All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: "Steven Price" <steven.price@arm.com>,
	"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"James Morse" <james.morse@arm.com>,
	"Julien Thierry" <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
	"Suzuki K Pouloze" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 09/10] arm/arm64: Make use of the SMCCC 1.1 wrapper
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 16:28:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191021152823.14882-10-steven.price@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191021152823.14882-1-steven.price@arm.com>

Rather than directly choosing which function to use based on
psci_ops.conduit, use the new arm_smccc_1_1 wrapper instead.

In some cases we still need to do some operations based on the
conduit, but the code duplication is removed.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c     | 13 +++---
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 81 ++++++++++++----------------------
 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c
index 54d87506d3b5..7c90b4c615a5 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c
@@ -74,12 +74,13 @@ static void cpu_v7_spectre_init(void)
 	case ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A72: {
 		struct arm_smccc_res res;
 
+		arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
+				     ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
+		if ((int)res.a0 != 0)
+			return;
+
 		switch (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit()) {
 		case SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC:
-			arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
-					  ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
-			if ((int)res.a0 != 0)
-				break;
 			per_cpu(harden_branch_predictor_fn, cpu) =
 				call_hvc_arch_workaround_1;
 			cpu_do_switch_mm = cpu_v7_hvc_switch_mm;
@@ -87,10 +88,6 @@ static void cpu_v7_spectre_init(void)
 			break;
 
 		case SMCCC_CONDUIT_SMC:
-			arm_smccc_1_1_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
-					  ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
-			if ((int)res.a0 != 0)
-				break;
 			per_cpu(harden_branch_predictor_fn, cpu) =
 				call_smc_arch_workaround_1;
 			cpu_do_switch_mm = cpu_v7_smc_switch_mm;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
index 9c0b011eee20..401246e095e7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
@@ -209,40 +209,31 @@ static int detect_harden_bp_fw(void)
 	struct arm_smccc_res res;
 	u32 midr = read_cpuid_id();
 
+	arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
+			     ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
+
+	switch ((int)res.a0) {
+	case 1:
+		/* Firmware says we're just fine */
+		return 0;
+	case 0:
+		break;
+	default:
+		return -1;
+	}
+
 	switch (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit()) {
 	case SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC:
-		arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
-				  ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
-		switch ((int)res.a0) {
-		case 1:
-			/* Firmware says we're just fine */
-			return 0;
-		case 0:
-			cb = call_hvc_arch_workaround_1;
-			/* This is a guest, no need to patch KVM vectors */
-			smccc_start = NULL;
-			smccc_end = NULL;
-			break;
-		default:
-			return -1;
-		}
+		cb = call_hvc_arch_workaround_1;
+		/* This is a guest, no need to patch KVM vectors */
+		smccc_start = NULL;
+		smccc_end = NULL;
 		break;
 
 	case SMCCC_CONDUIT_SMC:
-		arm_smccc_1_1_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
-				  ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
-		switch ((int)res.a0) {
-		case 1:
-			/* Firmware says we're just fine */
-			return 0;
-		case 0:
-			cb = call_smc_arch_workaround_1;
-			smccc_start = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_start;
-			smccc_end = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_end;
-			break;
-		default:
-			return -1;
-		}
+		cb = call_smc_arch_workaround_1;
+		smccc_start = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_start;
+		smccc_end = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_end;
 		break;
 
 	default:
@@ -332,6 +323,8 @@ void __init arm64_enable_wa2_handling(struct alt_instr *alt,
 
 void arm64_set_ssbd_mitigation(bool state)
 {
+	int conduit;
+
 	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_SSBD)) {
 		pr_info_once("SSBD disabled by kernel configuration\n");
 		return;
@@ -345,19 +338,10 @@ void arm64_set_ssbd_mitigation(bool state)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	switch (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit()) {
-	case SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC:
-		arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, state, NULL);
-		break;
-
-	case SMCCC_CONDUIT_SMC:
-		arm_smccc_1_1_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, state, NULL);
-		break;
+	conduit = arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, state,
+				       NULL);
 
-	default:
-		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
-		break;
-	}
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(conduit == SMCCC_CONDUIT_NONE);
 }
 
 static bool has_ssbd_mitigation(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
@@ -367,6 +351,7 @@ static bool has_ssbd_mitigation(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
 	bool required = true;
 	s32 val;
 	bool this_cpu_safe = false;
+	int conduit;
 
 	WARN_ON(scope != SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU || preemptible());
 
@@ -384,18 +369,10 @@ static bool has_ssbd_mitigation(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
 		goto out_printmsg;
 	}
 
