All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com>
To: <jejb@linux.ibm.com>, <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] scsi: core: try to get module before removing devcie
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 21:05:56 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191015130556.18061-1-yuyufen@huawei.com> (raw)

We have a test case like block/001 in blktests, which will
create a scsi device by loading scsi_debug module and then
try to delete the device by sysfs interface. At the same time,
it may remove the scsi_debug module.

And getting a invalid paging request BUG_ON as following:

[   34.625854] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffffa0016bb8
[   34.629189] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
[   34.629618] CPU: 1 PID: 450 Comm: bash Tainted: G        W         5.4.0-rc3+ #473
[   34.632524] RIP: 0010:scsi_proc_hostdir_rm+0x5/0xa0
[   34.643555] CR2: ffffffffa0016bb8 CR3: 000000012cd88000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
[   34.644545] Call Trace:
[   34.644907]  scsi_host_dev_release+0x6b/0x1f0
[   34.645511]  device_release+0x74/0x110
[   34.646046]  kobject_put+0x116/0x390
[   34.646559]  put_device+0x17/0x30
[   34.647041]  scsi_target_dev_release+0x2b/0x40
[   34.647652]  device_release+0x74/0x110
[   34.648186]  kobject_put+0x116/0x390
[   34.648691]  put_device+0x17/0x30
[   34.649157]  scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext+0x2e8/0x360
[   34.649953]  execute_in_process_context+0x29/0x80
[   34.650603]  scsi_device_dev_release+0x20/0x30
[   34.651221]  device_release+0x74/0x110
[   34.651732]  kobject_put+0x116/0x390
[   34.652230]  sysfs_unbreak_active_protection+0x3f/0x50
[   34.652935]  sdev_store_delete.cold.4+0x71/0x8f
[   34.653579]  dev_attr_store+0x1b/0x40
[   34.654103]  sysfs_kf_write+0x3d/0x60
[   34.654603]  kernfs_fop_write+0x174/0x250
[   34.655165]  __vfs_write+0x1f/0x60
[   34.655639]  vfs_write+0xc7/0x280
[   34.656117]  ksys_write+0x6d/0x140
[   34.656591]  __x64_sys_write+0x1e/0x30
[   34.657114]  do_syscall_64+0xb1/0x400
[   34.657627]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[   34.658335] RIP: 0033:0x7f156f337130

During deleting scsi target, the scsi_debug module have been
removed. Then, sdebug_driver_template belonged to the module
cannot be accessd, resulting in scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() BUG_ON.

To fix the bug, we add scsi_device_get() in sdev_store_delete()
to try to increase refcount of module, avoiding the module been
removed.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c | 11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
index 64c96c7828ee..6d7362e7367e 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
@@ -730,6 +730,14 @@ sdev_store_delete(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
 		  const char *buf, size_t count)
 {
 	struct kernfs_node *kn;
+	struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(dev);
+
+	/*
+	 * We need to try to get module, avoiding the module been removed
+	 * during delete.
+	 */
+	if (scsi_device_get(sdev))
+		return -ENODEV;
 
 	kn = sysfs_break_active_protection(&dev->kobj, &attr->attr);
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!kn);
@@ -744,9 +752,10 @@ sdev_store_delete(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
 	 * state into SDEV_DEL.
 	 */
 	device_remove_file(dev, attr);
-	scsi_remove_device(to_scsi_device(dev));
+	scsi_remove_device(sdev);
 	if (kn)
 		sysfs_unbreak_active_protection(kn);
+	scsi_device_put(sdev);
 	return count;
 };
 static DEVICE_ATTR(delete, S_IWUSR, NULL, sdev_store_delete);
-- 
2.17.2


             reply	other threads:[~2019-10-15 12:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-15 13:05 Yufen Yu [this message]
2019-10-17  2:35 ` [PATCH] scsi: core: try to get module before removing devcie Bart Van Assche
2019-10-18  1:58   ` Martin K. Petersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191015130556.18061-1-yuyufen@huawei.com \
    --to=yuyufen@huawei.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.