All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
To: jack@suse.cz, tytso@mit.edu, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, mbobrowski@mbobrowski.org,
	joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com,
	Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCHv5 1/3] ext4: fix ext4_dax_read/write inode locking sequence for IOCB_NOWAIT
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 11:25:55 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191212055557.11151-2-riteshh@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191212055557.11151-1-riteshh@linux.ibm.com>

Apparently our current rwsem code doesn't like doing the trylock, then
lock for real scheme.  So change our dax read/write methods to just do the
trylock for the RWF_NOWAIT case.
This seems to fix AIM7 regression in some scalable filesystems upto ~25%
in some cases. Claimed in commit 942491c9e6d6 ("xfs: fix AIM7 regression")

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Bobrowski <mbobrowski@mbobrowski.org>
Tested-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
---
 fs/ext4/file.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/file.c b/fs/ext4/file.c
index 6a7293a5cda2..977ac58dc718 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/file.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/file.c
@@ -88,9 +88,10 @@ static ssize_t ext4_dax_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
 	struct inode *inode = file_inode(iocb->ki_filp);
 	ssize_t ret;
 
-	if (!inode_trylock_shared(inode)) {
-		if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT)
+	if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT) {
+		if (!inode_trylock_shared(inode))
 			return -EAGAIN;
+	} else {
 		inode_lock_shared(inode);
 	}
 	/*
@@ -487,9 +488,10 @@ ext4_dax_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
 	bool extend = false;
 	struct inode *inode = file_inode(iocb->ki_filp);
 
-	if (!inode_trylock(inode)) {
-		if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT)
+	if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT) {
+		if (!inode_trylock(inode))
 			return -EAGAIN;
+	} else {
 		inode_lock(inode);
 	}
 
-- 
2.21.0


  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-12  5:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-12  5:55 [PATCHv5 0/3] Fix inode_lock sequence to scale performance of DIO mixed R/W workload Ritesh Harjani
2019-12-12  5:55 ` Ritesh Harjani [this message]
2019-12-12  5:55 ` [PATCHv5 2/3] ext4: Start with shared i_rwsem in case of DIO instead of exclusive Ritesh Harjani
2019-12-12  5:55 ` [PATCHv5 3/3] ext4: Move to shared i_rwsem even without dioread_nolock mount opt Ritesh Harjani
2019-12-26 15:06 ` [PATCHv5 0/3] Fix inode_lock sequence to scale performance of DIO mixed R/W workload Theodore Y. Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191212055557.11151-2-riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbobrowski@mbobrowski.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.