-	switch (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit()) {
-	case SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC:
-		arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
-				  ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, &res);
-		break;
+	conduit = arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
+				       ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, &res);
 
-	case SMCCC_CONDUIT_SMC:
-		arm_smccc_1_1_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
-				  ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, &res);
-		break;
-
-	default:
+	if (conduit == SMCCC_CONDUIT_NONE) {
 		ssbd_state = ARM64_SSBD_UNKNOWN;
 		if (!this_cpu_safe)
 			__ssb_safe = false;
-- 
2.20.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 09/10] arm/arm64: Make use of the SMCCC 1.1 wrapper
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 16:28:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191021152823.14882-10-steven.price@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191021152823.14882-1-steven.price@arm.com>

Rather than directly choosing which function to use based on
psci_ops.conduit, use the new arm_smccc_1_1 wrapper instead.

In some cases we still need to do some operations based on the
conduit, but the code duplication is removed.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c     | 13 +++---
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 81 ++++++++++++----------------------
 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c
index 54d87506d3b5..7c90b4c615a5 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c
@@ -74,12 +74,13 @@ static void cpu_v7_spectre_init(void)
 	case ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A72: {
 		struct arm_smccc_res res;
 
+		arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
+				     ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
+		if ((int)res.a0 != 0)
+			return;
+
 		switch (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit()) {
 		case SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC:
-			arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
-					  ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
-			if ((int)res.a0 != 0)
-				break;
 			per_cpu(harden_branch_predictor_fn, cpu) =
 				call_hvc_arch_workaround_1;
 			cpu_do_switch_mm = cpu_v7_hvc_switch_mm;
@@ -87,10 +88,6 @@ static void cpu_v7_spectre_init(void)
 			break;
 
 		case SMCCC_CONDUIT_SMC:
-			arm_smccc_1_1_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
-					  ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
-			if ((int)res.a0 != 0)
-				break;
 			per_cpu(harden_branch_predictor_fn, cpu) =
 				call_smc_arch_workaround_1;
 			cpu_do_switch_mm = cpu_v7_smc_switch_mm;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
index 9c0b011eee20..401246e095e7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
@@ -209,40 +209,31 @@ static int detect_harden_bp_fw(void)
 	struct arm_smccc_res res;
 	u32 midr = read_cpuid_id();
 
+	arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
+			     ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
+
+	switch ((int)res.a0) {
+	case 1:
+		/* Firmware says we're just fine */
+		return 0;
+	case 0:
+		break;
+	default:
+		return -1;
+	}
+
 	switch (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit()) {
 	case SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC:
-		arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
-				  ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
-		switch ((int)res.a0) {
-		case 1:
-			/* Firmware says we're just fine */
-			return 0;
-		case 0:
-			cb = call_hvc_arch_workaround_1;
-			/* This is a guest, no need to patch KVM vectors */
-			smccc_start = NULL;
-			smccc_end = NULL;
-			break;
-		default:
-			return -1;
-		}
+		cb = call_hvc_arch_workaround_1;
+		/* This is a guest, no need to patch KVM vectors */
+		smccc_start = NULL;
+		smccc_end = NULL;
 		break;
 
 	case SMCCC_CONDUIT_SMC:
-		arm_smccc_1_1_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
-				  ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
-		switch ((int)res.a0) {
-		case 1:
-			/* Firmware says we're just fine */
-			return 0;
-		case 0:
-			cb = call_smc_arch_workaround_1;
-			smccc_start = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_start;
-			smccc_end = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_end;
-			break;
-		default:
-			return -1;
-		}
+		cb = call_smc_arch_workaround_1;
+		smccc_start = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_start;
+		smccc_end = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_end;
 		break;
 
 	default:
@@ -332,6 +323,8 @@ void __init arm64_enable_wa2_handling(struct alt_instr *alt,
 
 void arm64_set_ssbd_mitigation(bool state)
 {
+	int conduit;
+
 	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_SSBD)) {
 		pr_info_once("SSBD disabled by kernel configuration\n");
 		return;
@@ -345,19 +338,10 @@ void arm64_set_ssbd_mitigation(bool state)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	switch (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit()) {
-	case SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC:
-		arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, state, NULL);
-		break;
-
-	case SMCCC_CONDUIT_SMC:
-		arm_smccc_1_1_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, state, NULL);
-		break;
+	conduit = arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, state,
+				       NULL);
 
-	default:
-		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
-		break;
-	}
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(conduit == SMCCC_CONDUIT_NONE);
 }
 
 static bool has_ssbd_mitigation(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
@@ -367,6 +351,7 @@ static bool has_ssbd_mitigation(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
 	bool required = true;
 	s32 val;
 	bool this_cpu_safe = false;
+	int conduit;
 
