9:16   ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-10-04  9:16   ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-10-09 13:29 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-10  8:45   ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-10-10  8:45   ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-10-09 13:29 ` Stefan Hajnoczi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190927112703.17745-5-sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --to=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=decui@microsoft.com \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=jhansen@vmware.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.