From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Hans Verkuil <hansverk@cisco.com>, Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Tom Anderson <thomasanderson@google.com> Subject: [PATCH v4 3/4] drm/edid: Throw away the dummy VIC 0 cea mode Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 19:43:47 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20191213174348.27261-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20191213174348.27261-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Now that the cea mode handling is not 100% tied to the single array the dummy VIC 0 mode is pretty much pointles. Throw it out. v2: Rebase Cc: Tom Anderson <thomasanderson@google.com> Cc: Hans Verkuil <hansverk@cisco.com> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 12 ++++-------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c index 2787ad0ef881..8bc69da53c2e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c @@ -714,9 +714,7 @@ static const struct minimode extra_modes[] = { * * Do not access directly, instead always use cea_mode_for_vic(). */ -static const struct drm_display_mode edid_cea_modes_0[] = { - /* 0 - dummy, VICs start at 1 */ - { }, +static const struct drm_display_mode edid_cea_modes_1[] = { /* 1 - 640x480@60Hz 4:3 */ { DRM_MODE("640x480", DRM_MODE_TYPE_DRIVER, 25175, 640, 656, 752, 800, 0, 480, 490, 492, 525, 0, @@ -3215,10 +3213,8 @@ static u8 *drm_find_cea_extension(const struct edid *edid) static const struct drm_display_mode *cea_mode_for_vic(u8 vic) { - if (!vic) - return NULL; - if (vic < ARRAY_SIZE(edid_cea_modes_0)) - return &edid_cea_modes_0[vic]; + if (vic >= 1 && vic < 1 + ARRAY_SIZE(edid_cea_modes_1)) + return &edid_cea_modes_1[vic - 1]; if (vic >= 193 && vic < 193 + ARRAY_SIZE(edid_cea_modes_193)) return &edid_cea_modes_193[vic - 193]; return NULL; @@ -3231,7 +3227,7 @@ static u8 cea_num_vics(void) static u8 cea_next_vic(u8 vic) { - if (++vic == ARRAY_SIZE(edid_cea_modes_0)) + if (++vic == 1 + ARRAY_SIZE(edid_cea_modes_1)) vic = 193; return vic; } -- 2.23.0 _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Hans Verkuil <hansverk@cisco.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Tom Anderson <thomasanderson@google.com> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 3/4] drm/edid: Throw away the dummy VIC 0 cea mode Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 19:43:47 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20191213174348.27261-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20191213174348.27261-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Now that the cea mode handling is not 100% tied to the single array the dummy VIC 0 mode is pretty much pointles. Throw it out. v2: Rebase Cc: Tom Anderson <thomasanderson@google.com> Cc: Hans Verkuil <hansverk@cisco.com> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 12 ++++-------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c index 2787ad0ef881..8bc69da53c2e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c @@ -714,9 +714,7 @@ static const struct minimode extra_modes[] = { * * Do not access directly, instead always use cea_mode_for_vic(). */ -static const struct drm_display_mode edid_cea_modes_0[] = { - /* 0 - dummy, VICs start at 1 */ - { }, +static const struct drm_display_mode edid_cea_modes_1[] = { /* 1 - 640x480@60Hz 4:3 */ { DRM_MODE("640x480", DRM_MODE_TYPE_DRIVER, 25175, 640, 656, 752, 800, 0, 480, 490, 492, 525, 0, @@ -3215,10 +3213,8 @@ static u8 *drm_find_cea_extension(const struct edid *edid) static const struct drm_display_mode *cea_mode_for_vic(u8 vic) { - if (!vic) - return NULL; - if (vic < ARRAY_SIZE(edid_cea_modes_0)) - return &edid_cea_modes_0[vic]; + if (vic >= 1 && vic < 1 + ARRAY_SIZE(edid_cea_modes_1)) + return &edid_cea_modes_1[vic - 1]; if (vic >= 193 && vic < 193 + ARRAY_SIZE(edid_cea_modes_193)) return &edid_cea_modes_193[vic - 193]; return NULL; @@ -3231,7 +3227,7 @@ static u8 cea_num_vics(void) static u8 cea_next_vic(u8 vic) { - if (++vic == ARRAY_SIZE(edid_cea_modes_0)) + if (++vic == 1 + ARRAY_SIZE(edid_cea_modes_1)) vic = 193; return vic; } -- 2.23.0 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-13 20:49 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-12-13 17:43 [PATCH v4 0/4] drm/edid: Add new modes from CTA-861-G Ville Syrjala 2019-12-13 17:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjala 2019-12-13 17:43 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] drm/edid: Abstract away cea_edid_modes[] Ville Syrjala 2019-12-13 17:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjala 2019-12-13 21:03 ` Tom Anderson 2019-12-13 21:03 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tom Anderson 2019-12-16 15:23 ` Ville Syrjälä 2019-12-16 15:23 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä 2019-12-13 17:43 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] drm/edid: Add CTA-861-G modes with VIC >= 193 Ville Syrjala 2019-12-13 17:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjala 2019-12-13 17:43 ` Ville Syrjala [this message] 2019-12-13 17:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 3/4] drm/edid: Throw away the dummy VIC 0 cea mode Ville Syrjala 2019-12-13 21:05 ` Tom Anderson 2019-12-13 21:05 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tom Anderson 2019-12-13 17:43 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] drm/edid: Make sure the CEA mode arrays have the correct amount of modes Ville Syrjala 2019-12-13 17:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjala 2019-12-14 0:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/edid: Add new modes from CTA-861-G (rev3) Patchwork 2019-12-14 1:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork 2019-12-15 0:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20191213174348.27261-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \ --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \ --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=hansverk@cisco.com \ --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \ --cc=thomasanderson@google.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.