 	WARN_ON(scope != SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU || preemptible());
 
@@ -384,18 +369,10 @@ static bool has_ssbd_mitigation(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
 		goto out_printmsg;
 	}
 
-	switch (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit()) {
-	case SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC:
-		arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
-				  ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, &res);
-		break;
+	conduit = arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
+				       ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, &res);
 
-	case SMCCC_CONDUIT_SMC:
-		arm_smccc_1_1_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
-				  ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, &res);
-		break;
-
-	default:
+	if (conduit == SMCCC_CONDUIT_NONE) {
 		ssbd_state = ARM64_SSBD_UNKNOWN;
 		if (!this_cpu_safe)
 			__ssb_safe = false;
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: "Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"Suzuki K Pouloze" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, "Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"Steven Price" <steven.price@arm.com>,
	"James Morse" <james.morse@arm.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Julien Thierry" <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 09/10] arm/arm64: Make use of the SMCCC 1.1 wrapper
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 16:28:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191021152823.14882-10-steven.price@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191021152823.14882-1-steven.price@arm.com>

Rather than directly choosing which function to use based on
psci_ops.conduit, use the new arm_smccc_1_1 wrapper instead.

In some cases we still need to do some operations based on the
conduit, but the code duplication is removed.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c     | 13 +++---
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 81 ++++++++++++----------------------
 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c
index 54d87506d3b5..7c90b4c615a5 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c
@@ -74,12 +74,13 @@ static void cpu_v7_spectre_init(void)
 	case ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A72: {
 		struct arm_smccc_res res;
 
+		arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
+				     ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
+		if ((int)res.a0 != 0)
+			return;
+
 		switch (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit()) {
 		case SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC:
-			arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
-					  ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
-			if ((int)res.a0 != 0)
-				break;
 			per_cpu(harden_branch_predictor_fn, cpu) =
 				call_hvc_arch_workaround_1;
 			cpu_do_switch_mm = cpu_v7_hvc_switch_mm;
@@ -87,10 +88,6 @@ static void cpu_v7_spectre_init(void)
 			break;
 
 		case SMCCC_CONDUIT_SMC:
-			arm_smccc_1_1_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
-					  ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
-			if ((int)res.a0 != 0)
-				break;
 			per_cpu(harden_branch_predictor_fn, cpu) =
 				call_smc_arch_workaround_1;
 			cpu_do_switch_mm = cpu_v7_smc_switch_mm;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
index 9c0b011eee20..401246e095e7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
@@ -209,40 +209,31 @@ static int detect_harden_bp_fw(void)
 	struct arm_smccc_res res;
 	u32 midr = read_cpuid_id();
 
+	arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
+			     ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
+
+	switch ((int)res.a0) {
+	case 1:
+		/* Firmware says we're just fine */
+		return 0;
+	case 0:
+		break;
+	default:
+		return -1;
+	}
+
 	switch (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit()) {
 	case SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC:
-		arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
-				  ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
-		switch ((int)res.a0) {
-		case 1:
-			/* Firmware says we're just fine */
-			return 0;
-		case 0:
-			cb = call_hvc_arch_workaround_1;
-			/* This is a guest, no need to patch KVM vectors */
-			smccc_start = NULL;
-			smccc_end = NULL;
-			break;
-		default:
-			return -1;
-		}
+		cb = call_hvc_arch_workaround_1;
+		/* This is a guest, no need to patch KVM vectors */
+		smccc_start = NULL;
+		smccc_end = NULL;
 		break;
 
 	case SMCCC_CONDUIT_SMC:
-		arm_smccc_1_1_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
-				  ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
-		switch ((int)res.a0) {
-		case 1:
-			/* Firmware says we're just fine */
-			return 0;
-		case 0:
-			cb = call_smc_arch_workaround_1;
-			smccc_start = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_start;
-			smccc_end = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_end;
-			break;
-		default:
-			return -1;
-		}
+		cb = call_smc_arch_workaround_1;
+		smccc_start = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_start;
+		smccc_end = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_end;
 		break;
 
 	default:
@@ -332,6 +323,8 @@ void __init arm64_enable_wa2_handling(struct alt_instr *alt,
 
 void arm64_set_ssbd_mitigation(bool state)
 {
+	int conduit;
+
 	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_SSBD)) {
 		pr_info_once("SSBD disabled by kernel configuration\n");
 		return;
@@ -345,19 +338,10 @@ void arm64_set_ssbd_mitigation(bool state)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	switch (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit()) {
-	case SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC:
-		arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, state, NULL);
-		break;
-
-	case SMCCC_CONDUIT_SMC:
-		arm_smccc_1_1_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, state, NULL);
-		break;
+	conduit = arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, state,
+				       NULL);
 
