All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@nxp.com>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-of-esdhc: Revert "mmc: sdhci-of-esdhc: add erratum A-009204 support"
Date: Wed,  4 Dec 2019 09:54:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191204085447.27491-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> (raw)

This reverts commit 5dd195522562542bc6ebe6e7bd47890d8b7ca93c.

First, the fix seems to be plain wrong, since the erratum suggests
waiting 5ms before setting setting SYSCTL[RSTD], but this msleep()
happens after the call of sdhci_reset() which is where that bit gets
set (if SDHCI_RESET_DATA is in mask).

Second, walking the whole device tree to figure out if some node has a
"fsl,p2020-esdhc" compatible string is hugely expensive - about 70 to
100 us on our mpc8309 board. Walking the device tree is done under a
raw_spin_lock, so this is obviously really bad on an -rt system, and a
waste of time on all.

In fact, since esdhc_reset() seems to get called around 100 times per
second, that mpc8309 now spends 0.8% of its time determining that
it is not a p2020. Whether those 100 calls/s are normal or due to some
other bug or misconfiguration, regularly hitting a 100 us
non-preemptible window is unacceptable.

Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
---

The errata sheet for mpc8309 also mentions A-009204, so I'm not at all
opposed to having a fix for that. But it needs to be done properly
without causing a huge performance or latency impact. We should
probably just add a bit to struct sdhci_esdhc which gets initialized
in esdhc_init.

 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c
index 5cca3fa4610b..7f87a90bf56a 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c
@@ -764,9 +764,6 @@ static void esdhc_reset(struct sdhci_host *host, u8 mask)
 	sdhci_writel(host, host->ier, SDHCI_INT_ENABLE);
 	sdhci_writel(host, host->ier, SDHCI_SIGNAL_ENABLE);
 
-	if (of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "fsl,p2020-esdhc"))
-		mdelay(5);
-
 	if (mask & SDHCI_RESET_ALL) {
 		val = sdhci_readl(host, ESDHC_TBCTL);
 		val &= ~ESDHC_TB_EN;
-- 
2.23.0


             reply	other threads:[~2019-12-04  8:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-04  8:54 Rasmus Villemoes [this message]
2019-12-09 14:48 ` [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-of-esdhc: Revert "mmc: sdhci-of-esdhc: add erratum A-009204 support" Rasmus Villemoes
2019-12-10  9:51 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-18 13:39   ` Ulf Hansson
2019-12-19  3:26     ` Y.b. Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191204085447.27491-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --to=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=yinbo.zhu@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.