From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Subject: [PATCH] drivers base/arch_topology: Remove 'struct sched_domain' forward declaration Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 16:24:20 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200210152420.10608-1-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> (raw) The sched domain pointer argument from topology_get_freq_scale() and topology_get_cpu_scale() got removed by commit 7673c8a4c75d ("sched/cpufreq: Remove arch_scale_freq_capacity()'s 'sd' parameter") and commit 8ec59c0f5f49 ("sched/topology: Remove unused 'sd' parameter from arch_scale_cpu_capacity()"). So the 'struct sched_domain' forward declaration is no longer needed. Remove it. W/o the sched domain pointer argument the storage class and inline definition as well as the return type, function name and parameter list fit all into one line. Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> --- include/linux/arch_topology.h | 7 ++----- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/arch_topology.h b/include/linux/arch_topology.h index 3015ecbb90b1..c507e9ddd909 100644 --- a/include/linux/arch_topology.h +++ b/include/linux/arch_topology.h @@ -16,9 +16,7 @@ bool topology_parse_cpu_capacity(struct device_node *cpu_node, int cpu); DECLARE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, cpu_scale); -struct sched_domain; -static inline -unsigned long topology_get_cpu_scale(int cpu) +static inline unsigned long topology_get_cpu_scale(int cpu) { return per_cpu(cpu_scale, cpu); } @@ -27,8 +25,7 @@ void topology_set_cpu_scale(unsigned int cpu, unsigned long capacity); DECLARE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, freq_scale); -static inline -unsigned long topology_get_freq_scale(int cpu) +static inline unsigned long topology_get_freq_scale(int cpu) { return per_cpu(freq_scale, cpu); } -- 2.17.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Subject: [PATCH] drivers base/arch_topology: Remove 'struct sched_domain' forward declaration Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 16:24:20 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200210152420.10608-1-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> (raw) The sched domain pointer argument from topology_get_freq_scale() and topology_get_cpu_scale() got removed by commit 7673c8a4c75d ("sched/cpufreq: Remove arch_scale_freq_capacity()'s 'sd' parameter") and commit 8ec59c0f5f49 ("sched/topology: Remove unused 'sd' parameter from arch_scale_cpu_capacity()"). So the 'struct sched_domain' forward declaration is no longer needed. Remove it. W/o the sched domain pointer argument the storage class and inline definition as well as the return type, function name and parameter list fit all into one line. Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> --- include/linux/arch_topology.h | 7 ++----- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/arch_topology.h b/include/linux/arch_topology.h index 3015ecbb90b1..c507e9ddd909 100644 --- a/include/linux/arch_topology.h +++ b/include/linux/arch_topology.h @@ -16,9 +16,7 @@ bool topology_parse_cpu_capacity(struct device_node *cpu_node, int cpu); DECLARE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, cpu_scale); -struct sched_domain; -static inline -unsigned long topology_get_cpu_scale(int cpu) +static inline unsigned long topology_get_cpu_scale(int cpu) { return per_cpu(cpu_scale, cpu); } @@ -27,8 +25,7 @@ void topology_set_cpu_scale(unsigned int cpu, unsigned long capacity); DECLARE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, freq_scale); -static inline -unsigned long topology_get_freq_scale(int cpu) +static inline unsigned long topology_get_freq_scale(int cpu) { return per_cpu(freq_scale, cpu); } -- 2.17.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2020-02-10 15:24 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-02-10 15:24 Dietmar Eggemann [this message] 2020-02-10 15:24 ` [PATCH] drivers base/arch_topology: Remove 'struct sched_domain' forward declaration Dietmar Eggemann 2020-02-10 16:02 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2020-02-10 16:02 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2020-02-07 11:49 Dietmar Eggemann 2020-02-07 11:49 ` Dietmar Eggemann 2020-02-07 15:48 ` Sudeep Holla 2020-02-07 15:48 ` Sudeep Holla 2020-02-10 15:20 ` Dietmar Eggemann 2020-02-10 15:20 ` Dietmar Eggemann
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20200210152420.10608-1-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \ --to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \ --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \ --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.