-	default:
-		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
-		break;
-	}
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(conduit == SMCCC_CONDUIT_NONE);
 }
 
 static bool has_ssbd_mitigation(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
@@ -367,6 +351,7 @@ static bool has_ssbd_mitigation(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
 	bool required = true;
 	s32 val;
 	bool this_cpu_safe = false;
+	int conduit;
 
 	WARN_ON(scope != SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU || preemptible());
 
@@ -384,18 +369,10 @@ static bool has_ssbd_mitigation(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
 		goto out_printmsg;
 	}
 
-	switch (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit()) {
-	case SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC:
-		arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
-				  ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, &res);
-		break;
+	conduit = arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
+				       ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, &res);
 
-	case SMCCC_CONDUIT_SMC:
-		arm_smccc_1_1_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
-				  ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, &res);
-		break;
-
-	default:
+	if (conduit == SMCCC_CONDUIT_NONE) {
 		ssbd_state = ARM64_SSBD_UNKNOWN;
 		if (!this_cpu_safe)
 			__ssb_safe = false;
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-21 15:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-21 15:28 [PATCH v7 00/10] arm64: Stolen time support Steven Price
2019-10-21 15:28 ` Steven Price
2019-10-21 15:28 ` Steven Price
2019-10-21 15:28 ` [PATCH v7 01/10] KVM: arm64: Document PV-time interface Steven Price
2019-10-21 15:28   ` Steven Price
2019-10-21 15:28   ` Steven Price
2019-10-21 15:28 ` [PATCH v7 02/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Factor out hypercall handling from PSCI code Steven Price
2019-10-21 15:28   ` Steven Price
2019-10-21 15:28   ` Steven Price
2019-10-21 15:28 ` [PATCH v7 03/10] KVM: arm64: Implement PV_TIME_FEATURES call Steven Price
2019-10-21 15:28   ` Steven Price
2019-10-21 15:28   ` Steven Price
2019-10-21 15:28 ` [PATCH v7 04/10] KVM: Implement kvm_put_guest() Steven Price
2019-10-21 15:28   ` Steven Price
2019-10-21 15:28   ` Steven Price
2019-10-21 15:28 ` [PATCH v7 05/10] KVM: arm64: Support stolen time reporting via shared structure Steven Price
2019-10-21 15:28   ` Steven Price
2019-10-21 15:28   ` Steven Price
2019-10-21 15:28 ` [PATCH v7 06/10] KVM: Allow kvm_device_ops to be const Steven Price
2019-10-21 15:28   ` Steven Price
2019-10-21 15:28   ` Steven Price
2019-10-21 15:28 ` [PATCH v7 07/10] KVM: arm64: Provide VCPU attributes for stolen time Steven Price
2019-10-21 15:28   ` Steven Price
2019-10-21 15:28   ` Steven Price
2019-10-21 15:28 ` [PATCH v7 08/10] arm/arm64: Provide a wrapper for SMCCC 1.1 calls Steven Price
2019-10-21 15:28   ` Steven Price
2019-10-21 15:28   ` Steven Price
2019-10-21 15:28 ` Steven Price [this message]
2019-10-21 15:28   ` [PATCH v7 09/10] arm/arm64: Make use of the SMCCC 1.1 wrapper Steven Price
2019-10-21 15:28   ` Steven Price
2019-10-25 15:50   ` Catalin Marinas
2019-10-25 15:50     ` Catalin Marinas
2019-10-25 15:50     ` Catalin Marinas
2019-10-21 15:28 ` [PATCH v7 10/10] arm64: Retrieve stolen time as paravirtualized guest Steven Price
2019-10-21 15:28   ` Steven Price
2019-10-21 15:28   ` Steven Price
2019-10-25 15:57   ` Catalin Marinas
2019-10-25 15:57     ` Catalin Marinas
2019-10-25 15:57     ` Catalin Marinas
2019-10-21 18:37 ` [PATCH v7 00/10] arm64: Stolen time support Marc Zyngier
2019-10-21 18:37   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-10-21 18:37   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-10-23 12:39 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-10-23 12:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-10-23 12:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-10-23 13:50   ` Steven Price
2019-10-23 13:50     ` Steven Price
2019-10-23 13:50     ` Steven Price

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191021152823.14882-10-steven.price@arm.com \
    --to=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.